One of the most prominent application areas for quantum computers is solving hard constraint satisfaction and optimization problems. However, detailed analyses of the complexity of standard quantum algorithms have suggested that outperforming classical methods for these problems would require extremely large and powerful quantum computers. The quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) is designed for near-term quantum computers, yet previous work has shown strong limitations on the ability of QAOA to outperform classical algorithms for optimization problems. Here we instead apply QAOA to hard constraint satisfaction problems, where both classical and quantum algorithms are expected to require exponential time. We analytically characterize the average success probability of QAOA on a constraint satisfaction problem commonly studied using statistical physics methods: random k -SAT at the threshold for satisfiability, as the number of variables n goes to infinity. We complement these theoretical results with numerical experiments on the performance of QAOA for small n , which match the limiting theoretical bounds closely. We then compare QAOA with leading classical solvers. For random 8-SAT, we find that for more than 14 quantum circuit layers, QAOA achieves more efficient scaling than the highest-performance classical solver we tested, WalkSATlm. Our results suggest that near-term quantum algorithms for solving constraint satisfaction problems may outperform their classical counterparts. Published by the American Physical Society 2024
One of the most prominent application areas for quantum computers is solving hard constraint satisfaction and optimization problems. However, detailed analyses of the complexity of standard quantum algorithms have suggested that outperforming classical methods for these problems would require extremely large and powerful quantum computers. The quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) is designed for near-term quantum computers, yet previous work has shown strong limitations on the ability of QAOA to outperform classical algorithms for optimization problems. Here we instead apply QAOA to hard constraint satisfaction problems, where both classical and quantum algorithms are expected to require exponential time. We analytically characterize the average success probability of QAOA on a constraint satisfaction problem commonly studied using statistical physics methods: random k -SAT at the threshold for satisfiability, as the number of variables n goes to infinity. We complement these theoretical results with numerical experiments on the performance of QAOA for small n , which match the limiting theoretical bounds closely. We then compare QAOA with leading classical solvers. For random 8-SAT, we find that for more than 14 quantum circuit layers, QAOA achieves more efficient scaling than the highest-performance classical solver we tested, WalkSATlm. Our results suggest that near-term quantum algorithms for solving constraint satisfaction problems may outperform their classical counterparts. Published by the American Physical Society 2024
The ability of the quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) to deliver a quantum advantage on combinatorial optimization problems is still unclear. Recently, a scaling advantage over a classical solver was postulated to exist for random 8-SAT at the satisfiability threshold. At the same time, the viability of quantum error mitigation for deep circuits on near-term devices has been put into doubt. Here we analyze the QAOA's performance on random Max- k XOR as a function of k and the clause-to-variable ratio. As a classical benchmark, we use the mean-field approximate optimization algorithm and find that it performs better than or equal to the QAOA on average. Still, for large k and numbers of layers p , there may remain a window of opportunity for the QAOA. However, by extrapolating our numerical results, we find that reaching high levels of satisfaction would require extremely large p , which must be considered rather difficult both in the variational context and on near-term devices.
In this work we develop theoretical techniques for analysing the performance of the quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) when applied to random boolean constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs), and use these techniques to compare the complexity of a variety of CSPs, such as k-SAT, 1-in-k SAT, and NAE-SAT. Our techniques allow us to compute the success probability of QAOA with one layer and given parameters, when applied to randomly generated instances of CSPs with k binary variables per constraint, in time polynomial in n and k. We apply this algorithm to all boolean CSPs with k=3 and a large number of CSPs with k=4, k=5, and compare the resulting complexity with the complexity of solving the corresponding CSP using the standard solver MapleSAT, determined experimentally. We find that random k-SAT seems to be the most promising of these CSPs for demonstrating a quantum-classical separation using QAOA.
