Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2609.40180

Improved Quantum Query Bounds for Boolean Matrix Product Verification

Amin Shiraz Gilani, François Le Gall, Xingyu Zhou

quant-phcs.DSSubmitted Sep 30, 2026• Announced Oct 1, 2026• 0 citations
v1 · Sep 30, 2026v2 · Oct 5, 2026
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We prove the first non-trivial upper bound for the quantum query complexity of Boolean Matrix Product Verification ($\mathsf{BMPV}$), answering a longstanding open question in quantum query complexity. For $n\times n$ matrices, our upper bound is $\widetilde O(n^{17/12})$, improving on the standard $O(n^{3/2})$ bound obtained using Grover search by Buhrman and Špalek (SODA 2006). We complement this result by showing an $Ω(n^{5/4})$ lower bound, which improves over the previous best known lower bound of $\widetildeΩ(n^{19/18})$ by Childs, Kimmel, and Kothari (ESA 2012). Our approach centers on a connection with Orthogonal Vectors ($\mathsf{OV}$), which asks whether an indexed list of $n$ Boolean vectors of dimension $n$ contains two vectors with disjoint supports. In particular, we prove equivalences between $\mathsf{OV}$ and $\mathsf{BMPV}$ and establish the above bounds for $\mathsf{OV}$. We also prove a tight $\widetilde Θ(n^{3/2})$ bound for a variant of $\mathsf{BMPV}$ that asks whether the product contains a given row vector. Together, these results imply a polynomial separation between the quantum query complexities of deciding whether a graph has radius at most two and whether it has diameter at most two.

Comments
38 pages

Related papers

Superlinear Quantum Query Lower Bounds for Subgraph Detection

Amin Shiraz Gilani, Xingyu Zhou

Subgraph detection asks whether an $n$-vertex graph, accessed through queries to its adjacency matrix, contains a copy of a fixed graph $H$. We prove the first unconditional superlinear lower bounds on the bounded-error quantum query complexity of this problem, answering a longstanding open question. A copy of $H$ is a certificate of constant size, so the adversary method with nonnegative weights cannot prove superlinear lower bounds. For every fixed $r\ge 4$, detecting the clique $K_r$ requires $n^{λ_r-o(1)}$ queries, where $λ_4=19/18$, the exponents $λ_r$ increase strictly with $r$, and $λ_r\ge 2-4\sqrt{2/r}+O(1/r)$. More generally, we prove superlinear lower bounds for detecting every fixed connected graph $H$ with chromatic number $c\ge 4$. These bounds approach quadratic as $c$ grows: for sufficiently large $c$, detection requires $n^{2-O(\sqrt{\log\log c/c})-o(1)}$ queries. Chromatic number alone does not characterize the quantum query complexity of subgraph detection: we show that detecting the complete bipartite graph $K_{r,r}$ requires $n^{β_r-o(1)}$ queries, where $β_{10}=181/180$ and $β_r\ge 2-O(1/\sqrt{r})$. Our main technical result is a lower bound for finding an all-ones certificate from a known family when the input bits are sampled independently. Its proof combines Zhandry's compressed oracle [CRYPTO 2019] with conditioning on a randomly planted certificate, adapting an argument of Belovs [FOCS 2026]. Our hard instances are built from graphs containing many copies of the desired subgraph with limited overlap. For cliques, we use a construction of Gowers and Janzer [CPC 2021]; for complete bipartite graphs, we use a random construction.

quant-pharXiv:2609.40263•Oct 1, 2026•0 citations

Near-optimal quantum query lower bounds on bipartiteness and expansion testing in the bounded-degree graph model

