Quantum computing is one of the most exciting research areas of the last decades. At the same time, methods of machine learning have started to dominate science, industry and our everyday life. In this thesis we combine these two essential research topics of the 21st century and introduce dissipative quantum neural networks (DQNNs), which are designed for fully quantum learning tasks, are capable of universal quantum computation and have low memory requirements while training. We start the discussion of this interdisciplinary topic by introducing artificial neural networks, which are a very common tool in classical machine learning. Next, we give an overview on quantum information. Here we focus on quantum algorithms and circuits, which are used to implement quantum neural networks. Moreover, we explain the opportunities and challenges arising with today's quantum computers. The discussion of the architecture and training algorithm of the DQNNs forms the core of this work. These networks are optimised with training data pairs in form of input and desired output states and therefore can be used for characterising unknown or untrusted quantum devices. We not only demonstrate the generalisation behaviour of these quantum neural networks using classical simulations, but also implement them successfully on actual quantum computers. To understand the ultimate limits for such quantum machine learning methods, we discuss the quantum no free lunch theorem, which describes a bound on the probability that a quantum device, which can be modelled as a unitary process and is optimised with quantum examples, gives an incorrect output for a random input. This gives us a tool to review the learning behaviour of quantum neural networks in general and the DQNNs in particular. Moreover we expand the area of applications of DQNNs in two directions. In the first case, we include additional information beyond just the training data pairs: since quantum devices are always structured, the resulting data is always structured as well. We modify the DQNN's training algorithm such that knowledge about the graph-structure of the training data pairs is included in the training process and show that this can lead to better generalisation behaviour. Both the original DQNN and the DQNN including graph structure are trained with data pairs in order to characterise an underlying relation. However, in the second extension of the algorithm we aim to learn characteristics of a set of quantum states in order to extend it to quantum states which have similar properties. Therefore we build a generative adversarial model where two DQNNs, called the generator and discriminator, are trained in a competitive way. Overall, we observe that DQNNs can not only be trained efficiently but also, similar to their classical counterparts, modified to suit different applications.
Quantum computing is one of the most exciting research areas of the last decades. At the same time, methods of machine learning have started to dominate science, industry and our everyday life. In this thesis we combine these two essential research topics of the 21st century and introduce dissipative quantum neural networks (DQNNs), which are designed for fully quantum learning tasks, are capable of universal quantum computation and have low memory requirements while training. We start the discussion of this interdisciplinary topic by introducing artificial neural networks, which are a very common tool in classical machine learning. Next, we give an overview on quantum information. Here we focus on quantum algorithms and circuits, which are used to implement quantum neural networks. Moreover, we explain the opportunities and challenges arising with today's quantum computers. The discussion of the architecture and training algorithm of the DQNNs forms the core of this work. These networks are optimised with training data pairs in form of input and desired output states and therefore can be used for characterising unknown or untrusted quantum devices. We not only demonstrate the generalisation behaviour of these quantum neural networks using classical simulations, but also implement them successfully on actual quantum computers. To understand the ultimate limits for such quantum machine learning methods, we discuss the quantum no free lunch theorem, which describes a bound on the probability that a quantum device, which can be modelled as a unitary process and is optimised with quantum examples, gives an incorrect output for a random input. This gives us a tool to review the learning behaviour of quantum neural networks in general and the DQNNs in particular. Moreover we expand the area of applications of DQNNs in two directions. In the first case, we include additional information beyond just the training data pairs: since quantum devices are always structured, the resulting data is always structured as well. We modify the DQNN's training algorithm such that knowledge about the graph-structure of the training data pairs is included in the training process and show that this can lead to better generalisation behaviour. Both the original DQNN and the DQNN including graph structure are trained with data pairs in order to characterise an underlying relation. However, in the second extension of the algorithm we aim to learn characteristics of a set of quantum states in order to extend it to quantum states which have similar properties. Therefore we build a generative adversarial model where two DQNNs, called the generator and discriminator, are trained in a competitive way. Overall, we observe that DQNNs can not only be trained efficiently but also, similar to their classical counterparts, modified to suit different applications.
Noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices build the first generation of quantum computers. Quantum neural networks (QNNs) gained high interest as one of the few suitable quantum algorithms to run on these NISQ devices. Most of the QNNs exploit supervised training algorithms with quantum states in form of pairs to learn their underlying relation. However, only little attention has been given to unsupervised training algorithms despite interesting applications where the quantum data does not occur in pairs. Here we propose an approach to unsupervised learning and reproducing characteristics of any given set of quantum states. We build a generative adversarial model using two dissipative quantum neural networks (DQNNs), leading to the dissipative quantum generative adversarial network (DQGAN). The generator DQNN aims to produce quantum states similar to the training data while the discriminator DQNN aims to distinguish the generator's output from the training data. We find that training both parts in a competitive manner results in a well trained generative DQNN. We see our contribution as a proof of concept for using DQGANs to learn and extend unlabeled training sets.
Neural networks enjoy widespread success in both research and industry and, with the advent of quantum technology, it is a crucial challenge to design quantum neural networks for fully quantum learning tasks. Here we propose a truly quantum analogue of classical neurons, which form quantum feedforward neural networks capable of universal quantum computation. We describe the efficient training of these networks using the fidelity as a cost function, providing both classical and efficient quantum implementations. Our method allows for fast optimisation with reduced memory requirements: the number of qudits required scales with only the width, allowing deep-network optimisation. We benchmark our proposal for the quantum task of learning an unknown unitary and find remarkable generalisation behaviour and a striking robustness to noisy training data.
Quantum machine learning is at the crossroads of two of the most exciting current areas of research: quantum computing and classical machine learning. Although the field is still in its infancy, the body of literature is already large enough to warrant several review articles [1–3]. This short survey focuses on a selection of significant recent results on the subtopic of quantum neural networks, an area that hopes to build on the enormous impact that classical neural networks have had. In particular, we concentrate on quantum generalizations of popular neural-network concepts such as Boltzmann machines, generative adversarial networks and autoencoders, as well as applications of classical neural networks to quantum information and vice versa. Examples of Boltzmann machines. In a fully connected Boltzmann machine, connections exist between all visible and hidden neurons. In a restricted Boltzmann machine (RBM), there are no connections between neurons of the same type. A deep Boltzmann machine (DBM) consists of adding one or more additional layers of hidden neurons to an RBM, with no connections between neurons in the same layer. The energy-based nature of BMs gives a natural framework for considering quantum generalizations of their behavior. The BM energy function is equivalent to the Hamiltonian of a simple Ising model and one might hope that more general Hamiltonians allowed by quantum mechanics could explain certain data sets better than classically. Amin et al. [4] adopt this approach, and take the so-called transverse field Ising Hamiltonian as the energy function. This increased generality brings certain difficulties, however, as the transverse field term makes training the quantum Boltzmann machine (QBM) non-trivial. Although the general scaling and performance of QBMs is not yet well understood, for certain small-size examples the authors observe that their QBMs can learn data distributions better than classical BMs. Kieferova and Wiebe [5] extend the formalism of Amin et al. and consider more general Hamiltonians that, unlike the transverse Ising model, are not in general believed to be classically efficiently simulatable. Furthermore, they propose new methods for training that allow for parameters corresponding to quantum terms to be learned. Finally, their QBM enables a form of quantum-state tomography that can learn non-classical data, and also generate copies of the reconstructed state. Again, small-scale numerical evidence suggests that their proposals may provide an advantage over classical BMs, although their tendency to overfit data must be investigated further. The practical value of BMs, either classical or quantum, relies in part on the ease with which they are trained. This in turn depends on sampling efficiently from the Boltzmann distribution. Classically this can be done approximately only for the special case of restricted Boltzmann machines (RBM), i.e. where connections are between visible and hidden units, and no connections exist between neurons of the same type. Wiebe et al. [6] propose two quantum algorithms for Boltzmann sampling, based on starting from a state corresponding to the product distribution that is closest to the target Boltzmann distribution. While small-scale numerical studies are encouraging, true bounds on the running time of their algorithms rely on a problem-dependent parameter κ, the scaling of which is hard to estimate. The hope remains though that empirically their algorithms work well in practice, even for multi-layer and fully connected BMs. The expressive power of BMs for compactly representing complicated probability distributions has led to another line of investigation, namely their use for representing quantum many-body wave functions. The authors apply this technique to two prototypical spin models and achieve high accuracy in both ground-state estimation and dynamical evolution, improving on existing state-of-the-art techniques. Their results indicate that RBM states can capture complex many-body correlations in an efficient manner—evidence reinforced by the work of Deng et al. [8], who show that certain topological quantum states in