Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2609.13885

Faithful certification of steering- and incompatibility-breaking channels

Po-Ting Hsu, Shin-Liang Chen

quant-phSubmitted Sep 12, 2026• Announced Sep 15, 2026• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We consider a quantum steering scenario where Alice prepares a bipartite state, sends one subsystem to Bob through a quantum channel, and aims to convince him that their shared state is entangled. Bob, however, will never be convinced if the channel is steering-breaking, that is, if the channel destroys steerability for any input state. To verify that a channel renders a state useless for demonstrating steering, one must consider all possible measurements performed by Alice and check if the conditional states Bob receives admit a local-hidden-state (LHS) model. This is generally a hard problem since it requires considering an infinite number of measurement combinations. Here, we show that the method proposed in [Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 190401 (2016); Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 190402 (2016)] can be utilized to tackle this problem. Furthermore, owing to the intimate relation between steering and measurement incompatibility, our approach can faithfully certify whether a channel destroys incompatibility for any set of measurements. Finally, we propose an experimental criterion for certifying steering- and incompatibility-breaking channels, which may be of independent interest.

Comments
11 pages, 2 figures

Related papers

Sufficient criterion for guaranteeing that a two-qubit state is unsteerable

Joseph Bowles, Flavien Hirsch, Marco Túlio Quintino +1 more

Quantum steering can be detected via the violation of steering inequalities, which provide sufficient conditions for the steerability of quantum states. Here we discuss the converse problem, namely, ensuring that an entangled state is unsteerable and hence Bell local. We present a simple criterion, applicable to any two-qubit state, that guarantees that the state admits a local hidden state model for arbitrary projective measurements. Specifically, we construct local hidden state models for a large class of entangled states, which thus cannot violate any steering or Bell inequality. In turn, this leads to sufficient conditions for a state to be only one-way steerable and provides the simplest possible example of one-way steering. Finally, by exploiting the connection between steering and measurement incompatibility, we give a sufficient criterion for a continuous set of qubit measurements to be jointly measurable.

arXiv:1510.06721•Physical Review A•Feb 26, 2016•131 citations

Device-independent quantification of steerability in tripartite scenario

Xin-Hong Wang, Miao-Tzu Lin, Shin-Liang Chen

Quantum steering captures the ability of one party, through local measurements on a shared entangled state, to affect the conditional states held by distant parties in a way that admits no local explanation. Its device-independent (DI) quantification -- requiring no characterization of any state or measurement -- has been developed in the bipartite setting, notably through the framework of assemblage moment matrices (AMMs) [Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 240401 (2016)], but has remained largely unexplored beyond it. Here, we extend the AMM framework to tripartite steering, covering both the scenario in which two parties jointly steer a third one (2-steer-1) and that in which a single party steers the remaining two (1-steer-2). For each scheme, we construct a semidefinite program that, from the observed correlations -- or merely from the violation of a Bell inequality -- yields lower bounds on the steering robustness of the underlying assemblage. As a by-product, our bounds also certify, in a DI manner, the incompatibility of the measurements performed by the steering parties.

quant-pharXiv:2609.36907•Sep 30, 2026•0 citations

Destroying and Preserving Measurement Incompatibility over a Quantum Channel

Eric Chitambar, Yujie Zhang

A quantum channel is called incompatibility-breaking if it always destroys the incompatibility of quantum measurements. On the other extreme are incompatibility-preserving channels, which never destroy incompatibility. This work studies both types of channels through the mathematical framework of zonotopes and zonoids, an approach that provides a complete characterization of compatibility for dichotomic measurements and is particularly powerful in the qubit setting. Using the language of zonoids, we present necessary and sufficient conditions for when a qubit unital channel is incompatibility-breaking, which are also sufficient for nonunital channels. As one of our main results, we demonstrate the superactivation phenomenon of two incompatibility-breaking qubit channels that are no longer incompatibility-breaking when used in parallel. Translating this result into the task of quantum steering, it says that two copies of a two-qubit Werner state can be steered at noise threshold $1/2$, even though this is impossible using just one copy. For the problem of incompatibility preservation, we prove that a quantum channel with matching input and output dimensions will preserve general incompatibility if and only if it is a unitary transformation. When the output dimension is larger, this result no longer holds, and we offer a conjectured form of a general incompatibility-preserving channel.

