Superfluidity in liquid 3 He, discovered in 1972, is due to pairing, as is the case for superconductivity in ordinary metals. However, the pair is in the 3 P state so that a new aspect of superfluidity appears with internal degrees of freedom. It offers quite an interesting real example of ‘spontaneous symmetry breaking’. This aspect will be emphasised in the following discussion. Fermi liquid 3 He A 3 He atom is a fermion with nuclear spin ½. Although 3 He gas liquefies at low temperatures due to the weak van der Waals force, it does not solidify even at T = 0 unless the pressure exceeds 33.5 atm (3.4 × 10 6 Pa) as shown in the phase diagram (Fig. 6.1 (a)). While Bose liquid 4 He becomes superfluid at about 2K, 3 He is Fermi-degenerate at less than T F ∼ 0.1 K and shows the properties of a normal Fermi gas. For example, the specific heat and the susceptibility are proportional to T at T < T F . It is only at an ultra-low temperature in the mK-region that the system undergoes a transition to the superfluid state. Figure 6.1(b) is the phase diagram showing the superfluid phases with variables T,P and external magnetic field H in the mK-region. It should be noted that there are two thermodynamically distinct phases called the A phase and the B phase even at H = 0, and that for H ≠ 0 the A 1 phase appears.
Superfluidity in liquid 3 He, discovered in 1972, is due to pairing, as is the case for superconductivity in ordinary metals. However, the pair is in the 3 P state so that a new aspect of superfluidity appears with internal degrees of freedom. It offers quite an interesting real example of ‘spontaneous symmetry breaking’. This aspect will be emphasised in the following discussion. Fermi liquid 3 He A 3 He atom is a fermion with nuclear spin ½. Although 3 He gas liquefies at low temperatures due to the weak van der Waals force, it does not solidify even at T = 0 unless the pressure exceeds 33.5 atm (3.4 × 10 6 Pa) as shown in the phase diagram (Fig. 6.1 (a)). While Bose liquid 4 He becomes superfluid at about 2K, 3 He is Fermi-degenerate at less than T F ∼ 0.1 K and shows the properties of a normal Fermi gas. For example, the specific heat and the susceptibility are proportional to T at T < T F . It is only at an ultra-low temperature in the mK-region that the system undergoes a transition to the superfluid state. Figure 6.1(b) is the phase diagram showing the superfluid phases with variables T,P and external magnetic field H in the mK-region. It should be noted that there are two thermodynamically distinct phases called the A phase and the B phase even at H = 0, and that for H ≠ 0 the A 1 phase appears.
A system composed of particles, whose quantum mechanical zero point energy is large compared to their interaction energy, does not solidify even at absolute zero temperature and remains a so-called quantum liquid. Typical examples of such systems are conduction electrons in metals and liquid helium. Many conductors undergo a phase transition at their critical temperature T c and become superconducting below it. Similarly, liquid 4 He under its vapour pressure becomes a superfluid at T c = 2.17 K ( T λ is often used instead of T c ), and liquid 3 He at T c = 0.9 mK. Although the phenomena are called superconductivity for a charged system like conduction electrons, and superfluidity for a neutral system like liquid helium, they are characterised by the same basic property that the wave nature of the particles manifests itself on a macroscopic scale, as we shall see below. Phenomena The most important factor in determining the properties of a quantum liquid is the statistics of the constituent particles. Liquid 3 He becomes a typical Fermi liquid below 0.1 K and a superfluid below a few mK, in contrast with the bosonic liquid 4 He mentioned above. The two superfluids are quite different both phenomenologically and microscopically. Table 1.1 shows systems which exhibit, or are predicted to exhibit (in brackets), superconductivity or superfluidity. In the case of fermion systems pair formation is responsible for the phenomena so that their properties differ according to the pairing type.
The hierarchy of equations for reduced density matrices relevant to thermodynamic equilibrium with account taken of the spin obtained earlier is modified in order to describe the state of a Fermi system with a condensate. Although the procedure is to some extent analogous with the one carried out by the author earlier for a Bose liquid peculiarities relevant to Fermi statistics complicate considerably the treatment. As in the case of the Bose liquid the condensate phase can be superfluid as well as nonsuperfluid, the physical causes of superfluidity being identical. A new mechanism of fermion pairing that acts even in the case of a purely repulsive Hamiltonian is pointed out. Special attention is given to the thermodynamics of a superfluid Fermi system. The example of a hard-sphere system is used to find out the form of phase diagrams, the character of the phase transition to a condensate phase and the properties of the last. Noticeable dissimilarities from a Bose system with the same Hamiltonian are revealed. Application of the present approach to superconductivity is discussed as well.
