Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review A

Quantum entanglement and fixed-point bifurcations (9 pages)

Andrew P. Hines, Ross H. McKenzie

Published Jan 1, 2005• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Quantum entanglement and fixed point Hopf bifurcation

Maria Carolina Nemes, K. Furuya, G. Q. Pellegrino +3 more

arXiv:quant-ph/0507026•Physics Letters A•Jan 23, 2006•19 citations

Quantum entanglement and fixed-point bifurcations

Andrew P. Hines, Ross H. McKenzie, Gerard J Milburn

How does the classical phase-space structure for a composite system relate to the entanglement characteristics of the corresponding quantum system? We demonstrate how the entanglement in nonlinear bipartite systems can be associated with a fixed-point bifurcation in the classical dynamics. Using the example of coupled giant spins we show that when a fixed point undergoes a supercritical pitchfork bifurcation, the corresponding quantum state---the ground state---achieves its maximum amount of entanglement near the critical point. We conjecture that this will be a generic feature of systems whose classical limit exhibits such a bifurcation.

arXiv:quant-ph/0308165•Physical Review A•Apr 4, 2005•68 citations

Entanglement in quantum catastrophes (6 pages)

Tobias Brandes, Clive Emary, Neill Lambert

Physical Review A•Jan 1, 2005•0 citations

Bifurcating subsystem symmetric entanglement renormalization in two dimensions

Jonathan F. San Miguel, Arpit Dua, Dominic J. Williamson

We introduce the subsystem symmetry-preserving real-space entanglement renormalization group and apply it to study bifurcating flows generated by linear and fractal subsystem symmetry-protected topological phases in two spatial dimensions. We classify all bifurcating fixed points that are given by subsystem symmetric cluster states with two qubits per unit cell. In particular, we find that the square lattice cluster state is a quotient-bifurcating fixed point, while the cluster states derived from Yoshida's first-order fractal spin liquid models are self-bifurcating fixed points. We discuss the relevance of bifurcating subsystem symmetry-preserving renormalization group fixed points for the classification and equivalence of subsystem symmetry-protected topological phases.

arXiv:2010.15124•Physical review. B./Physical review. B•Jan 29, 2021•17 citations

Entanglement dynamics in chaotic systems (5 pages)

Barry C. Sanders, Shohini Ghose

Physical Review A•Jan 1, 2004•2 citations

Entanglement in bosonic systems (6 pages)

Stein Olav Skrøvseth

Physical Review A•Jan 1, 2005•0 citations
How does the classical phase-space structure for a composite system relate to the entanglement characteristics of the corresponding quantum system? We demonstrate how the entanglement in nonlinear bipartite systems can be associated with a fixed-point bifurcation in the classical dynamics. Using the example of coupled giant spins we show that when a fixed point undergoes a supercritical pitchfork bifurcation, the corresponding quantum state---the ground state---achieves its maximum amount of entanglement near the critical point. We conjecture that this will be a generic feature of systems whose classical limit exhibits such a bifurcation.
We introduce the subsystem symmetry-preserving real-space entanglement renormalization group and apply it to study bifurcating flows generated by linear and fractal subsystem symmetry-protected topological phases in two spatial dimensions. We classify all bifurcating fixed points that are given by subsystem symmetric cluster states with two qubits per unit cell. In particular, we find that the square lattice cluster state is a quotient-bifurcating fixed point, while the cluster states derived from Yoshida's first-order fractal spin liquid models are self-bifurcating fixed points. We discuss the relevance of bifurcating subsystem symmetry-preserving renormalization group fixed points for the classification and equivalence of subsystem symmetry-protected topological phases.