Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2609.35498 · Physical review. B./Physical review. B

Electron decoherence in cylindrical holes and circular apertures

Cruz I. Velasco, F. Javier García de Abajo

quant-phcond-mat.mes-hallSubmitted Sep 28, 2026• Announced Sep 29, 2026• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The coherence of free electrons sets fundamental limits on the resolution and contrast of phase-sensitive electron microscopy because coherence is lost whenever the electron leaves a distinguishing excitation in its environment. We develop a quantitative theory of fast-electron decoherence in two canonical geometries: a cylindrical hole drilled through a realistic metal and a circular aperture in a thin perfectly conducting film. By combining an electromagnetic Green-tensor formulation with the fluctuation--dissipation theorem while fully retaining retardation, we obtain the decoherence probability and elastic phase as functions of the electron trajectory, temperature, and material response. For the cylindrical hole, we obtain a closed-form, azimuthally resolved expression that separates the dependences on path position, temperature, and conductivity. In the high-conductivity and high-temperature limits, this result reduces to a universal expression that is linear in temperature and independent of both conductivity and electron velocity. For the circular aperture, which we solve using a cylindrical-wave modal expansion, the energy-loss probability diverges as $1/ω$ at low frequency, whereas the decoherence probability remains finite and reaches a maximum when the aperture radius is comparable to the relevant electromagnetic wavelength. Because the interaction is spatially localized, aperture-induced decoherence is generally weaker than that produced by a cylindrical hole, except for sufficiently large apertures at high temperature. Finally, we show that, for sufficiently large holes, decoherence can dominate the spatial broadening of a focused electron probe and must therefore be incorporated into the design of coherent electron-beam instruments.

Comments
21 pages, 11 figures, 47 references

Related papers

Optical Emission from the Interaction of Fast Electrons with Metallic Films Containing a Circular Aperture: A Study of Radiative Decoherence of Fast Electrons

F. Javier Garcı́a de Abajo

Light emission resulting from the interaction of swift electrons with a distant material is shown to produce an unexpectedly large fraction of decoherence in the moving charges. The decoherence probability diverges for an electron passing through a hole drilled in a perfectly conducting metal film, regardless of the size of the opening. This divergence, which is logarithmic in the ratio of film radius to aperture radius, originates in an infrared catastrophe that differs from other sources of decoherence (e.g., bremsstrahlung radiation). Our results provide new avenues for controlling and assessing the role of coherence during electron acceleration (for example, in transmission electron microscopes) and for exploiting partial quantum interference of fast electrons.

Physical Review Letters•Jun 11, 2009•7 citations

Quantum decoherence by Coulomb interaction

N Kerker, R Röpke, L M Steinert +2 more

Abstract The performance of modern quantum devices in communication, metrology or microscopy relies on the quantum–classical interaction which is generally described by the theory of decoherence. Despite the high relevance for long coherence times in quantum electronics, decoherence mechanisms mediated by the Coulomb force are not well understood yet and several competing theoretical models exist. Here, we present an experimental study of the Coulomb-induced decoherence of free electrons in a superposition state in a biprism electron interferometer close to a semiconducting and metallic surface. The decoherence was determined through a contrast loss at different beam path separations, surface distances and conductibilities. To clarify the current literature discussion, four theoretical models were compared to our data. We could rule out three of them and got good agreement with a theory based on macroscopic quantum electrodynamics. The results will enable the determination and minimization of specific decoherence channels in the design of novel quantum instruments.

