Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2610.40158

Inevitability of the Petz transpose map

Jacopo Surace, Chenxu Li, Francesco Buscemi

quant-phSubmitted Oct 29, 2026• Announced Oct 30, 2026• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Bayes' rule is central to classical statistical inference: given a prior and a stochastic model, it determines the corresponding retrodictive conditional probabilities. In quantum theory, however, the question of whether an equally general rule of retrodiction exists and, if so, whether it is uniquely determined remains nontrivial. Here we prove that a retrodiction assignment defined for all priors and channels, which takes each predicted output state back to its prior, must coincide with the Petz transpose map if it is involutive, respects sequential and parallel composition, and agrees with unitary inversion. The theorem holds for channels between finite-dimensional full matrix algebras, with the input and output spaces restricted to the supports of the corresponding reference states. In particular, affinity under probabilistic mixtures and the characteristic square-root dependence on the reference states follow from these requirements rather than being postulated. Without involutivity, the remaining requirements characterize a family of doubly rotated Petz maps. Our result thus explains why the Petz transpose map arises in seemingly different areas of quantum theory: it is the unique quantum analogue of Bayes' rule compatible with these consistency requirements.

AI Summary

The paper asks whether quantum Bayesian retrodiction is uniquely fixed by compositional consistency. A retrodiction assignment must map every channel $\Phi$ taking a prior $\pi$ to $\sigma=\Phi(\pi)$ to a channel taking $\sigma$ back to $\pi$; it need not invert $\Phi$ on other states. For channels between arbitrary finite-dimensional full matrix algebras, the main theorem proves that exactly one such assignment is involutive, reverses sequential composition, preserves parallel composition, and agrees with unitary inversion: the Petz transpose map, $\mathcal R[\Phi](X)=\sqrt\pi\,\Phi^\dagger(\sigma^{-1/2}X\sigma^{-1/2})\sqrt\pi$. Neither affinity under channel mixtures nor continuity is assumed. This resolves the stated axiomatic uniqueness question within this algebraic setting. The proof derives affinity on channels sharing a reference transition using controlled-swap circuits. Comparing an arbitrary assignment with Petz reversal establishes agreement at maximally mixed references. Compression and return channels then reduce the remaining freedom to reference-dependent unitary conjugations; involutivity and tensor compatibility eliminate these rotations. Without involutivity, the remaining axioms characterize doubly rotated Petz maps whose rotations satisfy unitary covariance and tensor compatibility. Requiring continuity in the prior reduces this freedom to $M_\rho=\operatorname{Ad}_{\rho^{it}}$, with one real parameter $t$ common to all systems; involutivity selects $t=0$. Singular reference states are covered only after restricting channels to the corresponding input and output supports, leaving reversal outside the predicted support unspecified. Extensions beyond full matrix algebras, including general infinite-dimensional $C^*$- and von Neumann-algebraic settings, remain open. The theorem characterizes retrodiction, not conditions for accurate error correction.

No sign of AI-generated text

Written by gpt-6.1-sol from the paper's full text. Automated: it can be wrong.

Related papers

Axioms for retrodiction: achieving time-reversal symmetry with a prior

Arthur J. Parzygnat, Francesco Buscemi

We propose a category-theoretic definition of retrodiction and use it to exhibit a time-reversal symmetry for all quantum channels. We do this by introducing retrodiction families and functors, which capture many intuitive properties that retrodiction should satisfy and are general enough to encompass both classical and quantum theories alike. Classical Bayesian inversion and all rotated and averaged Petz recovery maps define retrodiction families in our sense. However, averaged rotated Petz recovery maps, including the universal recovery map of Junge-Renner-Sutter-Wilde-Winter, do not define retrodiction functors, since they fail to satisfy some compositionality properties. Among all the examples we found of retrodiction families, the original Petz recovery map is the only one that defines a retrodiction functor. In addition, retrodiction functors exhibit an inferential time-reversal symmetry consistent with the standard formulation of quantum theory. The existence of such a retrodiction functor seems to be in stark contrast to the many no-go results on time-reversal symmetry for quantum channels. One of the main reasons is because such works defined time-reversal symmetry on the category of quantum channels alone, whereas we define it on the category of quantum channels and quantum states. This fact further illustrates the importance of a prior in time-reversal symmetry.

