Imagine an experiment where a quantum particle inside a box is released at some time in some initial state. A detector is placed at a fixed location inside the box and its clicking signifies arrival of the particle at the detector. What is the time of arrival (TOA) of the particle at the detector ? Within the paradigm of the measurement postulate of quantum mechanics, one can use the idea of projective measurements to define the TOA. We consider a setup where a detector keeps making instantaneous measurements at regular finite time intervals until it detects the particle at time t , which is defined as the TOA. This is a stochastic variable and, for a simple lattice model of a free particle in a one-dimensional box, we find interesting features such as power-law tails in its distribution and in the probability of survival (non-detection). We propose a perturbative calculational approach which yields results that compare very well with exact numerics.Imagine an experiment where a quantum particle inside a box is released at some time in some initial state. A detector is placed at a fixed location inside the box and its clicking signifies arrival of the particle at the detector. What is the time of arrival (TOA) of the particle at the detector ? Within the paradigm of the measurement postulate of quantum mechanics, one can use the idea of projective measurements to define the TOA. We consider a setup where a detector keeps making instantaneous measurements at regular finite time intervals until it detects the particle at time t , which is defined as the TOA. This is a stochastic variable and, for a simple lattice model of a free particle in a one-dimensional box, we find interesting features such as power-law tails in its distribution and in the probability of survival (non-detection). We propose a perturbative calculational approach which yields results that compare very well with exact numerics.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and TheoreticalFeb 25, 201568 citations

Quantum Time of Arrival

Calvin Stubbins

Bulletin of the American Physical SocietyMar 3, 20140 citations

Quantum time of arrival distribution in a simple lattice model

Shrabanti Dhar, Subinay Dasgupta, Abhishek Dhar

Imagine an experiment where a quantum particle inside a box is released at some time in some initial state. A detector is placed at a fixed location inside the box and its clicking signifies arrival of the particle at the detector. What is the \emph{time of arrival} (TOA) of the particle at the detector ? Within the paradigm of the measurement postulate of quantum mechanics, one can use the idea of projective measurements to define the TOA. We consider the setup where a detector keeps making instantaneous measurements at regular finite time intervals {\emph{till}} it detects the particle at some time $t$ , which is defined as the TOA. This is a stochastic variable and, for a simple lattice model of a free particle in a one-dimensional box, we find interesting features such as power-law tails in its distribution and in the probability of survival (non-detection). We propose a perturbative calculational approach which yields results that compare very well with exact numerics.Imagine an experiment where a quantum particle inside a box is released at some time in some initial state. A detector is placed at a fixed location inside the box and its clicking signifies arrival of the particle at the detector. What is the \emph{time of arrival} (TOA) of the particle at the detector ? Within the paradigm of the measurement postulate of quantum mechanics, one can use the idea of projective measurements to define the TOA. We consider the setup where a detector keeps making instantaneous measurements at regular finite time intervals {\emph{till}} it detects the particle at some time $t$, which is defined as the TOA. This is a stochastic variable and, for a simple lattice model of a free particle in a one-dimensional box, we find interesting features such as power-law tails in its distribution and in the probability of survival (non-detection). We propose a perturbative calculational approach which yields results that compare very well with exact numerics.

arXiv:1312.5923Dec 20, 20132 citations

Arrival time from the general theory of quantum time distributions

Tajron Jurić, Hrvoje Nikolić

arXiv:2107.08777The European Physical Journal PlusMay 1, 20228 citations

Quantum Stroboscopy for Time Measurements

Seth Lloyd, Lorenzo Maccone, Lionel Martellini +1 more

Mielnik's cannonball argument uses the Zeno effect to argue that projective measurements for time of arrival are impossible. If one repeatedly measures the position of a particle (or a cannonball!) that has yet to arrive at a detector, the Zeno effect will repeatedly collapse its wave function away from it: the particle never arrives. Here we introduce quantum stroboscopic measurements where we accumulate statistics of projective position measurements, performed on different copies of the system at different times, to obtain a time-of-arrival distribution. We show that, under appropriate limits, this gives the same statistics as time measurements of conventional "always on" particle detectors that bypass Mielnik's argument using nonprojective, weak continuous measurements. In addition to time of arrival, quantum stroboscopy can describe distributions of general time measurements. It can also be adapted to obtain the conditional probability distribution of arrival times, given that the particle was not previously detected at the detector.Mielnik's cannonball argument uses the Zeno effect to argue that projective measurements for time of arrival are impossible. If one repeatedly measures the position of a particle (or a cannonball!) that has yet to arrive at a detector, the Zeno effect will repeatedly collapse its wave function away from it: the particle never arrives. Here we introduce quantum stroboscopic measurements where we accumulate statistics of projective position measurements, performed on different copies of the system at different times, to obtain a time-of-arrival distribution. We show that, under appropriate limits, this gives the same statistics as time measurements of conventional "always on" particle detectors that bypass Mielnik's argument using nonprojective, weak continuous measurements. In addition to time of arrival, quantum stroboscopy can describe distributions of general time measurements. It can also be adapted to obtain the conditional probability distribution of arrival times, given that the particle was not previously detected at the detector.

arXiv:2507.17740Physical Review LettersFeb 20, 20262 citations

t

, which is defined as the TOA. This is a stochastic variable and, for a simple lattice model of a free particle in a one-dimensional box, we find interesting features such as power-law tails in its distribution and in the probability of survival (non-detection). We propose a perturbative calculational approach which yields results that compare very well with exact numerics.