arXiv:2001.06154•New Journal of Physics•Apr 30, 2020•33 citations

Quantum correlations in electron microscopy

Chen Mechel, Yaniv Kurman, Aviv Karnieli +3 more

Electron microscopes provide a powerful platform for exploring physical phenomena with nanoscale resolution, based on the interaction of free electrons with the excitations of a sample such as phonons, excitons, bulk plasmons, and surface plasmons. The interaction usually results in the absorption or emission of such excitations, which can be detected directly through cathodoluminescence or indirectly through electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS). However, as we show here, the underlying interaction of a free electron and an arbitrary optical excitation goes beyond what was predicted or measured so far, due to the interplay of entanglement and decoherence of the electron-excitation system. The entanglement of electrons and optical excitations can provide new analytical tools in electron microscopy. For example, it can enable measurements of optical coherence, plasmonic lifetimes, and electronic length scales in matter (such as the Bohr radius of an exciton). We show how these can be achieved using common configurations in electron diffraction and EELS, revealing significant changes in the electron’s coherence, as well as in other quantum information theoretic measures such as purity. Specifically, we find that the purity after interaction with nanoparticles can only take discrete values, versus a continuum of values for interactions with surface plasmons. We quantify the post-interaction density matrix of the combined electron-excitation system by developing a framework based on macroscopic quantum electrodynamics. The framework enables a quantitative account of decoherence due to excitations in any general polarizable material (optical environment). This framework is thus applicable beyond electron microscopy. Particularly in electron microscopy, our work enriches analytical capabilities and informs the design of quantum information experiments with free electrons, allowing control over their quantum states and their decoherence by the optical environment.

Optica•Nov 23, 2020•29 citations

Radiative loss of coherence in free electrons: a long-range quantum phenomenon

Cruz I. Velasco, Valerio Di Giulio, F. Javier Garcı́a de Abajo

Quantum physics rules the dynamics of small objects as they interact over microscopic length scales. Nevertheless, quantum correlations involving macroscopic distances can be observed between entangled photons as well as in atomic gases and matter waves at low temperatures. The long-range nature of the electromagnetic coupling between charged particles and extended objects could also trigger quantum phenomena over large distances. Here, we reveal a manifestation of quantum mechanics that involves macroscopic distances and results in a nearly complete depletion of coherence associated with which-way free-electron interference produced by electron-radiation coupling in the presence of distant extended objects. This is a ubiquitous effect that we illustrate through a rigorous theoretical analysis of a two-path electron beam interacting with a semi-infinite metallic plate and find the inter-path coherence to vanish proportionally to the path separation at zero temperature and exponentially at finite temperature. The investigated regime of large distances originates in the coupling of the electron to radiative modes assisted by diffraction at material structures but without any involvement of material excitations. Besides the fundamental interest of this macroscopic quantum phenomenon, our results suggest an approach to measuring the vacuum temperature and nondestructively sensing the presence of distant objects.

arXiv:2306.11595•Light Science & Applications•Jan 25, 2024•10 citations

Single Electron Self-coherence and Its Wave/Particle Duality in the Electron Microscope

Christian F. Kisielowski, P. Specht, Joerg Ralf Jinschek +1 more

Intensities in high-resolution phase-contrast images from electron microscopes build up discretely in time by detecting single electrons. A wave description of pulse-like coherent-inelastic interaction of an electron with matter implies a time-dependent coexistence of coherent partial waves. Their superposition forms a wave package by phase decoherence of 0.5 - 1 radian with Heisenbergs energy uncertainty ΔEH = ħ/2 Δt-1 matching the energy loss ΔE of a coherent-inelastic interaction and sets the interaction time Δt. In these circumstances, the product of Planck's constant and the speed of light hc is given by the product of the expression for temporal coherence λ2/Δλ and the energy loss ΔE. Experimentally, the self-coherence length was measured by detecting the energy-dependent localization of scattered, plane matter waves in surface proximity exploiting the Goos-Hänchen shift. Chromatic-aberration Cc-corrected electron microscopy on boron nitride (BN) proves that the coherent crystal illumination and phase contrast are lost if the self-coherence length shrinks below the size of the crystal unit cell at ΔE > 200 eV. In perspective, the interaction time of any matter wave compares with the lifetime of a virtual particle of any elemental interaction, suggesting the present concept of coherent-inelastic interactions of matter waves might be generalizable.

