Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2610.38183

Quantum advantage by designing beneficial dissipation from lossless dynamics

Zeng-Zhao Li, Xiao Xue

quant-phphysics.chem-phSubmitted Oct 28, 2026• Announced Oct 29, 2026• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Passive loss removes probability from a system and therefore seems unable to improve an unconditional target. This intuition is exact for classical population dynamics under sink-only removal: passive killing obeys a finite-strength monotonicity principle even after optimization over the remaining controls. Here we show that coherent quantum dynamics can violate this classical monotonicity because coherent contributions to the final target can interfere destructively. We derive a trajectory-level criterion that determines when such a detrimental contribution is physically accessible to passive loss and accumulates into a net unconditional benefit. The criterion is encoded in a response operator constructed entirely from the lossless dynamics: its spectrum determines whether weak passive loss can help, while its principal eigenvector identifies the optimal environmental mode. Applying this criterion to vibronically assisted transfer, we identify a beneficial mode formed by coherently combining two individually detrimental local loss directions. The predicted mode remains near-optimal at finite loss, producing an \(8.73\%\) enhancement over the independently optimized lossless benchmark, compared with \(9.52\%\) under full finite-loss optimization. Our results establish how coherent quantum dynamics can evade classical passive-loss monotonicity and provide a general task-dependent principle for designing beneficial passive environments from lossless dynamics.

AI Summary

Can irreversible passive loss improve an unconditional quantum target, without postselection or population recycling? The paper contrasts quantum dynamics with classical Markov processes, where sink-only killing cannot increase any nonnegative terminal reward, even after optimizing the remaining controls: $R_{\rm cl}^{\rm opt}(\gamma)\le R_{\rm cl}^{\rm opt}(0)$ for all $\gamma\ge0$. For quantum dynamics, it derives a weak-loss response operator from the lossless forward state $\rho_s$ and backward target effect $E_s$: $G=-(1/T)P_{\rm adm}\int_0^T\{\rho_s,E_s\}/2\,ds\,P_{\rm adm}$. If every positive, trace-normalized loss operator on the admissible subspace is implementable, a positive first-order benefit exists exactly when $\lambda_{\max}(G)>0$; a principal eigenvector specifies the optimal rank-one loss mode. A three-state Bell-target example illustrates why instantaneous signed response must also be physically accessible and accumulate favourably along a fixed mode. Numerical tests use a donor–acceptor vibronic model. A coherent superposition of two individually detrimental local loss directions captures $82.5\%$ of the unrestricted optimal weak-loss response. Fixing this lossless-designed mode and reoptimizing frequency and duration gives an $8.73\%$ finite-loss improvement over the independently optimized lossless benchmark; full environmental reoptimization gives $9.52\%$. Incoherent mixtures remain below that benchmark over the tested interval $0<\gamma/J\le4$. Auxiliary-level simulations verify convergence to the effective loss model. The spectral criterion concerns first-order response, not arbitrary finite loss. Numerical advantages are restricted to the same one-quantum resonance operating branch, rather than unrestricted coherent control; the proposed reservoir realization is simulated, not experimentally demonstrated.

Little sign of AI-generated textUnclear novelty

Error found: The claimed iff criterion for beneficial weak passive loss only characterizes strictly positive first-order improvement: when G=0, admissible passive loss can still improve the unconditional target at second order.

Written by gpt-6.1-sol from the paper's full text. Automated: it can be wrong.

Comments
10 pages, 4 figures

Related papers

Optimal Coherent Control to Counteract Dissipation

Simeon Sauer, Clemens Gneiting, Andreas Buchleitner

We study to what extent the detrimental impact of dissipation on quantum properties can be compensated by suitable coherent dynamics. To this end, we develop a general method to determine the control Hamiltonian that optimally counteracts a given dissipation mechanism, in order to sustain the desired property, and apply it to two exemplary target properties: the coherence of a decaying two-level system and the entanglement of two qubits in the presence of local dissipation.

arXiv:1302.4690•Physical Review Letters•Jul 18, 2013•40 citations

Introduction to quantum control: From basic concepts to applications in quantum technologies

Christiane P. Koch

Quantum control refers to our ability to manipulate quantum systems. This tutorial-style chapter focuses on the use of classical electromagnetic fields to steer the system dynamics. In this approach, the quantum nature of the control stems solely from the underlying dynamics, through the exploitation of destructive and constructive interference to reach the control target. We first discuss two basic control principles -- coherent control which uses manipulation in frequency or time to design these interferences, and adiabatic following where access to the control target is enabled by tracking the time-dependent ground state. For complex control targets and system dynamics that exceed the scope of these basic principles, optimal control theory provides a powerful suite of tools to design the necessary protocols. A key consideration for the successful application of optimal control theory is a proper choice of the optimization functional. All concepts are illustrated using recent work from my research group, with a focus on controlling atoms and superconducting qubits. The chapter concludes with an outlook on integrating coherent control with engineered dissipation and a discussion of open questions in the field.

