Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2609.39922

Fault-tolerant cost of shallow QAOA on near-symmetric optimization problems

Jernej Rudi Finžgar, Martin Leib, Elisabeth Wybo

quant-phSubmitted Sep 30, 2026• Announced Oct 1, 2026• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Montanaro and Zhou proved that depth-one Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) finds the planted solution of certain near-symmetric constraint satisfaction problems with probability $Ω(1)$, and observed exponential runtimes for general-purpose classical solvers on explicit realizations, providing strong evidence of an empirical exponential speedup of low-depth QAOA. We ask what such a circuit costs fault-tolerantly. Although the cost Hamiltonian carries $Θ(n^\ell)$ clauses, the rotation angle at which QAOA succeeds shrinks as $n^{1-\ell}$, and we show that small-angle Clifford$+T$ rotation synthesis reduces the non-Clifford cost per circuit to $\widetilde O(n^2)$ for every clause locality $\ell$. Compiling the circuit, however, requires the explicit clause list. We find that the mechanism underlying constant QAOA success fixes the degree-one Fourier coefficients of the cost, whose signs reveal the planted solution. However, this leakage need not reveal the solution: we design families in which the quadratic non-Clifford scaling and hard exact optimization coexist.

Comments
11+3 pages, 3 figures

Related papers

Quantum speedups in solving near-symmetric optimization problems by low-depth QAOA

Ashley Montanaro, Leo Zhou

We present new advances towards achieving exponential quantum speedups for solving optimization problems by low-depth quantum algorithms. Specifically, we focus on families of combinatorial optimization problems that exhibit symmetry and contain planted solutions. We rigorously prove that the 1-step Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) can achieve a success probability of $Ω(1/\sqrt{n})$, and sometimes $Ω(1)$, for finding the exact solution in many cases. This allows us to prove a separation of $O(1)$ quantum queries and $Ω(n/\log n)$ classical queries required to find the planted solution in the latter setting. Furthermore, we construct near-symmetric optimization problems by randomly sampling the individual clauses of symmetric problems, and prove that the QAOA maintains a strong success probability in this setting even when the symmetry is broken. Finally, we construct various families of near-symmetric Max-SAT problems and benchmark state-of-the-art classical solvers, discovering instances where all known general-purpose classical algorithms require exponential time. Therefore, our results indicate that low-depth QAOA may achieve an exponential quantum speedup for optimization problems.

arXiv:2411.04979•Nov 7, 2024•2 citations

More efficient Clifford+T synthesis for small-angle rotations and application to Trotterization

Marius Bothe, Christoph Sünderhauf, Michael J. Witham +2 more

Clifford+T synthesis of rotation gates is an important routine in fault-tolerant quantum compilation. While Clifford+T synthesis is scalable, it has a high overhead of tens of T gates per rotation in practice, translating to high resource estimates for many fault-tolerant algorithms. However, these well-known results, including those using probabilistic mixtures [Quantum 7, 1208 (2023)], are independent of the rotation angle $θ$, requiring $O(\log 1/δ)$ T gates. We show that it is possible to do much better for small angles, reducing the T cost to $\tilde{O}(θ^2/δ)$, and returning to existing $O(\log1/δ)$ results in the worst case. This is particularly important since many algorithms, such as Trotterization, are dominated by small-angle rotations. Further, we perform a detailed theoretical and numerical study of quasi-probabilities, which can further reduce the total T cost of large circuits by orders of magnitude with only a small overhead in sample complexity. We also develop a scheme based on quasi-probability mixtures of Clifford+T fallback channels. We derive new $θ$-dependent formulas that can be used for resource estimation of fault-tolerant quantum algorithms. As an application of our results, we show that the gate cost of Trotterization circuits compiled to a Clifford+T gate set is constant in the small Trotter step size limit, and can be reduced by orders of magnitude even for large step sizes. The cost of fault-tolerant Trotterization for a variety of applications should be re-examined in light of these results. Our work dispels the widely-stated claim that Clifford+T rotation synthesis has a high cost independent of $θ$, and further develops a scalable quasi-probability method for rotation synthesis. We also expect our results to bring forward useful early fault-tolerant quantum computing by reducing required magic state resources.

quant-pharXiv:2605.31544•Jun 1, 2026•0 citations

Solving Boolean Satisfiability Problems With The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm

Sami Boulebnane, Ashley Montanaro

One of the most prominent application areas for quantum computers is solving hard constraint satisfaction and optimization problems. However, detailed analyses of the complexity of standard quantum algorithms have suggested that outperforming classical methods for these problems would require extremely large and powerful quantum computers. The quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) is designed for near-term quantum computers, yet previous work has shown strong limitations on the ability of QAOA to outperform classical algorithms for optimization problems. Here we instead apply QAOA to hard constraint satisfaction problems, where both classical and quantum algorithms are expected to require exponential time. We analytically characterize the average success probability of QAOA on a constraint satisfaction problem commonly studied using statistical physics methods: random k -SAT at the threshold for satisfiability, as the number of variables n goes to infinity. We complement these theoretical results with numerical experiments on the performance of QAOA for small n , which match the limiting theoretical bounds closely. We then compare QAOA with leading classical solvers. For random 8-SAT, we find that for more than 14 quantum circuit layers, QAOA achieves more efficient scaling than the highest-performance classical solver we tested, WalkSATlm. Our results suggest that near-term quantum algorithms for solving constraint satisfaction problems may outperform their classical counterparts. Published by the American Physical Society 2024

arXiv:2208.06909•PRX Quantum•Sep 10, 2024•57 citations

Optimizing QAOA: Success Probability and Runtime Dependence on Circuit Depth

Murphy Yuezhen Niu, Sirui Lu, Isaac L. Chuang

The quantum approximate optimization algorithm~(QAOA) first proposed by Farhi et al. promises near-term applications based on its simplicity, universality, and provable optimality. A depth-p QAOA consists of p interleaved unitary transformations induced by two mutually non-commuting Hamiltonians. A long-standing question concerning the performance of QAOA is the dependence of its success probability as a function of circuit depth p. We make initial progress by analyzing the success probability of QAOA for realizing state transfer in a one-dimensional qubit chain using two-qubit XY Hamiltonians and single-qubit Hamiltonians. We provide analytic state transfer success probability dependencies on p in both low and large p limits by leveraging the unique spectral property of the XY Hamiltonian. We support our proof under a given QAOA ansatz with numerical optimizations of QAOA for up to \(N\)=20 qubits. We show that the optimized QAOA can achieve the well-known quadratic speedup, Grover speedup, over the classical alternatives. Treating QAOA optimization as a quantum control problem, we also provide numerical evidence of how the circuit depth determines the controllability of the QAOA ansatz.

arXiv:1905.12134•May 28, 2019•23 citations

On the power of the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm

Sami Boulebnane

The main object of study of this work is the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) —the best-known heuristic quantum algorithm for addressing combinatorial optimization problems. Despite its popularity, QAOA poses major challenges. Namely, its performance remains poorly understood, especially in the low depth regime most relevant to near-term quantum computing. Besides, the algorithm is of variational nature, relying on several hyperparameters to be classically trained. In this work, we contribute to addressing these issues by developing techniques to understand the performance of QAOA at low depth, and deducing from these pretrained hyperparameters, thereby eliminating or considerably reducing the need for a classical optimization loop. We first consider applying QAOA to constraint satisfaction problems with the goal of maximizing the algorithm’s approximation ratio (fraction of satisfied constraints). As a particular example, we consider QAOA applied to MAXCUT on non-regular graphs, showing how analytic techniques provide good guess hyperparameters in this setting. Next, we analyze the performance of QAOA on a well-studied constraint satisfaction problem: random k-SAT. In this case, the performance is measured by the probability of finding an assignment satisfying all constraints (“success probability”). To estimate this quantity, we develop new techniques, mapping quantum expectation values of the QAOA circuits to classical spin models. We further show how these techniques can be generalized to a larger family of random constraint satisfaction problems. We conclude the work by two feasibility studies inspired by real-world use cases encountered in collaborations with industrial partners: peptide sampling, and solving flow problems. These problems are naturally phrased by encoding combinatorial variables in qudits, a relatively unexplored setting in the existing literature. We present partial analytic and numerical results for optimal QAOA hyperparameters and the scaling of its success probability in this framework, underlining potential specific difficulties when using QAOA with qudits.

•Nov 28, 2024•0 citations

Learning angles for quantum approximate optimization

Johannes Jakubik, Isabelle Wittmann, Zaheed Gaffoor +5 more

The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) and its variants are leading algorithms to help solve challenging combinatorial optimization problems. QAOA maps these problems to Ising Hamiltonians such that their ground state is the desired solution. Candidate solutions are then drawn from a variational quantum circuit. The performance of QAOA hinges on a set of variational angles. However, finding good angles is an instance-specific and computationally expensive non-convex classical optimization task. Here, we learn the mapping from the problem instance to high-quality QAOA angles. Our learned models replace the per-instance optimization, that we call the solver, with a single forward pass that is several orders of magnitude faster than the solver with a near identical quality. Our models further generalize to unseen topologies such as Barabási-Albert and 2D grid graphs. Experiments on quantum hardware confirm that QAOA samples with angles produced by our open-source models are indistinguishable from solver angles. Crucially, models sensitive to the topology of the problem instance increase the quality of the QAOA angles. Our work amortizes a major bottleneck in QAOA by an up-front data generation and training cost. Importantly, this cost can be amortized over time in settings where many similar problems are optimized on a regular basis, as is often the case in applications for industry.