Chandrima Kayal, Sayantan Sen, Dániel Szabó

In this work, we study bipartiteness and expansion testing, two canonical problems in graph property testing in the bounded-degree model through the lens of quantum query complexity. In the classical setting, it is known that $\widetildeΘ(\sqrt{N})$ queries are necessary and sufficient for both these testing problems (Goldreich and Ron, 1999, 2000 & 2002), where $N$ denotes the number of vertices of the input graph. Due to their significance, (Ambainis, Childs, and Liu, 2011) initiated the study of these problems in the quantum setting and designed quantum algorithms for bipartiteness and expansion testing that perform $\widetilde{O}(N^{1/3})$ queries, showing a polynomial speedup. They also proved that $\widetildeΩ(N^{1/4})$ queries are necessary for expansion testing, but the possibility of an exponential quantum advantage for bipartiteness testing remained open. Despite significant effort, there has been no improvement in these results in the last decade and a half. In this work, we prove essentially tight $\widetildeΩ(N^{1/3})$ quantum query lower bounds for both bipartiteness and expansion testing, thereby completely characterizing the quantum query complexity of these problems up to polylogarithmic factors. While our proofs use the polynomial method similarly to Ambainis, Childs, and Liu, we use intermediate problems that we relate to the main problems via reductions, and perform a more precise analysis of the resulting polynomials, leading to the near-optimal lower bounds.

quant-pharXiv:2610.01752•Oct 2, 2026•0 citations

Exact Quantum Query Complexity of the Five-Bit Symmetric Boolean Function $\Exact^5_{3,4}$

Guoliang Xu, Haoran Zhang, Mengfan Wu +2 more

Let \(f = \text{EXACT}^5_{3,4}\) be the Boolean function that equals 1 exactly on inputs of Hamming weight 3 or 4. Earlier numerical studies reported success probabilities close to one using three queries, but the existence of an exact three-query algorithm had remained unresolved. This paper settles this problem by proving that the exact quantum query complexity of \(f\) is \(4\). For the lower bound, we express every three-query algorithm through layer-by-layer Gram matrices of low-degree Fourier coefficients. We then construct a fixed rational dual certificate whose slack matrices are all positive definite. This certificate separates the necessary Gram-matrix region from the exact-output condition and therefore rules out every exact algorithm using at most three queries in the stated model. The positivity verification reduces to five small rational matrices and Sylvester's criterion. For the upper bound, we invoke the previously known four-query algorithm for the seven-bit function \(\text{EXACT}^7_{3,4}\) and apply the standard padding reduction. To quantify the near-exact behavior, we use the same certificate to derive a valid, though not claimed tight, lower bound \(\frac{25600}{43779488192449}>0\) on the worst-case error of every algorithm using at most three queries. This positive error gap is compatible with the near-unit success probabilities reported in earlier numerical studies, which do not establish exact computation.

quant-pharXiv:2610.24518•Oct 20, 2026•0 citations

Quantum lower bounds for convex optimization and real matrix-vector query problems

Andrew M. Childs

We (the author and the AI systems that did the heavy lifting) show that the quantum query complexity of minimizing a convex function over a convex subset of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with evaluation and membership queries is $\tildeΩ(n)$, nearly matching the best known upper bound. In particular, we show this even for quadratic minimization, which is equivalent to inverting an $n \times n$ real matrix using matrix-vector queries. We also show linear or nearly linear lower bounds on the quantum query complexity of computing the trace, the sign of the determinant, and the magnitude of the determinant of a real matrix in the matrix-vector query model. We use a novel quantum lower bound technique, the determinantal witness method, based on identifying a witness whose Fourier transform vanishes on low-rank matrices and that correlates well with the function being computed.

quant-pharXiv:2609.05679•Sep 8, 2026•0 citations

Strong Selective and List-Decoding Direct Product Theorems for Quantum Query Complexity