quant-pharXiv:2512.04990•Dec 5, 2025•0 citations

Metastability in Quantum Dynamics for Optimization

Yuchen Lu, Zherui Chen, Tongyang Li

Metastability separates apparent equilibration from true convergence: a dynamical system can remain near an intermediate state long before reaching its stationary state. In quantum dynamics used for optimization, such a plateau can delay progress toward a target concentrated near the global minimizers of a nonconvex potential. In this paper, we initiate the study of the general mechanisms by which coherent evolution and dissipation shape metastability, using quantum Langevin dynamics (QLD) as a concrete example [CLW+25], where the objective function is encoded in the potential and coherent transfer between wells interacts with tunable dissipation. To quantify this interaction, we solve a two-state model precisely and derive a spectral-separation criterion in terms of tunneling frequency, dissipation strength, and damping imbalance. Extending the analysis to multi-state models, we show that sufficiently weak tunneling between wells can separate slow population transfer from fast relaxation within each well. In addition, we establish conditions under which changing the structure of dissipation shortens the time needed to approach a prescribed target state. Numerical experiments on double-well and multi-well potentials demonstrate these improvements while keeping the target and accuracy fixed and accounting for the time spent on control.

quant-pharXiv:2610.06000•Oct 6, 2026•0 citations

Passive Environment-Assisted Quantum Communication

Evelyn Voss, Bikun Li, Zhaoyou Wang +1 more

As quantum information systems mature, efficient and coherent transfer of quantum information through noisy channels becomes increasingly important. We examine how passive environment-assisted quantum communication enhances direct quantum information transfer efficiency. A bosonic pure-loss channel, modeled as transmission through a beam splitter with a vacuum input state at the dark port, has zero quantum capacity when transmissivity is below 50%. Quantum communication through the channel can be enhanced by passive environment assistance, achieved via the selection of an appropriate input state for the ancilla port. Although ideal Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill (GKP) states enable perfect quantum information transmission at arbitrarily small transmissivity, they are challenging to realize experimentally. We therefore explore more experimentally accessible non-Gaussian ancilla states, such as Fock, cat, and squeezed cat states, and numerically determine the optimal encoding and decoding strategies. We also construct analytical schemes that yield high-fidelity transmission and good information rates.

quant-pharXiv:2602.21549•Feb 26, 2026•0 citations

Rank-One Loss Maximizes the Spectral Response Strength of Passive Full-Order Exceptional Points

Jan Wiersig

We consider finite-dimensional non-Hermitian systems in which all modes coalesce at a single exceptional point. For a rank-one anti-Hermitian contribution, the spectral response strength is computed exactly. For passive systems, we then derive a sharp upper bound at fixed exceptional-point decay rate and show that it is reached only when the decay operator has rank one, corresponding to a single independent dissipative direction. This establishes rank-one loss as the optimal configuration for enhancing the response of a full-order exceptional point. The bound holds for arbitrary order and improves on earlier passive estimates beyond second order. Two third-order trimers illustrate the result: a rank-one-loss system saturates the bound, whereas a passive rank-two-loss realization remains below it. The result turns dissipation into a design resource: concentrating the loss into a single effective dissipative direction maximizes the highest-order spectral response of a passive full-order exceptional-point device.

quant-pharXiv:2610.31268•Oct 23, 2026

From Coherent to Incoherent Dynamical Control of Open Quantum Systems

Gershon Kurizki, Analía Zwick

Coherence control was originally conceived by Shapiro and Brumer for closed quantum systems. In open quantum systems, the environment hampers or destroys coherence. Nevertheless, the Kurizki-Shapiro-Brumer coherent photocurrent control showed partial resilience to decoherence. Still, decoherence control is an essential prerequisite to our ability to fully exploit quantum coherence for any operational task. Yet decoherence control need not employ coherent fields: it may be incoherent. In operational tasks such as the preparation, transformation, transmission, and detection of quantumstates, environmental (bath) effects can be suppressed by dynamical decoupling, or by the more general incoherent dynamical control by modulation developed by our group. The resulting control dynamics must be Zeno-like in order to yield suppressed coupling to the bath in unitary operational tasks. There are however tasks which cannot be implemented by closed-system (unitary) evolution, in particular those involving a change of the system's entropy. Such tasks necessitate efficient coupling to a bath for their implementation. Examples are the use of measurements to cool (purify) a system, to equilibrate it, or harvest (and convert) energy from the environment. If the underlying dynamics is anti-Zeno like, enhancement of this coupling to the bath will occur and thereby facilitate the task, as discovered by us. A general task may also require state and energy transfer between non-interacting parties via shared modes of the bath. For such tasks, a more subtle interplay of Zeno and anti-Zeno dynamics may be optimal. We have therefore constructed a general framework for optimizing the way a system interacts with its environment to achieve a desired task. This optimization consists in adjusting a given “score” that quantifies the success of the task, such as the targeted fidelity, purity, entropy, energy or state transfer probability by dynamical modification of the system-bath coupling spectrum on demand.

