Non-uniform security allows an adversary to receive bounded advice about an oracle before attempting a fresh challenge. This captures the most realistic attacks and has already been studied extensively in prior work. In this work, we introduce an operator-norm approach for non-uniform security in the quantum random oracle and random permutation models. This new approach yields a unified reduction for both search success probability and distinguishing advantage. Previously, the reduction only worked with success probability even in the decision games, yielding a worse bound.
Our framework enables tight bounds for Yao's box, both with and without salting, and improved bounds for pseudorandom generators. We also prove an optimal generic salting theorem for decision games. By defining a property of a game, which separates the contributions of the existing queries in the offline stage and subsequent online queries, we obtain stronger bounds for specific salted constructions. These include salted permutation inversion, tight up to logarithmic factors, and salted random-function inversion, tight up to logarithmic factors and the gap already present in classical function inversion.
Non-uniform security allows an adversary to receive bounded advice about an oracle before attempting a fresh challenge. This captures the most realistic attacks and has already been studied extensively in prior work. In this work, we introduce an operator-norm approach for non-uniform security in the quantum random oracle and random permutation models. This new approach yields a unified reduction for both search success probability and distinguishing advantage. Previously, the reduction only worked with success probability even in the decision games, yielding a worse bound.
Our framework enables tight bounds for Yao's box, both with and without salting, and improved bounds for pseudorandom generators. We also prove an optimal generic salting theorem for decision games. By defining a property of a game, which separates the contributions of the existing queries in the offline stage and subsequent online queries, we obtain stronger bounds for specific salted constructions. These include salted permutation inversion, tight up to logarithmic factors, and salted random-function inversion, tight up to logarithmic factors and the gap already present in classical function inversion.
We prove near-optimal lower bounds for preprocessing attacks on quantum cryptography in the random oracle model. Specifically, we show that a T-query adversary with S qubits of non-uniform advice can recover a random key k from the n-qubit binary phase state ∣ψk⟩∝∑xR(k,x)∣x⟩ with probability at most O(NT2+ST) for N=2n. In contrast, the best known bound for post-quantum one-way functions is O(NT2+ST), with a trivial attack at S=N. This demonstrates a new advantage of quantum cryptography over classical cryptography: n qubits of communication suffice for security against preprocessing attacks with space up to N2 rather than N. Our methodology is simple: express the optimal preprocessing attack as the operator norm of a random matrix, and bound this value in expectation over the random oracle via the trace-moment method. These trace moments have a natural interpretation using compressed oracles [Zhandry, Crypto 2019], which we then analyze. This can be viewed as a simplification and generalization of the approach of Liu [Eurocrypt 2023] for proving the security of post-quantum cryptography against preprocessing attacks. We also prove the following results: (1) We tighten Liu's analysis of post-quantum PRGs in QROM, achieving a distinguishing advantage bound of O(NT2+NST). (2) For unitary synthesis, we extend the one-query lower bound of Lombardi-Ma-Wright [STOC 2024] to hold against adversaries that can make one arbitrary function query along with polynomially many (adaptive) queries to the random oracle, either before or after the function query. This also interprets the original LMW24 result in terms of compressed oracles. (3) Finally, we prove a tight O(NS) bound for the pseudorandomness of random binary phase states against space S distinguishers.
We construct simulation-secure one-time memories (OTM) in the random oracle model, and present a plausible argument for their security against quantum adversaries with bounded and adaptive depth. Our contributions include: (1) A simple scheme where we use only single-qubit Wiesner states and conjunction obfuscation (constructible from LPN): no complex entanglement or quantum cryptography is required. (2) A new POVM bound where e prove that any measurement achieving (1−ε) success on one basis has conjugate-basis guessing probability at most 2m1+O(ε41). (3) Simultation-secure OTMs in the quantum random oracle model where an adversary can only query the random oracle classically. (4) Adaptive depth security where, via an informal application of a lifting theorem from Arora et al., we conjecture security against adversaries with polynomial quantum circuit depth between random oracle queries.
Security against adaptive, depth-bounded, quantum adversaries captures many realistic attacks on OTMs built from single-qubit states; our work thus paves the way for practical and truly secure one-time programs. Moreover, depth bounded adaptive adversarial models may allow for encoding one-time memories into error corrected memory states, opening the door to implementations of one-time programs which persist for long periods of time.
We study the (quantum) security of pseudorandom generators (PRGs) constructed from random oracles. We prove a "lifting theorem" showing, roughly, that if such a PRG is unconditionally secure against classical adversaries making polynomially many queries to the random oracle, then it is also (unconditionally) secure against quantum adversaries in the same sense. As a result of independent interest, we also show that any pseudo-deterministic quantum-oracle algorithm (i.e., a quantum algorithm that with high probability returns the same value on repeated executions) can be simulated by a computationally unbounded but query bounded classical-oracle algorithm with only a polynomial blowup in the number of queries. This implies as a corollary that our lifting theorem holds even for PRGs that themselves make quantum queries to the random oracle.