quant-pharXiv:2610.06642•Oct 6, 2026•0 citations

Steerability Of Local Quantum Coherence

Debasis Mondal, Tanumoy Pramanik, Arun Kumar Pati

The bipartite state is said to be steerable iff it does not have single system description, i.e., the bipartite state can not be explained by local hidden state model [Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 98}, 140402 (2007)]. Several steering inequalities have been derived using different local uncertainty relations to verify the control on the state of one subsystem by other. Here, we derive complementarity kind of relations between coherences measured on mutually unbiased bases using various coherence measures like the $l_1$-norm, relative entropy and skew information. Using these relations, we formulate steering inequalities to check whether one subsystem has control to the coherence of the other entangled subsystem. According to our results, all pure entangled states are maximally steerable but for mixed entangled states, coherence steerability needs stronger non-local correlation than the existing state steering inequalities. We also show that our steering criteria is monogamous.

•Aug 15, 2015•0 citations

One-to-One Mapping between Steering and Joint Measurability Problems

Roope Uola, Costantino Budroni, Otfried Gühne +1 more

Quantum steering refers to the possibility for Alice to remotely steer Bob's state by performing local measurements on her half of a bipartite system. Two necessary ingredients for steering are entanglement and incompatibility of Alice's measurements. In particular, it is known that for the case of pure states of maximal Schmidt rank the problem of steerability for Bob's assemblage is equivalent to the problem of joint measurability for Alice's observables. We show that such an equivalence holds in general; namely, the steerability of any assemblage can always be formulated as a joint measurability problem, and vice versa. We use this connection to introduce steering inequalities from joint measurability criteria and develop quantifiers for the incompatibility of measurements.

arXiv:1507.08633•Physical Review Letters•Dec 1, 2015•179 citations

Incompatibility breaking quantum channels

Teiko Heinosaari, Jukka Kiukas, Daniel Reitzner +1 more

A typical bipartite quantum protocol, such as EPR-steering, relies on two quantum features, entanglement of states and incompatibility of measurements. Noise can delete both of these quantum features. In this work we study the behavior of incompatibility under noisy quantum channels. The starting point for our investigation is the observation that compatible measurements cannot become incompatible by the action of any channel. We focus our attention to channels which completely destroy the incompatibility of various relevant sets of measurements. We call such channels incompatibility breaking , in analogy to the concept of entanglement breaking channels. This notion is relevant especially for the understanding of noise-robustness of the local measurement resources for steering.

