Bell's theorem asserts that no local hidden variable theory can explain the predictions of quantum theory in an experiment where spacelike separated measurements are performed in distant laboratories. Loophole-free Bell tests performed in the last decade demonstrate Bell nonlocality as a property of Nature. However, the amount of nonlocality allowed in quantum theory is limited, compared to the sole restriction of no-signaling, meaning the impossibility of faster-than-light communication implied by special relativity. Information causality is a physical principle that generalizes no-signaling and is satisfied by quantum theory. It is based on the idea that shared quantum entanglement cannot enable a receiver to obtain more classical information than how much was sent by a distant sender. Remarkably, the principle was shown to imply the maximal quantum bound for the violation of the most well-known Bell inequality. The aim of this thesis is to widen our understanding of information causality and compare its predictions with other known outer approximations of the quantum set of correlations. We build upon the recent realization that most of the known consequences of information causality can be derived with a single copy of the shared systems, whereas before it was thought that many copies were necessary. We develop a novel optimization framework which bounds the possible violations of information causality by other sets of correlations, allowing us to certify when violations are not possible. We generalize the statement of information causality and reach a precise definition for the set of correlations satisfying this principle. We show that when searching for violations of information causality by physical theories, considering many copies is not necessary. Our aforementioned optimization framework approximates the information causality set from the outside. Conversely, we propose a different approach which allows us to approximate this set from the inside.
Bell's theorem asserts that no local hidden variable theory can explain the predictions of quantum theory in an experiment where spacelike separated measurements are performed in distant laboratories. Loophole-free Bell tests performed in the last decade demonstrate Bell nonlocality as a property of Nature. However, the amount of nonlocality allowed in quantum theory is limited, compared to the sole restriction of no-signaling, meaning the impossibility of faster-than-light communication implied by special relativity. Information causality is a physical principle that generalizes no-signaling and is satisfied by quantum theory. It is based on the idea that shared quantum entanglement cannot enable a receiver to obtain more classical information than how much was sent by a distant sender. Remarkably, the principle was shown to imply the maximal quantum bound for the violation of the most well-known Bell inequality. The aim of this thesis is to widen our understanding of information causality and compare its predictions with other known outer approximations of the quantum set of correlations. We build upon the recent realization that most of the known consequences of information causality can be derived with a single copy of the shared systems, whereas before it was thought that many copies were necessary. We develop a novel optimization framework which bounds the possible violations of information causality by other sets of correlations, allowing us to certify when violations are not possible. We generalize the statement of information causality and reach a precise definition for the set of correlations satisfying this principle. We show that when searching for violations of information causality by physical theories, considering many copies is not necessary. Our aforementioned optimization framework approximates the information causality set from the outside. Conversely, we propose a different approach which allows us to approximate this set from the inside.
Information causality (IC) was introduced as a physical principle constraining correlations in non-signaling theories. Whether it can recover the exact quantum correlation boundary, beyond Uffink's inequality, has remained an open question. Here, we combine its generalized formulation for correlated inputs with a new communication protocol to derive quantum Bell inequalities that exactly characterize the quantum correlations in the simplest bipartite Bell scenario, with two binary measurements. In particular, we derive the Tsirelson-Landau-Masanes criterion directly from IC. Thus, the generalized IC implies macroscopic locality, while we also present macroscopically local correlations that violate the generalized IC. This establishes that generalized IC is a strictly stronger principle in this scenario. Together with our earlier result that generalized IC implies a nontrivial communication complexity principle, these findings strengthen the role of information causality in explaining the limits of quantum nonlocality and provide a systematic route to deriving tighter bounds on the set of quantum correlations in more general Bell scenarios.
Bell nonlocality is the experimentally testable incompatibility between quantum correlations and explanations based on local hidden variables. Its significance now extends beyond the foundations of quantum mechanics: a Bell-inequality violation can certify entanglement, randomness, measurement incompatibility, and cryptographic security without requiring a detailed model of the devices producing the observed data. This article develops the mathematical structure of Bell experiments and explains its role in device-independent quantum information. Conditional probability distributions are classified into local, quantum, and no-signalling sets; the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt inequality is derived, and its classical, quantum, and algebraic limits are distinguished. Tsirelson’s bound is obtained from the CHSH operator, while Popescu-Rohrlich correlations demonstrate that no-signalling alone does not identify the quantum set. The relation between entanglement and nonlocality is examined through local entangled states, hidden nonlocality, and activation. Nonlocal games, semidefinite relaxations, self-testing, certified randomness, and device-independent quantum key distribution are treated as operational consequences of Bell violation. Particular attention is given to entropy accumulation, finite-data security, loophole-free experiments, and the limitations of device independence. Bell nonlocality emerges as both a foundational separation between classical and quantum causal models and a quantitative resource for cryptographic and informational tasks.
