Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Theoretical and mathematical physics

Quantum Capacity and Coding

Masanori Ohya, Igor Vasil'evich Volovich

Published Jan 1, 2011• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-94-007-0171-7_9

Related papers

FOUNDATION OF QUANTUM CAPACITY

Noboru Watanabe

IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems•Oct 1, 2004•0 citations

Quantum-capacity-approaching codes for the detected-jump channel

Markus Grassl, Zhengfeng Ji, Zhaohui Wei +1 more

The quantum-channel capacity gives the ultimate limit for the rate at which quantum data can be reliably transmitted through a noisy quantum channel. Degradable quantum channels are among the few channels whose quantum capacities are known. Given the quantum capacity of a degradable channel, it remains challenging to find a practical coding scheme which approaches capacity. Here we discuss code designs for the detected-jump channel, a degradable channel with practical relevance describing the physics of spontaneous decay of atoms with detected photon emission. We show that this channel can be used to simulate a binary classical channel with both erasures and bit flips. The capacity of the simulated classical channel gives a lower bound on the quantum capacity of the detected-jump channel. When the jump probability is small, it almost equals the quantum capacity. Hence using a classical capacity-approaching code for the simulated classical channel yields a quantum code which approaches the quantum capacity of the detected-jump channel.

arXiv:1008.3350•Physical Review A•Dec 27, 2010•5 citations

Quantum Coding and Error Correction

François Chapeau‐Blondeau

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2026•0 citations

Degenerate quantum codes and the quantum channel capacity problem

Graeme Smith, John A. Smolin

A striking feature of quantum error correcting codes is that they can sometimes be used to correct more errors than they can uniquely identify. Indeed, such degenerate codes are known to outperform all non-degenerate codes for very noisy quantum channels. As a result, rather than being chosen randomly according to some i.i.d. distribution, capacity achieving quantum codes must be chosen in a highly structured fashion. While there is no systematic understanding of how to design such codes, I will describe our best understanding of the problem. I will also briefly discuss a single-letter upper bound on the quantum capacity and its relation to the capacitypsilas possible additivity.

IEEE Information Theory Workshop (ITW)•May 1, 2008•0 citations

Quantum information: The promise

Vlatko Vedral

The New Scientist•Jul 1, 2013•0 citations

Superadditivity in Capacity of Quantum Channel by Classical Pseudo-Cyclic Codes

Shogo Usami, Tsuyoshi Sasaki Usuda, Ichi Takumi +2 more

Analytical solution of mutual information by square-root measurement for binary linear code is given. Applying the solution, we show properties of superadditivity in capacity by BCH codes with codeword length 15 and 31. Furthermore, we refer to codes almost achieving the quantum channel capacity.

Kluwer Academic Publishers eBooks•Feb 24, 2006•0 citations
The quantum-channel capacity gives the ultimate limit for the rate at which quantum data can be reliably transmitted through a noisy quantum channel. Degradable quantum channels are among the few channels whose quantum capacities are known. Given the quantum capacity of a degradable channel, it remains challenging to find a practical coding scheme which approaches capacity. Here we discuss code designs for the detected-jump channel, a degradable channel with practical relevance describing the physics of spontaneous decay of atoms with detected photon emission. We show that this channel can be used to simulate a binary classical channel with both erasures and bit flips. The capacity of the simulated classical channel gives a lower bound on the quantum capacity of the detected-jump channel. When the jump probability is small, it almost equals the quantum capacity. Hence using a classical capacity-approaching code for the simulated classical channel yields a quantum code which approaches the quantum capacity of the detected-jump channel.
A striking feature of quantum error correcting codes is that they can sometimes be used to correct more errors than they can uniquely identify. Indeed, such degenerate codes are known to outperform all non-degenerate codes for very noisy quantum channels. As a result, rather than being chosen randomly according to some i.i.d. distribution, capacity achieving quantum codes must be chosen in a highly structured fashion. While there is no systematic understanding of how to design such codes, I will describe our best understanding of the problem. I will also briefly discuss a single-letter upper bound on the quantum capacity and its relation to the capacitypsilas possible additivity.