We study the (quantum) security of pseudorandom generators (PRGs) constructed from random oracles. We prove a "lifting theorem" showing, roughly, that if such a PRG is unconditionally secure against classical adversaries making polynomially many queries to the random oracle, then it is also (unconditionally) secure against quantum adversaries in the same sense. As a result of independent interest, we also show that any pseudo-deterministic quantum-oracle algorithm (i.e., a quantum algorithm that with high probability returns the same value on repeated executions) can be simulated by a computationally unbounded but query bounded classical-oracle algorithm with only a polynomial blowup in the number of queries. This implies as a corollary that our lifting theorem holds even for PRGs that themselves make quantum queries to the random oracle.
We study the (quantum) security of pseudorandom generators (PRGs) constructed from random oracles. We prove a "lifting theorem" showing, roughly, that if such a PRG is unconditionally secure against classical adversaries making polynomially many queries to the random oracle, then it is also (unconditionally) secure against quantum adversaries in the same sense. As a result of independent interest, we also show that any pseudo-deterministic quantum-oracle algorithm (i.e., a quantum algorithm that with high probability returns the same value on repeated executions) can be simulated by a computationally unbounded but query bounded classical-oracle algorithm with only a polynomial blowup in the number of queries. This implies as a corollary that our lifting theorem holds even for PRGs that themselves make quantum queries to the random oracle.
We investigate query-to-communication lifting theorems for models related to the quantum adversary bounds. Our results are as follows: 1) We show that the classical adversary bound lifts to a lower bound on randomized communication complexity with a constant-sized gadget. We also show that the classical adversary bound is a strictly stronger lower bound technique than the previously-lifted measure known as critical block sensitivity, making our lifting theorem one of the strongest lifting theorems for randomized communication complexity using a constant-sized gadget. 2) Turning to quantum models, we show a connection between lifting theorems for quantum adversary bounds and secure 2-party quantum computation in a certain "honest-but-curious" model. Under the assumption that such secure 2-party computation is impossible, we show that a simplified version of the positive-weight adversary bound lifts to a quantum communication lower bound using a constant-sized gadget. We also give an unconditional lifting theorem which lower bounds bounded-round quantum communication protocols. 3) Finally, we give some new results in query complexity. We show that the classical adversary and the positive-weight quantum adversary are quadratically related. We also show that the positive-weight quantum adversary is never larger than the square of the approximate degree. Both relations hold even for partial functions.
We construct simulation-secure one-time memories (OTM) in the random oracle model, and present a plausible argument for their security against quantum adversaries with bounded and adaptive depth. Our contributions include: (1) A simple scheme where we use only single-qubit Wiesner states and conjunction obfuscation (constructible from LPN): no complex entanglement or quantum cryptography is required. (2) A new POVM bound where e prove that any measurement achieving (1−ε) success on one basis has conjugate-basis guessing probability at most 2m1+O(ε41). (3) Simultation-secure OTMs in the quantum random oracle model where an adversary can only query the random oracle classically. (4) Adaptive depth security where, via an informal application of a lifting theorem from Arora et al., we conjecture security against adversaries with polynomial quantum circuit depth between random oracle queries.
Security against adaptive, depth-bounded, quantum adversaries captures many realistic attacks on OTMs built from single-qubit states; our work thus paves the way for practical and truly secure one-time programs. Moreover, depth bounded adaptive adversarial models may allow for encoding one-time memories into error corrected memory states, opening the door to implementations of one-time programs which persist for long periods of time.