Paul Beame, Niels Kornerup, Michael Whitmeyer

Quantum strong direct-product theorems for specific functions have been known for nearly two decades. These have been extended to general results for function computation and state generation. The proofs of these results use a version of the multiplicative adversary method that does not naturally extend to relations. Standard strong direct-product theorems apply when algorithms must correctly answer every given question. Prior work extended them to equivalent threshold direct-product theorems, which require answers to all questions but only require that most answers are correct. We focus on two further generalizations. Strong selective direct-products apply to algorithms that adaptively choose, based on what they learn from queries, which questions from a large list to answer. This generalization is relational and useful for proving time-space tradeoffs. We prove a quantum strong selective direct-product theorem for all functions using a relational formulation of the multiplicative adversary method by Jeffery and Zur which we prove, via an equivalent formulation, satisfies a strong selective direct product property and captures any query lower bound for functions proven by negative-weights adversaries. The second generalization is list-decoding direct product problems introduced by Ben-David and Blais for classical query complexity. These allow an algorithm to produce a large list of possible output vectors such that one of them is fully correct. They proved that such theorems hold for randomized complexity of all Boolean functions. We prove a quantum analogue of this theorem for all partial Boolean-valued functions. We show that strong list-decoding direct-product theorems are implied by a special case of multiplicative adversaries which we show, via a new reduction, can be obtained from negative-weights adversaries for any Boolean-valued function.

cs.CCCross-listedarXiv:2609.26678•Sep 23, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Query Complexity of Maximum Degree and its Generalizations

Amin Shiraz Gilani, Nikhil S. Mande, Subhasree Patro +1 more

We study the quantum query complexity of several basic graph problems. 1) We prove a tight $Θ(n^{3/2})$ bound for finding a maximum-out-degree vertex in an $n$-vertex tournament, resolving a conjecture of Mande, Paraashar, and Saurabh [FSTTCS'23]. 2) Using the same proof idea, we give a direct proof that finding a maximum-degree vertex in an $n$-vertex undirected graph requires $Θ(n^{3/2})$ quantum queries, a bound implicit in the work of Apers and Lee [CCC'21]. Both lower bounds above hold even for computing only the maximum degree or maximum out-degree. 3) We also study Maximum $(k,n-k)$-Cut, which asks for the largest cut with one side of size $k$. For every constant $k\geq 1$, we give an $O(n^{2-1/(k+1)})$-query quantum algorithm. 4) We establish a reduction to Maximum $(k,n-k)$-Cut involving $k$-Graph Collision, which asks whether the marked vertices of a known graph contain a $k$-clique. For $k\geq 3$, this yields unconditional lower bounds with exponents strictly larger than $3/2$, showing that this problem is strictly harder than computing maximum degree. Additionally, under a conjecture we propose for $k$-Graph Collision, the reduction yields a lower bound matching our upper bound above.

