Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2611.02444

Logarithmic Bias of Zero-Noise Extrapolation under 1/f Noise

Chenhui Wang, Weilong Wang, Haoran He, Ping Lv, Zheng Shan

On Aqora:Ch.WangCh.Wang
quant-phSubmitted Nov 2, 2026• Announced Nov 3, 2026• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Zero-noise extrapolation estimates ideal quantum observables by amplifying noise and extrapolating the measured response. Its accuracy depends on whether the extrapolation model captures the physical effect of amplification, including correlations between repeated operations. Here we derive the response of complete multiqubit gate folding in the simultaneous presence of time-local Markovian noise and stationary finite-band 1/f noise. An ordered circuit kernel couples the observable to noise memory; exact block counting shows how folding samples correlations at increasing time separations. The resulting response contains an r^2 ln r coordinate, with a coefficient fixed by the noise spectrum and the integrated forward-inverse control response. Ordinary polynomial Richardson extrapolation leaves a calculable contribution from this coordinate; the three-node rule (1,3,5) retains 2.73 theta. We construct response-matched extrapolation, including a log-domain implementation, that cancels this contribution at the retained order. Explicit bounds separate the remaining control-shape, finite-band, higher-order, and native-offset errors. The theory applies to arbitrary finite multiqubit circuits within the stated control and noise model, and distinguishes removal of memory-induced bias from an unconditional guarantee of the ideal intercept. Single- and ten-qubit numerical examples illustrate the predicted correction and its response dependence.

AI Summary

Zero-noise extrapolation (ZNE) depends on how amplification transforms temporal noise correlations. This paper derives the observable response of complete global unitary folding under simultaneous time-local Markovian noise and stationary classical finite-band $1/f$ noise, allowing arbitrary finite multiqubit circuits with repeatable forward and inverse control blocks. An ordered Dyson expansion, retaining first Markovian order and second colored-noise order, gives an observable-dependent circuit kernel. Exact block-pair counting relates the response’s second difference to covariance integrated over delays around $rT$. Logarithmic memory then yields $E(r)=E^*+\delta+a_1r+a_2r^2+\theta r^2\ln r+R(r)$, with $\theta$ determined by the spectrum and integrated forward–inverse control response. Ordinary quadratic Richardson extrapolation on $(1,3,5)$ retains a logarithmic bias contribution $2.73\theta$; every minimal positive-node Richardson rule of degree at least two has a positive logarithmic moment. Response-matched weights cancel $r$, $r^2$, and $r^2\ln r$, using at least four nodes. The linear estimator has bias bounded by $H_{\rm nat}+\|w\|_1D_{\max}$; a log-domain implementation is also proposed. Single-qubit simulations give biases of $5.55\%$, $1.71\%$, and $-0.26\%$ for exponential, Richardson, and log-domain matched extrapolation, respectively, using different node sets. The four-coordinate model is not an exact closure: control-shape, band-edge, higher-order, and native-offset errors remain. Cancellation does not guarantee the ideal intercept or finite-budget improvement. Log-domain fitting requires nonzero fixed-sign signals and lacks the linear estimator’s certificate. Numerical illustrations are not hardware measurements; the ten-qubit model factorizes Markovian and classical-noise responses.

Some signs of AI-generated textStrong assumptions

Written by gpt-6.1-sol from the paper's full text. Automated: it can be wrong.

Comments
32 pages, 4 figures, 4 tables; 8 pages main text plus Supplemental Material