Quantum mechanics has been a paradigm shift and a revolutionary framework in our understanding of the physical world. The theory has been able to describe a wide variety of phenomena and has been experimentally verified with great precision. Despite that, to this day, the seemingly ad hoc formulation of quantum theory and several of its features still elude an intuitive understanding. At the same time, the applications of quantum mechanics in information theory have emerged as a promising avenue. Namely, its potential advantages in computation, in the so-called nascent field of quantum computation and in communication and information processing tasks such as quantum teleportation and super-dense coding. In all these endeavours, a significant effort has been made in understanding the maximum extent to which quantum mechanics can provide an advantage. This thesis explores an intersection of these two research lines, i.e. to have a physical explanation of some of the features of quantum mechanics and at the same time, study the outer limits of quantum mechanics. The combining insight rests on a newer foundational idea: that information itself is physical rather than an abstract entity and thus, is subject to physical laws. In this thesis, we explore the principle of information causality, which states that in any communication scenario, the amount of information carried is bounded by the degrees of freedom of the carrier. Information causality was initially proposed as a physical principle aimed at deriving the predictions of quantum mechanics on the type of correlations observed in a Bell scenario, which is a communication scenario involving multiple parties with access to a shared randomness resource. This principle has been proposed to recover some of the well-known features of quantum mechanics, specifically Tsirelson’s bound of the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt inequality. Earlier results found limited generalisations due to the difficulty of deducing implications of the information causality principle. In this thesis, we greatly expand the scope of applicability of the principle. We develop a general-purpose algorithm to derive constraints on the set of quantum correlations. We extend the principle to be applicable to a wider variety of Bell scenarios, derive new families of quantum Bell inequalities and prove new bounds on the success probabilities of Entanglement Assisted Random Access Codes. We introduce an extension of the principle which applies to any distributed computing scenario. Using this extension, we improve on several previously known results in the field, and in certain cases, we even recover part of the quantum set as well. This extension provides rich insights into the communication complexity of distributed functions, using which we prove theory-independent randomised communication complexity bounds for several well-known functions and provide another general-purpose algorithm to bound the randomised quantum communication complexity of any function. As a consequence of the extension, we also establish that the extension supersedes the principle of non-trivial communication complexity.
Information causality (IC) posits that communicating m classical bits cannot give the receiver access to more than m bits of information about the sender's independent data. Although IC holds in quantum theory and excludes a broad class of supra-quantum correlations, its validity for the almost-quantum set has remained open. This semidefinite relaxation of the quantum set satisfies nontrivial communication complexity, no advantage for non-local computation, macroscopic locality, local orthogonality, and numerical evidence has suggested that it may also satisfy IC. Here we show that almost-quantum correlations violate IC, and do so without bound. Unlike earlier violations of IC, which rely on biased guesses, ours is driven by zero-error certificates: each is rare but never wrong, carries information linear in its probability, and vouches for many of the sender's bits at once. This establishes a sharp dichotomy: either IC is a valid physical principle that excludes these correlations, or any nonsignalling theory realizing them admits no mutual information obeying consistency, data processing and the chain rule. In the latter case, we discuss why the chain rule is the natural property to relinquish, and how this possibility relates to histories-based formulations and to locality defined relative to the state rather than presupposed in a fixed spacetime.
Information Causality was introduced as a physical principle for constraining the set of nonlocal correlations. In recent work, we proposed an extension of Information Causality that allows correlations among Alice's inputs. This extended principle yields tighter constraints than the original formulation and recovers part of the quantum boundary in certain Bell scenarios. In this work, we further investigate the implications of extended Information Causality and apply it to scenarios beyond binary inputs and outputs. We derive a family of quantum Bell inequalities that strengthen previously known constraints on quantum correlations. Using these inequalities, we obtain an improved analytical bound for the Collins-Gisin family of Bell inequalities. We also apply Information Causality to entanglement-assisted random access codes and derive new theory-independent analytical bounds on the winning probability. For this latter task, we prove that, despite being stronger in general, the extended principle does not improve the bounds obtained from the original Information Causality principle. This suggests that the existing Information Causality bounds are optimal for this class of random access codes.
In a Bell test, the set of observed probability distributions complying with the principle of local realism is fully characterized by Bell inequalities. Quantum theory allows for a violation of these inequalities, which is famously regarded as Bell nonlocality. However, finding the maximal degree of this violation is, in general, an undecidable problem. Consequently, no algorithm can be used to derive quantum analogs of Bell inequalities, which would characterize the set of probability distributions allowed by quantum theory. Here we present a family of inequalities, which approximate the set of quantum correlations in Bell scenarios where the number of settings or outcomes can be arbitrary. We derive these inequalities from the principle of Information Causality, and thus, we do not assume the formalism of quantum mechanics. Moreover, we identify a subspace in the correlation space for which the derived inequalities give the necessary and sufficient conditions for the principle of Macroscopic Locality. As a result, we show that in this subspace, the principle of Information Causality is strictly stronger than the principle of Macroscopic Locality.