Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Springer eBooks

On the True Ideas Underlying Wave Mechanics

Louis de Broglie

Published Jan 1, 1983• 2 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-1-4684-8830-2_7

Related papers

The fundamental idea of wave mechanics

Erwin Schrödinger

Resonance•Feb 1, 1999•24 citations

Pure wave mechanics and the very idea of empirical adequacy

Jeffrey Alan Barrett

Synthese•Feb 25, 2015•40 citations

How a wave function can collapse without violating Schroedinger's equation, and how to understand Born's rule

Gerard ’t Hooft

It is often claimed that the collapse of the wave function and Born's rule to interpret the square of the norm as a probability, have to be introduced as separate axioms in quantum mechanics besides the Schroedinger equation. Here we show that this is not true in certain models where quantum behavior can be attributed to underlying deterministic equations. It is argued that indeed the apparent spontaneous collapse of wave functions and Born's rule are features that strongly point towards determinism underlying quantum mechanics.

arXiv:1112.1811•Dec 8, 2011•16 citations

The reinterpretation of wave mechanics

Louis de Broglie

Foundations of Physics•Mar 1, 1970•170 citations

Schrodinger’s wave mechanics

J Manners

Chapter 2 Schrodinger’s wave mechanics I Quantum mechanics — a new approach to describing atomic m atter If experimental evidence conflicts with an accepted scientific theory, adjustments to the theory can usually be made, but only up to a point. As mounting experimental evidence becomes overwhelming, scientists sometimes have to revolutionize their ideas with a new theory capable of accommodating experimental observations comfortably. Perhaps the most significant scientific revolution since the time of Newton, began at around the turn of the twentieth century and peaked in the mid1920s, with the advent of Schrodinger’s formulation of quantum mechanics. The need for a revolutionary theory of microscopic nature began to be recognized as the results of experimental atomic physics accreted into a body of evidence which, scientists eventually realized, undermined many of the basic ideas of classical mechanics. (Figure 2.1.) The challenge to classical mechanics could hardly have been more formidable, for the world of classical mechanics is deterministic. Classical mechanics supposes that, while the mathematical difficulties are often insurmountable, it is in principle possible, given sufficient information about the present, to predict the future exactly, that is, to predict the progress of any experiment with absolute certainty. The evidence from atomic physics implied that this was not true of microscopic nature. In microscopic nature, identical conditions do not produce identical results.

CRC Press eBooks•Oct 8, 2018•0 citations

The Creation of Wave Mechanics

Erwin Schrödinger

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1987•1 citation
It is often claimed that the collapse of the wave function and Born's rule to interpret the square of the norm as a probability, have to be introduced as separate axioms in quantum mechanics besides the Schroedinger equation. Here we show that this is not true in certain models where quantum behavior can be attributed to underlying deterministic equations. It is argued that indeed the apparent spontaneous collapse of wave functions and Born's rule are features that strongly point towards determinism underlying quantum mechanics.
Chapter 2 Schrodinger’s wave mechanics I Quantum mechanics — a new approach to describing atomic m atter If experimental evidence conflicts with an accepted scientific theory, adjustments to the theory can usually be made, but only up to a point. As mounting experimental evidence becomes overwhelming, scientists sometimes have to revolutionize their ideas with a new theory capable of accommodating experimental observations comfortably. Perhaps the most significant scientific revolution since the time of Newton, began at around the turn of the twentieth century and peaked in the mid1920s, with the advent of Schrodinger’s formulation of quantum mechanics. The need for a revolutionary theory of microscopic nature began to be recognized as the results of experimental atomic physics accreted into a body of evidence which, scientists eventually realized, undermined many of the basic ideas of classical mechanics. (Figure 2.1.) The challenge to classical mechanics could hardly have been more formidable, for the world of classical mechanics is deterministic. Classical mechanics supposes that, while the mathematical difficulties are often insurmountable, it is in principle possible, given sufficient information about the present, to predict the future exactly, that is, to predict the progress of any experiment with absolute certainty. The evidence from atomic physics implied that this was not true of microscopic nature. In microscopic nature, identical conditions do not produce identical results.