Related papers

Folding-Free Zero-Noise Extrapolation by Layout-induced Noise Diversity

Debarthi Pal, Yogesh Simmhan

Near term quantum processors operate in a noise dominated regime, motivating error mitigation techniques that recover accurate expectation values without full fault tolerance. Zero Noise Extrapolation (ZNE) is a widely used but biased error mitigation method that lacks rigorous error bounds. Its effective application requires nontrivial technical choices, most notably the selection of noise scaling factors and extrapolation models, making ZNE sensitive to user expertise and often necessitating costly trial and error procedures. Here, we introduce Folding Free Zero Noise Extrapolation (FF-ZNE), a method that removes the need for noise factor selection by achieving effective noise amplification without circuit folding. FF-ZNE exploits isomorphic hardware layouts with distinct native noise profiles, such that executing a fixed circuit across these layouts induces controllable variations in the effective noise strength. Under a depolarizing noise model, we analytically show that the resulting extrapolation admits a fixed linear form, eliminating extrapolator choice and enabling a seamless, user independent mitigation procedure. We further propose two algorithms that identify sets of isomorphic hardware layouts on which a given circuit yields sufficiently distinct expectation values to enable reliable zero noise extrapolation. Experiments on a 133 qubit IBM Quantum device demonstrate that FF-ZNE yields mitigated expectation values with average deviations of ~6% and 4.5% for up to 50 qubit EfficientSU2 (sparse) and Hamiltonian simulation (dense) circuits, respectively. The method is thus scalable and applicable to a broad range of circuits. By eliminating noise factor and extrapolator selection, FF-ZNE transforms zero noise extrapolation from a technique requiring expert tuning into a practical, scalable, and broadly accessible error mitigation method for current quantum hardware.

quant-pharXiv:2603.13949•Mar 17, 2026•1 citation

When Does Zero-Noise Extrapolation Help? A Controlled Bias–Variance Analysis of Error Mitigation for Variational Quantum Chemistry

Sahibjot Singh

Variational Quantum Eigensolvers (VQE) promise molecular ground-state energies on today's noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) processors, but device noise biases the estimated energy severely — under a device-calibrated noise model, the hydrogen molecule's energy error grows from 0.000 mHa (noiseless) to 303.6 mHa (noisy), roughly 190× the "chemical accuracy" threshold of 1.6 mHa that computational chemistry requires. Error-mitigation techniques repair such biases in software, but published results usually report each technique in isolation, making it impossible to know which mitigation to buy with a fixed shot budget. This work answers that question with a controlled comparison. Under identical circuits, noise profiles and shot budgets, I measure the bias and variance of four estimator stacks — raw sampling, twirled-readout extinction (TREX-style calibrated readout inversion), zero-noise extrapolation (ZNE), and ZNE+TREX — across independent random seeds. Three findings emerge. (1) ZNE is a bias–variance tradeoff, not a free lunch: a 7-point Richardson extrapolant reduces the deterministic bias 3200-fold (303.6 → 0.094 mHa) but amplifies statistical noise by a measured factor of up to 25× per run, while TREX removes readout bias with no variance penalty. (2) ZNE has a finite operating window in circuit depth: error recovery falls 99.97% → 99.1% → 95.5% as CX count grows 56 → 112 → 168, and is exhausted entirely for a 1616-CX lithium-hydride circuit at near-term error rates. (3) A noise-bias-tailored repetition code corrects the dominant error axis with logical error rates matching theory (3p², 10p³, 35p⁴ for distances 3, 5, 7) at strictly linear gate overhead (gates = 6d − 6). The results reframe mitigation selection as budget allocation on an empirically measured bias–variance frontier and provide open-source tooling to reproduce every number.

•Sep 30, 2026•0 citations

Benchmarking Error Mitigation: Artefactual Improvements in Zero-Noise Extrapolation