quant-pharXiv:2610.13906•Oct 12, 2026•0 citations
We prove the first non-trivial upper bound for the quantum query complexity of Boolean Matrix Product Verification (BMPV\mathsf{BMPV}BMPV), answering a longstanding open question in quantum query complexity. For n×nn\times nn×n matrices, our upper bound is O~(n17/12)\widetilde O(n^{17/12})O(n17/12), improving on the standard O(n3/2)O(n^{3/2})O(n3/2) bound obtained using Grover search by Buhrman and Špalek (SODA 2006). We complement this result by showing an Ω(n5/4)Ω(n^{5/4})Ω(n5/4) lower bound, which improves over the previous best known lower bound of Ω~(n19/18)\widetildeΩ(n^{19/18})Ω(n19/18) by Childs, Kimmel, and Kothari (ESA 2012).
Our approach centers on a connection with Orthogonal Vectors (OV\mathsf{OV}OV), which asks whether an indexed list of nnn Boolean vectors of dimension nnn contains two vectors with disjoint supports. In particular, we prove equivalences between OV\mathsf{OV}OV and BMPV\mathsf{BMPV}BMPV and establish the above bounds for OV\mathsf{OV}OV. We also prove a tight Θ~(n3/2)\widetilde Θ(n^{3/2})Θ(n3/2) bound for a variant of BMPV\mathsf{BMPV}BMPV that asks whether the product contains a given row vector. Together, these results imply a polynomial separation between the quantum query complexities of deciding whether a graph has radius at most two and whether it has diameter at most two.
Subgraph detection asks whether an nnn-vertex graph, accessed through queries to its adjacency matrix, contains a copy of a fixed graph HHH. We prove the first unconditional superlinear lower bounds on the bounded-error quantum query complexity of this problem, answering a longstanding open question. A copy of HHH is a certificate of constant size, so the adversary method with nonnegative weights cannot prove superlinear lower bounds. For every fixed r≥4r\ge 4r≥4, detecting the clique KrK_rKr​ requires nλr−o(1)n^{λ_r-o(1)}nλr​−o(1) queries, where λ4=19/18λ_4=19/18λ4​=19/18, the exponents λrλ_rλr​ increase strictly with rrr, and λr≥2−42/r+O(1/r)λ_r\ge 2-4\sqrt{2/r}+O(1/r)λr​≥2−42/r​+O(1/r). More generally, we prove superlinear lower bounds for detecting every fixed connected graph HHH with chromatic number c≥4c\ge 4c≥4. These bounds approach quadratic as ccc grows: for sufficiently large ccc, detection requires n2−O(log⁡log⁡c/c)−o(1)n^{2-O(\sqrt{\log\log c/c})-o(1)}n2−O(loglogc/c​)−o(1) queries. Chromatic number alone does not characterize the quantum query complexity of subgraph detection: we show that detecting the complete bipartite graph Kr,rK_{r,r}Kr,r​ requires nβr−o(1)n^{β_r-o(1)}nβr​−o(1) queries, where β10=181/180β_{10}=181/180β10​=181/180 and βr≥2−O(1/r)β_r\ge 2-O(1/\sqrt{r})βr​≥2−O(1/r​). Our main technical result is a lower bound for finding an all-ones certificate from a known family when the input bits are sampled independently. Its proof combines Zhandry's compressed oracle [CRYPTO 2019] with conditioning on a randomly planted certificate, adapting an argument of Belovs [FOCS 2026]. Our hard instances are built from graphs containing many copies of the desired subgraph with limited overlap. For cliques, we use a construction of Gowers and Janzer [CPC 2021]; for complete bipartite graphs, we use a random construction.
In this work, we study bipartiteness and expansion testing, two canonical problems in graph property testing in the bounded-degree model through the lens of quantum query complexity. In the classical setting, it is known that Θ~(N)\widetildeΘ(\sqrt{N})Θ(N​) queries are necessary and sufficient for both these testing problems (Goldreich and Ron, 1999, 2000 & 2002), where NNN denotes the number of vertices of the input graph. Due to their significance, (Ambainis, Childs, and Liu, 2011) initiated the study of these problems in the quantum setting and designed quantum algorithms for bipartiteness and expansion testing that perform O~(N1/3)\widetilde{O}(N^{1/3})O(N1/3) queries, showing a polynomial speedup. They also proved that Ω~(N1/4)\widetildeΩ(N^{1/4})Ω(N1/4) queries are necessary for expansion testing, but the possibility of an exponential quantum advantage for bipartiteness testing remained open. Despite significant effort, there has been no improvement in these results in the last decade and a half. In this work, we prove essentially tight Ω~(N1/3)\widetildeΩ(N^{1/3})Ω(N1/3) quantum query lower bounds for both bipartiteness and expansion testing, thereby completely characterizing the quantum query complexity of these problems up to polylogarithmic factors. While our proofs use the polynomial method similarly to Ambainis, Childs, and Liu, we use intermediate problems that we relate to the main problems via reductions, and perform a more precise analysis of the resulting polynomials, leading to the near-optimal lower bounds.
