Quantum neural networks are a prominent model of quantum machine learning. Their training consists in the minimization of a given loss function over a parametrized family of quantum circuits, mathematically described by unitary operators, or, more generally, completely positive linear maps. In this work, we extend the notion of quantum neural network, using random sampling and classical data processing to enlarge the optimization space in a way that includes linear combinations of completely positive maps. Our extended model, called virtual quantum neural networks, leverages its enlarged optimization space to achieve increased expressivity and improved noise robustness. These benefits are illustrated in three representative tasks: quantum error mitigation, binary classification, and estimation of ground-state energies. Overall, virtual quantum neural networks offer a flexible learning paradigm that expands the space of achievable computations and strengthens the applications of near-term quantum hardware.
Quantum neural networks are a prominent model of quantum machine learning. Their training consists in the minimization of a given loss function over a parametrized family of quantum circuits, mathematically described by unitary operators, or, more generally, completely positive linear maps. In this work, we extend the notion of quantum neural network, using random sampling and classical data processing to enlarge the optimization space in a way that includes linear combinations of completely positive maps. Our extended model, called virtual quantum neural networks, leverages its enlarged optimization space to achieve increased expressivity and improved noise robustness. These benefits are illustrated in three representative tasks: quantum error mitigation, binary classification, and estimation of ground-state energies. Overall, virtual quantum neural networks offer a flexible learning paradigm that expands the space of achievable computations and strengthens the applications of near-term quantum hardware.
Quantum neural networks generalize classical artificial neural networks into the quantum domain. They are formulated as parameterized quantum circuits which are optimized by measuring and minimizing a suitably chosen loss function. The core challenge in understanding, implementing and ultimately using quantum neural networks is that they represent many-body systems with an exponentially large Hilbert space, in combination with a large parameter search space. Moreover, noise -- which is inherent to any quantum measurement -- sets practical limits for the estimation of training loss. Here, we study physics-informed large-scale quantum neural networks that are trained through a finite number of noisy loss function measurements. We show that this architecture permits the construction of nontrivial decision boundaries that enable the classification of quantum states through measuring an order parameter. Our approach can directly process quantum data that is output from quantum simulators and computers and is well suited for implementation on current hardware. Moreover, owed to a close link between the neural network dynamics and the evolution of Markovian open many-body quantum systems, one may expect a certain robustness to noise, which is ubiquitous in the current NISQ era.
Quantum machine learning is at the crossroads of two of the most exciting current areas of research: quantum computing and classical machine learning. Although the field is still in its infancy, the body of literature is already large enough to warrant several review articles [1–3]. This short survey focuses on a selection of significant recent results on the subtopic of quantum neural networks, an area that hopes to build on the enormous impact that classical neural networks have had. In particular, we concentrate on quantum generalizations of popular neural-network concepts such as Boltzmann machines, generative adversarial networks and autoencoders, as well as applications of classical neural networks to quantum information and vice versa. Examples of Boltzmann machines. In a fully connected Boltzmann machine, connections exist between all visible and hidden neurons. In a restricted Boltzmann machine (RBM), there are no connections between neurons of the same type. A deep Boltzmann machine (DBM) consists of adding one or more additional layers of hidden neurons to an RBM, with no connections between neurons in the same layer. The energy-based nature of BMs gives a natural framework for considering quantum generalizations of their behavior. The BM energy function is equivalent to the Hamiltonian of a simple Ising model and one might hope that more general Hamiltonians allowed by quantum mechanics could explain certain data sets better than classically. Amin et al. [4] adopt this approach, and take the so-called transverse field Ising Hamiltonian as the energy function. This increased generality brings certain difficulties, however, as the transverse field term makes training the quantum Boltzmann machine (QBM) non-trivial. Although the general scaling and performance of QBMs is not yet well understood, for certain small-size examples the authors observe that their QBMs can learn data distributions better than classical BMs. Kieferova and Wiebe [5] extend the formalism of Amin et al. and consider more general Hamiltonians that, unlike the transverse Ising model, are not in general believed to be classically efficiently simulatable. Furthermore, they propose new