We investigate query-to-communication lifting theorems for models related to the quantum adversary bounds. Our results are as follows: 1) We show that the classical adversary bound lifts to a lower bound on randomized communication complexity with a constant-sized gadget. We also show that the classical adversary bound is a strictly stronger lower bound technique than the previously-lifted measure known as critical block sensitivity, making our lifting theorem one of the strongest lifting theorems for randomized communication complexity using a constant-sized gadget. 2) Turning to quantum models, we show a connection between lifting theorems for quantum adversary bounds and secure 2-party quantum computation in a certain "honest-but-curious" model. Under the assumption that such secure 2-party computation is impossible, we show that a simplified version of the positive-weight adversary bound lifts to a quantum communication lower bound using a constant-sized gadget. We also give an unconditional lifting theorem which lower bounds bounded-round quantum communication protocols. 3) Finally, we give some new results in query complexity. We show that the classical adversary and the positive-weight quantum adversary are quadratically related. We also show that the positive-weight quantum adversary is never larger than the square of the approximate degree. Both relations hold even for partial functions.
We prove near-optimal lower bounds for preprocessing attacks on quantum cryptography in the random oracle model. Specifically, we show that a T-query adversary with S qubits of non-uniform advice can recover a random key k from the n-qubit binary phase state ∣ψk⟩∝∑xR(k,x)∣x⟩ with probability at most O(NT2+ST) for N=2n. In contrast, the best known bound for post-quantum one-way functions is O(NT2+ST), with a trivial attack at S=N. This demonstrates a new advantage of quantum cryptography over classical cryptography: n qubits of communication suffice for security against preprocessing attacks with space up to N2 rather than N. Our methodology is simple: express the optimal preprocessing attack as the operator norm of a random matrix, and bound this value in expectation over the random oracle via the trace-moment method. These trace moments have a natural interpretation using compressed oracles [Zhandry, Crypto 2019], which we then analyze. This can be viewed as a simplification and generalization of the approach of Liu [Eurocrypt 2023] for proving the security of post-quantum cryptography against preprocessing attacks. We also prove the following results: (1) We tighten Liu's analysis of post-quantum PRGs in QROM, achieving a distinguishing advantage bound of O(NT2+NST). (2) For unitary synthesis, we extend the one-query lower bound of Lombardi-Ma-Wright [STOC 2024] to hold against adversaries that can make one arbitrary function query along with polynomially many (adaptive) queries to the random oracle, either before or after the function query. This also interprets the original LMW24 result in terms of compressed oracles. (3) Finally, we prove a tight O(NS) bound for the pseudorandomness of random binary phase states against space S distinguishers.
Cryptographic security proofs often involve an adversary interacting with a larger, keyed oracle that consists of (potentially exponentially) many independent instances of a smaller, base oracle. However, showing quantum indistinguishability between two such keyed oracles can be tricky, since a single query made by an adversary may involve a superposition that covers all instances of the base oracles simultaneously.
In this paper, we establish a generic indistinguishability lifting theorem of the following form: if the two base oracles are indistinguishable under quantum queries, then their corresponding keyed oracles are too, up to an O(q^2) multiplicative loss in distinguishing advantage, where q is the number of queries made by the adversary. Our lifting theorem applies to both statistical and computational settings, and to oracles that are stateful as well. It is also optimal in that it matches the obvious Grover search attack for a certain (contrived) choice of oracles.
As an immediate application, we extend Carolan's compressed permutation oracle to an efficiently implementable compressed ideal cipher, and use it to prove preimage resistance of the Davies-Meyer compression function in the quantum ideal cipher model. Thanks to our lifting theorem, the soundness of our compressed ideal cipher reduces to that of Carolan's oracle, and any further improvement on the latter would automatically carry over to the former.
As our second application, we give a modular construction that doubles the message length of any quantum-secure strong pseudorandom permutation. Along the way, we show that an existing two-round tweakable Feistel construction is indistinguishable from a random permutation under quantum bidirectional queries. This is done via a dedicated polynomial-method argument, which may be of independent interest.
We obtain a certified randomness protocol in the quantum random oracle model. The protocol is non-interactive and publicly verifiable with a classical verifier, and is based on Yamakawa and Zhandry's proof of quantumness [JACM'24]. We prove unconditional security of this protocol against adversaries making subexponentially-many adaptive quantum queries to the random oracle.
Prior work on certified randomness relative to a random oracle additionally assumed the Aaronson--Ambainis conjecture or proved security only against low query-depth adversaries.