At CRYPTO 2007, Damgård and Nielsen introduced a preprocessing approach to multi-party computation (MPC) to achieve linear communication complexity. Another approach to reduce communication complexity was proposed by Cramer, Damgård, and de Haan at EUROCRYPT 2007, which involved using ramp-secret sharing schemes to jointly share base-field components of secrets from the extension field. In this paper, we combine these two ideas to achieve a non-asymptotic reduction of communication cost in a multi-phase MPC setup. We introduce a new modification of the ramp secret sharing scheme, called compact sharing, and tailor the MPC protocol to accommodate this modification. Compact sharing masks the polynomial coefficients that would otherwise leak during degree reduction. The protocol provides perfect security against static semi-honest adversaries under an explicit tradeoff between the corruption threshold and the extension degree. When the extension degree scales linearly with the number of parties, the gate-evaluation core achieves constant communication overhead relative to an extension-field element, amortized over full preprocessing batches; input and output communication is counted separately.
At CRYPTO 2007, Damgård and Nielsen introduced a preprocessing approach to multi-party computation (MPC) to achieve linear communication complexity. Another approach to reduce communication complexity was proposed by Cramer, Damgård, and de Haan at EUROCRYPT 2007, which involved using ramp-secret sharing schemes to jointly share base-field components of secrets from the extension field. In this paper, we combine these two ideas to achieve a non-asymptotic reduction of communication cost in a multi-phase MPC setup. We introduce a new modification of the ramp secret sharing scheme, called compact sharing, and tailor the MPC protocol to accommodate this modification. Compact sharing masks the polynomial coefficients that would otherwise leak during degree reduction. The protocol provides perfect security against static semi-honest adversaries under an explicit tradeoff between the corruption threshold and the extension degree. When the extension degree scales linearly with the number of parties, the gate-evaluation core achieves constant communication overhead relative to an extension-field element, amortized over full preprocessing batches; input and output communication is counted separately.
Abstract We construct the first actively-secure Multi-Party Computation (MPC) protocols with an arbitrary number of parties in the dishonest majority setting, for an arbitrary field F F with constant communication overhead over the “passive-GMW” protocol (Goldreich, Micali and Wigderson, STOC ‘87). Our protocols rely on passive implementations of Oblivious Transfer (OT) in the Boolean setting and Oblivious Linear function Evaluation (OLE) in the arithmetic setting. Previously, such protocols were only known over sufficiently large fields (Genkin et al. STOC ‘14) or a constant number of parties (Ishai et al. CRYPTO ‘08). Conceptually, our protocols are obtained via a new compiler from a passively-secure protocol for a distributed multiplication functionality FMULT F MULT , to an actively-secure protocol for general functionalities. Roughly, FMULT F MULT is parameterized by a linear-secret sharing scheme S S , where it takes S S -shares of two secrets and returns S S -shares of their product. We show that our compilation is concretely efficient for sufficiently large fields, resulting in an overhead of 2 when securely computing natural circuits. Our compiler has two additional benefits: (1) It can rely on any passive implementation of FMULT F MULT , which, besides the standard implementation based on OT (for Boolean) and OLE (for arithmetic), allows us to rely on implementations based on threshold cryptosystems (Cramer et al. Eurocrypt ‘01), and (2) it can rely on weaker-than-passive (i.e., imperfect/leaky) implementations, which in some parameter regimes yield actively-secure protocols with overhead less than 2. Instantiating this compiler with an “honest-majority” implementation of FMULT F MULT , we obtain the first honest-majority protocol (with up to one-third corruptions) for Boolean circuits with constant communication overhead over the best passive protocol (Damgård and Nielsen, CRYPTO ‘07).