methods for training that allow for parameters corresponding to quantum terms to be learned. Finally, their QBM enables a form of quantum-state tomography that can learn non-classical data, and also generate copies of the reconstructed state. Again, small-scale numerical evidence suggests that their proposals may provide an advantage over classical BMs, although their tendency to overfit data must be investigated further. The practical value of BMs, either classical or quantum, relies in part on the ease with which they are trained. This in turn depends on sampling efficiently from the Boltzmann distribution. Classically this can be done approximately only for the special case of restricted Boltzmann machines (RBM), i.e. where connections are between visible and hidden units, and no connections exist between neurons of the same type. Wiebe et al. [6] propose two quantum algorithms for Boltzmann sampling, based on starting from a state corresponding to the product distribution that is closest to the target Boltzmann distribution. While small-scale numerical studies are encouraging, true bounds on the running time of their algorithms rely on a problem-dependent parameter κ, the scaling of which is hard to estimate. The hope remains though that empirically their algorithms work well in practice, even for multi-layer and fully connected BMs. The expressive power of BMs for compactly representing complicated probability distributions has led to another line of investigation, namely their use for representing quantum many-body wave functions. The authors apply this technique to two prototypical spin models and achieve high accuracy in both ground-state estimation and dynamical evolution, improving on existing state-of-the-art techniques. Their results indicate that RBM states can capture complex many-body correlations in an efficient manner—evidence reinforced by the work of Deng et al. [8], who show that certain topological quantum states in one, two and three dimensions can be represented by RBM states with a number of parameters only linear in the system size. In a subsequent study, however, Gao and Duan [9] prove that although RBM states can indeed represent many highly entangled states, their expressive power is limited in that they cannot represent arbitrary states generated by polynomial-sized quantum circuits, nor those that are the ground states of k-local Hamiltonians with polynomial-sized energy gaps, unless the polynomial hierarchy from computational complexity theory collapses. On the other hand, they show that these two important classes of states can be efficiently represented by a deep Boltzmann machine of three layers. Intriguingly though, another paper by Deng et al. [10] gives an analytic construction of a family of RBM states with a number of parameters linear in the system size that exhibits maximal volume-law entanglement, and that cannot be represented efficiently by either matrix product states (MPS) or tensor-network (TN) states. This shows that the expressive power of even efficiently parametrized RBM states is not limited by entanglement in the same way that other popular compact representations are. This gives the hope that RBM states may prove a valuable tool in understanding entangled quantum systems intractable by traditional methods. Levine et al. [11] establish another connection between the many-body wave function and neural networks, this time in the form of convolutional arithmetic circuits (ConvAC), a variant of the popular convolutional neural networks in widespread use today. By proving a one-to-one equivalence between a ConvAC circuit and TN quantum states, the authors are able to use tools from quantum information theory to analyze the entanglement present in the corresponding TN, and quantify the neural network's ability to model complex correlations between its inputs. This in turn can be used to obtain bounds on the expressivity of a given ConvAC architecture and be of practical use in choosing network parameters tailored to the data. While ConvAC are not widely used in practice, the authors empirically validate that the insights gained can be applied successfully to more common convolutional neural-network designs. Generative adversarial networks (GAN) are machine-learning algorithms in which two players—a generator and a discriminator—compete against each another. The generator's goal is to create and send fake data samples to the discriminator and maximize the probability that the discriminator erroneously believes that the sample comes from some true data distribution. The discriminator attempts to discern real from fake data as best as possible. Under reasonable assumptions the game converges to a point where the discriminator is unable to discriminate with probability greater than 1/2 (i.e. no better than random guessing), and the generator in fact has learned to generate data from the true distribution. Lloyd and Weedbrook [12] consider the natural extension in which one or both of the generator and discriminator are equipped with quantum information processors. When the data to be learned are a quantum state and both parties have quantum processors, the authors show that the unique end point of the adversarial game also coincides with the generator producing a quantum state corresponding to the true data statistics, and the discriminator unable to discern true from false data better than random guessing. They further argue that a different outcome may hold when the true samples are produced by