quant-pharXiv:2610.23296•Oct 19, 2026•0 citations
Montanaro and Zhou proved that depth-one Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) finds the planted solution of certain near-symmetric constraint satisfaction problems with probability Ω(1)Ω(1)Ω(1), and observed exponential runtimes for general-purpose classical solvers on explicit realizations, providing strong evidence of an empirical exponential speedup of low-depth QAOA. We ask what such a circuit costs fault-tolerantly. Although the cost Hamiltonian carries Θ(nℓ)Θ(n^\ell)Θ(nℓ) clauses, the rotation angle at which QAOA succeeds shrinks as n1−ℓn^{1-\ell}n1−ℓ, and we show that small-angle Clifford+T+T+T rotation synthesis reduces the non-Clifford cost per circuit to O~(n2)\widetilde O(n^2)O(n2) for every clause locality ℓ\ellℓ. Compiling the circuit, however, requires the explicit clause list. We find that the mechanism underlying constant QAOA success fixes the degree-one Fourier coefficients of the cost, whose signs reveal the planted solution. However, this leakage need not reveal the solution: we design families in which the quadratic non-Clifford scaling and hard exact optimization coexist.
We present new advances towards achieving exponential quantum speedups for solving optimization problems by low-depth quantum algorithms. Specifically, we focus on families of combinatorial optimization problems that exhibit symmetry and contain planted solutions. We rigorously prove that the 1-step Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) can achieve a success probability of Ω(1/n)Ω(1/\sqrt{n})Ω(1/n​), and sometimes Ω(1)Ω(1)Ω(1), for finding the exact solution in many cases. This allows us to prove a separation of O(1)O(1)O(1) quantum queries and Ω(n/log⁡n)Ω(n/\log n)Ω(n/logn) classical queries required to find the planted solution in the latter setting. Furthermore, we construct near-symmetric optimization problems by randomly sampling the individual clauses of symmetric problems, and prove that the QAOA maintains a strong success probability in this setting even when the symmetry is broken. Finally, we construct various families of near-symmetric Max-SAT problems and benchmark state-of-the-art classical solvers, discovering instances where all known general-purpose classical algorithms require exponential time. Therefore, our results indicate that low-depth QAOA may achieve an exponential quantum speedup for optimization problems.
Clifford+T synthesis of rotation gates is an important routine in fault-tolerant quantum compilation. While Clifford+T synthesis is scalable, it has a high overhead of tens of T gates per rotation in practice, translating to high resource estimates for many fault-tolerant algorithms. However, these well-known results, including those using probabilistic mixtures [Quantum 7, 1208 (2023)], are independent of the rotation angle θθθ, requiring O(log⁡1/δ)O(\log 1/δ)O(log1/δ) T gates. We show that it is possible to do much better for small angles, reducing the T cost to O~(θ2/δ)\tilde{O}(θ^2/δ)O~(θ2/δ), and returning to existing O(log⁡1/δ)O(\log1/δ)O(log1/δ) results in the worst case. This is particularly important since many algorithms, such as Trotterization, are dominated by small-angle rotations. Further, we perform a detailed theoretical and numerical study of quasi-probabilities, which can further reduce the total T cost of large circuits by orders of magnitude with only a small overhead in sample complexity. We also develop a scheme based on quasi-probability mixtures of Clifford+T fallback channels. We derive new θθθ-dependent formulas that can be used for resource estimation of fault-tolerant quantum algorithms. As an application of our results, we show that the gate cost of Trotterization circuits compiled to a Clifford+T gate set is constant in the small Trotter step size limit, and can be reduced by orders of magnitude even for large step sizes. The cost of fault-tolerant Trotterization for a variety of applications should be re-examined in light of these results. Our work dispels the widely-stated claim that Clifford+T rotation synthesis has a high cost independent of θθθ, and further develops a scalable quasi-probability method for rotation synthesis. We also expect our results to bring forward useful early fault-tolerant quantum computing by reducing required magic state resources.
One of the most prominent application areas for quantum computers is solving hard constraint satisfaction and optimization problems. However, detailed analyses of the complexity of standard quantum algorithms have suggested that outperforming classical methods for these problems would require extremely large and powerful quantum computers. The quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) is designed for near-term quantum computers, yet previous work has shown strong limitations on the ability of QAOA to outperform classical algorithms for optimization problems. Here we instead apply QAOA to hard constraint satisfaction problems, where both classical and quantum algorithms are expected to require exponential time. We analytically characterize the average success probability of QAOA on a constraint satisfaction problem commonly studied using statistical physics methods: random k -SAT at the threshold for satisfiability, as the number of variables n goes to infinity. We complement these theoretical results with numerical experiments on the performance of QAOA for small n , which match the limiting theoretical bounds closely. We then compare QAOA with leading classical solvers. For random 8-SAT, we find that for more than 14 quantum circuit layers, QAOA achieves more efficient scaling than the highest-performance classical solver we tested, WalkSATlm. Our results suggest that near-term quantum algorithms for solving constraint satisfaction problems may outperform their classical counterparts. Published by the American Physical Society 2024