Dominik Köster, Wolfgang Mauerer

Reliable benchmarking of Quantum Error Mitigation (QEM) requires distinguishing genuine improvements from artefacts of the post-processing arithmetic. In this paper, we expose a failure mode in Richardson Zero-Noise Extrapolation (ZNE), a widely used technique routinely (and often implicitly) relied upon in benchmarks and experiments. When noise amplification operates beyond usable signals - a regime that is quickly reached on current hardware for non-trivial circuits - we show that the extrapolation no longer reflects the underlying physics, but collapses into a fixed rescaling of a single noisy measurement, producing a bogus apparent improvement that is independent of noise amplification. This poses a rarely considered threat to the validity of many empirical evaluations in quantum computing. Measurements on real hardware (IQM Euro-Q-Exa) confirm this collapse with ordinary folding alone: as circuit depth erodes the signal, the reported estimate decouples from the truth and overshoots the ideal by up to 21%. We further introduce a matched-cost "garbage-folding" negative control that carries no usable signal yet reports a larger apparent improvement than genuine folding - showing that the magnitude of an improvement is not evidence of its correctness - alongside a zero-cost check flagging the artefact from data a benchmark already holds. We distil both into a short reporting checklist for ZNE benchmarks.

quant-pharXiv:2607.09360•Jul 13, 2026•2 citations

Separability does not certify zero-noise extrapolation: Factorial diagnostics in dynamic quantum circuits

Aryan Kumar

Separately amplifying gate, latency, and mid-circuit measurement errors can simplify zero-noise extrapolation, but a weak interaction between amplification knobs does not establish an accurate zero-noise limit. We distinguish observable separability, response-model adequacy, and calibration of that limit, and test them in a pre-specified $2^3$ factorial experiment on three IBM dynamic circuits. For the primary echoed spectator observable, the latency-measurement coefficient is $b_{LM}=+0.0007$ with a nominal 95% bootstrap interval $[-0.0033,+0.0049]$. A separately planned follow-up meets a $\pm0.005$ equivalence criterion and recovers two injected interactions; both repeat runs nevertheless trigger the drift rule. Multi-knob extrapolations have smaller median absolute errors than the single-knob comparisons, yet all five original strategies exclude the known ideal value for three of six observables. Duration controls support a model-dependent contribution to the spectator deficit from unequal decay rates in native padding and added delay. We give an explicit construction showing why measurements at two measurement-knob levels cannot identify the extrapolated limit without response assumptions. A post-hoc precision analysis and an additive full-factorial estimator expose a further bias-variance trade-off hidden by point-error comparisons. The experiment provides a diagnostic of the implemented response surface, not a certification of physical channel independence or mitigation accuracy.

quant-pharXiv:2610.28705•Oct 21, 2026•0 citations

A finite-shot mean-squared-error boundary for Richardson zero-noise extrapolation

Vicenzo Scavino Alfaro

Zero-noise extrapolation (ZNE) reduces the bias of noisy quantum-circuit measurements, but Richardson coefficients and shot splitting increase their statistical error. This paper determines the noise strength at which Richardson ZNE starts to lower the mean-squared error relative to the unmitigated estimator at a fixed shot budget $B$. The boundary is set by the balance between the leading squared-bias improvement and the leading excess-variance penalty: depending on the variance exponent of the measurement, it shrinks with $B$, becomes a budget threshold, or disappears. For fixed Richardson extrapolation with linear leading bias, the Richardson order and the shot allocation change only constants; the boundary exponent is set by the measured observable and protocol. Deterministic stabilizer measurements and nonzero-variance Hamiltonian or variational-energy measurements have boundaries that shrink as $B^{-1}$ and $B^{-1/2}$, and for finite-outcome shot measurements these two classes are the only ones. Qiskit Aer simulations of Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger (GHZ) and quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) circuits reproduce this separation, and on IBM Quantum hardware ZNE lowers the mean-squared error at equal budget in 75 of 101 instances.

quant-pharXiv:2605.08251•May 8, 2026•2 citations

Hybrid Gaussian-exponential zero-noise extrapolation for periodic circuits

Tao Wang, Yun Shang

Zero-noise extrapolation provides a practical means of suppressing gate errors in current noisy intermediate-scale quantum hardware. The accuracy of the zero-noise estimate depends sensitively on the fidelity of the assumed noise model to the actual error scaling. This work introduces a hybrid Gaussian-exponential extrapolation scheme tailored for quantum circuits with periodic structure, which are ubiquitous in quantum algorithms. Under Pauli diagonal errors, by constructing and analyzing an approximate Markov process for the transfer of Pauli operators, we prove a central limit theorem: the noise amplification factor weakly approaches a log-normal distribution, which motivates augmenting the standard exponential model with Gaussian variance corrections. The resulting model requires no prior noise characterization and applies directly to arbitrary periodic circuits. Performance is assessed on Trotterized Ising dynamics, random circuits, and Grover search algorithm using Qiskit noise simulators. For moderate to large circuit depths, the hybrid model yields measurable reductions in bias relative to previous extrapolation variants, indicating its utility for error mitigation on near-term quantum hardware.

