Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Communications in Theoretical Physics

Exact Solution to the One-Dimensional Dirac Equation with Time Varying Mass

Yang Jin, Xiang An-ping, Yu Wan‐Lun

Published Sep 15, 2003• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

We directly use the quantum-invariant operator method to obtain the closed-form solution to the one-dimensional Dirac equation with a time-changing mass with a little manipulation. The solution got is also applicable for the case with time-independence mass.
DOI
10.1088/0253-6102/40/3/283

Related papers

Exact Solution to the One-Dimensional Dirac Equation with Time Varying Mass

YANGJin, Jin, Xiang +3 more

We directly use the quantum-invariant operator method to obtain the closed-form solution to the one-dimensional Dirac equation with a time-changing mass with a little manipulation. The solution got is also applicable for the case with time-independence mass.

理论物理通讯:英文版•Jan 1, 2003•0 citations

Exact solution of time-independent one-dimensional Dirac equation with position-dependent mass and vector potential of hyperbolic type by generalized SUSY QM approach

S. Medjenah, Farid Benamira

Indian Journal of Physics•Jul 11, 2022•5 citations

Time-Dependent Perturbation—Variation Method

Robert Yaris

Through the use of the time-ordered perturbation expansion, an operator equation for the time-dependent perturbation problem, of the same form as occurs in the time-independent problem, is generated. Thus, a variational method can be used to study the time-dependent case as well as the time-independent case. This variational method is used to recover the Dirac expansion as an example of a solution in series form, and it is also used to develop a simple (approximate) analytic solution as an example of a solution in closed form.

The Journal of Chemical Physics•Nov 15, 1963•24 citations

Exact solutions of time-dependent Dirac equations and the quantum–classical correspondence

Zhiguo Zhang

Exact solutions to the Dirac equations with a time-dependent mass and a static magnetic field or a time-dependent linear potential are given. Matrix elements of the coordinate, momentum and velocity operator are calculated. In the large quantum number limit, these matrix elements give the classical solution.

Physica Scripta•Jul 19, 2006•3 citations

The Relativistic One-Dimensional Square Potential

Carl G. Adler

The one-dimensional Dirac equation is applied to the cases of a particle bound in a square well and of a beam of particles impinging upon a square potential. The solutions are compared to the Schrödinger solutions, and the effect of the negative mass states is discussed.

American Journal of Physics•Mar 1, 1971•21 citations

The Dirac Equation and Time Flux

Francesco R. Ruggeri

It was argued in a number of previous notes that for the nonrelativistic case, W(x,t) transforms under x->x+a, t-> t+b (with a and b infinitesimal) as exp(ipx - iEt), except with p replaced with = - i d/dx W(x,t) and E replaced with i d/dt W(x,t). It was suggested this was a driving condition of nonrelativistic quantum mechanics, and if this is the case, one might expect these ideas to carry over into relativistic quantum mechanics. For relativistic quantum mechanics, however, one has the Einstein energy-momentum relationship E*E= p*p + mo*mo (c=1) which leads to -d/dt d/dt W(x,t) and -d/dx d/dx W(x,t) being used. The momentum term is fine because it is related to < p*p conditional >, but the second derivative of time seems to be a little confusing as it represents < E*E conditional > and not <E conditional >. If <E conditional> has physical significance, as it seems to be the case in nonrelativistic quantum mechanics, one might expect an equation with this time flux i.e. i d/dt W(x,t) / W(x,t) = < E conditional > and not < E*E conditional >. Dirac wrote such an equation, but obtaining a single time derivative comes at a price. The Dirac equation, in one dimension, contains matrices, d/dx and d/dt in addition to a two vector wavefunction (U(x,t), V(x,t)) instead of W(x,t). Thus, the Dirac equation in one dimension leads to coupled equations with U(x,t) and V(x,t). The single derivative d/dx is deceptive because U(x,t) can be written in terms of d/dx V(x,t) and vice versa, so ultimately the Dirac equations contain d/dx d/dx which is needed to obtain < p*p conditional >. The question is: How can one obtain < E conditional >? This may be done by using a (d/dt + constant ) -1 operator i,e. almost an inverse time operator, in other words either (E+m)-1 or (E-m) -1 where E can be thought of as id/dt. Thus, the RHS of the Dirac equations is i d/dt U(x,t) or i d/dt V(x,t) which suggests an infinitesimal step forward in time, while the LHS side contains (id/dt +m)-1 or (-id/dt-m) -1 which seems to be representative of undoing such a step. It should be noted that one may take Einstein’s energy-momentum equation E*E = p*p + mo*mo, without any knowledge of quantum mechanics, and cast it as 2x2 matrix equation, linear in E, namely H (U,V) = E (U,V). The matrix H serves as an evolution operator and another matrix serves as a velocity operator. One may derive the Schrodinger zitterbewegung equation for the velocity matrix without any use of wavefunctions and derivatives which are key to quantum mechanics. Nevertheless, the idea of noncommuting matrices, vectors and zitterbewegung is present. There are several choices for the matrix H, but one leads to the one dimensional Dirac coupled equations Thus, the “spin” features may be obtained directly from E*E= p*p+mo*mo without any quantum mechanics. (1), (2). The purpose of this note is to examine some of these ideas.