arXiv:2404.13160•Microscopy and Microanalysis•Nov 14, 2024•1 citation

Measurement of Self-coherence in the Transmission Electron Microscope for Detecting Time-dependent Coherent-inelastic Electron Scattering in the Heisenberg Limit

Christian F. Kisielowski, Peta Specht, Joerg Ralf Jinschek +1 more

Atomic resolution transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is an indispensable tool for interdisciplinary investigations of radiation soft or hard materials that evolves rapidly because emerging technologies enable remarkable new experiments [1, 2]. Nowadays, many of them embrace the time domain [2-4]. Beyond materials research, electron microscopy is uniquely suited to study fundamental quantum-mechanical aspects. In fact, it remains concerning that aspects addressing the wave-particle duality, time-dependent measurements, or the entanglement of wave functions and their collapse at a detector still require detailed investigations to guide progress. Certainly, this is no academic matter because such aspects become the bottleneck for the deployment of microscopes that enable studying dynamic processes at high spatiotemporal resolution. It is established practice to describe the scattering of electron ensembles by either a particle picture (Figure 1a) or a wave picture (Figure 1b). Sometimes both pictures are mixed. In spite of calls for solving Schrödinger’s time dependent equation [5], the static Schrödinger equation of wave functions is almost exclusively used to reliably simulate the image formation process using multislice calculations for coherent-elastically scattered electron ensembles [6, 7]. Moreover, the Copenhagen convention of quantum mechanics [8] is adopted, which emphasizes the importance of an observation for the collapse of wave functions (Figure 1b). In order to foster further insight into fundamental quantum-mechanical aspects we pursue a series of experiments with low electron dose rates that guarantee the presence of single electrons in the microscope column at any given time [9]. Consequently, we address the scattering of single electrons (Figure 1c) and build up intensities from electron ensembles over time. In such conditions energy filtered TEM recently revealed the presence of image intensity at sample/vacuum interfaces that cannot be simulated using the established (static) calculation tools even if frozen phonon excitations are considered [10]. In contrast, these intensities can be explained by the time-dependent Schrödinger equation assuming that an energy exchange ΔE occurs during any interaction of the electron with the sample in the Heisenberg limit ΔE = ℏ/2 Δt−1 (coherent-inelastic scattering). In this process a wave package is formed by the superposition of partial waves and a decoherence phase of 0.5-1 radian [10]. The time-dependent Schrödinger equation yields two parameters that characterize the static and the dynamic behavior of any wave function ψ(r, t) = ψ(r) ϕ(t), namely xstatic = ℏ/(2mΔE)1/2 and xdynamic = ℏc/ΔE [11]. The former is the de Broglie wavelength if ΔE is a kinetic energy and the latter becomes an expression for self-coherence if the scattering process is coherent-inelastic in the Heisenberg limit. In these circumstances, the product of Planck’s constant and the speed of light hc is given by the product of the expression for temporal coherence λ2/Δλ and the energy loss ΔE (hc = (λ2/Δλ) ΔE). The validity of the relation is shown in Figure 2 [11]. Thus, the temporal part of Schrödinger’s equation adds contributions of a finite self-coherence length (or time if the electron velocity is considered) to any scattering process, which is neglected if only the static expression is exploited. Further, the formation of wave packages rationalizes the wave-particle duality. The width of wave packages is described by a self-coherence length ls that can vary by over 40 orders of magnitude depending on the strength of interactions [11]. For Coulomb interactions, ls explains the vanishing phase contrast from EF-HRTEM images when the energy loss exceeds values of ΔE > 200 eV [11]. A procedure to experimentally determine the self-coherence length was established earlier by measuring the energy dependent localization of scattered matter waves in surface proximity [10]. Therefore, electron microscopy can be used as a general tool to measure the self-coherence length in real space images on a scale of nanometers and relate this these values to a self-coherence time that reaches attoseconds [12]. Particle and wave descriptions of electron scattering. a) Scattering of electron ensembles in a particle picture. The process is often described by Feynman diagrams, which involves the emission of a virtual photon of lifetime given by Heisenbergs Uncertainty Principle. b) Scattering of electron ensembles in a wave picture that underlies the multi-slice calculations. Infinite wave functions entangle source, sample and detector. The Copenhagen convention requires a wave function collapse upon observation. c) Proposed scattering process of a single electron wave function. The energy exchange occurs in the Heisenberg limit ΔEloss = E2-E1= ℏ/2 (t2-t1)−1= ℏ/2 Δt−1 when a wave package is formed during Δt because of existing energy (wavelength) differences ΔEloss of partial waves [11]. Measurements of self-coherence length and the related self-coherence time at the calculated Heisenberg limit. The colored background marks the quantum realm. The solid lines represent the Heisenberg limit in space and time, which includes the constant ℏc [11].