quant-pharXiv:2605.29242•May 29, 2026•0 citations
Zero-noise extrapolation estimates ideal quantum observables by amplifying noise and extrapolating the measured response. Its accuracy depends on whether the extrapolation model captures the physical effect of amplification, including correlations between repeated operations. Here we derive the response of complete multiqubit gate folding in the simultaneous presence of time-local Markovian noise and stationary finite-band 1/f noise. An ordered circuit kernel couples the observable to noise memory; exact block counting shows how folding samples correlations at increasing time separations. The resulting response contains an r^2 ln r coordinate, with a coefficient fixed by the noise spectrum and the integrated forward-inverse control response. Ordinary polynomial Richardson extrapolation leaves a calculable contribution from this coordinate; the three-node rule (1,3,5) retains 2.73 theta. We construct response-matched extrapolation, including a log-domain implementation, that cancels this contribution at the retained order. Explicit bounds separate the remaining control-shape, finite-band, higher-order, and native-offset errors. The theory applies to arbitrary finite multiqubit circuits within the stated control and noise model, and distinguishes removal of memory-induced bias from an unconditional guarantee of the ideal intercept. Single- and ten-qubit numerical examples illustrate the predicted correction and its response dependence.
Zero-noise extrapolation (ZNE) depends on how amplification transforms temporal noise correlations. This paper derives the observable response of complete global unitary folding under simultaneous time-local Markovian noise and stationary classical finite-band 1/f1/f1/f noise, allowing arbitrary finite multiqubit circuits with repeatable forward and inverse control blocks.
An ordered Dyson expansion, retaining first Markovian order and second colored-noise order, gives an observable-dependent circuit kernel. Exact block-pair counting relates the response’s second difference to covariance integrated over delays around rTrTrT. Logarithmic memory then yields E(r)=E∗+δ+a1r+a2r2+θr2ln⁡r+R(r)E(r)=E^*+\delta+a_1r+a_2r^2+\theta r^2\ln r+R(r)E(r)=E∗+δ+a1​r+a2​r2+θr2lnr+R(r), with θ\thetaθ determined by the spectrum and integrated forward–inverse control response. Ordinary quadratic Richardson extrapolation on (1,3,5)(1,3,5)(1,3,5) retains a logarithmic bias contribution 2.73θ2.73\theta2.73θ; every minimal positive-node Richardson rule of degree at least two has a positive logarithmic moment.
Response-matched weights cancel rrr, r2r^2r2, and r2ln⁡rr^2\ln rr2lnr, using at least four nodes. The linear estimator has bias bounded by Hnat+∥w∥1Dmax⁡H_{\rm nat}+\|w\|_1D_{\max}Hnat​+∥w∥1​Dmax​; a log-domain implementation is also proposed. Single-qubit simulations give biases of 5.55%5.55\%5.55%, 1.71%1.71\%1.71%, and −0.26%-0.26\%−0.26% for exponential, Richardson, and log-domain matched extrapolation, respectively, using different node sets.
The four-coordinate model is not an exact closure: control-shape, band-edge, higher-order, and native-offset errors remain. Cancellation does not guarantee the ideal intercept or finite-budget improvement. Log-domain fitting requires nonzero fixed-sign signals and lacks the linear estimator’s certificate. Numerical illustrations are not hardware measurements; the ten-qubit model factorizes Markovian and classical-noise responses.
Near term quantum processors operate in a noise dominated regime, motivating error mitigation techniques that recover accurate expectation values without full fault tolerance. Zero Noise Extrapolation (ZNE) is a widely used but biased error mitigation method that lacks rigorous error bounds. Its effective application requires nontrivial technical choices, most notably the selection of noise scaling factors and extrapolation models, making ZNE sensitive to user expertise and often necessitating costly trial and error procedures. Here, we introduce Folding Free Zero Noise Extrapolation (FF-ZNE), a method that removes the need for noise factor selection by achieving effective noise amplification without circuit folding. FF-ZNE exploits isomorphic hardware layouts with distinct