States on Effect Algebras That Have the ϕ-Symmetry Property

David J. Foulis

Symmetry in quantum mechanicsRoughly speaking, a symmetry of some mathematical object is an invertible transformation that leaves all relevant structure as it is.Thus a symmetry of a set is just a bijection (as sets have no further structure, whence invertibility is the only demand on a symmetry), a symmetry of a topological space is a homeomorphism, a symmetry of a Banach space is a linear isometric isomorphism, and, crucially important for this chapter, a symmetry of a Hilbert space H is a unitary operator, i.e., a linear map u : H → H satisfying one and hence all of the following equivalent conditions:• u is invertible and preserves the inner product, i.e., uϕ, uψ = ϕ, ψ (ϕ, ψ ∈ H).The discussion of symmetries in quantum physics is based on the above idea, but the mathematically obvious choices need not be the physically relevant ones.Even in elementary quantum mechanics, where A = B(H), i.e., the C*-algebra of all bounded operators on some Hilbert space H, the concept of a symmetry is already diverse.The main structures whose symmetries we shall study in this chapter are:1.The normal pure state space P 1 (H), i.e., the set of one-dimensional projections on H, with transition probability τ : P 1 (H) × P 1 (H) → [0, 1] defined by (2.44).2. The normal state space D(H), i.e. the convex set of density operators ρ on H. The self-adjoint operators B(H)sa on H, seen as a Jordan algebra (see below).4. The effects E (H) = [0, 1] B(H) , seen as a convex partially ordered set (poset). 5.The projections P(H) on H, seen as an orthocomplemented lattice.6.The unital commutative C*-subalgebras C (B(H)) of B(H), seen as a poset.Each of these structures comes with its own notion of a symmetry, but the main point of this chapter will be to show these notions are equivalent, corresponding in all cases to either unitary or-surprisingly-anti-unitary operators, both merely defined up to a phase.The latter subtlety will open the world of projective unitary group representation to quantum mechanics (without which the existence of spin-1 2 particles such as electrons, and therewith also of ourselves, would be impossible).

W. A. Majewski, Tomasz I. Tylec

Peter Šemrl

Let H be a Hilbert space and E ( H ) the effect algebra on H . A bijective map is called an ortho-order automorphism of E ( H ) if for every we have and . The classical theorem of Ludwig states that every such ϕ is of the form , , for some unitary or antiunitary operator U . It is also known that each bijective map on E ( H ) preserving order and coexistency in both directions is of the same form. Can we improve these two theorems by relaxing the bijectivity assumption and/or replacing the above preserving properties by the weaker assumptions of preserving above relations in one direction only and still get the same conclusion? For both characterizations of automorphisms of effect algebras we will prove the optimal versions and give counterexamples showing the optimality of the obtained results.

Jan Paseka

Mona Khare, Shraddha Roy

The purpose of the present paper is to study the entropy h s (Φ) of a quantum dynamical systems Φ = (L,s,ϕ), where s is a bayessian state on an orthomodular lattice L. Having introduced the notion of entropy h s (ϕ, ) of partition of a Boolean algebra B with respect to a state s and a state preserving homomorphism ϕ, we prove a few results on that, define the entropy of a dynamical system h s (Φ), and show its invariance. The concept of sufficient families is also given and we establish that h s (Φ) comes out to be equal to the supremum of h s (ϕ, ), where varies over any sufficient family. The present theory has then been extended to the quantum dynamical system (L,s,ϕ), which as an effect of the theory of commutators and Bell inequalities can equivalently be replaced by the dynamical system (B,s 0 ,ϕ), where B is a Boolean algebra and s 0 is a state on B.