The Simultaneous Message Passing (SMP) model provides a fundamental framework for comparing classical and quantum communication. For two players, Gavinsky et al. (STOC 2006) established a separation underlying the incomparability of shared randomness and quantum communication: \textsc{Index Coordination} needs $O(\log n)$ public-coin bits but $Ω(n^{1/3})$ bounded-error qubits.
In this work, we establish a multiparty exponential separation through $\operatorname{IC}_{k,n}$, a natural $k$-party generalization of \textsc{Index Coordination}. Public-coin protocols solve it unambiguously with maximum message length $O(\log n)$ bits. In contrast, quantum SMP protocols without shared entanglement or public coins require maximum message length $Ω(n^{1-1/k})$ qubits in the unambiguous regime and $Ω(n^{(k-1)/(k+1)})$ qubits in the bounded-error regime. A classical private-coin protocol matches the unambiguous bound, so quantum communication provides no asymptotic advantage over private randomness in this regime. For fixed error parameters, all constants are independent of $k$, establishing the exponential separation for every integer-valued function $k=k(n)\ge2$, without restricting its growth. Both quantum lower bounds become $Ω(n)$ when $k\ge c\log n$ for any fixed $c>0$, matching the full-input protocol and yielding tight linear complexity in both regimes.
Our results demonstrate that quantum superposition cannot efficiently simulate the coordination afforded by public randomness, extending this separation to arbitrary $k$. To bound success probabilities for multiparty product states, we prove an exact factorization theorem for unambiguous quantum state identification, which may be of independent mathematical interest.
The Simultaneous Message Passing (SMP) model provides a fundamental framework for comparing classical and quantum communication. For two players, Gavinsky et al. (STOC 2006) established a separation underlying the incomparability of shared randomness and quantum communication: \textsc{Index Coordination} needs O(logn) public-coin bits but Ω(n1/3) bounded-error qubits.
In this work, we establish a multiparty exponential separation through ICk,n, a natural k-party generalization of \textsc{Index Coordination}. Public-coin protocols solve it unambiguously with maximum message length O(logn) bits. In contrast, quantum SMP protocols without shared entanglement or public coins require maximum message length Ω(n1−1/k) qubits in the unambiguous regime and Ω(n(k−1)/(k+1)) qubits in the bounded-error regime. A classical private-coin protocol matches the unambiguous bound, so quantum communication provides no asymptotic advantage over private randomness in this regime. For fixed error parameters, all constants are independent of k, establishing the exponential separation for every integer-valued function k=k(n)≥2, without restricting its growth. Both quantum lower bounds become Ω(n) when k≥clogn for any fixed c>0, matching the full-input protocol and yielding tight linear complexity in both regimes.
Our results demonstrate that quantum superposition cannot efficiently simulate the coordination afforded by public randomness, extending this separation to arbitrary k. To bound success probabilities for multiparty product states, we prove an exact factorization theorem for unambiguous quantum state identification, which may be of independent mathematical interest.
In this paper we study a quantum version of the multiparty simultaneous message-passing (SMP) model, and we show that in some cases, quantum communication can replace public randomness, even with no entanglement between the parties. This was already known for two players, but not for more than two players, and indeed, so far all that was known was a negative result. Our main technical contribution is a compiler that takes any classical public-coin simultaneous protocol based on "modified equality queries," and converts it into a quantum simultaneous protocol without public coins with roughly the same communication complexity. We then use our compiler to derive protocols for several problems, including frequency moments, neighborhood diversity, enumeration of isolated cliques, and more.
In the private simultaneous message (PSM) setting, k players obtain inputs xi∈{0,1}n and then each send messages to a referee, who should learn f(x1,...,xk) but no other information about (x1,...,xk). The PSM setting was introduced as a minimal model for secure multiparty computation and has connections to Boolean function complexity. In the quantum setting, PSM has been related to non-local quantum computation (NLQC). The communication and correlation cost of implementing PSM remains poorly understood. Here, we give new upper and lower bounds on the (quantum) PSM model. For lower bounds, we show: 1) Nečiporuk's measure lower bounds the entanglement required for k-player quantum PSM with perfect correctness. This leads to quadratic lower bounds for explicit functions. 2) The rank of the communication matrix of f(x1,x2) lower bounds 2-player quantum PSM with perfect privacy but imperfect correctness. This implies a previously unknown lower bound on classical PSM with imperfect correctness. When allowing quantum communication and shared entanglement, these are the first lower bounds on quantum PSM that make use of the privacy condition. For upper bounds, we show: 1) Letting s be the size of a quantum circuit computing f, df be the circuit depth, k the number of players, n the number of bits received by each player, and ε a correctness parameter, we obtain PSMk∗(f)≤(kn+s)⋅logO(df)(s/ε). 2) The square of the Fourier 1 norm of f, ∥f^∥12, upper bounds the classical PSM complexity, PSM(f)≤O(∥f^∥12). In proving the first upper bound, we generalize existing T-depth based techniques for NLQC from 2 to k≥2 parties, and consider cases where the Clifford layers are restricted to having small light cones.