Microscopy and Microanalysis•Jul 1, 2025•0 citations
The coherence of free electrons sets fundamental limits on the resolution and contrast of phase-sensitive electron microscopy because coherence is lost whenever the electron leaves a distinguishing excitation in its environment. We develop a quantitative theory of fast-electron decoherence in two canonical geometries: a cylindrical hole drilled through a realistic metal and a circular aperture in a thin perfectly conducting film. By combining an electromagnetic Green-tensor formulation with the fluctuation--dissipation theorem while fully retaining retardation, we obtain the decoherence probability and elastic phase as functions of the electron trajectory, temperature, and material response. For the cylindrical hole, we obtain a closed-form, azimuthally resolved expression that separates the dependences on path position, temperature, and conductivity. In the high-conductivity and high-temperature limits, this result reduces to a universal expression that is linear in temperature and independent of both conductivity and electron velocity. For the circular aperture, which we solve using a cylindrical-wave modal expansion, the energy-loss probability diverges as 1/ω1/ω1/ω at low frequency, whereas the decoherence probability remains finite and reaches a maximum when the aperture radius is comparable to the relevant electromagnetic wavelength. Because the interaction is spatially localized, aperture-induced decoherence is generally weaker than that produced by a cylindrical hole, except for sufficiently large apertures at high temperature. Finally, we show that, for sufficiently large holes, decoherence can dominate the spatial broadening of a focused electron probe and must therefore be incorporated into the design of coherent electron-beam instruments.
Light emission resulting from the interaction of swift electrons with a distant material is shown to produce an unexpectedly large fraction of decoherence in the moving charges. The decoherence probability diverges for an electron passing through a hole drilled in a perfectly conducting metal film, regardless of the size of the opening. This divergence, which is logarithmic in the ratio of film radius to aperture radius, originates in an infrared catastrophe that differs from other sources of decoherence (e.g., bremsstrahlung radiation). Our results provide new avenues for controlling and assessing the role of coherence during electron acceleration (for example, in transmission electron microscopes) and for exploiting partial quantum interference of fast electrons.
Abstract The performance of modern quantum devices in communication, metrology or microscopy relies on the quantum–classical interaction which is generally described by the theory of decoherence. Despite the high relevance for long coherence times in quantum electronics, decoherence mechanisms mediated by the Coulomb force are not well understood yet and several competing theoretical models exist. Here, we present an experimental study of the Coulomb-induced decoherence of free electrons in a superposition state in a biprism electron interferometer close to a semiconducting and metallic surface. The decoherence was determined through a contrast loss at different beam path separations, surface distances and conductibilities. To clarify the current literature discussion, four theoretical models were compared to our data. We could rule out three of them and got good agreement with a theory based on macroscopic quantum electrodynamics. The results will enable the determination and minimization of specific decoherence channels in the design of novel quantum instruments.
Electron microscopes provide a powerful platform for exploring physical phenomena with nanoscale resolution, based on the interaction of free electrons with the excitations of a sample such as phonons, excitons, bulk plasmons, and surface plasmons. The interaction usually results in the absorption or emission of such excitations, which can be detected directly through cathodoluminescence or indirectly through electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS). However, as we show here, the underlying interaction of a free electron and an arbitrary optical excitation goes beyond what was predicted or measured so far, due to the interplay of entanglement and decoherence of the electron-excitation system. The entanglement of electrons and optical excitations can provide new analytical tools in electron microscopy. For example, it can enable measurements of optical coherence, plasmonic