•Jul 24, 2019•0 citations
Through the use of the time-ordered perturbation expansion, an operator equation for the time-dependent perturbation problem, of the same form as occurs in the time-independent problem, is generated. Thus, a variational method can be used to study the time-dependent case as well as the time-independent case. This variational method is used to recover the Dirac expansion as an example of a solution in series form, and it is also used to develop a simple (approximate) analytic solution as an example of a solution in closed form.
It was argued in a number of previous notes that for the nonrelativistic case, W(x,t) transforms under x->x+a, t-> t+b (with a and b infinitesimal) as exp(ipx - iEt), except with p replaced with = - i d/dx W(x,t) and E replaced with i d/dt W(x,t). It was suggested this was a driving condition of nonrelativistic quantum mechanics, and if this is the case, one might expect these ideas to carry over into relativistic quantum mechanics. For relativistic quantum mechanics, however, one has the Einstein energy-momentum relationship E*E= p*p + mo*mo (c=1) which leads to -d/dt d/dt W(x,t) and -d/dx d/dx W(x,t) being used. The momentum term is fine because it is related to < p*p conditional >, but the second derivative of time seems to be a little confusing as it represents < E*E conditional > and not <E conditional >. If <E conditional> has physical significance, as it seems to be the case in nonrelativistic quantum mechanics, one might expect an equation with this time flux i.e. i d/dt W(x,t) / W(x,t) = < E conditional > and not < E*E conditional >. Dirac wrote such an equation, but obtaining a single time derivative comes at a price. The Dirac equation, in one dimension, contains matrices, d/dx and d/dt in addition to a two vector wavefunction (U(x,t), V(x,t)) instead of W(x,t). Thus, the Dirac equation in one dimension leads to coupled equations with U(x,t) and V(x,t). The single derivative d/dx is deceptive because U(x,t) can be written in terms of d/dx V(x,t) and vice versa, so ultimately the Dirac equations contain d/dx d/dx which is needed to obtain < p*p conditional >. The question is: How can one obtain < E conditional >? This may be done by using a (d/dt + constant ) -1 operator i,e. almost an inverse time operator, in other words either (E+m)-1 or (E-m) -1 where E can be thought of as id/dt. Thus, the RHS of the Dirac equations is i d/dt U(x,t) or i d/dt V(x,t) which suggests an infinitesimal step forward in time, while the LHS side contains (id/dt +m)-1 or (-id/dt-m) -1 which seems to be representative of undoing such a step. It should be noted that one may take Einstein’s energy-momentum equation E*E = p*p + mo*mo, without any knowledge of quantum mechanics, and cast it as 2x2 matrix equation, linear in E, namely H (U,V) = E (U,V). The matrix H serves as an evolution operator and another matrix serves as a velocity operator. One may derive the Schrodinger zitterbewegung equation for the velocity matrix without any use of wavefunctions and derivatives which are key to quantum mechanics. Nevertheless, the idea of noncommuting matrices, vectors and zitterbewegung is present. There are several choices for the matrix H, but one leads to the one dimensional Dirac coupled equations Thus, the “spin” features may be obtained directly from E*E= p*p+mo*mo without any quantum mechanics. (1), (2). The purpose of this note is to examine some of these ideas.