The private simultaneous messages model is a non-interactive version of the multiparty secure computation, which has been intensively studied to examine the communication cost of the secure computation. We consider its quantum counterpart, the private simultaneous quantum messages (PSQM) model, and examine the advantages of quantum communication and prior entanglement of this model. In the PSQM model, k parties P1,…,Pk initially share a common random string (or entangled states in a stronger setting), and they have private classical inputs x1,…,xk. Every Pi generates a quantum message from the private input xi and the shared random string (entangled states), and then sends it to the referee R. Receiving the messages, R computes F(x1,…,xk). Then, R learns nothing except for F(x1,…,xk) as the privacy condition. We obtain the following results for this PSQM model. (1) We demonstrate that the privacy condition inevitably increases the communication cost in the two-party PSQM model as well as in the classical case presented by Applebaum, Holenstein, Mishra, and Shayevitz. In particular, we prove a lower bound (3−o(1))n of the communication complexity in two-party PSQM protocols with a shared random string for random Boolean functions of 2n-bit input, which is larger than the trivial upper bound 2n of the communication complexity without the privacy condition. (2) We demonstrate a factor two gap between the communication complexity of PSQM protocols with shared entangled states and with shared random strings by designing a multiparty PSQM protocol with shared entangled states for a total function that extends the two-party equality function. (3) We demonstrate an exponential gap between the communication complexity of PSQM protocols with shared entangled states and with shared random strings for a two-party partial function.
Computing many instances jointly can reduce communication per instance. We ask whether such savings occur in the simultaneous-message-passing (SMP) model and how they depend on quantum messages and shared resources. For every finite total function f and fixed error 0≤ε<1, we prove that the optimal worst-case communication per instance for fn converges to D∥(f)=log∣Row(f)∣+log∣Col(f)∣, where Row(f) and Col(f) are the sets of distinct rows and columns of the table (f(x,y))x,y. This holds for classical and quantum SMP without shared entanglement, with or without shared randomness. Thus, transmitting row and column indices is asymptotically optimal, even with bounded error, joint computation, and quantum messages. In particular, the exponential advantage of quantum fingerprinting for a single instance of equality without shared randomness disappears in the asymptotic rate. We also prove that the same threshold governs an exponential strong converse: every fixed worst-case communication rate below it forces the probability of computing all n outputs correctly to decay as 2−Ω(n), even on average under a fixed product input distribution. With shared randomness, the optimal expected communication rate is (1−ε)D∥(f). Entanglement shared between each sender and the referee halves both rates; arbitrary tripartite entanglement gives no further reduction. The results extend to a class of total relations and yield one-way characterizations with D∥(f) replaced by log∣Row(f)∣. Our proof reduces SMP to one-way communication and relates successful computation to sampling based on quantum min-entropy; we also give a simpler proof of the key lemma using the pretty-good measurement.
In this paper we study a quantum version of the multiparty simultaneous message-passing (SMP) model, and we show that in some cases, quantum communication can replace public randomness, even with no entanglement between the parties. This was already known for two players, but not for more than two players, and indeed, so far all that was known was a negative result. Our main technical contribution is a compiler that takes any classical public-coin simultaneous protocol based on "modified equality queries," and converts it into a quantum simultaneous protocol without public coins with roughly the same communication complexity. We then use our compiler to derive protocols for several problems, including frequency moments, neighborhood diversity, enumeration of isolated cliques, and more.
Private simultaneous quantum messages (PSQM) provide a minimal model of noninteractive secure multiparty quantum computation, yet their communication complexity for concrete functions remains poorly understood. We show that familiar total functions already exhibit both genuine quantum advantages and strong structural limitations. For three-party equality on n-bit inputs, which determines whether the players' n-bit strings are identical, we construct an entanglement-assisted protocol with asymptotic communication (1.633…)n qubits, whereas every perfectly correct protocol without prior entanglement requires at least 3n qubits. For three-bit majority, one shared GHZ state and one transmitted qubit per player suffice for perfect correctness and perfect privacy, reducing the communication from the optimal classical cost of six bits to three qubits. Three-bit AND behaves differently. No perfectly correct and perfectly private protocol exists when the players share an arbitrary three-qubit state, apply arbitrary local unitary encodings, and transmit one qubit each. However, increasing the local dimension overcomes this obstruction: one shared three-qutrit GHZ state and one transmitted qutrit per player yield a one-shot protocol with total communication 3log23. Together with the six-bit classical lower bound, this gives a strict quantum communication advantage. More generally, for every k≥3, we construct a perfectly correct and perfectly private one-shot protocol for k-bit AND using one qudit of dimension at most k per player, and hence at most klog2k qubits in total.