The no-signalling principle lies at the heart of Bell-type experiments involving spacelike-separated parties. Although not all no-signalling correlations can be realized within quantum theory, the no-sinalling principle itself remains fundamental even for post-quantum theories, since its violation would imply superluminal signalling. In the spirit of device independent nature of the Bell inequalities, there has recently been growing interest in causal inequalities, which identify correlations admitting no causal explanation. Such correlations have been rigorously studied within the process-matrix formalism, which is built upon a constraint analogous to spacelike separation in Bell scenarios. We refer to this constraint as the single-interaction constraint, whereby each party interacts with the environment only once. Despite considerable effort, no fundamental guiding principle is currently known that characterizes the restrictions this constraint imposes on the correlations generated by Process Matrices. In this work, we address this gap by proposing a generalized causality principle for the bipartite case. We show that for certain cases, the generalised causality principle defines a strict subset of the set of all signalling correlations. This principle thus provides a fundamental limit on quantum and even post-quantum theories subject to the single-interaction constraint. By analogy with no-signalling, whose violation excludes certain causal structures among the parties, a violation of the generalised causality principle rules out a corresponding class of causal structures(causal structures with the single interaction constraint). More broadly, our techniques provide a general framework for deriving generalised causal constraints, applicable to a wide class of indefinite-causal-order scenarios.
The no-signalling principle lies at the heart of Bell-type experiments involving spacelike-separated parties. Although not all no-signalling correlations can be realized within quantum theory, the no-sinalling principle itself remains fundamental even for post-quantum theories, since its violation would imply superluminal signalling. In the spirit of device independent nature of the Bell inequalities, there has recently been growing interest in causal inequalities, which identify correlations admitting no causal explanation. Such correlations have been rigorously studied within the process-matrix formalism, which is built upon a constraint analogous to spacelike separation in Bell scenarios. We refer to this constraint as the single-interaction constraint, whereby each party interacts with the environment only once. Despite considerable effort, no fundamental guiding principle is currently known that characterizes the restrictions this constraint imposes on the correlations generated by Process Matrices. In this work, we address this gap by proposing a generalized causality principle for the bipartite case. We show that for certain cases, the generalised causality principle defines a strict subset of the set of all signalling correlations. This principle thus provides a fundamental limit on quantum and even post-quantum theories subject to the single-interaction constraint. By analogy with no-signalling, whose violation excludes certain causal structures among the parties, a violation of the generalised causality principle rules out a corresponding class of causal structures(causal structures with the single interaction constraint). More broadly, our techniques provide a general framework for deriving generalised causal constraints, applicable to a wide class of indefinite-causal-order scenarios.
Non-classical correlations resulting from entangled quantum systems have sparked debates about the compatibility of quantum theory and relativity, and about the right way to think about causation. Key to a causal theory is that superluminal signalling is forbidden, which holds in quantum theory. In Bell scenarios, relativistic causality principles like no superluminal signalling are often assumed to follow from the standard no-signalling constraints on correlations. We explore the connections between a range of relativistic principles, including no superluminal signalling and no causal loops, and constraints on correlations that can arise with arbitrary interventions, within multi-party Bell scenarios. This includes standard no-signalling conditions and proposed relaxations allowing phenomena like jamming, where it was suggested that superluminal signalling and causal loops remain impossible. Using our recent framework combining relativistic principles with causal modelling, we show that any theory (classical or non-classical) allowing jamming must rely on causal fine-tuning and superluminal causal influences. Additionally, we show that jamming theories can lead to superluminal signalling in certain situations, highlighting limitations for their physicality. However, we identify cases where jamming correlations avoid superluminal signalling under general interventions, demonstrating that standard no-signalling constraints are not necessary for this purpose. We also show that these constraints are insufficient to rule out superluminal signalling and are neither necessary nor sufficient for ensuring no causal loops under general interventions. Finally, we derive necessary and sufficient conditions for ruling out superluminal signalling and operationally detectable causal loops, solidifying our understanding of relativistic causality principles in information processing tasks in space-time.
Bell's theorem asserts that no local hidden variable theory can explain the predictions of quantum theory in an experiment where spacelike separated measurements are performed in distant laboratories. Loophole-free Bell tests performed in the last decade demonstrate Bell nonlocality as a property of Nature. However, the amount of nonlocality allowed in quantum theory is limited, compared to the sole restriction of no-signaling, meaning the impossibility of faster-than-light communication implied by special relativity. Information causality is a physical principle that generalizes no-signaling and is satisfied by quantum theory. It is based on the idea that shared quantum entanglement cannot enable a receiver to obtain more classical information than how much was sent by a distant sender. Remarkably, the principle was shown to imply the maximal quantum bound for the violation of the most well-known Bell inequality. The aim of this thesis is to widen our understanding of information causality and compare its predictions with other known outer approximations of the quantum set of correlations. We build upon the recent realization that most of the known consequences of information causality can be derived with a single copy of the shared systems, whereas before it was thought that many copies were necessary. We develop a novel optimization framework which bounds the possible violations of information causality by other sets of correlations, allowing us to certify when violations are not possible. We generalize the statement of information causality and reach a precise definition for the set of correlations satisfying this principle. We show that when searching for violations of information causality by physical theories, considering many copies is not necessary. Our aforementioned optimization framework approximates the information causality set from the outside. Conversely, we propose a different approach which allows us to approximate this set from the inside.