one, two and three dimensions can be represented by RBM states with a number of parameters only linear in the system size. In a subsequent study, however, Gao and Duan [9] prove that although RBM states can indeed represent many highly entangled states, their expressive power is limited in that they cannot represent arbitrary states generated by polynomial-sized quantum circuits, nor those that are the ground states of k-local Hamiltonians with polynomial-sized energy gaps, unless the polynomial hierarchy from computational complexity theory collapses. On the other hand, they show that these two important classes of states can be efficiently represented by a deep Boltzmann machine of three layers. Intriguingly though, another paper by Deng et al. [10] gives an analytic construction of a family of RBM states with a number of parameters linear in the system size that exhibits maximal volume-law entanglement, and that cannot be represented efficiently by either matrix product states (MPS) or tensor-network (TN) states. This shows that the expressive power of even efficiently parametrized RBM states is not limited by entanglement in the same way that other popular compact representations are. This gives the hope that RBM states may prove a valuable tool in understanding entangled quantum systems intractable by traditional methods. Levine et al. [11] establish another connection between the many-body wave function and neural networks, this time in the form of convolutional arithmetic circuits (ConvAC), a variant of the popular convolutional neural networks in widespread use today. By proving a one-to-one equivalence between a ConvAC circuit and TN quantum states, the authors are able to use tools from quantum information theory to analyze the entanglement present in the corresponding TN, and quantify the neural network's ability to model complex correlations between its inputs. This in turn can be used to obtain bounds on the expressivity of a given ConvAC architecture and be of practical use in choosing network parameters tailored to the data. While ConvAC are not widely used in practice, the authors empirically validate that the insights gained can be applied successfully to more common convolutional neural-network designs. Generative adversarial networks (GAN) are machine-learning algorithms in which two players—a generator and a discriminator—compete against each another. The generator's goal is to create and send fake data samples to the discriminator and maximize the probability that the discriminator erroneously believes that the sample comes from some true data distribution. The discriminator attempts to discern real from fake data as best as possible. Under reasonable assumptions the game converges to a point where the discriminator is unable to discriminate with probability greater than 1/2 (i.e. no better than random guessing), and the generator in fact has learned to generate data from the true distribution. Lloyd and Weedbrook [12] consider the natural extension in which one or both of the generator and discriminator are equipped with quantum information processors. When the data to be learned are a quantum state and both parties have quantum processors, the authors show that the unique end point of the adversarial game also coincides with the generator producing a quantum state corresponding to the true data statistics, and the discriminator unable to discern true from false data better than random guessing. They further argue that a different outcome may hold when the true samples are produced by the measurement of some quantum state, and the generator is purely classical. The concept of quantum supremacy is based on the assumption that there exist probability distributions accessible to a quantum computer that no classical computer can efficiently sample from. If the true data correspond to one of these distributions, then no classical generator can efficiently generate fake data reproducing the true statistics and, in principle, the discriminator can successfully discriminate true from fake data. However, whether the discriminator can efficiently find the measurements required to do so is unclear. Quantum-computing techniques have also found applications in autoencoders—neural networks where a larger number of input and output neurons are connected via a smaller number of intermediary latent neurons. The goal is to tune the weights of the network so that a training set of classical bit strings can be approximately recovered after being passed through the autoencoder. Romero et al. [13] consider instead a training set of quantum states, and ask whether a quantum circuit with a similar bottleneck structure can compress and approximately recover the data. The circuits that they consider consist of gates chosen from some set of parametrized unitary operations, and arranged in some fixed order. The parameters are then optimized classically so that the circuit best predicts the training-set labels. The authors demonstrate the validity of this approach by showing that ground states of the Hubbard model and certain molecules can indeed be compressed and recovered by such circuits. However, in general, the performance of such quantum autoencoders will be highly dependent on the kind of programmable circuit on which they are based, and at present there does not seem to be a structured way of determining this. Quantum neural networks are still in their infancy and, while the above works are important steps towards bridging our understanding between classical neural networks and quantum computing, many questions remain unanswered. If the expressivity of Boltzmann machine states is not restricted by entanglement in the same way that MPS and tensor-network states are, what is the best way of understanding their limitations? How can physicists use the correspondence between ConvAC and TN to their advantage in finding efficient, expressive representations of many-body wave functions? Can classical data distributions be learned more efficiently by quantum GAN than classical GAN? Whatever the outcome of these and many other related questions, this promises to be an exciting and active area of research in the years to come.