the measurement of some quantum state, and the generator is purely classical. The concept of quantum supremacy is based on the assumption that there exist probability distributions accessible to a quantum computer that no classical computer can efficiently sample from. If the true data correspond to one of these distributions, then no classical generator can efficiently generate fake data reproducing the true statistics and, in principle, the discriminator can successfully discriminate true from fake data. However, whether the discriminator can efficiently find the measurements required to do so is unclear. Quantum-computing techniques have also found applications in autoencoders—neural networks where a larger number of input and output neurons are connected via a smaller number of intermediary latent neurons. The goal is to tune the weights of the network so that a training set of classical bit strings can be approximately recovered after being passed through the autoencoder. Romero et al. [13] consider instead a training set of quantum states, and ask whether a quantum circuit with a similar bottleneck structure can compress and approximately recover the data. The circuits that they consider consist of gates chosen from some set of parametrized unitary operations, and arranged in some fixed order. The parameters are then optimized classically so that the circuit best predicts the training-set labels. The authors demonstrate the validity of this approach by showing that ground states of the Hubbard model and certain molecules can indeed be compressed and recovered by such circuits. However, in general, the performance of such quantum autoencoders will be highly dependent on the kind of programmable circuit on which they are based, and at present there does not seem to be a structured way of determining this. Quantum neural networks are still in their infancy and, while the above works are important steps towards bridging our understanding between classical neural networks and quantum computing, many questions remain unanswered. If the expressivity of Boltzmann machine states is not restricted by entanglement in the same way that MPS and tensor-network states are, what is the best way of understanding their limitations? How can physicists use the correspondence between ConvAC and TN to their advantage in finding efficient, expressive representations of many-body wave functions? Can classical data distributions be learned more efficiently by quantum GAN than classical GAN? Whatever the outcome of these and many other related questions, this promises to be an exciting and active area of research in the years to come.
Quantum computing is one of the most exciting research areas of the last decades. At the same time, methods of machine learning have started to dominate science, industry and our everyday life. In this thesis we combine these two essential research topics of the 21st century and introduce dissipative quantum neural networks (DQNNs), which are designed for fully quantum learning tasks, are capable of universal quantum computation and have low memory requirements while training. We start the discussion of this interdisciplinary topic by introducing artificial neural networks, which are a very common tool in classical machine learning. Next, we give an overview on quantum information. Here we focus on quantum algorithms and circuits, which are used to implement quantum neural networks. Moreover, we explain the opportunities and challenges arising with today's quantum computers. The discussion of the architecture and training algorithm of the DQNNs forms the core of this work. These networks are optimised with training data pairs in form of input and desired output states and therefore can be used for characterising unknown or untrusted quantum devices. We not only demonstrate the generalisation behaviour of these quantum neural networks using classical simulations, but also implement them successfully on actual quantum computers. To understand the ultimate limits for such quantum machine learning methods, we discuss the quantum no free lunch theorem, which describes a bound on the probability that a quantum device, which can be modelled as a unitary process and is optimised with quantum examples, gives an incorrect output for a random input. This gives us a tool to review the learning behaviour of quantum neural networks in general and the DQNNs in particular. Moreover we expand the area of applications of DQNNs in two directions. In the first case, we include additional information beyond just the training data pairs: since quantum devices are always structured, the resulting data is always structured as well. We modify the DQNN's training algorithm such that knowledge about the graph-structure of the training data pairs is included in the training process and show that this can lead to better generalisation behaviour. Both the original DQNN and the DQNN including graph structure are trained with data pairs in order to characterise an underlying relation. However, in the second extension of the algorithm we aim to learn characteristics of a set of quantum states in order to extend it to quantum states which have similar properties. Therefore we build a generative adversarial model where two DQNNs, called the generator and discriminator, are trained in a competitive way. Overall, we observe that DQNNs can not only be trained efficiently but also, similar to their classical counterparts, modified to suit different applications.
