Qubits are powerful computational resources because each additional qubit doubles the size of the accessible state space. This expressive power comes at a cost: adding qubits also increases circuit size, constraint overhead, and exposure to hardware noise. These limitations are especially critical for near-term quantum computers, making the number of qubits required to formulate a problem a central practical concern. In this work, we present a method for efficiently mapping logistics and routing problems onto qubits through structure-aware encoding reduction. We demonstrate the method on a benchmark problem of latency-resilient routing under dual-link failures. For this benchmark, the reduced formulation substantially lowers both the qubit count and the compiled circuit complexity while preserving the original optimization task. By running the reduced model on the same trapped-ion quantum computer as the benchmark, we obtain a 100X improvement in the success probability. This finding shows how careful problem formulation can make current quantum hardware substantially more effective for practical optimization.
Qubits are powerful computational resources because each additional qubit doubles the size of the accessible state space. This expressive power comes at a cost: adding qubits also increases circuit size, constraint overhead, and exposure to hardware noise. These limitations are especially critical for near-term quantum computers, making the number of qubits required to formulate a problem a central practical concern. In this work, we present a method for efficiently mapping logistics and routing problems onto qubits through structure-aware encoding reduction. We demonstrate the method on a benchmark problem of latency-resilient routing under dual-link failures. For this benchmark, the reduced formulation substantially lowers both the qubit count and the compiled circuit complexity while preserving the original optimization task. By running the reduced model on the same trapped-ion quantum computer as the benchmark, we obtain a 100X improvement in the success probability. This finding shows how careful problem formulation can make current quantum hardware substantially more effective for practical optimization.
Near-term quantum computers will operate in a noisy environment, without error correction. A critical problem for near-term quantum computing is laying out a logical circuit onto a physical device with limited connectivity between qubits. This is known as the qubit mapping and routing (QMR) problem, an intractable combinatorial problem. It is important to solve QMR as optimally as possible to reduce the amount of added noise, which may render a quantum computation useless. In this paper, we present a novel approach for optimally solving the QMR problem via a reduction to maximum satisfiability (MAXSAT). Additionally, we present two novel relaxation ideas that shrink the size of the MAXSAT constraints by exploiting the structure of a quantum circuit. Our thorough empirical evaluation demonstrates (1) the scalability of our approach compared to state-of-the-art optimal QMR techniques (solves more than 3x benchmarks with 40x speedup), (2) the significant cost reduction compared to state-of-the-art heuristic approaches (an average of ~5x swap reduction), and (3) the power of our proposed constraint relaxations.
Abstract In this work we propose a high-quality decomposition approach for qubit routing by swap insertion. This optimization problem arises in the context of compiling quantum algorithms formulated in the circuit model of computation onto specific quantum hardware. Our approach decomposes the routing problem into an allocation subproblem and a set of token swapping problems. This allows us to tackle the allocation part and the token swapping part separately. Extracting the allocation part from the qubit routing model of Nannicini et al. (Optimal qubit assignment and routing via integer programming, 2021, http://arxiv.org/abs/2106.06446 ), we formulate the allocation subproblem as a binary linear program. Herein, we employ a cost function that is a lower bound on the overall routing problem objective. We strengthen the linear relaxation by novel valid inequalities. For the token swapping part we develop an exact branch-and-bound algorithm. In this context, we improve upon known lower bounds on the token swapping problem. Furthermore, we enhance an existing approximation algorithm which runs much faster than the exact approach and typically is able to determine solutions close to the optimum. We present numerical results for the fully integrated allocation and token swapping problem. Obtained solutions may not be globally optimal due to the decomposition and the usage of an approximation algorithm. However, the solutions are obtained fast and are typically close to optimal. In addition, there is a significant reduction in the number of artificial gates and output circuit depth when compared to various state-of-the-art heuristics. Reducing these figures is crucial for minimizing noise when running quantum algorithms on near-term hardware. As a consequence, using the novel decomposition approach leads to compiled algorithms with improved quality. Indeed, when compiled with the novel routing procedure and executed on real hardware, our experimental results for quantum approximate optimization algorithms show an significant increase in solution quality in comparison to standard routing methods.