Secure multi-party computation (MPC) is a cryptographic tool that enables a set of parties to compute a function jointly while keeping each input secret. Since MPC based on secret sharing (SS) achieves high throughput and works fast, many applications have been developed. However, SS-based MPC requires many communication rounds in general, and this becomes a performance bottleneck in real-world applications under high-latency networks. In this paper, we propose SS-based secure three-party computation with almost no preprocessing based on our new (small-)constant-round fundamental gates, by revisiting a framework in a few previous works where a number of parties are assisted by another party who may partially learn secret information. Instead of ordinary logical gates, our fundamental gate is an efficient Equality, for which the result leaks to the third party, and we develop novel two-round constructions of secure building-block protocols (LessThan Comparison, RightShift, Table LookUp, etc.) from the insecure Equality. To show the practicality of our protocols, we implement a secure exact edit distance protocol for two genome strings. Our experiments show that in some network setting our protocol is about 2 times faster (14 times faster taking preprocessing into consideration) than the state-of-the-art SS-based protocol (Ohata and Nuida, FC 2020).
Secure multiparty computation (MPC) enables a set of parties to securely carry out a joint computation of their private inputs without revealing anything but the output. Protocols for semi-honest adversaries guarantee security as long as the corrupted parties run the specified protocol and ensure that nothing is leaked in the transcript. In contrast, protocols for malicious adversaries guarantee security in the presence of arbitrary adversaries who can run any attack strategy. Security for malicious adversaries is typically what is needed in practice (and is always preferred), but comes at a significant cost. In this paper, we present the first protocol for a two-thirds honest majority that achieves security in the presence of malicious adversariesat essentially the exact same cost as the best known protocols for semi-honest adversaries. Our construction is not a general transformation and thus it is possible that better semi-honest protocols will be constructed which do not support our transformation. Nevertheless, for the current state-of-the-art for many parties (based on Shamir sharing), our protocol invokes the best semi-honest multiplication protocol exactly once per multiplication gate (plus some additional local computation that is negligible to the overall cost). Concretely, the best version of our protocol requires each party to send on average of just 2 2/3 elements per multiplication gate (when the number of multiplication gates is at least the number of parties). This is four times faster than the previous-best protocol of Barak et al. (ACM CCS 2018) for small fields, and twice as fast as the previous-best protocol of Chida et al. (CRYPTO 2018) for large fields.
Secure multi-party computation (MPC) allows a set of parties to compute a function jointly while keeping their inputs private. Compared with the MPC based on garbled circuits, some recent research results show that MPC based on secret sharing (SS) works at a very high speed. Moreover, SS-based MPC can be easily vectorized and achieve higher throughput. In SS-based MPC, however, we need many communication rounds for computing concrete protocols like equality check, less-than comparison, etc. This property is not suited for large-latency environments like the Internet (or WAN). In this paper, we construct semi-honest secure communication-efficient two-party protocols. The core technique is Beaver triple extension, which is a new tool for treating multi-fan-in gates, and we also show how to use it efficiently. We mainly focus on reducing the number of communication rounds, and our protocols also succeed in reducing the number of communication bits (in most cases). As an example, we propose a less-than comparison protocol (under practical parameters) with three communication rounds. This is less than a half compared with the previous work. Moreover, the number of communication bits is also 38.4% fewer. As a result, total online execution time is 56.1% shorter than the previous work adopting the same settings. Although the computation costs of our protocols are more expensive than those of previous work, we confirm via experiments that such a disadvantage has small effects on the whole online performance in the typical WAN environments.
Secure multi-party computation (MPC) is a cryptographic primitive that lets a num- ber N of mutually distrustful parties compute a function f (x1, . . . , xN ) on their private inputs xi such that at the end of the MPC protocol, each honest party obtains the func- tion’s correct output and no adversary controlling a certain subset of parties learns any- thing about the honest parties’ inputs beyond what can be inferred from the function’s output value. In 2002, [Smi01] and [CGS02] introduced the notion of multi-party quan- tum computation (MPQC) in which arbitrary quantum circuits can be evaluated in a distributed manner, secure against a quantum adversary. Few protocols for MPQC are known. We present a fundamental study of the building blocks of MPC and MPQC in the information-theoretic setting with a focus on protocols built on top of (quantum) se- cret sharing schemes. In particular, we point out structural similarities and differences and compile an extensive list of theoretical feasibility results for the maximum number of corrupted parties within classical and quantum secret sharing and MPC protocols.
