Unlike orbital angular momentum, the total spin of a system can be integral or half-integral. Fermions such as electrons, positrons, neutrinos, and quarks possess intrinsic angular momentum or spin with a measurable value of ±1/2 (in units of ħ). Composite particles such as protons and neutrons also have measurable spin of ±1/2 and atomic nuclei can have half-integral spin values (1/2, 3/2, 5/2, …). The “spinor” function for half-integral spin is unusual in that rotation by 2π transforms it into the negative of itself. A rotation by 4π is required in order to transform the spin function into itself. While this may at first glance seem unreasonable, there are simple examples that display this property. Take a strip of paper and form a Möbius strip by twisting one end 180° and joining it to the other end. Start at any point on the strip and trace a line through 360°. You do not end up at the starting point, but rather on the other side of the paper strip, as shown in Fig. 5.1. Continue tracing along the surface for another 360° and you will return to the original starting point. Early spectroscopic experiments on hydrogen and hydrogen-like atoms revealed that there were twice as many states as predicted by the solutions of Schrödinger's equation. The idea that an electron could have intrinsic angular momentum (spin) with two possible states was proposed by Kronig, Uhlenbeck, and Goudsmit [5.1] in 1925.
Unlike orbital angular momentum, the total spin of a system can be integral or half-integral. Fermions such as electrons, positrons, neutrinos, and quarks possess intrinsic angular momentum or spin with a measurable value of ±1/2 (in units of ħ). Composite particles such as protons and neutrons also have measurable spin of ±1/2 and atomic nuclei can have half-integral spin values (1/2, 3/2, 5/2, …). The “spinor” function for half-integral spin is unusual in that rotation by 2π transforms it into the negative of itself. A rotation by 4π is required in order to transform the spin function into itself. While this may at first glance seem unreasonable, there are simple examples that display this property. Take a strip of paper and form a Möbius strip by twisting one end 180° and joining it to the other end. Start at any point on the strip and trace a line through 360°. You do not end up at the starting point, but rather on the other side of the paper strip, as shown in Fig. 5.1. Continue tracing along the surface for another 360° and you will return to the original starting point. Early spectroscopic experiments on hydrogen and hydrogen-like atoms revealed that there were twice as many states as predicted by the solutions of Schrödinger's equation. The idea that an electron could have intrinsic angular momentum (spin) with two possible states was proposed by Kronig, Uhlenbeck, and Goudsmit [5.1] in 1925.
First, the experimental foundations for the existence of a new dynamical variable, the spin of particles, are presented. The Pauli equation is then derived in detail, two applications are given and the energy levels of a particle with spin in a constant magnetic field are studied. This is the analysis of Landau levels, which can be performed by using the known results on the spectrum of harmonic oscillators. In this chapter we also study in detail the addition of orbital angular momentum and spin, as well as the spin–orbit interaction with the resulting Thomas precession. Stern-Gerlach experiment and electron spin The hypothesis that the electron has an intrinsic magnetic moment and an angular momentum, in short a spin , was first suggested in Uhlenbeck and Goudsmit (1926). They noticed, even before the discovery of quantum mechanics, that a complete description of spectra was not possible unless a magnetic moment and a mechanical moment were ascribed to the electron, and hence the concept of an electron as a point charge was insufficient. First, let us therefore try to understand how a magnetic moment can be associated to an atomic system. For this purpose, consider for simplicity the Bohr model of an hydrogen atom, where the electron moves along a circular orbit and rotates with orbital angular momentum L .
The concept and much of the mathematical treatment of orbital angular momentum was treated in Chapter 3. An unexpected result from that treatment is that using the result of Equation (3.41) along with the result of Equation (3.48), we find that mT −mB = 2` = n , (4.1) so ` is either an integer or a half integer! The integers correspond to orbital angular momentum, while the half-integer values correspond to intrinsic angular momentum, or spin angular momentum. There is no classical model for spin angular momentum, but the most fundamental particles (electrons, quarks, protons, and neutrons) all exhibit this type of intrinsic angular momentum.