Let f=EXACT3,45f = \text{EXACT}^5_{3,4}f=EXACT3,45​ be the Boolean function that equals 1 exactly on inputs of Hamming weight 3 or 4. Earlier numerical studies reported success probabilities close to one using three queries, but the existence of an exact three-query algorithm had remained unresolved. This paper settles this problem by proving that the exact quantum query complexity of fff is 444. For the lower bound, we express every three-query algorithm through layer-by-layer Gram matrices of low-degree Fourier coefficients. We then construct a fixed rational dual certificate whose slack matrices are all positive definite. This certificate separates the necessary Gram-matrix region from the exact-output condition and therefore rules out every exact algorithm using at most three queries in the stated model. The positivity verification reduces to five small rational matrices and Sylvester's criterion. For the upper bound, we invoke the previously known four-query algorithm for the seven-bit function EXACT3,47\text{EXACT}^7_{3,4}EXACT3,47​ and apply the standard padding reduction. To quantify the near-exact behavior, we use the same certificate to derive a valid, though not claimed tight, lower bound 2560043779488192449>0\frac{25600}{43779488192449}>04377948819244925600​>0 on the worst-case error of every algorithm using at most three queries. This positive error gap is compatible with the near-unit success probabilities reported in earlier numerical studies, which do not establish exact computation.
We (the author and the AI systems that did the heavy lifting) show that the quantum query complexity of minimizing a convex function over a convex subset of Rn\mathbb{R}^nRn with evaluation and membership queries is Ω~(n)\tildeΩ(n)Ω~(n), nearly matching the best known upper bound. In particular, we show this even for quadratic minimization, which is equivalent to inverting an n×nn \times nn×n real matrix using matrix-vector queries. We also show linear or nearly linear lower bounds on the quantum query complexity of computing the trace, the sign of the determinant, and the magnitude of the determinant of a real matrix in the matrix-vector query model. We use a novel quantum lower bound technique, the determinantal witness method, based on identifying a witness whose Fourier transform vanishes on low-rank matrices and that correlates well with the function being computed.
Quantum strong direct-product theorems for specific functions have been known for nearly two decades. These have been extended to general results for function computation and state generation. The proofs of these results use a version of the multiplicative adversary method that does not naturally extend to relations. Standard strong direct-product theorems apply when algorithms must correctly answer every given question. Prior work extended them to equivalent threshold direct-product theorems, which require answers to all questions but only require that most answers are correct. We focus on two further generalizations. Strong selective direct-products apply to algorithms that adaptively choose, based on what they learn from queries, which questions from a large list to answer. This generalization is relational and useful for proving time-space tradeoffs. We prove a quantum strong selective direct-product theorem for all functions using a relational formulation of the multiplicative adversary method by Jeffery and Zur which we prove, via an equivalent formulation, satisfies a strong selective direct product property and captures any query lower bound for functions proven by negative-weights adversaries. The second generalization is list-decoding direct product problems introduced by Ben-David and Blais for classical query complexity. These allow an algorithm to produce a large list of possible output vectors such that one of them is fully correct. They proved that such theorems hold for randomized complexity of all Boolean functions. We prove a quantum analogue of this theorem for all partial Boolean-valued functions. We show that strong list-decoding direct-product theorems are implied by a special case of multiplicative adversaries which we show, via a new reduction, can be obtained from negative-weights adversaries for any Boolean-valued function.
We study the quantum query complexity of several basic graph problems. 1) We prove a tight Θ(n3/2)Θ(n^{3/2})Θ(n3/2) bound for finding a maximum-out-degree vertex in an nnn-vertex tournament, resolving a conjecture of Mande, Paraashar, and Saurabh [FSTTCS'23]. 2) Using the same proof idea, we give a direct proof that finding a maximum-degree vertex in an nnn-vertex undirected graph requires Θ(n3/2)Θ(n^{3/2})Θ(n3/2) quantum queries, a bound implicit in the work of Apers and Lee [CCC'21]. Both lower bounds above hold even for computing only the maximum degree or maximum out-degree. 3) We also study Maximum (k,n−k)(k,n-k)(k,n−k)-Cut, which asks for the largest cut with one side of size kkk. For every constant k≥1k\geq 1k≥1, we give an O(n2−1/(k+1))O(n^{2-1/(k+1)})O(n2−1/(k+1))-query quantum algorithm. 4) We establish a reduction to Maximum (k,n−k)(k,n-k)(k,n−k)-Cut involving kkk-Graph Collision, which asks whether the marked vertices of a known graph contain a kkk-clique. For k≥3k\geq 3k≥3, this yields unconditional lower bounds with exponents strictly larger than 3/23/23/2, showing that this problem is strictly harder than computing maximum degree. Additionally, under a conjecture we propose for kkk-Graph Collision, the reduction yields a lower bound matching our upper bound above.