Despite significant recent progress toward making multi-party computation (MPC) practical, no existing MPC library offers complete robustness-meaning guaranteed output delivery, including in the offline phase-in a network that even has intermittent delays.Importantly, several theoretical MPC constructions already ensure robustness in this setting.We observe that the key reason for this gap between theory and practice is the absence of efficient verifiable/complete secret sharing (VSS/CSS) constructions; existing CSS protocols either require a) challenging broadcast channels in practice or b) introducing computation and communication overhead that is at least quadratic in the number of players.This work presents hbACSS, a suite of optimal-resilience asynchronous complete secret sharing protocols that are (quasi)linear in both computation and communication overhead.Towards developing hbACSS, we develop hbPolyCommit, an efficient polynomial commitment scheme that is (quasi)linear (in the polynomial degree) in terms of computation and communication overhead without requiring a trusted setup.We implement our hbACSS protocols, extensively analyze their practicality, and observe that our protocols scale well with an increasing number of parties.In particular, we use hbACSS to generate MPC input masks: a useful primitive which had previously only been calculated nonrobustly in practice.Recent work shows how to make the online phase of practical asynchronous MPC robust [47].However, the preprocessing phase, which must be run by the servers prior to receiving input, is much harder to make robust in practice.To explain the problem we will focus on generating random input masks, which allow clients to easily contribute secret inputs to an MPC program.The goal is to produce a random secret sharing r t which satisfies the following: if no more than t of the N MPC server nodes are corrupted, r is uniformly random, unknown, and any t + 1 parties can reconstruct the same r.The standard way to generate such values is for all the servers to contribute shares they sample individually, which are then all combined to extract fully random values, even if some corrupt parties chose their inputs in a correlated way [11].This approach hinges on a protocol that can be used to verify that the individually chosen shares are chosen correctly.Verifiable Secret Sharing (VSS) [30], [40], [22] is a natural choice for this task.In particular, Asynchronous Complete Secret Sharing (ACSS) [54] provides all the robustness guarantees needed for the MPC application, since it guarantees not only that the secret inputs can be reconstructed if necessary, but also that each of the servers can receive its original share of the secret.However, existing ACSS protocols introduce a computation and communication overhead that is quadratic in the number of parties and cannot scale well beyond a small number of nodes.This motivates the design of an efficient, scalable ACSS protocol without compromising the optimal replication factor of 3t + 1 or the asynchronous communication setting.In targeting this threat model, we prefix the protocols designed in this paper with "hb" as a reference to the honey badger, a creature known for its resilience in harsh adversarial settings.A. Challenges and overview of our solution a) Good performance under worst case conditions: The asynchronous network setting is fundamentally challenging: unlike in synchrony, a protocol which waits to hear from all parties will stall indefinitely.Instead, we must proceed after hearing from only N -t of the parties, where t is a bound on the number of parties that can fail.Since crashed nodes are indistinguishable from slow nodes, it could be that t parties for which we waited are corrupted, and thus only N -2t correct parties received valid shares.To cope with asynchrony, the most closely related protocol, VSS-R [9], falls back to an inefficient backup mode with communication overhead that is quadratic in the number of servers, even after a brief period of desynchronization.Alternately, Patra et al. give AVSS protocols with linear communication overhead [53], but require weakening resilience (t < N/4).We remark, however, that many t < N/3, AVSS/AVCSS protocols (including ours) could improve their amortized bandwidth by a factor of O(N ) through the use of Packed Secret Sharing.Consequently, we focus on the t < N/3 setting, knowing that improvements here can also lead to improvements in more relaxed settings.b) Aggressive batching for large secrets: Motivated by our application of MPC preprocessing, we seek general efficiency but assume the amount of data that needs to be shared is large.We focus on the case where each single dealer needs to deal a large batch of secrets, such as for precomputation purposes.In doing so, we can amortize away