The main object of study of this work is the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) —the best-known heuristic quantum algorithm for addressing combinatorial optimization problems. Despite its popularity, QAOA poses major challenges. Namely, its performance remains poorly understood, especially in the low depth regime most relevant to near-term quantum computing. Besides, the algorithm is of variational nature, relying on several hyperparameters to be classically trained. In this work, we contribute to addressing these issues by developing techniques to understand the performance of QAOA at low depth, and deducing from these pretrained hyperparameters, thereby eliminating or considerably reducing the need for a classical optimization loop. We first consider applying QAOA to constraint satisfaction problems with the goal of maximizing the algorithm’s approximation ratio (fraction of satisfied constraints). As a particular example, we consider QAOA applied to MAXCUT on non-regular graphs, showing how analytic techniques provide good guess hyperparameters in this setting. Next, we analyze the performance of QAOA on a well-studied constraint satisfaction problem: random k-SAT. In this case, the performance is measured by the probability of finding an assignment satisfying all constraints (“success probability”). To estimate this quantity, we develop new techniques, mapping quantum expectation values of the QAOA circuits to classical spin models. We further show how these techniques can be generalized to a larger family of random constraint satisfaction problems. We conclude the work by two feasibility studies inspired by real-world use cases encountered in collaborations with industrial partners: peptide sampling, and solving flow problems. These problems are naturally phrased by encoding combinatorial variables in qudits, a relatively unexplored setting in the existing literature. We present partial analytic and numerical results for optimal QAOA hyperparameters and the scaling of its success probability in this framework, underlining potential specific difficulties when using QAOA with qudits.
Abstract Quantum Approximate Optimization algorithm (QAOA) aims to search for approximate solutions to discrete optimization problems with near-term quantum computers. As there are no algorithmic guarantee possible for QAOA to outperform classical computers, without a proof that bounded-error quantum polynomial time (BQP) ≠ nondeterministic polynomial time (NP), it is necessary to investigate the empirical advantages of QAOA. We identify a computational phase transition of QAOA when solving hard problems such as SAT—random instances are most difficult to train at a critical problem density. We connect the transition to the controllability and the complexity of QAOA circuits. Moreover, we find that the critical problem density in general deviates from the SAT-UNSAT phase transition, where the hardest instances for classical algorithms lies. Then, we show that the high problem density region, which limits QAOA’s performance in hard optimization problems (reachability deficits), is actually a good place to utilize QAOA: its approximation ratio has a much slower decay with the problem density, compared to classical approximate algorithms. Indeed, it is exactly in this region that quantum advantages of QAOA over classical approximate algorithms can be identified.
The quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) is a promising method for solving certain classical combinatorial optimization problems on near-term quantum devices. When employing the QAOA to 3-SAT and Max-3-SAT problems, the quantum cost exhibits an easy-hard-easy or easy-hard pattern, respectively, as the clause density is changed. The quantum resources needed in the hard-region problems are out of reach for current noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices. We show by numerical simulations with up to 14 variables and analytical arguments that the adaptive-bias QAOA (ab-QAOA) greatly improves performance in the hard region of the 3-SAT problems and hard region of the Max-3-SAT problems. For similar accuracy, on average, ab-QAOA needs 3 levels for 10-variable 3-SAT problems as compared to 22 for QAOA. For 10-variable Max-3-SAT problems, the numbers are 7 levels and 62 levels. The improvement comes from a more targeted and more limited generation of entanglement during the evolution. We demonstrate that classical optimization is not strictly necessary in the ab-QAOA since local fields are used to guide the evolution. This leads us to propose an optimization-free ab-QAOA that can solve the hard-region 3-SAT and Max-3-SAT problems effectively with significantly fewer quantum gates as compared to the original ab-QAOA. Our work paves the way for realizing quantum advantages for optimization problems on NISQ devices.
Establishing quantum advantage for variational quantum algorithms is an important direction in quantum computing. In this work, we apply the Quantum Approximate Optimisation Algorithm (QAOA) -- a popular variational quantum algorithm for general combinatorial optimisation problems -- to a variant of the satisfiability problem (SAT): Not-All-Equal SAT (NAE-SAT). We focus on regimes where the problems are known to have solutions with low probability and introduce a novel classical solver that outperforms existing solvers. Extensively benchmarking QAOA against this, we show that while the runtime of both solvers scales exponentially with the problem size, the scaling exponent for QAOA is smaller for large enough circuit depths. This implies a polynomial quantum speedup for solving NAE-SAT.