arXiv:2210.13531•Quantum•May 23, 2023•33 citations

Bayesian inference and retrodiction for faithful states on von Neumann algebras

Pradyut Karmakar, Arthur J. Parzygnat

Retrodiction is the act of inferring a cause from its effects, the most common example of which is Bayesian inference. Retrodiction can be defined by its structural process-theoretic properties, which are mathematically captured by category theory. This categorical definition of retrodiction has recently been shown to potentially isolate the Petz recovery map as a unique universal candidate for quantum Bayesian inference. This paper extends these results to the infinite-dimensional setting on von Neumann algebras. In the process, we provide a pedagogical review of the Petz recovery map in infinite dimensions and its relation to the more commonly used expression in the finite-dimensional setting. We formalize the open question as to whether these categorical axioms for retrodiction do in fact uniquely characterize the Petz recovery map. If such a characterization holds, this would show that Bayesian inversion and the Petz recovery map are structural necessities and not simply useful algorithms for classical and quantum inference.

math.OACross-listedarXiv:2608.20001•Aug 21, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Bayes' Rule and Petz Transpose Map from the Minimum Change Principle

Bai, Ge, Francesco Buscemi, Valerio Scarani

Bayes’ rule, which is routinely used to update beliefs based on new evidence, can be derived from a principle of minimum change. This principle states that updated beliefs must be consistent with new data, while deviating minimally from the prior belief. Here, we introduce a quantum analog of the minimum change principle and use it to derive a quantum Bayes’ rule by minimizing the change between two quantum input-output processes, not just their marginals. This is analogous to the classical case, where Bayes’ rule is obtained by minimizing several distances between the joint input-output distributions. When the change maximizes the fidelity, the quantum minimum change principle has a unique solution, and the resulting quantum Bayes’ rule recovers the Petz transpose map in many cases.

•Aug 28, 2025•0 citations

Schrödinger Bridges via the Hacking of Bayesian Priors in Classical and Quantum Regimes

Clive Cenxin Aw, Peter Sidajaya

Bayes' rule is widely regarded as the canonical prescription for belief updating. We show, however, that one can arbitrarily preserve pre-specified beliefs while appearing to perform Bayesian updates via "prior hacking": engineering a reference prior distribution such that, for a fixed channel and evidence, the update matches a chosen target distribution. We prove that this is generically possible in both classical and quantum settings whenever Bayesian inversions are well-defined (with the Petz recovery map as the quantum analogue to Bayes' rule), and provide constructive algorithms for doing so. We further establish a duality between prior hacking and Schrödinger bridge problems (a key object in statistical physics with applications in generative modelling), yielding in the quantum setting a unique, inference-consistent selection among candidate bridges. This formally establishes the Bayes-like updating that Schrödinger bridges are performing with respect to the process as opposed to the reference prior, both in classical and quantum settings.

quant-pharXiv:2603.18665•Mar 20, 2026•0 citations

Bayesian retrodiction of quantum supermaps

Bai, Ge

The Petz map has been established as a quantum version of the Bayes' rule. It unifies the conceptual belief update rule of a quantum state observed after a forward quantum process, and the operational reverse process that recovers the final state to match the updated belief, effectively counteracting the forward process. Here, we study a higher-order generalization of the quantum Bayes' rule by considering a quantum process undergoing a quantum supermap. For a few families of initial beliefs, we show that a similar unification is possible -- the rules updating the beliefs about quantum channels can be implemented via a "reverse" quantum supermap, termed the retrodiction supermap. The potential applications of retrodiction supermap are demonstrated with examples of improved error correction in quantum cloud computing. Analytical solutions are provided for these families, while a recipe for arbitrary initial beliefs remains an open question.

