Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2403.13422

Acceptable solutions of the Schrodinger radial equation for a particle in a two-dimensional central potential

J. Etxebarría

Published Mar 20, 2024• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The stationary states of a particle in a central potential are usually taken as a product of an angular part Phi and a radial part R. The function R satisfies the so-called radial equation and is usually solved by demanding R to be finite at the origin. In this work we examine the reason for this requirement in the case of a two-dimensional (2D) central force problem. In contrast to some claims commonly accepted, the reason for discarding solutions with divergent R(0) is not the need to have a normalizable wave function. In fact some wave functions can be normalized even if R is singular at the origin. Instead, here we show that if R is singular, the complete wave function psi = Phi R fails to satisfy the full Schrodinger equation, but follows a equation similar to Schrodinger's but with an additional term containing the 2D Dirac delta function or its derivatives. Thus, psi is not a true eigenfunction of the Hamiltonian. In contrast, there are no additional terms in the equation for wave functions psi built from solutions R that remain finite at the origin. A similar situation also occurs for 3D central potentials as has been shown recently. A comparison between the 2D and 3D cases is carried out.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2403.13422

Related papers

Acceptable solutions of the radial Schrödinger equation for a particle in a central potential

J. Etxebarría

We revisit the discussion about the boundary condition at the origin in the Schrödinger radial equation for central potentials. We give a transparent and convincing reason for demanding the radial part R(r) of the wave function to be finite at r = 0, showing that if R(0) diverges the complete wave function ψ does not satisfy the full Schrödinger equation. If R(r) is singular, we show that the corresponding ψ follows an equation similar to Schrödinger's, but with an additional term involving the Dirac delta function or its derivatives at the origin. Although, in general, understanding some of our arguments requires certain knowledge of the theory of distributions, the important case of a behavior R ∝ 1/r near r = 0, which gives rise to a normalizable ψ, is especially simple: The origin of the Dirac delta term is clearly demonstrated by using a slight modification of the usual spherical coordinates. The argument can be easily followed by undergraduate physics students.

American Journal of Physics•Sep 21, 2023•0 citations

Dirac’s reduced radial equations and the problem of additional solutions

Anzor Khelashvili, Teimuraz Nadareishvili

We show that additional solutions must be ignored (in differences of the Schrödinger and Klein–Gordon equations) in the Dirac equation, where usually the second-order radial equation is passed, called the reduced equation, instead of a system. Analogously to the Schrödinger equation, in this process, the Dirac’s delta function appears, which was unnoted during the full history of quantum mechanics. This unphysical term we remove by a boundary condition at the origin. However, the distribution theory imposes on the radial function strong restriction and by this reason practically for all potentials, even regular, use of these reduced equations is not permissible. At the end, we include consideration in the framework of two-dimensional Dirac equation. We show that even here the additional solution does not survive as a result of usual physical requirements.

arXiv:1610.07936•International Journal of Modern Physics E•Jul 1, 2017•12 citations

The Boundary Condition for Reduced Radial Wave Function in Multi-Dimensional Schrodinger Equation

Anzor Khelashvili, T. Nadareishvili

Abstract We study the behavior of reduced radial wave function at the origin for multidimensional Schrodinger equation, where the angular variables are separated by using a hyperspherical formalism and the overall potential is chosen symmetric under rotations in full Euclidean space. It is shown that the rigorous restriction at the origin—Dirichlet boundary condition follows only in three-dimensional space, whereas in other dimensions (more than three) some physical reasonings are necessary in addition. According to our previous investigation the most appropriate is the Hermiticity of Hamiltonian or, equivalently, the conservation of particle number. In this case the preferable is a Dirichlet condition again for regular potentials, but for singular potentials (not soft) other conditions are also allowed together with it. In this meaning the three dimensions is a peculiar one.

Physics of Particles and Nuclei Letters•Aug 1, 2024•0 citations

On the appearance of a Dirac delta term at the origin in the Schroedinger radial equation

J. Etxebarria

We revisit a recent discussion about the boundary condition at the origin in the Schroedinger radial equation for central potentials. Using a slight modification of the usual spherical coordinates, the origin of a previously reported Dirac delta function term at the origin is clearly shown up. As a consequence, a vanishing boundary condition at the origin must be imposed in solving the radial equation, regardless the kind of potential.

arXiv:1305.2782•May 13, 2013•0 citations

What is the boundary condition for the radial wave function of the Schrödinger equation?