Information causality (IC) was introduced as a physical principle constraining correlations in non-signaling theories. Whether it can recover the exact quantum correlation boundary, beyond Uffink's inequality, has remained an open question. Here, we combine its generalized formulation for correlated inputs with a new communication protocol to derive quantum Bell inequalities that exactly characterize the quantum correlations in the simplest bipartite Bell scenario, with two binary measurements. In particular, we derive the Tsirelson-Landau-Masanes criterion directly from IC. Thus, the generalized IC implies macroscopic locality, while we also present macroscopically local correlations that violate the generalized IC. This establishes that generalized IC is a strictly stronger principle in this scenario. Together with our earlier result that generalized IC implies a nontrivial communication complexity principle, these findings strengthen the role of information causality in explaining the limits of quantum nonlocality and provide a systematic route to deriving tighter bounds on the set of quantum correlations in more general Bell scenarios.
Bell scenarios are multipartite scenarios that exclude any communication between parties. This constraint leads to a strict hierarchy of correlation sets in such scenarios, namely, classical, quantum, and nonsignaling. However, without any constraints on communication between the parties, they can realize arbitrary correlations by exchanging only classical systems. Here we consider a multipartite scenario where the parties can engage in at most a single round of communication, i.e., each party is allowed to receive a system once, implement any local intervention on it, and send out the resulting system once. While no global assumption about causal relations between parties is assumed in this scenario, we do make a causal assumption local to each party, i.e., the input received by it causally precedes the output it sends out. We then introduce antinomicity, a notion of nonclassicality for correlations in such scenarios, and prove the existence of a strict hierarchy of correlation sets classified by their antinomicity. Antinomicity serves as a generalization of Bell nonlocality: when all the parties discard their output systems (i.e., in a nonsignaling scenario), it is mathematically equivalent to Bell nonlocality. Like Bell nonlocality, it can be understood as an instance of fine-tuning, one that is necessary in any classical model of cyclic causation that avoids time-travel antinomies but allows antinomic correlations. Furthermore, antinomicity resolves a long-standing puzzle, i.e., the failure of causal inequality violations as device-independent witnesses of nonclassicality. Antinomicity implies causal inequality violations, but not conversely.
Information causality (IC) was introduced as a physical principle that imposes constraints on the non-local correlations between two parties (Alice and Bob) in a Bell scenario. Specifically, it states that the information that Bob can gain about an n-bit database held by Alice is bounded by the information she communicates to him. To date, the question whether IC for any n∈N singles out the set of quantum correlations remains open, meaning that it is unknown whether for any number of inputs m and outputs d of the two parties the set of correlations that satisfy IC exactly coincides with the quantum correlations. In this work, we answer this question in the negative. Firstly, we show that for any finite database length n≥2, there is a bipartite set of correlations that satisfies IC for all compatible protocols and that exhibits post-quantum correlations in the Bell scenario with n+1 inputs and 2 outcomes per party. This result relies on constructing an entropic proof of IC for GPTs that may be of independent interest. We further show that in the Bell scenario with n+1 inputs and 2 outcomes per party, our constructed sets of correlations lead to neither a superset nor a subset of the quantum correlations. Secondly, we construct a set of correlations in the Bell scenario with 3 inputs and 2 outputs per party that satisfies IC (for all database sizes n∈N) and that includes post-quantum points. Consequently, all known formulations of information causality fail to fully characterize the bipartite set of quantum correlations, already in the 3-input, 2-outcome Bell scenario.
Requiring that the causal structure between different parties is well-defined imposes constraints on the correlations they can establish, which define so-called causal correlations. Some of these are known to have a "dynamical" causal order in the sense that their causal structure is not fixed a priori but is instead established on the fly, with for instance the causal order between future parties depending on some choice of action of parties in the past. Here we identify a new way that the causal order between the parties can be dynamical: with at least four parties, there can be some dynamical order which can nevertheless not be influenced by the actions of past parties. This leads us to introduce an intermediate class of correlations with what we call non-influenceable causal order, in between the set of correlations with static (non-dynamical) causal order and the set of general causal correlations. We then define analogous classes of quantum processes, considering recently introduced classes of quantum circuits with classical or quantum control of causal order---the latter being the largest class within the process matrix formalism known to have a clear interpretation in terms of coherent superpositions of causal orders. This allows us to formalise precisely in which sense certain quantum processes can have both indefinite and dynamical causal order.