arXiv:2610.41709
A Highly Nondegenerate Photon-Pair Source for Detector-Matched Quantum Key Distribution
Sander van Haagen, Bora Ulu, Alper Ozulker, Wardah Mahmood, Michal Krelina, Utku Tefek, Kadir Durak
Abstract
In a commercial entanglement-distribution system over telecom fibre, the single-photon detectors are the largest part of the hardware cost. In entanglement-based quantum key distribution (QKD), both photons of each pair must be detected. With two telecom photons, each arm needs either an InGaAs single-photon avalanche diode (SPAD) of low efficiency or a superconducting nanowire single-photon detector (SNSPD) with its own cryostat. We study a highly nondegenerate photon-pair source that needs a telecom detector on one arm only. Two periodically poled KTiOPO$_4$ (ppKTP) crystals pumped at 405~nm emit pairs at 548 and 1550~nm. A Si-SPAD with 82\% efficiency detects the 548~nm photon at the source node, and only the 1550~nm photon travels through fibre. A first, unoptimised module in a polarisation-correlated configuration generates about $1.5\times10^6$ pairs/s per mW of pump power. It collects 13\% of the pairs on the 548~nm arm and 23\% on the 1550~nm arm. In an asymptotic BBM92 model, we compare its links with generic $2\times1550$~nm links that use a bright published source at the same pump power. At 50~km, our link with one SNSPD costs about 25\% more per secret bit than the generic link with one SNSPD. With optimistic target values of 52\% collection and twice the brightness, it costs about 40\% as much as the generic link with two SNSPDs. Our link without a cryostat then costs about 70\% less than the generic link with one SNSPD. If every link runs at its own best pump power, the two-SNSPD link is again the cheapest. The source can also serve clock synchronisation and detector calibration, which need only time-correlated pairs. All key rates assume the entangled configuration of the source, which is under development.
AI Summary
The paper asks whether highly nondegenerate photon pairs can reduce detector costs in fibre-based entanglement QKD by keeping a visible photon local and transmitting only its telecom partner. It characterises a compact, 405-nm-pumped, crossed-ppKTP source emitting at 548 and 1550 nm. Singles and coincidence measurements give an inferred generation rate of approximately $1.5\times10^6$ pairs/s/mW; dead-time-corrected heralding efficiencies, divided by detector efficiencies, imply collection efficiencies of 13.5% and 23.0%, respectively. An asymptotic BBM92 rate model includes detector dead time, afterpulsing and accidental coincidences, and compares Si-SPAD/telecom-detector links with published-source-based $2\times1550$-nm configurations. At 50 km and equal 14.5-mW pump power, the measured-source parameters predict about 11 kbit/s with one SNSPD, costing $376/Gbit over two years versus $301/Gbit for the generic one-SNSPD link. A target source with 52% collection on both arms, twice the brightness and improved loop transmission predicts 150 kbit/s and $27/Gbit, versus $66/Gbit for two SNSPDs. Optimising each link’s pump power instead makes the two-SNSPD comparator cheapest, at $15/Gbit versus $23/Gbit for the target source. Crucially, the measured configuration is expected to be separable and cannot generate BBM92 key: all key rates assume an entangled Sagnac configuration still under development. Other stated limitations include unverified simultaneous brightness and collection targets, residual afterpulsing, approximate component prices, omitted finite-key effects and fibre dispersion, assumed polarisation compensation, and count-rate-dependent timing jitter. The main rate comparisons also omit a dead-time-attack countermeasure whose estimated penalties are reported separately.
Written by gpt-6.1-sol from the paper's full text. Automated: it can be wrong.