In this paper we applied for the first time the no-signaling in time (NSIT) formalism discussed by Kofler and Brukner (2013) to investigate temporal entanglement between binary human behavioral unconscious choices at t1 with binary random outcomes at t2. NSIT consists of a set of inequalities and represents mathematical conditions for macro-realism which require only two measurements in time. The analyses of three independent experiments show a strong violation of NSIT in two out of three of them, suggesting the hypothesis of a quantum-like temporal entanglement between human choices at t1 with binary random outcomes at t2. We discuss the potentialities of using NSIT to test temporal entanglement with behavioral measures.
In this paper we applied for the first time the no-signaling in time (NSIT) formalism discussed by Kofler and Brukner (2013) to investigate temporal entanglement between binary human behavioral unconscious choices at t1 with binary random outcomes at t2. NSIT consists of a set of inequalities and represents mathematical conditions for macro-realism which require only two measurements in time. The analyses of three independent experiments show a strong violation of NSIT in two out of three of them, suggesting the hypothesis of a quantum-like temporal entanglement between human choices at t1 with binary random outcomes at t2. We discuss the potentialities of using NSIT to test temporal entanglement with behavioral measures.
We consider two different types of conditions which were proposed to test macrorealism in the context of a system described by a single dichotomic variable Q. This is the view that a macroscopic system evolving in time possesses definite properties which can be determined without disturbing the future or past state. The Leggett-Garg (LG) inequalities, the most commonly studied test, are only necessary conditions for macrorealism, but, building on earlier work J. J. Halliwell, Phys. Rev. A 93, 022123 (2016), it is shown that when the four three-time LG inequalities are augmented with a certain set of two-time inequalities also of the LG form, Fine's theorem applies and these augmented conditions are then both necessary and sufficient. A comparison is carried out with a very different set of necessary and sufficient conditions for macrorealism, namely the no-signaling in time (NSIT) conditions proposed by J. Kofler and C. Brukner, Phys. Rev. A 87, 052115 (2013) and L. Clemente and J. Kofler, Phys. Rev. A 91, 062103 (2015), which ensure that all probabilities for Q at one and two times are independent of whether earlier or intermediate measurements are made in a given run, and do not require (but imply) the LG inequalities. We argue that tests based on the LG inequalities have the form of very weak classicality conditions and can be satisfied in the face of moderate interference effects, but those based on NSIT conditions have the form of much stronger coherence witness conditions, satisfied only for zero interference. The two tests differ in their implementation of noninvasive measurability and so are testing different notions of macrorealism: the augmented LG tests are indirect, entailing a combination of the results of different experiments with only compatible quantities measured in each experimental run, in close analogy with Bell tests, and are primarily tests for macrorealism per se; in contrast, the NSIT tests entail sequential measurements of incompatible quantities and are primarily tests for noninvasiveness.
Macroscopic realism, the classical world view that macroscopic objects exist independently of and are not influenced by measurements, is usually tested using Leggett-Garg inequalities. Recently, another necessary condition called no-signaling in time (NSIT) has been proposed as a witness for nonclassical behavior. In this paper, we show that a combination of NSIT conditions is not only necessary but also sufficient for a macrorealistic description of a physical system. Any violation of macroscopic realism must therefore be witnessed by a suitable NSIT condition. Subsequently, we derive an operational formulation for NSIT in terms of positive operator-valued measures and the system Hamiltonian. We argue that this leads to a suitable definition of ``classical'' measurements and Hamiltonians, and we apply our formalism to some generic coarse-grained quantum measurements.
Macro-realistic description of systems is based majorly on two basic intuitions about the classical world, namely, macrorealism per se, that is, the system is always in a distinct state, and non-invasive measurements, that is, measurements do not disturb the system. Given the assumption of no-signaling in time, one utilizes Leggett–Garg inequalities to observe a violation of macroscopic realism, which requires at least three measurements. In this work, we show that if one has access to shared randomness, then one can observe a violation of macroscopic realism using a single measurement even if no signaling in time is satisfied. Interestingly, using the proposed scheme one can also rule out a larger class of models, which we term macroscopic no-signaling theories that cannot violate the no-signaling in time conditions. We further construct a witness to observe the violation of macroscopic no-signaling.
Macroscopic realism is a set of assumptions about how we experience the world at a classical level. While the Leggett-Garg inequalities are temporal correlations that are violated by quantum systems not obeying such macrorealism, the no-signaling in time condition is also a necessary condition. This compares measurement outcomes with and without prior measurements. As dynamics and correlations play a central role in these measures, this paper explores the effects of regular versus chaotic dynamics on the violations of macroscopic realism. We observe a close connection between a 3 point out-of-time-order correlator and the conditional probabilities of measurement, and we find unmistakable imprints of chaos on the violations of macrorealism. We provide qualitative semiclassical reasoning for the numerical results involving a kicked top, and for two important initial states that behave very differently.
We show that, given an evolving quantum system and the quasiprobability distribution generated by the spatiotemporal generalization of the Born rule in pseudo density-matrices (PDMs), this distribution deviates from the sequential measurements probability distribution, given by the Lüders von-Neumann distribution, if and only if the non-signaling in time (NSIT) is violated; equivalently, if and only if the macroscopic realism (MR) is violated. Furthermore, we propose a definition of temporal entanglement according to the structure of the PDMs that is analogous to the definition of spatial entanglement in density matrices, showing that temporal entanglement is necessary for the violation of temporal Bell inequalities and the violation of MR. We employ our results to study the relationship between the negativity of the PDM, temporal entanglement, violation of temporal Bell inequalities, and MR.
In this paper, we introduce the concept of quasi non-signaling in time (QNSIT), which extends non-signaling in time (NSIT) to quasiprobability distributions. QNSIT requires that the marginals of the quasiprobability distribution under consideration at intermediate times remain unperturbed by the measurement back-action induced by a sequence of quantum measurements. Associated with QNSIT, we propose a quasiprobabilistic characterization of macrorealism, MRqp, which requires that both the QNSIT conditions are satisfied and the quasiprobability distribution constructed from the measurement outcomes is positive. We prove that MRqp implies NSIT, whereas the converse does not hold because of hidden superposition paths generated or preserved by the system dynamics. We also prove that, for a two-level system, the MRqp and NSIT conditions coincide. MRqp therefore provides a more sensitive tool for testing macrorealism and can be implemented experimentally through a quantum non-demolition measurement scheme.