In quantum mechanics, there is a profound distinction between orbital angular momentum and spin angular momentum in which the former can be associated with the motion of a physical object in space but the later cannot. The difference leads to a radical deviation in the formulation of their corresponding dynamics in which an orbital angular momentum can be described by using a coordinate system but a spin angular momentum cannot. In this work we show that it is possible to treat spin angular momentum in the same manner as orbital angular momentum by formulating spin dynamics using Schrodinger equation in an intrinsic coordinate system. As an illustration, we apply the formulation to the dynamics of a hydrogen atom and show that the intrinsic spin angular momentum of the electron can take half-integral values and, in particular, the intrinsic mass of the electron can take negative values. We also consider a further extension by generalising the formulation so that it can be used to describe other intrinsic dynamics that may associate with a quantum particle, for example, when a hydrogen atom radiates a photon, the photon associated with the electron may also possess an intrinsic dynamics that can be described by an intrinsic wave equation that has a similar form to that for the electron.
Spin is well known to be an intrinsically relativistic property of particles. Nonetheless its effects are seen in many physical situations which are not obviously relativistic, perhaps the most obvious examples being magnets and the quantum mechanically permitted electronic configurations of the elements in the periodic table. The view of spin adopted in these and other problems is that the electron has a quantized spin ( s = 1/2) and that is a fundamental tenet of the theory, rather than something that has to be explained. In this chapter we are going to discuss the behaviour of spin-1/2 particles (electrons, protons and neutrons for example) without much direct reference to relativistic quantum theory and the origins of spin. This chapter should be instructive in its own right and as a guide to understanding spin when we come to discuss it in a fully relativistic context at various stages throughout this book. Unless otherwise specified, we will refer to electrons, but it should be borne in mind that the theory is equally applicable to any spin-1/2 particle. Students of quantum theory cannot delve very deeply into the subject without coming across the quantization of angular momentum. The orbital angular momentum usually surfaces in the theory leading up to the quantum description of the hydrogen atom.
In quantum mechanics, there is a profound distinction between orbital angular momentum and spin angular momentum in which the former can be associated with the motion of a physical object in space but the latter cannot. The difference leads to a radical deviation in the formulation of their corresponding dynamics in which an orbital angular momentum can be described by using a coordinate system but a spin angular momentum cannot. In this work, we show that it is possible to treat spin angular momentum in the same manner as orbital angular momentum by formulating spin dynamics using Schrödinger equation in an intrinsic coordinate system. As an illustration, we apply the formulation to the dynamics of a hydrogen atom and show that the intrinsic spin angular momentum of the electron can take half-integral values and, in particular, the intrinsic mass of the electron can take negative values. We also consider a further extension by generalising the formulation so that it can be used to describe other intrinsic dynamics that may associate with a quantum particle, for example, when a hydrogen atom radiates a photon, the photon associated with the electron may also possess an intrinsic dynamics that can be described by an intrinsic wave equation that has a similar form to that for the electron.
Most students of science and engineering know that every elementary particle, such as electrons, neutrons, photons, neutrinos, etc., has a quantum mechanical property called “spin” which can be measured (perhaps not easily, but at least in principle) and has a quantized value, including zero. The vast majority of these students mentally visualize spin as the angular momentum associated with the elementary particle spinning or rotating about its own axis (like a top or a planetary object). This mental picture, although convenient and comforting, is actually somewhat crude and certainly incomplete. Landau and Lifshitz, in their classic textbook on quantum mechanics [1], wrote “[the spin] property of elementary particles is peculiar to quantum theory. [It] has no classical interpretation... It would be wholly meaningless to imagine the ‘intrinsic’ angular momentum of an elementary particle as being the result of its rotation about its own axis.” The simplistic notion of self-rotation about an axis, shown in Fig. 1.1, can- not explain many features of spin, such as why its magnitude cannot assume continuous values and why it is quantized to certain specific values. It also causes serious problems if taken too literally. As we will see later (Problem 1.2), if we think of an electron as a solid sphere of radius equal to the Lorentz radius e2/(4πǫ0m0c 2) (where e is the electron’s charge, m0 is the mass, c is the speed of light in vacuum, and ǫ0 is the dielectric constant of vacuum), then the velocity on the surface of a rotating electron would have to be many times the velocity of light in vacuum if such a rotation were to generate an angular momentum equal to the electron’s spin. Obviously that would not be permitted by the theory of relativity. Indeed, a deep understanding of quantum mechanics is required to understand how the spin property comes about. Its origin is in relativistic quantum mechanics and really was first appreciated by Paul Andrew Maurice Dirac when he derived the Dirac equation which is the cornerstone of relativistic quantum mechanics. Richard Feynman, noted for his distaste for mysticism in physics, wrote about the notion of “spin”: “It appears to be one of the few places in physics where there is a rule which can be stated very simply, but for which no one has found a simple and easy explanation. The explanation is down deep in relativistic quantum mechanics.