Advances in chemical physics•Apr 1, 2016•6 citations
Passive loss removes probability from a system and therefore seems unable to improve an unconditional target. This intuition is exact for classical population dynamics under sink-only removal: passive killing obeys a finite-strength monotonicity principle even after optimization over the remaining controls. Here we show that coherent quantum dynamics can violate this classical monotonicity because coherent contributions to the final target can interfere destructively. We derive a trajectory-level criterion that determines when such a detrimental contribution is physically accessible to passive loss and accumulates into a net unconditional benefit. The criterion is encoded in a response operator constructed entirely from the lossless dynamics: its spectrum determines whether weak passive loss can help, while its principal eigenvector identifies the optimal environmental mode. Applying this criterion to vibronically assisted transfer, we identify a beneficial mode formed by coherently combining two individually detrimental local loss directions. The predicted mode remains near-optimal at finite loss, producing an (8.73%) enhancement over the independently optimized lossless benchmark, compared with (9.52%) under full finite-loss optimization. Our results establish how coherent quantum dynamics can evade classical passive-loss monotonicity and provide a general task-dependent principle for designing beneficial passive environments from lossless dynamics.
Can irreversible passive loss improve an unconditional quantum target, without postselection or population recycling? The paper contrasts quantum dynamics with classical Markov processes, where sink-only killing cannot increase any nonnegative terminal reward, even after optimizing the remaining controls: Rclopt(γ)≤Rclopt(0)R_{\rm cl}^{\rm opt}(\gamma)\le R_{\rm cl}^{\rm opt}(0)Rclopt​(γ)≤Rclopt​(0) for all γ≥0\gamma\ge0γ≥0.
For quantum dynamics, it derives a weak-loss response operator from the lossless forward state ρs\rho_sρs​ and backward target effect EsE_sEs​: G=−(1/T)Padm∫0T{ρs,Es}/2 ds PadmG=-(1/T)P_{\rm adm}\int_0^T\{\rho_s,E_s\}/2\,ds\,P_{\rm adm}G=−(1/T)Padm​∫0T​{ρs​,Es​}/2dsPadm​. If every positive, trace-normalized loss operator on the admissible subspace is implementable, a positive first-order benefit exists exactly when λmax⁡(G)>0\lambda_{\max}(G)>0λmax​(G)>0; a principal eigenvector specifies the optimal rank-one loss mode. A three-state Bell-target example illustrates why instantaneous signed response must also be physically accessible and accumulate favourably along a fixed mode.
Numerical tests use a donor–acceptor vibronic model. A coherent superposition of two individually detrimental local loss directions captures 82.5%82.5\%82.5% of the unrestricted optimal weak-loss response. Fixing this lossless-designed mode and reoptimizing frequency and duration gives an 8.73%8.73\%8.73% finite-loss improvement over the independently optimized lossless benchmark; full environmental reoptimization gives 9.52%9.52\%9.52%. Incoherent mixtures remain below that benchmark over the tested interval 0<γ/J≤40<\gamma/J\le40<γ/J≤4. Auxiliary-level simulations verify convergence to the effective loss model.
The spectral criterion concerns first-order response, not arbitrary finite loss. Numerical advantages are restricted to the same one-quantum resonance operating branch, rather than unrestricted coherent control; the proposed reservoir realization is simulated, not experimentally demonstrated.
Quantum control refers to our ability to manipulate quantum systems. This tutorial-style chapter focuses on the use of classical electromagnetic fields to steer the system dynamics. In this approach, the quantum nature of the control stems solely from the underlying dynamics, through the exploitation of destructive and constructive interference to reach the control target. We first discuss two basic control principles -- coherent control which uses manipulation in frequency or time to design these interferences, and adiabatic following where access to the control target is enabled by tracking the time-dependent ground state. For complex control targets and system dynamics that exceed the scope of these basic principles, optimal control theory provides a powerful suite of tools to design the necessary protocols. A key consideration for the successful application of optimal control theory is a proper choice of the optimization functional. All concepts are illustrated using recent work from my research group, with a focus on controlling atoms and superconducting qubits. The chapter concludes with an outlook on integrating coherent control with engineered dissipation and a discussion of open questions in the field.