Combinatorial optimization problems are typically formulated using Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO), where constraints are enforced through penalty terms that introduce auxiliary variables and rapidly increase Hamiltonian complexity, limiting scalability on near term quantum devices. In this work, we systematically study Quadratic Unconstrained D-ary Optimization (QUDO) as an alternative formulation in which decision variables are encoded directly in higher dimensional Hilbert spaces. We demonstrate that QUDO naturally captures structural constraints across a range of problem classes, including the Traveling Salesman Problem, two variants of the Vehicle Routing Problem, graph coloring, job scheduling, and Max-K-Cut, without the need for extensive penalty constructions. Using a qudit-level implementation of the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (qudit QAOA), we benchmark these formulations against their binary QUBO counterparts and exact classical solutions. Our study show consistently improved approximation ratios and substantially reduced computational overhead at comparable circuit depths, highlighting QUDO as a scalable and expressive representation for quantum combinatorial optimization.
Near-term quantum computers often have connectivity constraints, i.e. restrictions, on which pairs of qubits in the device can interact. Optimally mapping a quantum circuit to a hardware topology under these constraints is a difficult task. While numerous approaches have been proposed to optimize qubit routing, the resulting gate count and depth overheads of the compiled circuits remain high due to the short-range coupling of qubits in many near-term devices. Resource states, such as Bell or Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) pairs, can be used to mediate operations that facilitate long-range interactions between qubits. In this work, we studied some of the practical trade-offs involved in using resource states for qubit routing. We developed a method that leverages an existing state-of-the-art compiler to optimize the routing of circuits with both standard gates and EPR mediated remote controlled-NOT gates. This was then used to compile different benchmark circuits for a square grid topology, where a fraction of the qubits are used to store EPR pairs. We demonstrate that EPR-mediated operations can substantially reduce the total number of gates and depths of compiled circuits when used with an appropriate optimizing compiler that accounts for practical overheads. Our results highlight the relevance of developing efficient compilation tools that can integrate EPR-mediated operations.
Despite rapid advances in quantum computing technologies, the qubit connectivity limitation remains to be a critical challenge. Both near-term NISQ quantum computers and relatively long-term scalable quantum architectures do not offer full connectivity. As a result, quantum circuits may not be directly executed on quantum hardware, and a quantum compiler needs to perform qubit routing to make the circuit compatible with the device layout. During the qubit routing step, the compiler inserts SWAP gates and performs circuit transformations. Given the connectivity topology of the target hardware, there are typically multiple qubit routing candidates. The state-of-the-art compilers use a cost function to evaluate the number of SWAP gates for different routes and then select the one with the minimum number of SWAP gates. After qubit routing, the quantum compiler performs gate optimizations upon the circuit with the newly inserted SWAP gates.In this paper, we observe that the aforementioned qubit routing is not optimal, and qubit routing should not be independent on subsequent gate optimizations. We find that with the consideration of gate optimizations, not all of the SWAP gates have the same basis-gate cost. These insights lead to the development of our qubit routing algorithm, NASSC (Not All Swaps have the Same Cost). NASSC is the first algorithm that considers the subsequent optimizations during the routing step. Our optimization-aware qubit routing leads to better routing decisions and benefits subsequent optimizations. We also propose a new optimization-aware decomposition for the inserted SWAP gates. Our experiments show that the routing overhead compiled with our routing algorithm is reduced by up to 69.30% (21.30% on average) in the number of CNOT gates and up to 43.50% (7.61% on average) in the circuit depth compared with the state-of-the-art scheme, SABRE.
This work presents a routing-aware pruning strategy for quantum circuits executed on Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices. We propose a method to remove parametric controlled rotations whose small rotation angles do not justify the routing overhead required for their implementation. By selectively pruning such gates, the method mitigates fidelity loss arising from additional SWAP operations introduced during compilation. Our approach evaluates whether executing a gate leads to greater fidelity loss than omitting it. Simulations on benchmark circuits with realistic noise models show that the method reduces two-qubit gate counts (up to 48.6%) while improving final state fidelity (up to 47.7%), especially for larger circuits where routing costs dominate.