arXiv:1504.05768•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•Oct 7, 2015•59 citations
We consider a quantum steering scenario where Alice prepares a bipartite state, sends one subsystem to Bob through a quantum channel, and aims to convince him that their shared state is entangled. Bob, however, will never be convinced if the channel is steering-breaking, that is, if the channel destroys steerability for any input state. To verify that a channel renders a state useless for demonstrating steering, one must consider all possible measurements performed by Alice and check if the conditional states Bob receives admit a local-hidden-state (LHS) model. This is generally a hard problem since it requires considering an infinite number of measurement combinations. Here, we show that the method proposed in [Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 190401 (2016); Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 190402 (2016)] can be utilized to tackle this problem. Furthermore, owing to the intimate relation between steering and measurement incompatibility, our approach can faithfully certify whether a channel destroys incompatibility for any set of measurements. Finally, we propose an experimental criterion for certifying steering- and incompatibility-breaking channels, which may be of independent interest.
Quantum steering can be detected via the violation of steering inequalities, which provide sufficient conditions for the steerability of quantum states. Here we discuss the converse problem, namely, ensuring that an entangled state is unsteerable and hence Bell local. We present a simple criterion, applicable to any two-qubit state, that guarantees that the state admits a local hidden state model for arbitrary projective measurements. Specifically, we construct local hidden state models for a large class of entangled states, which thus cannot violate any steering or Bell inequality. In turn, this leads to sufficient conditions for a state to be only one-way steerable and provides the simplest possible example of one-way steering. Finally, by exploiting the connection between steering and measurement incompatibility, we give a sufficient criterion for a continuous set of qubit measurements to be jointly measurable.
Quantum steering captures the ability of one party, through local measurements on a shared entangled state, to affect the conditional states held by distant parties in a way that admits no local explanation. Its device-independent (DI) quantification -- requiring no characterization of any state or measurement -- has been developed in the bipartite setting, notably through the framework of assemblage moment matrices (AMMs) [Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 240401 (2016)], but has remained largely unexplored beyond it. Here, we extend the AMM framework to tripartite steering, covering both the scenario in which two parties jointly steer a third one (2-steer-1) and that in which a single party steers the remaining two (1-steer-2). For each scheme, we construct a semidefinite program that, from the observed correlations -- or merely from the violation of a Bell inequality -- yields lower bounds on the steering robustness of the underlying assemblage. As a by-product, our bounds also certify, in a DI manner, the incompatibility of the measurements performed by the steering parties.
A quantum channel is called incompatibility-breaking if it always destroys the incompatibility of quantum measurements. On the other extreme are incompatibility-preserving channels, which never destroy incompatibility. This work studies both types of channels through the mathematical framework of zonotopes and zonoids, an approach that provides a complete characterization of compatibility for dichotomic measurements and is particularly powerful in the qubit setting. Using the language of zonoids, we present necessary and sufficient conditions for when a qubit unital channel is incompatibility-breaking, which are also sufficient for nonunital channels. As one of our main results, we demonstrate the superactivation phenomenon of two incompatibility-breaking qubit channels that are no longer incompatibility-breaking when used in parallel. Translating this result into the task of quantum steering, it says that two copies of a two-qubit Werner state can be steered at noise threshold 1/21/21/2, even though this is impossible using just one copy. For the problem of incompatibility preservation, we prove that a quantum channel with matching input and output dimensions will preserve general incompatibility if and only if it is a unitary transformation. When the output dimension is larger, this result no longer holds, and we offer a conjectured form of a general incompatibility-preserving channel.
The bipartite state is said to be steerable iff it does not have single system description, i.e., the bipartite state can not be explained by local hidden state model [Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 98}, 140402 (2007)]. Several steering inequalities have been derived using different local uncertainty relations to verify the control on the state of one subsystem by other. Here, we derive complementarity kind of relations between coherences measured on mutually unbiased bases using various coherence measures like the l1l_1l1​-norm, relative entropy and skew information. Using these relations, we formulate steering inequalities to check whether one subsystem has control to the coherence of the other entangled subsystem. According to our results, all pure entangled states are maximally steerable but for mixed entangled states, coherence steerability needs stronger non-local correlation than the existing state steering inequalities. We also show that our steering criteria is monogamous.
Quantum steering refers to the possibility for Alice to remotely steer Bob's state by performing local measurements on her half of a bipartite system. Two necessary ingredients for steering are entanglement and incompatibility of Alice's measurements. In particular, it is known that for the case of pure states of maximal Schmidt rank the problem of steerability for Bob's assemblage is equivalent to the problem of joint measurability for Alice's observables. We show that such an equivalence holds in general; namely, the steerability of any assemblage can always be formulated as a joint measurability problem, and vice versa. We use this connection to introduce steering inequalities from joint measurability criteria and develop quantifiers for the incompatibility of measurements.
A typical bipartite quantum protocol, such as EPR-steering, relies on two quantum features, entanglement of states and incompatibility of measurements. Noise can delete both of these quantum features. In this work we study the behavior of incompatibility under noisy quantum channels. The starting point for our investigation is the observation that compatible measurements cannot become incompatible by the action of any channel. We focus our attention to channels which completely destroy the incompatibility of various relevant sets of measurements. We call such channels incompatibility breaking , in analogy to the concept of entanglement breaking channels. This notion is relevant especially for the understanding of noise-robustness of the local measurement resources for steering.