arXiv:2408.07885•Aug 15, 2024•0 citations

Tomographic Limits of the Petz Recovery Map

Peter Sidajaya, Clive Cenxin Aw, Mingxuan Liu +1 more

The Petz recovery map is considered one of the key candidates for the quantum analogue of Bayesian inference and Jeffrey's conditionalization. Since, there seems to be a natural connection between Bayesian inference and the notion of state tomography, it is natural to ask if the Petz recovery can be used for this latter task. In this paper, we discuss such recent results on iterated Petz recovery and relate them to Bayesian approaches to quantum state tomography. We highlight the limitations of direct Petz iteration and show how an extended Petz construction, by lifting the inference problem to a classical distribution over candidate quantum states, recovers the structure of Bayesian and maximum likelihood tomography. This provides perspective on the modifications or nuances required for a Petz approach to quantum retrodiction to perform quantum state tomography.

quant-pharXiv:2608.21309•Aug 24, 2026•0 citations
Bayes' rule is central to classical statistical inference: given a prior and a stochastic model, it determines the corresponding retrodictive conditional probabilities. In quantum theory, however, the question of whether an equally general rule of retrodiction exists and, if so, whether it is uniquely determined remains nontrivial. Here we prove that a retrodiction assignment defined for all priors and channels, which takes each predicted output state back to its prior, must coincide with the Petz transpose map if it is involutive, respects sequential and parallel composition, and agrees with unitary inversion. The theorem holds for channels between finite-dimensional full matrix algebras, with the input and output spaces restricted to the supports of the corresponding reference states. In particular, affinity under probabilistic mixtures and the characteristic square-root dependence on the reference states follow from these requirements rather than being postulated. Without involutivity, the remaining requirements characterize a family of doubly rotated Petz maps. Our result thus explains why the Petz transpose map arises in seemingly different areas of quantum theory: it is the unique quantum analogue of Bayes' rule compatible with these consistency requirements.
The paper asks whether quantum Bayesian retrodiction is uniquely fixed by compositional consistency. A retrodiction assignment must map every channel Φ\PhiΦ taking a prior π\piπ to σ=Φ(π)\sigma=\Phi(\pi)σ=Φ(π) to a channel taking σ\sigmaσ back to π\piπ; it need not invert Φ\PhiΦ on other states.
For channels between arbitrary finite-dimensional full matrix algebras, the main theorem proves that exactly one such assignment is involutive, reverses sequential composition, preserves parallel composition, and agrees with unitary inversion: the Petz transpose map, R[Φ](X)=π Φ†(σ−1/2Xσ−1/2)π\mathcal R[\Phi](X)=\sqrt\pi\,\Phi^\dagger(\sigma^{-1/2}X\sigma^{-1/2})\sqrt\piR[Φ](X)=π​Φ†(σ−1/2Xσ−1/2)π​. Neither affinity under channel mixtures nor continuity is assumed. This resolves the stated axiomatic uniqueness question within this algebraic setting.
The proof derives affinity on channels sharing a reference transition using controlled-swap circuits. Comparing an arbitrary assignment with Petz reversal establishes agreement at maximally mixed references. Compression and return channels then reduce the remaining freedom to reference-dependent unitary conjugations; involutivity and tensor compatibility eliminate these rotations.
Without involutivity, the remaining axioms characterize doubly rotated Petz maps whose rotations satisfy unitary covariance and tensor compatibility. Requiring continuity in the prior reduces this freedom to Mρ=Ad⁡ρitM_\rho=\operatorname{Ad}_{\rho^{it}}Mρ​=Adρit​, with one real parameter ttt common to all systems; involutivity selects t=0t=0t=0.
Singular reference states are covered only after restricting channels to the corresponding input and output supports, leaving reversal outside the predicted support unspecified. Extensions beyond full matrix algebras, including general infinite-dimensional C∗C^*C∗- and von Neumann-algebraic settings, remain open. The theorem characterizes retrodiction, not conditions for accurate error correction.
We propose a category-theoretic definition of retrodiction and use it to exhibit a time-reversal symmetry for all quantum channels. We do this by introducing retrodiction families and functors, which capture many intuitive properties that retrodiction should satisfy and are general enough to encompass both classical and quantum theories alike. Classical Bayesian inversion and all rotated and averaged Petz recovery maps define retrodiction families in our sense. However, averaged rotated Petz recovery maps, including the universal recovery map of Junge-Renner-Sutter-Wilde-Winter, do not define retrodiction functors, since they fail to satisfy some compositionality properties. Among all the examples we found of retrodiction families, the original Petz recovery map is the only one that defines a retrodiction functor. In addition, retrodiction functors exhibit an inferential time-reversal symmetry consistent with the standard formulation of quantum theory. The existence of such a retrodiction functor seems to be in stark contrast to the many no-go results on time-reversal symmetry for quantum channels. One of the main reasons is because such works defined time-reversal symmetry on the category of quantum channels alone, whereas we define it on the category of quantum channels and quantum states. This fact further illustrates the importance of a prior in time-reversal symmetry.