Quantum neural networks (QNNs) represent a cutting-edge approach to machine learning and artificial intelligence, harnessing the principles of quantum mechanics to process and analyze data in fundamentally new ways. Unlike classical neural networks, which operate on classical bits and are limited by the laws of classical physics, QNNs use quantum bits (qubits) and exploit quantum phenomena such as superposition and entanglement to achieve unprecedented computational power and efficiency. This chapter explores the principles and applications of QNNs, including their potential for solving complex optimisation problems, pattern recognition tasks, and quantum simulation tasks. We discuss various QNN architectures, training algorithms, and applications, highlighting their advantages and challenges compared to classical neural networks. Additionally, we explore the potential impact of QNNs on fields such as quantum computing, quantum communication, and quantum sensing, as well as their implications for society and the economy. Overall, this chapter provides insights into the emerging field of quantum neural networks and sets the stage for further research and innovation in this exciting area.
One of the most promising new directions in quantum computing and artificial intelligence convergence is the Quantum Neural Networks (QNNs) that can potentially revolutionize the manner in which intelligent systems are designed, trained, and implemented. Although traditional deep learning models have proven to be incredibly successful in fields like computer vision, natural language processing and autonomous systems, they are becoming limited by computational bottlenecks, energy use, and scalability constraints when operating on large high-dimensional data. The distinctive principles of quantum mechanics (superposition, entanglement, and quantum parallelism) may be applied to the QNNs to provide a distinct computational paradigm with the ability to execute exponentially complicated computations more effectively than his classical counterparts. This article gives an in-depth analysis of QNNs as the new frontier of artificial intelligence. We start with the description of the theoretical foundations of quantum computation and their realization in the form of neural networks. We then examine state-of-the-art QNN architectures, such as hybrid quantum-classical models that help overcome present quantum hardware limitations in relation to the capabilities of classical machine learning. Some of the upcoming applications are showcased including molecular simulation and drug discovery and financial modeling, optimization, cryptography and intelligent automation. Such applications reveal the revolutionary power of QNNs to tackle the issues that cannot be tackled by traditional systems. Nonetheless, there are also major obstacles on the way to a practical implementation of QNN. Problems that still remain a barrier to widespread adoption include quantum decoherence, noise in near-term quantum devices, and the inability to scale qubit architectures or to train large-scale quantum models. In order to overcome these obstacles, we speak about the current research work on the topic of error correction, variational algorithms, and hybrid system designs. Also we examine the ethical and societal ramifications of quantum-accelerated AI, such as security, data sovereignty, and technological equity globally.
Artificial neural networks, usually just called neural networks, computing systems indefinitely inspired by the biological neural networks and they are extensive in both research as well as industry. It is critical to design quantum Neural Networks for complete quantum learning tasks. In this project, we suggest a computational neural network model based on principles of quantum mechanics which form a quantum feed-forward neural network proficient in universal quantum computation. This structure takes input from one layer of qubits and drives that input onto another layer of qubits. This layer of qubits evaluates this information and drives on the output to the next layer. Eventually, the path leads to the final layer of qubits. The layers do not have to be of the same breadth, meaning they need not have the same number of qubits as the layer before and/or after it. This assembly is trained on which path to take identical to classical ANN. The intended project can be compiled by the subsequent points provided here: 1. The expert training of the quantum neural network utilizing the fidelity as a cost function, providing both conventional and efficient quantum implementations. 2. Use of methods that enable quick optimization with reduced memory requirements. 3. Benchmarking our proposal for the quantum task of learning an unknown unitary and find extraordinary generality and a remarkable sturdiness to noisy training data.