Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

A study of metal-insulator transitions in the binary alloy and ionic Hubbard models

Norman Paris

Published Jan 1, 2007• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Mott and Band Insulator Transitions in the Binary Alloy Hubbard Model

A. Baldwin, Richard T. Scalettar, Norman Paris

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 5, 2007•0 citations

Insulator-Insulator Transitions in an Ionic Hubbard Model

Ara Go, Gun Sang Jeon

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 13, 2008•0 citations

Nature of the insulating phases and phase transitions in ionic Hubbard model

Michael Sekania, A. P. Kampf, G. I. Japaridze

APS•Mar 1, 2004•0 citations

Band to Mott Insulator Transition in the Ionic Hubbard Model

Ph. Brune, A. P. Kampf

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2002•0 citations

FIRST ORDER METAL-INSULATOR TRANSITION IN AN ALLOY ANALOGY APPROACH TO THE HUBBARD MODEL

MASSIMO CORRIAS

Series on advances in statistical mechanics•Jul 1, 1991•0 citations

Phase transitions in the binary-alloy Hubbard model: Insights from strong-coupling perturbation theory

Elaheh Adibi, Alireza Habibi, S. A. Jafari

In the binary alloy with composition ${A}_{x}{B}_{1\ensuremath{-}x}$ of two atoms with ionic energy scales $\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Delta}}$, an apparent Anderson insulator (AI) is obtained as a result of randomness in the position of atoms. Using our recently developed technique that combines the local self-energy from strong-coupling perturbation theory with the transfer matrix method, we are able to address the problem of adding a Hubbard $U$ to the binary-alloy problem for millions of lattice sites on the honeycomb lattice. By adding the Hubbard interaction $U$, the resulting AI phase will become metallic, which in our formulation can be manifestly attributed to the screening of disorder by Hubbard $U$. Upon further increase in $U$, again the AI phase emerges, which can be understood in terms of the suppressed charge fluctuations due to residual Hubbard interaction. The randomness takes advantage of such suppression and localizes the quasiparticles of the metallic phase. The ultimate destiny of the system at very large $U$ is to become a Mott insulator. We construct the phase diagram of this model in the plane of $(U,\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Delta}})$ for various compositions $x$.

arXiv:1810.02505•Physical review. B./Physical review. B•Jan 7, 2019•5 citations
In the binary alloy with composition ${A}_{x}{B}_{1\ensuremath{-}x}$ of two atoms with ionic energy scales $\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Delta}}$, an apparent Anderson insulator (AI) is obtained as a result of randomness in the position of atoms. Using our recently developed technique that combines the local self-energy from strong-coupling perturbation theory with the transfer matrix method, we are able to address the problem of adding a Hubbard UUU to the binary-alloy problem for millions of lattice sites on the honeycomb lattice. By adding the Hubbard interaction UUU, the resulting AI phase will become metallic, which in our formulation can be manifestly attributed to the screening of disorder by Hubbard UUU. Upon further increase in UUU, again the AI phase emerges, which can be understood in terms of the suppressed charge fluctuations due to residual Hubbard interaction. The randomness takes advantage of such suppression and localizes the quasiparticles of the metallic phase. The ultimate destiny of the system at very large UUU is to become a Mott insulator. We construct the phase diagram of this model in the plane of $(U,\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Delta}})$ for various compositions xxx.