native noise profiles, such that executing a fixed circuit across these layouts induces controllable variations in the effective noise strength. Under a depolarizing noise model, we analytically show that the resulting extrapolation admits a fixed linear form, eliminating extrapolator choice and enabling a seamless, user independent mitigation procedure. We further propose two algorithms that identify sets of isomorphic hardware layouts on which a given circuit yields sufficiently distinct expectation values to enable reliable zero noise extrapolation. Experiments on a 133 qubit IBM Quantum device demonstrate that FF-ZNE yields mitigated expectation values with average deviations of ~6% and 4.5% for up to 50 qubit EfficientSU2 (sparse) and Hamiltonian simulation (dense) circuits, respectively. The method is thus scalable and applicable to a broad range of circuits. By eliminating noise factor and extrapolator selection, FF-ZNE transforms zero noise extrapolation from a technique requiring expert tuning into a practical, scalable, and broadly accessible error mitigation method for current quantum hardware.
Variational Quantum Eigensolvers (VQE) promise molecular ground-state energies on today's noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) processors, but device noise biases the estimated energy severely — under a device-calibrated noise model, the hydrogen molecule's energy error grows from 0.000 mHa (noiseless) to 303.6 mHa (noisy), roughly 190× the "chemical accuracy" threshold of 1.6 mHa that computational chemistry requires. Error-mitigation techniques repair such biases in software, but published results usually report each technique in isolation, making it impossible to know which mitigation to buy with a fixed shot budget. This work answers that question with a controlled comparison. Under identical circuits, noise profiles and shot budgets, I measure the bias and variance of four estimator stacks — raw sampling, twirled-readout extinction (TREX-style calibrated readout inversion), zero-noise extrapolation (ZNE), and ZNE+TREX — across independent random seeds. Three findings emerge. (1) ZNE is a bias–variance tradeoff, not a free lunch: a 7-point Richardson extrapolant reduces the deterministic bias 3200-fold (303.6 → 0.094 mHa) but amplifies statistical noise by a measured factor of up to 25× per run, while TREX removes readout bias with no variance penalty. (2) ZNE has a finite operating window in circuit depth: error recovery falls 99.97% → 99.1% → 95.5% as CX count grows 56 → 112 → 168, and is exhausted entirely for a 1616-CX lithium-hydride circuit at near-term error rates. (3) A noise-bias-tailored repetition code corrects the dominant error axis with logical error rates matching theory (3p², 10p³, 35p⁴ for distances 3, 5, 7) at strictly linear gate overhead (gates = 6d − 6). The results reframe mitigation selection as budget allocation on an empirically measured bias–variance frontier and provide open-source tooling to reproduce every number.
Reliable benchmarking of Quantum Error Mitigation (QEM) requires distinguishing genuine improvements from artefacts of the post-processing arithmetic. In this paper, we expose a failure mode in Richardson Zero-Noise Extrapolation (ZNE), a widely used technique routinely (and often implicitly) relied upon in benchmarks and experiments. When noise amplification operates beyond usable signals - a regime that is quickly reached on current hardware for non-trivial circuits - we show that the extrapolation no longer reflects the underlying physics, but collapses into a fixed rescaling of a single noisy measurement, producing a bogus apparent improvement that is independent of noise amplification. This poses a rarely considered threat to the validity of many empirical evaluations in quantum computing. Measurements on real hardware (IQM Euro-Q-Exa) confirm this collapse with ordinary folding alone: as circuit depth erodes the signal, the reported estimate decouples from the truth and overshoots the ideal by up to 21%. We further introduce a matched-cost "garbage-folding" negative control that carries no usable signal yet reports a larger apparent improvement than genuine folding - showing that the magnitude of an improvement is not evidence of its correctness - alongside a zero-cost check flagging the artefact from data a benchmark already holds. We distil both into a short reporting checklist for ZNE benchmarks.