Retrodiction is the act of inferring a cause from its effects, the most common example of which is Bayesian inference. Retrodiction can be defined by its structural process-theoretic properties, which are mathematically captured by category theory. This categorical definition of retrodiction has recently been shown to potentially isolate the Petz recovery map as a unique universal candidate for quantum Bayesian inference. This paper extends these results to the infinite-dimensional setting on von Neumann algebras. In the process, we provide a pedagogical review of the Petz recovery map in infinite dimensions and its relation to the more commonly used expression in the finite-dimensional setting. We formalize the open question as to whether these categorical axioms for retrodiction do in fact uniquely characterize the Petz recovery map. If such a characterization holds, this would show that Bayesian inversion and the Petz recovery map are structural necessities and not simply useful algorithms for classical and quantum inference.
Bayes’ rule, which is routinely used to update beliefs based on new evidence, can be derived from a principle of minimum change. This principle states that updated beliefs must be consistent with new data, while deviating minimally from the prior belief. Here, we introduce a quantum analog of the minimum change principle and use it to derive a quantum Bayes’ rule by minimizing the change between two quantum input-output processes, not just their marginals. This is analogous to the classical case, where Bayes’ rule is obtained by minimizing several distances between the joint input-output distributions. When the change maximizes the fidelity, the quantum minimum change principle has a unique solution, and the resulting quantum Bayes’ rule recovers the Petz transpose map in many cases.
Bayes' rule is widely regarded as the canonical prescription for belief updating. We show, however, that one can arbitrarily preserve pre-specified beliefs while appearing to perform Bayesian updates via "prior hacking": engineering a reference prior distribution such that, for a fixed channel and evidence, the update matches a chosen target distribution. We prove that this is generically possible in both classical and quantum settings whenever Bayesian inversions are well-defined (with the Petz recovery map as the quantum analogue to Bayes' rule), and provide constructive algorithms for doing so. We further establish a duality between prior hacking and Schrödinger bridge problems (a key object in statistical physics with applications in generative modelling), yielding in the quantum setting a unique, inference-consistent selection among candidate bridges. This formally establishes the Bayes-like updating that Schrödinger bridges are performing with respect to the process as opposed to the reference prior, both in classical and quantum settings.
The Petz map has been established as a quantum version of the Bayes' rule. It unifies the conceptual belief update rule of a quantum state observed after a forward quantum process, and the operational reverse process that recovers the final state to match the updated belief, effectively counteracting the forward process. Here, we study a higher-order generalization of the quantum Bayes' rule by considering a quantum process undergoing a quantum supermap. For a few families of initial beliefs, we show that a similar unification is possible -- the rules updating the beliefs about quantum channels can be implemented via a "reverse" quantum supermap, termed the retrodiction supermap. The potential applications of retrodiction supermap are demonstrated with examples of improved error correction in quantum cloud computing. Analytical solutions are provided for these families, while a recipe for arbitrary initial beliefs remains an open question.
The Petz recovery map is considered one of the key candidates for the quantum analogue of Bayesian inference and Jeffrey's conditionalization. Since, there seems to be a natural connection between Bayesian inference and the notion of state tomography, it is natural to ask if the Petz recovery can be used for this latter task. In this paper, we discuss such recent results on iterated Petz recovery and relate them to Bayesian approaches to quantum state tomography. We highlight the limitations of direct Petz iteration and show how an extended Petz construction, by lifting the inference problem to a classical distribution over candidate quantum states, recovers the structure of Bayesian and maximum likelihood tomography. This provides perspective on the modifications or nuances required for a Petz approach to quantum retrodiction to perform quantum state tomography.