A straightforward derivation is given for the Hermitian operator pr ≡ 1r ħi δδrr corresponding to the radial component of linear momentum in the central force problem. The purpose is purely pedagogical; we believe that the radial term of the Schrödinger equation in spherical coordinates is more comprehensible when it appears in the form (pr2/2m)ψ = [(1r ħi δδrr)2/2m]ψ than when it appears, as it does in most textbooks, in the form −ħ22mr2 δδr[r2δδr]ψ. The latter expression is usually arrived at by a tedious transformation of variable done “in the appendix”; instead one may derive pr with a minimum of algebra and with the focus where it belongs, on the concepts of quantum mechanics.A straightforward derivation is given for the Hermitian operator pr ≡ 1r ħi δδrr corresponding to the radial component of linear momentum in the central force problem. The purpose is purely pedagogical; we believe that the radial term of the Schrödinger equation in spherical coordinates is more comprehensible when it appears in the form (pr2/2m)ψ = [(1r ħi δδrr)2/2m]ψ than when it appears, as it does in most textbooks, in the form −ħ22mr2 δδr[r2δδr]ψ. The latter expression is usually arrived at by a tedious transformation of variable done “in the appendix”; instead one may derive pr with a minimum of algebra and with the focus where it belongs, on the concepts of quantum mechanics.

American Journal of PhysicsAug 1, 19642 citations

Radial equation perturbation theory

John P. Killingbeck

Chemical Physics LettersApr 1, 19789 citations

The Inverse-Cube Central Force Field in Quantum Mechanics

George H. Shortley

The problem of the motion of a particle in an inverse-cube central force field is fully treated by quantum mechanics and the results compared with the classical theory. Taking the effective radial potential energy as $\frac{S}{{r}^{2}}$ , although the solutions for negative energy for $0\ensuremath{\geqq}S\ensuremath{\geqq}\frac{\ensuremath{-}{h}^{2}}{32{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{2}\ensuremath{\mu}}$ satisfy the usual boundary conditions, they can not be admitted because the Hamiltonian is not Hermitian in these solutions. This corresponds to taking ${(l+\frac{1}{2})}^{2}$ in place of $l(l+1)$ as the analogue of the square of the classical angular momentum. If we do this, we get a complete analogy between the classical and quantum mechanically allowed solutions, with no quantization. The solutions involve Bessel functions of both real and imaginary orders with both real and imaginary arguments.The problem of the motion of a particle in an inverse-cube central force field is fully treated by quantum mechanics and the results compared with the classical theory. Taking the effective radial potential energy as $\frac{S}{{r}^{2}}$, although the solutions for negative energy for $0\ensuremath{\geqq}S\ensuremath{\geqq}\frac{\ensuremath{-}{h}^{2}}{32{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{2}\ensuremath{\mu}}$ satisfy the usual boundary conditions, they can not be admitted because the Hamiltonian is not Hermitian in these solutions. This corresponds to taking ${(l+\frac{1}{2})}^{2}$ in place of $l(l+1)$ as the analogue of the square of the classical angular momentum. If we do this, we get a complete analogy between the classical and quantum mechanically allowed solutions, with no quantization. The solutions involve Bessel functions of both real and imaginary orders with both real and imaginary arguments.

Physical ReviewJul 1, 193153 citations

Acceptable solutions of the Schrodinger radial equation for a particle in a two-dimensional central potential

J. Etxebarría

The stationary states of a particle in a central potential are usually taken as a product of an angular part Phi and a radial part R. The function R satisfies the so-called radial equation and is usually solved by demanding R to be finite at the origin. In this work we examine the reason for this requirement in the case of a two-dimensional (2D) central force problem. In contrast to some claims commonly accepted, the reason for discarding solutions with divergent R(0) is not the need to have a normalizable wave function. In fact some wave functions can be normalized even if R is singular at the origin. Instead, here we show that if R is singular, the complete wave function psi = Phi R fails to satisfy the full Schrodinger equation, but follows a equation similar to Schrodinger's but with an additional term containing the 2D Dirac delta function or its derivatives. Thus, psi is not a true eigenfunction of the Hamiltonian. In contrast, there are no additional terms in the equation for wave functions psi built from solutions R that remain finite at the origin. A similar situation also occurs for 3D central potentials as has been shown recently. A comparison between the 2D and 3D cases is carried out.The stationary states of a particle in a central potential are usually taken as a product of an angular part Phi and a radial part R. The function R satisfies the so-called radial equation and is usually solved by demanding R to be finite at the origin. In this work we examine the reason for this requirement in the case of a two-dimensional (2D) central force problem. In contrast to some claims commonly accepted, the reason for discarding solutions with divergent R(0) is not the need to have a normalizable wave function. In fact some wave functions can be normalized even if R is singular at the origin. Instead, here we show that if R is singular, the complete wave function psi = Phi R fails to satisfy the full Schrodinger equation, but follows a equation similar to Schrodinger's but with an additional term containing the 2D Dirac delta function or its derivatives. Thus, psi is not a true eigenfunction of the Hamiltonian. In contrast, there are no additional terms in the equation for wave functions psi built from solutions R that remain finite at the origin. A similar situation also occurs for 3D central potentials as has been shown recently. A comparison between the 2D and 3D cases is carried out.

arXiv:2403.13422Mar 20, 20240 citations

\frac{S}{{r}^{2}}

, although the solutions for negative energy for $0\ensuremath{\geqq}S\ensuremath{\geqq}\frac{\ensuremath{-}{h}^{2}}{32{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{2}\ensuremath{\mu}}$ satisfy the usual boundary conditions, they can not be admitted because the Hamiltonian is not Hermitian in these solutions. This corresponds to taking

{(l+\frac{1}{2})}^{2}

in place of

l(l+1)

as the analogue of the square of the classical angular momentum. If we do this, we get a complete analogy between the classical and quantum mechanically allowed solutions, with no quantization. The solutions involve Bessel functions of both real and imaginary orders with both real and imaginary arguments.