Anzor Khelashvili, Teimuraz Nadareishvili

There is much discussion in the mathematical physics literature as well as in quantum mechanics textbooks on spherically symmetric potentials. Nevertheless, there is no consensus about the behavior of the radial function at the origin, particularly for singular potentials. A careful derivation of the radial Schrödinger equation leads to the appearance of a delta function term when the Laplace operator is written in spherical coordinates. As a result, regardless of the behavior of the potential, an additional constraint is imposed on the radial wave function in the form of a vanishing boundary condition at the origin.

arXiv:1009.2694•American Journal of Physics•May 13, 2011•31 citations

Behaviour of the wave function near the origin in the radial case

André Martin

We give one more proof in two and three space dimensions that the irregular solution of the Schrodinger equation, for zero angular momentum, is in fact the solution of an equation containing an extra 'delta function'. We propose another criterium to eliminate the irregular solution which is to require the validity of the virial theorem of which we give a general proof in the classical and quantum cases.

arXiv:quant-ph/0411196•Nov 29, 2004•0 citations
The stationary states of a particle in a central potential are usually taken as a product of an angular part Phi and a radial part R. The function R satisfies the so-called radial equation and is usually solved by demanding R to be finite at the origin. In this work we examine the reason for this requirement in the case of a two-dimensional (2D) central force problem. In contrast to some claims commonly accepted, the reason for discarding solutions with divergent R(0) is not the need to have a normalizable wave function. In fact some wave functions can be normalized even if R is singular at the origin. Instead, here we show that if R is singular, the complete wave function psi = Phi R fails to satisfy the full Schrodinger equation, but follows a equation similar to Schrodinger's but with an additional term containing the 2D Dirac delta function or its derivatives. Thus, psi is not a true eigenfunction of the Hamiltonian. In contrast, there are no additional terms in the equation for wave functions psi built from solutions R that remain finite at the origin. A similar situation also occurs for 3D central potentials as has been shown recently. A comparison between the 2D and 3D cases is carried out.
We revisit the discussion about the boundary condition at the origin in the Schrödinger radial equation for central potentials. We give a transparent and convincing reason for demanding the radial part R(r) of the wave function to be finite at r = 0, showing that if R(0) diverges the complete wave function ψ does not satisfy the full Schrödinger equation. If R(r) is singular, we show that the corresponding ψ follows an equation similar to Schrödinger's, but with an additional term involving the Dirac delta function or its derivatives at the origin. Although, in general, understanding some of our arguments requires certain knowledge of the theory of distributions, the important case of a behavior R ∝ 1/r near r = 0, which gives rise to a normalizable ψ, is especially simple: The origin of the Dirac delta term is clearly demonstrated by using a slight modification of the usual spherical coordinates. The argument can be easily followed by undergraduate physics students.
We show that additional solutions must be ignored (in differences of the Schrödinger and Klein–Gordon equations) in the Dirac equation, where usually the second-order radial equation is passed, called the reduced equation, instead of a system. Analogously to the Schrödinger equation, in this process, the Dirac’s delta function appears, which was unnoted during the full history of quantum mechanics. This unphysical term we remove by a boundary condition at the origin. However, the distribution theory imposes on the radial function strong restriction and by this reason practically for all potentials, even regular, use of these reduced equations is not permissible. At the end, we include consideration in the framework of two-dimensional Dirac equation. We show that even here the additional solution does not survive as a result of usual physical requirements.
Abstract We study the behavior of reduced radial wave function at the origin for multidimensional Schrodinger equation, where the angular variables are separated by using a hyperspherical formalism and the overall potential is chosen symmetric under rotations in full Euclidean space. It is shown that the rigorous restriction at the origin—Dirichlet boundary condition follows only in three-dimensional space, whereas in other dimensions (more than three) some physical reasonings are necessary in addition. According to our previous investigation the most appropriate is the Hermiticity of Hamiltonian or, equivalently, the conservation of particle number. In this case the preferable is a Dirichlet condition again for regular potentials, but for singular potentials (not soft) other conditions are also allowed together with it. In this meaning the three dimensions is a peculiar one.
There is much discussion in the mathematical physics literature as well as in quantum mechanics textbooks on spherically symmetric potentials. Nevertheless, there is no consensus about the behavior of the radial function at the origin, particularly for singular potentials. A careful derivation of the radial Schrödinger equation leads to the appearance of a delta function term when the Laplace operator is written in spherical coordinates. As a result, regardless of the behavior of the potential, an additional constraint is imposed on the radial wave function in the form of a vanishing boundary condition at the origin.