Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Il Nuovo cimento della Società italiana di fisica. B/Il Nuovo cimento B

Aspects of a model of superfluidity

James R. Johnston, F.W. Cummings

Published Jul 1, 1968• 2 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/bf02711948

Related papers

On the theory of superfluidity

Yongle Yu

arXiv:cond-mat/0609711•Annals of Physics•Jul 11, 2008•7 citations

Aspect-ratio dependence of the spin stiffness of a two-dimensional XY model

Roger G. Melko, Anders W. Sandvik, Douglas J. Scalapino

We calculate the superfluid stiffness of two-dimensional (2D) lattice hard-core bosons at half filling (equivalent to the $S=1/2$ $\mathrm{XY}$ model) using the squared winding number quantum Monte Carlo estimator. For ${L}_{x}\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{L}_{y}$ lattices with aspect ratio ${L}_{x}{/L}_{y}=R$ and ${L}_{x}{,L}_{y}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\infty},$ we confirm the recent prediction [N. Prokof'ev and B.V. Svistunov, Phys. Rev. B 61, 11 282 (2000)] that the finite-temperature stiffness parameters ${\ensuremath{\rho}}_{x}^{W}$ and ${\ensuremath{\rho}}_{y}^{W}$ determined from the winding number differ from each other and from the true superfluid density ${\ensuremath{\rho}}_{s}.$ Formally, ${\ensuremath{\rho}}_{y}^{W}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{\ensuremath{\rho}}_{s}$ in the limit in which ${L}_{x}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\infty}$ first and then ${L}_{y}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\infty}.$ In practice we find that ${\ensuremath{\rho}}_{y}^{W}$ converges exponentially to ${\ensuremath{\rho}}_{s}$ for $R>1.$ We also confirm that for 3D systems, ${\ensuremath{\rho}}_{x}^{W}={\ensuremath{\rho}}_{y}^{W}={\ensuremath{\rho}}_{z}^{W}={\ensuremath{\rho}}_{s}$ for any R. In addition, we determine the Kosterlitz-Thouless transition temperature to be ${T}_{\mathrm{KT}}/J=0.34303(8)$ for the 2D model.

arXiv:cond-mat/0302591•Physical Review B•Jan 22, 2004•39 citations

Elastic theory of Normal-Superfluid Boundary in trapped Fermi Gases

Stefan S. Natu, Erich J. Mueller

By modeling the normal-superfluid boundary in a trapped polarized Fermi gas as an elastic membrane, we calculate the atomic density profile. For small trapping anisotropy, we find that the superfluid-normal boundary remains approximately elliptical, and has an aspect ratio different from that of the trap. For very prolate clouds the boundary becomes distorted into a capsule-like shape. We present an analytic explanation of this shape.

arXiv:0802.2083•Feb 14, 2008•0 citations

ON THE THEORY OF SUPERFLUIDITY

Nikolay N. Bogolubov

Elsevier eBooks•Jan 1, 1971•52 citations

Universal and nonuniversal aspects of vortex reconnections in superfluids

Alberto Villois, Davide Proment, Giorgio Krstulovic

Vortex reconnections play a fundamental role in fluid dynamics. A study of reconnection events in superfluids using different vortex configurations is presented. By deriving asymptotic theory and using numerical simulations the universal and nonuniversal aspects of vortex reconnections are revealed.

arXiv:1612.00386•Physical Review Fluids•Apr 4, 2017•63 citations

Theory of Superfluidity

F.W. Cummings, James R. Johnston

Physical Review•Dec 5, 1967•1 citation
We calculate the superfluid stiffness of two-dimensional (2D) lattice hard-core bosons at half filling (equivalent to the S=1/2S=1/2S=1/2 XY\mathrm{XY}XY model) using the squared winding number quantum Monte Carlo estimator. For ${L}_{x}\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{L}_{y}$ lattices with aspect ratio Lx/Ly=R{L}_{x}{/L}_{y}=RLx​/Ly​=R and ${L}_{x}{,L}_{y}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\infty},$ we confirm the recent prediction [N. Prokof'ev and B.V. Svistunov, Phys. Rev. B 61, 11 282 (2000)] that the finite-temperature stiffness parameters ${\ensuremath{\rho}}_{x}^{W}$ and ${\ensuremath{\rho}}_{y}^{W}$ determined from the winding number differ from each other and from the true superfluid density ${\ensuremath{\rho}}_{s}.$ Formally, ${\ensuremath{\rho}}_{y}^{W}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{\ensuremath{\rho}}_{s}$ in the limit in which ${L}_{x}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\infty}$ first and then ${L}_{y}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\infty}.$ In practice we find that ${\ensuremath{\rho}}_{y}^{W}$ converges exponentially to ${\ensuremath{\rho}}_{s}$ for R>1.R>1.R>1. We also confirm that for 3D systems, ${\ensuremath{\rho}}_{x}^{W}={\ensuremath{\rho}}_{y}^{W}={\ensuremath{\rho}}_{z}^{W}={\ensuremath{\rho}}_{s}$ for any R. In addition, we determine the Kosterlitz-Thouless transition temperature to be TKT/J=0.34303(8){T}_{\mathrm{KT}}/J=0.34303(8)TKT​/J=0.34303(8) for the 2D model.