Cryptographic security proofs often involve an adversary interacting with a larger, keyed oracle that consists of (potentially exponentially) many independent instances of a smaller, base oracle. However, showing quantum indistinguishability between two such keyed oracles can be tricky, since a single query made by an adversary may involve a superposition that covers all instances of the base oracles simultaneously.
In this paper, we establish a generic indistinguishability lifting theorem of the following form: if the two base oracles are indistinguishable under quantum queries, then their corresponding keyed oracles are too, up to an O(q^2) multiplicative loss in distinguishing advantage, where q is the number of queries made by the adversary. Our lifting theorem applies to both statistical and computational settings, and to oracles that are stateful as well. It is also optimal in that it matches the obvious Grover search attack for a certain (contrived) choice of oracles.
As an immediate application, we extend Carolan's compressed permutation oracle to an efficiently implementable compressed ideal cipher, and use it to prove preimage resistance of the Davies-Meyer compression function in the quantum ideal cipher model. Thanks to our lifting theorem, the soundness of our compressed ideal cipher reduces to that of Carolan's oracle, and any further improvement on the latter would automatically carry over to the former.
As our second application, we give a modular construction that doubles the message length of any quantum-secure strong pseudorandom permutation. Along the way, we show that an existing two-round tweakable Feistel construction is indistinguishable from a random permutation under quantum bidirectional queries. This is done via a dedicated polynomial-method argument, which may be of independent interest.
The famous no-cloning principle has been shown recently to enable a number of uncloneable cryptographic primitives, including the copy-protection of certain functionalities. Here we address for the first time unkeyed quantum uncloneablity, via the study of a complexity-theoretic tool that enables a computation, but that is natively unkeyed: quantum advice. Remarkably, this is an application of the no-cloning principle in a context where the quantum states of interest are not chosen by a random process. We establish unconditional constructions for promise problems admitting uncloneable quantum advice and, assuming the feasibility of quantum copy-protecting certain functions, for languages with uncloneable advice. Along the way, we note that state complexity classes, introduced by Rosenthal and Yuen (ITCS 2022) — which concern the computational difficulty of synthesizing sequences of quantum states — can be naturally generalized to obtain state cloning complexity classes. We make initial observations on these classes, notably obtaining a result analogous to the existence of undecidable problems. Our proof technique defines and constructs ingenerable sequences of finite bit strings, essentially meaning that they cannot be generated by any uniform circuit family with non-negligible probability. We then prove a generic result showing that the difficulty of accomplishing a computational task on uniformly random inputs implies its difficulty on any fixed, ingenerable sequence. We use this result to derandomize quantum cryptographic games that relate to cloning, and then incorporate a result of Kundu and Tan (arXiv 2022) to obtain uncloneable advice. Applying this two-step process to a monogamy-of-entanglement game yields a promise problem with uncloneable advice, and applying it to the quantum copy-protection of pseudorandom functions with super-logarithmic output lengths yields a language with uncloneable advice.
The unitary synthesis problem (Aaronson-Kuperberg, CCC 2007) asks whether every n-qubit unitary U is computable by efficient quantum circuits relative to some classical oracle f=fU depending on U. Recently, Lombardi-Ma-Wright (STOC 2024) proved that Haar-random unitaries cannot be efficiently synthesized by algorithms that make 1 query (or poly(n) parallel queries) to an arbitrary classical oracle. In this work, we prove several results about the hardness (and easiness!) of variants of unitary synthesis. Our results include: (1) 1-query vs. 2-query unitary synthesis: we prove 1-query lower bounds for synthesizing random permutation unitaries P∣x⟩=∣π(x)⟩, as well as random alternating-basis phase unitaries F2⋅H⊗n⋅F1. This gives 1-query lower bounds for "explicit" families of unitaries that have efficient (even 2-query) synthesis algorithms. (2) Upper bound for complex phase unitaries: we also consider complex phase unitaries ∣x⟩↦αx∣x⟩, which have a clean 2-query synthesis algorithm with no obvious 1-query algorithm. In this case, we prove an upper bound: there are 1-query algorithms (relative to binary phase oracles) that constant-approximate these unitaries in diamond distance. In order to prove our lower bounds, we introduce and analyze two new cryptographic games: the oracle state search game and the oracle Choi state game. Compared to prior work, our framework is mathematically simple, more flexible in what it can prove, and more accurately captures the hardness of synthesizing unitaries that are not "fully random". Finally, we also use the search game to prove a new hardness-of-approximation result for quantum programs (synthesizing unitaries relative to quantum advice) for phase unitaries, giving a sharper separation between 1-query unitary synthesis and quantum programs.