Machine learning (ML) techniques are increasingly explored to analyse gravitational wave (GW) data expected from the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA). At the same time, advances in quantum computing have stimulated interest in quantum machine learning as a potential alternative to conventional approaches. We investigate the applicability of quantum, hybrid quantum-classical, and classical ML models to two tasks relevant for LISA observations of massive black hole binaries: GW signal detection and merger prediction. Using the Sangria dataset from the LISA Data Challenge, we benchmark several quantum architectures, including variational quantum classifiers (VQCs), post VQC hybrid models, quantum kernel methods, data reuploading classifiers, and quantum long short-term memory (QLSTM) networks, against classical support vector machines, multilayer perceptrons, recurrent neural networks, and LSTM networks. The models are trained on labelled data derived from the Sangria training dataset and evaluated on the corresponding blind dataset. For signal detection, several quantum models match or outperform classical baselines. In particular, the best performing hybrid post VQC architecture correctly identifies all signal samples in the blind dataset, while the standard VQC and data reuploading classifier achieve competitive detection rates. For merger detection and coalescence time estimation, however, the standard VQC emerges as the most reliable model, successfully localising all detected merger events with the lowest localisation errors. We further analyse the trade-offs between predictive performance, model complexity, and quantum circuit resources. Our results indicate that, although no universal quantum advantage is observed, selected quantum models can provide practical benefits for specific GW analysis tasks and represent promising candidates for future LISA data analysis pipelines.
Machine learning (ML) techniques are increasingly explored to analyse gravitational wave (GW) data expected from the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA). At the same time, advances in quantum computing have stimulated interest in quantum machine learning as a potential alternative to conventional approaches. We investigate the applicability of quantum, hybrid quantum-classical, and classical ML models to two tasks relevant for LISA observations of massive black hole binaries: GW signal detection and merger prediction. Using the Sangria dataset from the LISA Data Challenge, we benchmark several quantum architectures, including variational quantum classifiers (VQCs), post VQC hybrid models, quantum kernel methods, data reuploading classifiers, and quantum long short-term memory (QLSTM) networks, against classical support vector machines, multilayer perceptrons, recurrent neural networks, and LSTM networks. The models are trained on labelled data derived from the Sangria training dataset and evaluated on the corresponding blind dataset. For signal detection, several quantum models match or outperform classical baselines. In particular, the best performing hybrid post VQC architecture correctly identifies all signal samples in the blind dataset, while the standard VQC and data reuploading classifier achieve competitive detection rates. For merger detection and coalescence time estimation, however, the standard VQC emerges as the most reliable model, successfully localising all detected merger events with the lowest localisation errors. We further analyse the trade-offs between predictive performance, model complexity, and quantum circuit resources. Our results indicate that, although no universal quantum advantage is observed, selected quantum models can provide practical benefits for specific GW analysis tasks and represent promising candidates for future LISA data analysis pipelines.
Abstract The field of gravitational wave (GW) detection is progressing rapidly, with several next-generation observatories on the horizon, including LISA. GW data is challenging to analyze due to highly variable signals shaped by source properties and the presence of complex noise. These factors emphasize the need for robust, advanced analysis tools. In this context, we have initiated the development of a low-latency GW detection pipeline based on quantum neural networks (QNNs). Previously, we demonstrated that QNNs can recognize GWs simulated using post-Newtonian approximations in the Newtonian limit. We then extended this work using data from the LISA Consortium, training QNNs to distinguish between noisy GW signals and pure noise. Currently, we are evaluating performance on the Sangria LISA Data Challenge dataset and comparing it against classical methods. Our results show that QNNs can reliably distinguish GW signals embedded in noise, achieving classification accuracies above 98%. Notably, our QNN identified 5 out of 6 mergers in the Sangria blind dataset. The missed event corresponds to the lowest signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) source, indicating that model sensitivity improvements are needed for weak signals. This can potentially be addressed using additional mock training datasets, and by testing different QNN architectures and ansatzes. Compared with a recurrent neural network baseline, the QNN achieves comparable accuracy on higher-SNR events while using orders of magnitude fewer trainable parameters. These results demonstrate the feasibility of QNNs for GW detection and motivate further investigation of quantum-enhanced data analysis techniques for LISA.
Quantum Machine Learning (QML) has emerged as an interdisciplinary field that harnesses the potential of quantum computing to revolutionize classical machine learning paradigms. This paper presents a benchmarking study focused on four quantum classifier algorithms: Quantum Support Vector Classifier (QSVC), Variational Quantum Circuit (VQC), Quantum Neural Network Classifier (QNNC) and Pegasos Quantum Support Vector Classifier (PegasosQSVC). These quantum classifiers hold promise for unlocking quantum advantages in classification tasks. However, a systematic assessment of their performance across diverse datasets is yet to be fully explored. In this research study, we evaluate and compare the classification performance of quantum machine learning classifiers on various datasets (Breast Cancer, Diabetes, and Titanic) and compare them to a classical model. Our findings revealed that PegasosQSVC consistently maintained high performance across all datasets with the highest average accuracy, recall, and F1-score values of 0.81, 0.72, and 0.71, respectively, followed by VQC, followed by VQC, while QSVC and QNNC perform variably. Nevertheless, QSVC was found to balance performance and training time, achieving an average accuracy of 0.81 and a training time of 177 seconds. Overall, the classical model surpassed QML models as it was up to 10% higher in average accuracy.