Separately amplifying gate, latency, and mid-circuit measurement errors can simplify zero-noise extrapolation, but a weak interaction between amplification knobs does not establish an accurate zero-noise limit. We distinguish observable separability, response-model adequacy, and calibration of that limit, and test them in a pre-specified 232^323 factorial experiment on three IBM dynamic circuits. For the primary echoed spectator observable, the latency-measurement coefficient is bLM=+0.0007b_{LM}=+0.0007bLM​=+0.0007 with a nominal 95% bootstrap interval [−0.0033,+0.0049][-0.0033,+0.0049][−0.0033,+0.0049]. A separately planned follow-up meets a ±0.005\pm0.005±0.005 equivalence criterion and recovers two injected interactions; both repeat runs nevertheless trigger the drift rule. Multi-knob extrapolations have smaller median absolute errors than the single-knob comparisons, yet all five original strategies exclude the known ideal value for three of six observables. Duration controls support a model-dependent contribution to the spectator deficit from unequal decay rates in native padding and added delay. We give an explicit construction showing why measurements at two measurement-knob levels cannot identify the extrapolated limit without response assumptions. A post-hoc precision analysis and an additive full-factorial estimator expose a further bias-variance trade-off hidden by point-error comparisons. The experiment provides a diagnostic of the implemented response surface, not a certification of physical channel independence or mitigation accuracy.
Zero-noise extrapolation (ZNE) reduces the bias of noisy quantum-circuit measurements, but Richardson coefficients and shot splitting increase their statistical error. This paper determines the noise strength at which Richardson ZNE starts to lower the mean-squared error relative to the unmitigated estimator at a fixed shot budget BBB. The boundary is set by the balance between the leading squared-bias improvement and the leading excess-variance penalty: depending on the variance exponent of the measurement, it shrinks with BBB, becomes a budget threshold, or disappears. For fixed Richardson extrapolation with linear leading bias, the Richardson order and the shot allocation change only constants; the boundary exponent is set by the measured observable and protocol. Deterministic stabilizer measurements and nonzero-variance Hamiltonian or variational-energy measurements have boundaries that shrink as B−1B^{-1}B−1 and B−1/2B^{-1/2}B−1/2, and for finite-outcome shot measurements these two classes are the only ones. Qiskit Aer simulations of Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger (GHZ) and quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) circuits reproduce this separation, and on IBM Quantum hardware ZNE lowers the mean-squared error at equal budget in 75 of 101 instances.
Zero-noise extrapolation provides a practical means of suppressing gate errors in current noisy intermediate-scale quantum hardware. The accuracy of the zero-noise estimate depends sensitively on the fidelity of the assumed noise model to the actual error scaling. This work introduces a hybrid Gaussian-exponential extrapolation scheme tailored for quantum circuits with periodic structure, which are ubiquitous in quantum algorithms. Under Pauli diagonal errors, by constructing and analyzing an approximate Markov process for the transfer of Pauli operators, we prove a central limit theorem: the noise amplification factor weakly approaches a log-normal distribution, which motivates augmenting the standard exponential model with Gaussian variance corrections. The resulting model requires no prior noise characterization and applies directly to arbitrary periodic circuits. Performance is assessed on Trotterized Ising dynamics, random circuits, and Grover search algorithm using Qiskit noise simulators. For moderate to large circuit depths, the hybrid model yields measurable reductions in bias relative to previous extrapolation variants, indicating its utility for error mitigation on near-term quantum hardware.