Metastability separates apparent equilibration from true convergence: a dynamical system can remain near an intermediate state long before reaching its stationary state. In quantum dynamics used for optimization, such a plateau can delay progress toward a target concentrated near the global minimizers of a nonconvex potential. In this paper, we initiate the study of the general mechanisms by which coherent evolution and dissipation shape metastability, using quantum Langevin dynamics (QLD) as a concrete example [CLW+25], where the objective function is encoded in the potential and coherent transfer between wells interacts with tunable dissipation. To quantify this interaction, we solve a two-state model precisely and derive a spectral-separation criterion in terms of tunneling frequency, dissipation strength, and damping imbalance. Extending the analysis to multi-state models, we show that sufficiently weak tunneling between wells can separate slow population transfer from fast relaxation within each well. In addition, we establish conditions under which changing the structure of dissipation shortens the time needed to approach a prescribed target state. Numerical experiments on double-well and multi-well potentials demonstrate these improvements while keeping the target and accuracy fixed and accounting for the time spent on control.
As quantum information systems mature, efficient and coherent transfer of quantum information through noisy channels becomes increasingly important. We examine how passive environment-assisted quantum communication enhances direct quantum information transfer efficiency. A bosonic pure-loss channel, modeled as transmission through a beam splitter with a vacuum input state at the dark port, has zero quantum capacity when transmissivity is below 50%. Quantum communication through the channel can be enhanced by passive environment assistance, achieved via the selection of an appropriate input state for the ancilla port. Although ideal Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill (GKP) states enable perfect quantum information transmission at arbitrarily small transmissivity, they are challenging to realize experimentally. We therefore explore more experimentally accessible non-Gaussian ancilla states, such as Fock, cat, and squeezed cat states, and numerically determine the optimal encoding and decoding strategies. We also construct analytical schemes that yield high-fidelity transmission and good information rates.
We consider finite-dimensional non-Hermitian systems in which all modes coalesce at a single exceptional point. For a rank-one anti-Hermitian contribution, the spectral response strength is computed exactly. For passive systems, we then derive a sharp upper bound at fixed exceptional-point decay rate and show that it is reached only when the decay operator has rank one, corresponding to a single independent dissipative direction. This establishes rank-one loss as the optimal configuration for enhancing the response of a full-order exceptional point. The bound holds for arbitrary order and improves on earlier passive estimates beyond second order. Two third-order trimers illustrate the result: a rank-one-loss system saturates the bound, whereas a passive rank-two-loss realization remains below it. The result turns dissipation into a design resource: concentrating the loss into a single effective dissipative direction maximizes the highest-order spectral response of a passive full-order exceptional-point device.
Coherence control was originally conceived by Shapiro and Brumer for closed quantum systems. In open quantum systems, the environment hampers or destroys coherence. Nevertheless, the Kurizki-Shapiro-Brumer coherent photocurrent control showed partial resilience to decoherence. Still, decoherence control is an essential prerequisite to our ability to fully exploit quantum coherence for any operational task. Yet decoherence control need not employ coherent fields: it may be incoherent. In operational tasks such as the preparation, transformation, transmission, and detection of quantumstates, environmental (bath) effects can be suppressed by dynamical decoupling, or by the more general incoherent dynamical control by modulation developed by our group. The resulting control dynamics must be Zeno-like in order to yield suppressed coupling to the bath in unitary operational tasks. There are however tasks which cannot be implemented by closed-system (unitary) evolution, in particular those involving a change of the system's entropy. Such tasks necessitate efficient coupling to a bath for their implementation. Examples are the use of measurements to cool (purify) a system, to equilibrate it, or harvest (and convert) energy from the environment. If the underlying dynamics is anti-Zeno like, enhancement of this coupling to the bath will occur and thereby facilitate the task, as discovered by us. A general task may also require state and energy transfer between non-interacting parties via shared modes of the bath. For such tasks, a more subtle interplay of Zeno and anti-Zeno dynamics may be optimal. We have therefore constructed a general framework for optimizing the way a system interacts with its environment to achieve a desired task. This optimization consists in adjusting a given “score” that quantifies the success of the task, such as the targeted fidelity, purity, entropy, energy or state transfer probability by dynamical modification of the system-bath coupling spectrum on demand.