arXiv:2610.40561
Grow, Compress, and Perturb: A Hybrid Quantum-Classical Pathway to Scalable Quantum Chemistry on Quantum Computers
Hugo D. Nogueira, Siwar Badreddine, Olivier Adjoua, Diata Traore, Guillaume Michel, Jean-Philip Piquemal
Abstract
While Variational Quantum Eigensolver (VQE) variants are among the leading candidates for electronic structure calculations on quantum computers, gradient-based operator selection limits their scalability. To solve this, we introduce the Hamiltonian-gradient-free VULCAN (Variational Upbuilding, Layered Compression, Adaptive N-body perturbation) layered VQE framework. Our method dynamically generates ansatz operators using Variational Double Bracket Flow (VDBF) equations. Combined with a linearly scaling minimal complete pool, it creates a pool 4-12 times smaller than QEB (Qubit-Excitation-Based) pools. By appending entire layers simultaneously, Hamiltonian gradient measurements are completely eliminated. Circuit depth is managed via a grow-then-compress scheme using efficient state-overlap measurements, and qubit requirements are reduced by projecting the Hamiltonian onto a dominant-determinant subspace. Using high-performance emulation up to 32 logical qubits, we achieve chemical accuracy at just 5-20% of the measurement cost of batched ADAPT-VQE for hydrogen chains, BeH2 and H2O. For the 32-qubit C3H6, where batched ADAPT-VQE does not reach chemical accuracy, a single VULCAN layer combined with a GPU-accelerated stochastic Epstein-Nesbet (ENPT2) correction does. This stochastic ENPT2 post-processing step enables early termination at chemical accuracy.
AI Summary
VULCAN addresses the measurement overhead of gradient-based operator selection in adaptive VQE for electronic structure. It constructs a Hamiltonian-informed Pauli pool using a truncated double-bracket-flow commutator, supplements it with a minimal complete pool, and appends and optimizes whole layers while freezing earlier parameters. Optional overlap-guided compression reduces circuit size; determinant-subspace projection reduces register size; classical stochastic Epstein–Nesbet perturbation theory (ENPT2) supplies an energy correction. Benchmarks use noiseless state-vector emulation of hydrogen chains, BeH$_2$, H$_2$O and a 32-qubit C$_3$H$_6$ active space. Without compression, chemical accuracy is reached using 5–20% of the cumulative Pauli-term evaluations of batched QEB-ADAPT-VQE, generally with deeper circuits. Compression lowers CNOT counts below that baseline in four of seven tested cases, all at stretched geometries, reaching 0.14 times the baseline for stretched H$_{10}$. Projected Hamiltonians reach chemical accuracy under exact diagonalization with 23–50% fewer qubits. Single-layer states plus stochastic ENPT2 reach chemical accuracy for 26-qubit H$_2$O and 32-qubit C$_3$H$_6$; the latter has a reported error of $1.0\times10^{-3}$ Ha. The resource estimates count Pauli-term evaluations, not shots; noisy optimization of layers containing roughly $10^3$ parameters remains untested. Only the minimal complete component scales linearly: added pool excitations scale as $O(N^4)$. Neither the pool nor projection preserves particle number or spin, and stretched-chain states can be contaminated. Classical projection preprocessing requires emulation, and ENPT2 retains exponential state-vector memory despite denominator sampling; its C$_3$H$_6$ denominator evaluations take 11.8 GPU-hours. Energies are referenced to finite-basis FCI, not the complete-basis limit.
Central claim may not hold: Only the MCP component scales linearly; the full appended operator pool contains additional O(N^4) excitations that dominate its size. The abstract's pool-size reduction range of 4–12 disagrees with the C3H6 table entry, whose QEB/VULCAN ratio is approximately 24.63. The 5–20% measurement-cost result concerns uncompressed growth and Pauli-term evaluations, whereas compression can raise this proxy cost to 59% of the baseline and finite-shot costs are not established. The stochastic ENPT2 correction still requires full exponentially sized statevectors and classical ansatz emulation, so its demonstrated savings do not establish scalability beyond classical emulation. The stated pool generator vanishes identically for the particle-number-conserving electronic Hamiltonian because sum_i[Z_i,H] = -2[N_e,H] = 0, leaving the reported nonempty VDBF pool unexplained by the defined construction.
Written by gpt-6.1-sol from the paper's full text. Automated: it can be wrong.