The classification and regression of particle collision events constitute a persistent computational challenge in experimental high energy physics, where large volumes of simulated data must be processed with both speed and precision. This work carries out a systematic comparison of four classical machine learning architectures, support vector machines (SVM), artificial neural networks (ANN), convolutional neural networks (CNN), and long short-term memory (LSTM) networks against their quantum counterparts: quantum SVM (QSVM), quantum neural networks (QNN), quantum CNN (QCNN), and quantum LSTM (QLSTM). All models are trained on simulated proton-proton collision events with electron-positron and muon-antimuon final states from the CERN Open Data portal, using transverse-momentum components as input features and transverse-momentum magnitude as the regression target. Classical architectures, and in particular the CNN and LSTM, achieve marginally better quantitative performance under current hardware and dataset constraints. Quantum models, however, reach competitive accuracy with substantially fewer trainable parameters: the QCNN reproduces the performance of the deep classical CNN using only four qubits and a circuit of depth three, pointing to a genuine parameter-efficiency advantage on near-term quantum devices. A baseline analysis confirms that the regression problem is non-trivial for shallow polynomial fits, supporting the relevance of the architectural comparison. These results characterize the trade-offs between classical and quantum approaches under realistic, resource-constrained conditions and provide a benchmark for future studies on actual quantum hardware.
Breast cancer is rated as one of the top leading diagnosed and deadliest cancers affecting women worldwide and causing high mortality rate among cancers. With the data-driven applications, hybrid quantum-classical machine learning models have evolved as significant alternatives for handling complex feature spaces with the growing interest in quantum computing. This paper presents a systematic comparative study of classical and quantum machine learning approaches for breast cancer classification using the Wisconsin Breast Cancer Dataset. In this architecture we have preprocessed classical feature vectors using standard normalized techniques and parallelly quantum states are mapped through data embedding techniques which relies on parameterized rotational gates. In this work we have implemented all quantum models using the Pennylane library, resulting in hybrid quantum–classical optimization on near-term quantum simulators. The comparison results in multiple classical and quantum models. In classical we have Support Vector Machine (SVM), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), which are compared with the quantum-based models such as the Variational Quantum Classifier (VQC), Quantum Support Vector Machine (QSVM) and Quantum Convolutional Neural Network (QCNN). In QSVM, we have performed dimensionality reduction using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) before to quantum embedding, and quantum-generated features are used to train a classical linear SVM. The evaluation metrics results in accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, ROC curves and confusion matrices. The classical models achieves the accuracy in the range of 94%-96%, whereas competitive performance of quantum models demonstrate depending on the embedding strategy and circuit configuration. In the implemented quantum models, the variational quantum classifier achieved the highest classification accuracy of 96.06%, surpassing other evaluated models. These results demonstrate quantum embedding combined with variational quantum circuits can effectively capture discriminative patterns in medical datasets, indicating the implementation of quantum machine learning models for breast cancer diagnosis with the present quantum simulating platforms.
This study evaluates the use of Quantum Convolutional Neural Networks (QCNNs) for identifying signals resembling Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) within simulated astrophysical datasets in the form of light curves. The task addressed here focuses on distinguishing GRB-like signals from background noise in simulated Cherenkov Telescope Array Observatory (CTAO) data, the next-generation astrophysical observatory for very high-energy gamma-ray science. QCNNs, a quantum counterpart of classical Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), leverage quantum principles to process and analyze high-dimensional data efficiently. We implemented a hybrid quantum-classical machine learning technique using the Qiskit framework, with the QCNNs trained on a quantum simulator. Several QCNN architectures were tested, employing different encoding methods such as Data Reuploading and Amplitude encoding. Key findings include that QCNNs achieved accuracy comparable to classical CNNs, often surpassing 90%, while using fewer parameters, potentially leading to more efficient models in terms of computational resources. A benchmark study further examined how hyperparameters like the number of qubits and encoding methods affected performance, with more qubits and advanced encoding methods generally enhancing accuracy but increasing complexity. QCNNs showed robust performance on time-series datasets, successfully detecting GRB signals with high precision. The research is a pioneering effort in applying QCNNs to astrophysics, offering insights into their potential and limitations. This work sets the stage for future investigations to fully realize the advantages of QCNNs in astrophysical data analysis.
A potential path forward is Quantum Machine Learning (QML), which aims to leverage quantum computing in conjunction with classical machine learning to enhance computing efficiency and the expressiveness of models. In this paper, two different quantum classifiers - Variational Quantum Classifier (VQC) and Quantum Kernel Support Vector Machine (QSVM) - are compared with three classical classifiers as baseline classifiers - Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine (SVM), and a Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) - on the Breast Cancer Wisconsin dataset. The quantum circuits were created in the PennyLane framework and simulated on a classical backend. However, in terms of accuracy, classical Logistic Regression performed better with an accuracy of 97.8%, classical SVM and QSVM with an accuracy of 95.6% each, although the Quantum VQC achieved a lower accuracy of 88.9% and had a recall of 100% for the benign class, though it correctly identified only 12 of the 17 malignant cases (a malignant-class recall of approximately 70.6%). The drawback of quantum models is the higher training time; however, since the quantum circuit needs to be classically simulated, the quantum SVM took 23.29 seconds compared to less than 0.01 seconds for the classical linear models. These results indicate that for small structured datasets, classifiers based on quantum computing have not yet surpassed well-tuned classical counterparts. In some respects (e.g., benign-class recall), they perform competitively, though not on malignant-class recall, where the VQC in particular performed worse than the classical baselines, which is worth further investigation on real quantum computers.