lifetimes, and electronic length scales in matter (such as the Bohr radius of an exciton). We show how these can be achieved using common configurations in electron diffraction and EELS, revealing significant changes in the electron’s coherence, as well as in other quantum information theoretic measures such as purity. Specifically, we find that the purity after interaction with nanoparticles can only take discrete values, versus a continuum of values for interactions with surface plasmons. We quantify the post-interaction density matrix of the combined electron-excitation system by developing a framework based on macroscopic quantum electrodynamics. The framework enables a quantitative account of decoherence due to excitations in any general polarizable material (optical environment). This framework is thus applicable beyond electron microscopy. Particularly in electron microscopy, our work enriches analytical capabilities and informs the design of quantum information experiments with free electrons, allowing control over their quantum states and their decoherence by the optical environment.
Quantum physics rules the dynamics of small objects as they interact over microscopic length scales. Nevertheless, quantum correlations involving macroscopic distances can be observed between entangled photons as well as in atomic gases and matter waves at low temperatures. The long-range nature of the electromagnetic coupling between charged particles and extended objects could also trigger quantum phenomena over large distances. Here, we reveal a manifestation of quantum mechanics that involves macroscopic distances and results in a nearly complete depletion of coherence associated with which-way free-electron interference produced by electron-radiation coupling in the presence of distant extended objects. This is a ubiquitous effect that we illustrate through a rigorous theoretical analysis of a two-path electron beam interacting with a semi-infinite metallic plate and find the inter-path coherence to vanish proportionally to the path separation at zero temperature and exponentially at finite temperature. The investigated regime of large distances originates in the coupling of the electron to radiative modes assisted by diffraction at material structures but without any involvement of material excitations. Besides the fundamental interest of this macroscopic quantum phenomenon, our results suggest an approach to measuring the vacuum temperature and nondestructively sensing the presence of distant objects.
Intensities in high-resolution phase-contrast images from electron microscopes build up discretely in time by detecting single electrons. A wave description of pulse-like coherent-inelastic interaction of an electron with matter implies a time-dependent coexistence of coherent partial waves. Their superposition forms a wave package by phase decoherence of 0.5 - 1 radian with Heisenbergs energy uncertainty ΔEH = ħ/2 Δt-1 matching the energy loss ΔE of a coherent-inelastic interaction and sets the interaction time Δt. In these circumstances, the product of Planck's constant and the speed of light hc is given by the product of the expression for temporal coherence λ2/Δλ and the energy loss ΔE. Experimentally, the self-coherence length was measured by detecting the energy-dependent localization of scattered, plane matter waves in surface proximity exploiting the Goos-Hänchen shift. Chromatic-aberration Cc-corrected electron microscopy on boron nitride (BN) proves that the coherent crystal illumination and phase contrast are lost if the self-coherence length shrinks below the size of the crystal unit cell at ΔE > 200 eV. In perspective, the interaction time of any matter wave compares with the lifetime of a virtual particle of any elemental interaction, suggesting the present concept of coherent-inelastic interactions of matter waves might be generalizable.