The goal of this chapter will be to briefly describe the remarkable properties of helium at low temperatures. After stating some of these properties we will see how they can be understood in terms of the phenomenon of Bose–Einstein condensation described in Chapter 7. We will give the main argument in two different formulations, once using the quasi-particle method of Bogoliubov, and then using a Green function approach. We start with some experimental facts. Helium is a remarkable element. It was predicted to exist from observations of the Sun before it was found on Earth. It is the only element which remains a liquid at zero temperature and atmospheric pressure. Experimentally the phase diagram of 4 He is shown in Figure 10.1. Helium I is a normal fluid and has a normal gas-liquid critical point. Helium II is a mixture of a normal fluid and a superfluid. The superfluid is characterized by the vanishing of its viscosity. Helium I and helium II are separated by a line known as the λ -transition line. At T λ = 2.18 K, P λ = 2.29 Pa, helium I, helium II, and helium gas coexist. The specific heat of liquid helium along the vapor transition line forms a logarithmic discontinuity shown in Figure 10.2. The form of this diagram resembles the Greek letter λ and is the reason for calling the transition a λ -transition. The lack of viscosity of helium II leads to some remarkable experimental consequences, one of which we briefly describe. Let two containers A and B be linked by a thin capillary through which only a fluid with zero (or very low) viscosity can pass freely.
Abstract We discuss the dependence of the phase diagram of a hypothetical isotope of helium with nuclear mass less than 4 atomic mass units. We argue that with decreasing nucleus mass, the temperature of the superfluid phase transition (about 2.2 K in real 4 He) increases, while that of the liquid–gas critical point (about 5.2 K in real 4 He) decreases. We discuss various scenarios that may occur when the two temperatures approach each other and the order parameters of the superfluid and the liquid–gas phase transitions interact with each other. The simplest scenario, in which both order parameters become critical at particular values of the nuclear mass, temperature, and pressure, can be ruled out through on an analysis of the Landau theory. We argue that in the most likely scenario, as the nuclear mass decreases, first, a tricritical point appears on the line separating the superfluid and the normal fluid phase, then the critical point disappears under the first-order part of superfluid phase transition line, and in the end the tricritical point disappears. The last change in the phase diagram occurs when the two-body scattering length crosses zero, which corresponds to the nuclear mass of about 1.55 u. We develop a quantitative theory that allows one to determine the phase diagram in the vicinity of this point. Finally, we discuss several ways to physically realize such liquids.
In the same series of experiments which led to the discovery of superconductivity, Kamerlingh Onnes was the first who succeeded in cooling helium below its boiling point of 4.2 K. In 1908, he was cooling this liquefied helium further in an attempt to produce solid helium. But since helium only solidifies at very low temperatures (below 1 K) and high pressures (above 25 bar), Kamerlingh Onnes did not succeed, and he turned his attention to other experiments. It was, however, soon recognized that at 2.2 K (a temperature reached by Kamerlingh Onnes), the liquid helium underwent a transition into a new phase, which was called helium II. After this observation, it took almost 30 years to discover that this new phase is actually characterized by a complete absence of viscosity (a discovery made by Kapitza and Allen in 1937). The phase was therefore called superfluid . In a superfluid, there can be persistent frictionless flows – superflows – very much like supercurrents in superconductors. This helium II is, up to now, the only superfluid which is available for experiments. The most abundant isotope of helium, 4 He, is a spinless boson. Given this fact, the origin of superfluidity was almost immediately attributed to Bose condensation, which was a known phenomenon by that time.
Various BCS-like pairing theories are still invariably used to describe the unusual superconducting/superfluid states and properties of condensed matters without clarifying the fermionic or bosonic nature of Cooper pairs and the relevant mechanisms of superconductivity and superfluidity. We show that the bosonization of Cooper pairs and the novel superconductivity and superfluidity resulting from the condensation of an attractive Bose gas of Cooper pairs into a superfluid state in high-Tc cuprates and other exotic systems occur under the condition εF≲2εA (where εF is the Fermi energy, εA is the energy of the effective attraction between fermions). We argue that the simple BCS criterion (i.e. formation of an energy gap on the Fermi surface) is insufficient for the occurrence of unconventional superconductivity (superfluidity) and the superconducting/superfluid transition in attractive Bose systems is more λ-like than the usual Bose–Einstein condensation. The new and specific criteria for unconventional superconductivity and superfluidity are formulated. Mean-field theory of the three- and two-dimensional superfluid Bose condensates of Cooper pairs describes reasonably well the novel superconducting states (i.e., two distinct superconducting phases below the bulk superconducting transition temperature Tc and a vortex-like state above Tc) and properties (such as λ-like transition at Tc, first-order phase transition and gapless bosonic excitations somewhat below Tc or even far below Tc) of high-Tc cuprates in full agreement with the experimental findings. The unusual superconducting/superfluid states and properties of heavy-fermion and organic compounds, Sr2RuO4, 3He, 4He and atomic Fermi gases are explained more clearly by this theory.