Quantum Neural Networks (QNNs) represent a compelling convergence of quantum mechanics and machine learning, yet their practical deployment remains constrained by noise, limited qubit counts, and the cost of full quantum execution. Hybrid quantum-classical (HQC) training offers a pragmatic path forward: parameterized quantum circuits (PQCs) process information in exponentially large Hilbert spaces while classical optimizers update parameters via gradient methods accessible on today's hardware. We present a modular HQC training framework, formalising the parameter-shift rule for hardware-compatible gradient estimation, characterising the barren-plateau phenomenon through a variance-decay analysis, and introducing noise-aware training strategies for NISQ devices. Empirical results from state-vector and shot-based simulation confirm measurable quantum advantage on quantum-structured tasks, with the phase classification benchmark improving +12.1% over a classical MLP baseline. The accompanying open-source library provides a clean abstraction between quantum simulation and classical optimisation, serving as a foundation for near-term quantum machine learning research.
The field of quantum neural networks, an emerging interdisciplinary frontier bridging quantum computing and machine learning, has recently garnered substantial attention in the scientific community. In this work, we propose a complex-valued quantum neural network in the quantum circuit framework through expanding the number domains of conventional quantum machine learning architecture from the real-valued domain to the complex-valued plane. Such an expansion can alleviate the unitary constraints in quantum feature maps and optimization blocks, and introduce enhanced nonlinear characteristics. It is proven theoretically that the expressivity can be significantly enhanced through the frequency-dependent adaptability and the exponential or hyperbolic functional distribution extension for the Fourier coefficients of quantum models' outputs. Moreover, analysis based on covering numbers indicates that our algorithm can achieve an adaptive balance between expressivity and generalization via the trainable scaling factor, while exhibiting superior parameter efficiency relative to unitary quantum learning models. The performance of the proposed algorithms is demonstrated through extensive numerical simulations in regression and classification tasks, including an experimental realization on the superconducting quantum processor. Our work advances the harnessing of imaginarity resources of quantum theory for learning tasks, achieving a theoretically grounded performance enhancement, and underscores the potential of improving quantum neural networks through structured design for future applications.
Quantum Neural Networks (QNNs) have emerged as a promising avenue in the quest for next-generation machine learning capabilities.By harnessing the principles of quantum mechanics and quantum computing, QNNs offer the potential for exponential speedup and enhanced computational power compared to classical machine learning algorithms.This paper presents a comprehensive exploration of Quantum Neural Networks, covering their foundational concepts, various architectures, novel quantum-enhanced machine learning algorithms, practical implementations, advantages, and challenges.We begin with an overview of related work in Quantum Machine Learning, highlighting the achievements and progress in the field.Subsequently, we delve into the fundamental principles of Quantum Mechanics and Quantum Computing to provide a solid grounding for understanding QNNs.We then introduce the basics of Quantum Neural Networks, including quantum neurons, quantum gates, and quantum circuits for machine learning tasks.Various QNN architectures, such as Variational Quantum Circuits and Quantum Convolutional Neural Networks, are explored along with their potential applications.Additionally, quantum-enhanced machine learning algorithms, like Quantum Support Vector Machines and Quantum Generative Adversarial Networks, are discussed for a deeper understanding of QNN capabilities.Practical aspects, including hardware implementations, noise mitigation, and experimental results, are presented to shed light on the feasibility of QNNs in real-world scenarios.The paper concludes by discussing the advantages and challenges of Quantum Neural Networks and their potential implications for the future of machine learning and artificial intelligence.