Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Advances in quantum chemistry

Chapter 2 A Single Quantum System: Evolution, Prediction, Observation

P. E. Toschek

Published Nov 27, 2007• 1 citation
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/s0065-3276(07)53002-9

Related papers

Evolution of Quantum Systems

Bei Zeng, Xie Chen, D. L. Zhou +1 more

Quantum science and technology•Jan 1, 2019•0 citations

Atom–field interaction – quantum theory

Marlan O. Scully, Muhammad Suhail Zubairy

In the preceding chapters concerning the interaction of a radiation field with matter, we assumed the field to be classical. In many situations this assumption is valid. There are, however, many instances where a classical field fails to explain experimentally observed results and a quantized description of the field is required. This is, for example, true of spontaneous emission in an atomic system which was described phenomenologically in Chapter 5. For a rigorous treatment of the atomic level decay in free space, we need to consider the interaction of the atom with the vacuum modes of the universe. Even in the simplest system involving the interaction of a single-mode radiation field with a single two-level atom, the predictions for the dynamics of the atom are quite different in the semiclassical theory and the fully quantum theory. In the absence of the decay process, the semiclassical theory predicts Rabi oscillations for the atomic inversion whereas the quantum theory predicts certain collapse and revival phenomena due to the quantum aspects of the field. These interesting quantum field theoretical predictions have been experimentally verified. In this chapter we discuss the interaction of the quantized radiation field with the two-level atomic system described by a Hamiltonian in the dipole and the rotating-wave approximations. For a single-mode field it reduces to a particularly simple form. This is a very interesting Hamiltonian in quantum optics for several reasons. First, it can be solved exactly for arbitrary coupling constants and exhibits some true quantum dynamical effects such as collapse followed by periodic revivals of the atomic inversion.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Sep 4, 1997•7 citations

Evolution of Quantum Systems

O. Furtmaier

•Jan 1, 2017•0 citations

Quantum Dynamics: Resonance and a Quantum Flip-Flop

Duncan G. Steel

Abstract This chapter begins the discussion of the time evolution of an active quantum system. From the earlier chapters, time dependent physics has been observed through the presence of the time evolution of the phase of each eigenstate. The Hamiltonian itself is time independent. This represents the same kind of evolution of a classical system like the vibration of a tuning fork when it has been struck or the oscillation of an LC circuit if the capacitor is charged to some voltage and then the switch is closed. In the quantum case, the Hamiltonian has also been time independent. The time evolution evolves according the full-time dependent Schrödinger equation, depending only on a single initial condition of the state vector or wave function and the corresponding time evolution of the phase factor for each eigenstate. However in this chapter, we consider the case of when there is a time dependent Hamiltonian such as a sinewave generator or laser. As in the case of resonant tunneling, we see the importance in dynamics of resonant coupling. With an oscillating potential energy term, we see the presence of Rabi oscillations in the probability amplitude of a two-state system on resonance, which can be viewed as a quantum flip-flop between two states of a quantum bit (qubit).

•Apr 30, 2021•0 citations

Alternative Formulations

Bernard d’Espagnat

The description of the time evolution of systems is technically known as the "Schrodinger picture." An important alternative description is the "Heisenberg picture," which indeed was the one Heisenberg used when he first formulated quantum mechanics. The Schrodinger and Heisenberg pictures represent two different but equivalent sets of rules. In other words, when applied to a given physical situation they lead to the same observable predictions. In some respects, the Heisenberg picture presents definite technical advantages. It is particularly convenient, for instance, in quantum field theory. The chapter discusses work consistently with the equivalent Schrodinger set of rules. For this reason, it describes briefly the Heisenberg formulation. The chapter shows that the expressions used in the Schrodinger picture can be carried over to the Heisenberg picture. It implies, however, that the kets associated with the possible values that can be found upon measurement of an observable are themselves time-dependent kets.

CRC Press eBooks•Mar 5, 2018•0 citations

The Evolution of Quantum Theory

Ig. Tamm

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1991•18 citations
In the preceding chapters concerning the interaction of a radiation field with matter, we assumed the field to be classical. In many situations this assumption is valid. There are, however, many instances where a classical field fails to explain experimentally observed results and a quantized description of the field is required. This is, for example, true of spontaneous emission in an atomic system which was described phenomenologically in Chapter 5. For a rigorous treatment of the atomic level decay in free space, we need to consider the interaction of the atom with the vacuum modes of the universe. Even in the simplest system involving the interaction of a single-mode radiation field with a single two-level atom, the predictions for the dynamics of the atom are quite different in the semiclassical theory and the fully quantum theory. In the absence of the decay process, the semiclassical theory predicts Rabi oscillations for the atomic inversion whereas the quantum theory predicts certain collapse and revival phenomena due to the quantum aspects of the field. These interesting quantum field theoretical predictions have been experimentally verified. In this chapter we discuss the interaction of the quantized radiation field with the two-level atomic system described by a Hamiltonian in the dipole and the rotating-wave approximations. For a single-mode field it reduces to a particularly simple form. This is a very interesting Hamiltonian in quantum optics for several reasons. First, it can be solved exactly for arbitrary coupling constants and exhibits some true quantum dynamical effects such as collapse followed by periodic revivals of the atomic inversion.
Abstract This chapter begins the discussion of the time evolution of an active quantum system. From the earlier chapters, time dependent physics has been observed through the presence of the time evolution of the phase of each eigenstate. The Hamiltonian itself is time independent. This represents the same kind of evolution of a classical system like the vibration of a tuning fork when it has been struck or the oscillation of an LC circuit if the capacitor is charged to some voltage and then the switch is closed. In the quantum case, the Hamiltonian has also been time independent. The time evolution evolves according the full-time dependent Schrödinger equation, depending only on a single initial condition of the state vector or wave function and the corresponding time evolution of the phase factor for each eigenstate. However in this chapter, we consider the case of when there is a time dependent Hamiltonian such as a sinewave generator or laser. As in the case of resonant tunneling, we see the importance in dynamics of resonant coupling. With an oscillating potential energy term, we see the presence of Rabi oscillations in the probability amplitude of a two-state system on resonance, which can be viewed as a quantum flip-flop between two states of a quantum bit (qubit).
The description of the time evolution of systems is technically known as the "Schrodinger picture." An important alternative description is the "Heisenberg picture," which indeed was the one Heisenberg used when he first formulated quantum mechanics. The Schrodinger and Heisenberg pictures represent two different but equivalent sets of rules. In other words, when applied to a given physical situation they lead to the same observable predictions. In some respects, the Heisenberg picture presents definite technical advantages. It is particularly convenient, for instance, in quantum field theory. The chapter discusses work consistently with the equivalent Schrodinger set of rules. For this reason, it describes briefly the Heisenberg formulation. The chapter shows that the expressions used in the Schrodinger picture can be carried over to the Heisenberg picture. It implies, however, that the kets associated with the possible values that can be found upon measurement of an observable are themselves time-dependent kets.