Atomic resolution transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is an indispensable tool for interdisciplinary investigations of radiation soft or hard materials that evolves rapidly because emerging technologies enable remarkable new experiments [1, 2]. Nowadays, many of them embrace the time domain [2-4]. Beyond materials research, electron microscopy is uniquely suited to study fundamental quantum-mechanical aspects. In fact, it remains concerning that aspects addressing the wave-particle duality, time-dependent measurements, or the entanglement of wave functions and their collapse at a detector still require detailed investigations to guide progress. Certainly, this is no academic matter because such aspects become the bottleneck for the deployment of microscopes that enable studying dynamic processes at high spatiotemporal resolution. It is established practice to describe the scattering of electron ensembles by either a particle picture (Figure 1a) or a wave picture (Figure 1b). Sometimes both pictures are mixed. In spite of calls for solving Schrödinger’s time dependent equation [5], the static Schrödinger equation of wave functions is almost exclusively used to reliably simulate the image formation process using multislice calculations for coherent-elastically scattered electron ensembles [6, 7]. Moreover, the Copenhagen convention of quantum mechanics [8] is adopted, which emphasizes the importance of an observation for the collapse of wave functions (Figure 1b). In order to foster further insight into fundamental quantum-mechanical aspects we pursue a series of experiments with low electron dose rates that guarantee the presence of single electrons in the microscope column at any given time [9]. Consequently, we address the scattering of single electrons (Figure 1c) and build up intensities from electron ensembles over time. In such conditions energy filtered TEM recently revealed the presence of image intensity at sample/vacuum interfaces that cannot be simulated using the established (static) calculation tools even if frozen phonon excitations are considered [10]. In contrast, these intensities can be explained by the time-dependent Schrödinger equation assuming that an energy exchange ΔE occurs during any interaction of the electron with the sample in the Heisenberg limit ΔE = ℏ/2 Δt−1 (coherent-inelastic scattering). In this process a wave package is formed by the superposition of partial waves and a decoherence phase of 0.5-1 radian [10]. The time-dependent Schrödinger equation yields two parameters that characterize the static and the dynamic behavior of any wave function ψ(r, t) = ψ(r) ϕ(t), namely xstatic = ℏ/(2mΔE)1/2 and xdynamic = ℏc/ΔE [11]. The former is the de Broglie wavelength if ΔE is a kinetic energy and the latter becomes an expression for self-coherence if the scattering process is coherent-inelastic in the Heisenberg limit. In these circumstances, the product of Planck’s constant and the speed of light hc is given by the product of the expression for temporal coherence λ2/Δλ and the energy loss ΔE (hc = (λ2/Δλ) ΔE). The validity of the relation is shown in Figure 2 [11]. Thus, the temporal part of Schrödinger’s equation adds contributions of a finite self-coherence length (or time if the electron velocity is considered) to any scattering process, which is neglected if only the static expression is exploited. Further, the formation of wave packages rationalizes the wave-particle duality. The width of wave packages is described by a self-coherence length ls that can vary by over 40 orders of magnitude depending on the strength of interactions [11]. For Coulomb interactions, ls explains the vanishing phase contrast from EF-HRTEM images when the energy loss exceeds values of ΔE > 200 eV [11]. A procedure to experimentally determine the self-coherence length was established earlier by measuring the energy dependent localization of scattered matter waves in surface proximity [10]. Therefore, electron microscopy can be used as a general tool to measure the self-coherence length in real space images on a scale of nanometers and relate this these values to a self-coherence time that reaches attoseconds [12]. Particle and wave descriptions of electron scattering. a) Scattering of electron ensembles in a particle picture. The process is often described by Feynman diagrams, which involves the emission of a virtual photon of lifetime given by Heisenbergs Uncertainty Principle. b) Scattering of electron ensembles in a wave picture that underlies the multi-slice calculations. Infinite wave functions entangle source, sample and detector. The Copenhagen convention requires a wave function collapse upon observation. c) Proposed scattering process of a single electron wave function. The energy exchange occurs in the Heisenberg limit ΔEloss = E2-E1= ℏ/2 (t2-t1)−1= ℏ/2 Δt−1 when a wave package is formed during Δt because of existing energy (wavelength) differences ΔEloss of partial waves [11]. Measurements of self-coherence length and the related self-coherence time at the calculated Heisenberg limit. The colored background marks the quantum realm. The solid lines represent the Heisenberg limit in space and time, which includes the constant ℏc [11].