The quantum approximate optimization algorithm~(QAOA) first proposed by Farhi et al. promises near-term applications based on its simplicity, universality, and provable optimality. A depth-p QAOA consists of p interleaved unitary transformations induced by two mutually non-commuting Hamiltonians. A long-standing question concerning the performance of QAOA is the dependence of its success probability as a function of circuit depth p. We make initial progress by analyzing the success probability of QAOA for realizing state transfer in a one-dimensional qubit chain using two-qubit XY Hamiltonians and single-qubit Hamiltonians. We provide analytic state transfer success probability dependencies on p in both low and large p limits by leveraging the unique spectral property of the XY Hamiltonian. We support our proof under a given QAOA ansatz with numerical optimizations of QAOA for up to NNN=20 qubits. We show that the optimized QAOA can achieve the well-known quadratic speedup, Grover speedup, over the classical alternatives. Treating QAOA optimization as a quantum control problem, we also provide numerical evidence of how the circuit depth determines the controllability of the QAOA ansatz.
The main object of study of this work is the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) —the best-known heuristic quantum algorithm for addressing combinatorial optimization problems. Despite its popularity, QAOA poses major challenges. Namely, its performance remains poorly understood, especially in the low depth regime most relevant to near-term quantum computing. Besides, the algorithm is of variational nature, relying on several hyperparameters to be classically trained. In this work, we contribute to addressing these issues by developing techniques to understand the performance of QAOA at low depth, and deducing from these pretrained hyperparameters, thereby eliminating or considerably reducing the need for a classical optimization loop. We first consider applying QAOA to constraint satisfaction problems with the goal of maximizing the algorithm’s approximation ratio (fraction of satisfied constraints). As a particular example, we consider QAOA applied to MAXCUT on non-regular graphs, showing how analytic techniques provide good guess hyperparameters in this setting. Next, we analyze the performance of QAOA on a well-studied constraint satisfaction problem: random k-SAT. In this case, the performance is measured by the probability of finding an assignment satisfying all constraints (“success probability”). To estimate this quantity, we develop new techniques, mapping quantum expectation values of the QAOA circuits to classical spin models. We further show how these techniques can be generalized to a larger family of random constraint satisfaction problems. We conclude the work by two feasibility studies inspired by real-world use cases encountered in collaborations with industrial partners: peptide sampling, and solving flow problems. These problems are naturally phrased by encoding combinatorial variables in qudits, a relatively unexplored setting in the existing literature. We present partial analytic and numerical results for optimal QAOA hyperparameters and the scaling of its success probability in this framework, underlining potential specific difficulties when using QAOA with qudits.
The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) and its variants are leading algorithms to help solve challenging combinatorial optimization problems. QAOA maps these problems to Ising Hamiltonians such that their ground state is the desired solution. Candidate solutions are then drawn from a variational quantum circuit. The performance of QAOA hinges on a set of variational angles. However, finding good angles is an instance-specific and computationally expensive non-convex classical optimization task. Here, we learn the mapping from the problem instance to high-quality QAOA angles. Our learned models replace the per-instance optimization, that we call the solver, with a single forward pass that is several orders of magnitude faster than the solver with a near identical quality. Our models further generalize to unseen topologies such as Barabási-Albert and 2D grid graphs. Experiments on quantum hardware confirm that QAOA samples with angles produced by our open-source models are indistinguishable from solver angles. Crucially, models sensitive to the topology of the problem instance increase the quality of the QAOA angles. Our work amortizes a major bottleneck in QAOA by an up-front data generation and training cost. Importantly, this cost can be amortized over time in settings where many similar problems are optimized on a regular basis, as is often the case in applications for industry.