Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2609.07604

Quantum Approximate Counting with Bernoulli Oracles

Chengshen Gao, Yongzhen Xu, Lvzhou Li

quant-phSubmitted Sep 7, 2026• Announced Sep 8, 2026• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Quantum counting is a fundamental quantum algorithm that estimates the fraction of marked elements using a membership oracle, achieving a quadratic speedup over classical sampling. The membership oracle, however, assumes exact labeling of each element, but this assumption fails when the labels are inherently probabilistic. We study quantum counting with \emph{Bernoulli oracles}, where given $m$ Bernoulli distributions with unknown biases $p_1,\dots,p_m$ and a gap parameter $Δ$, the goal is to estimate the fraction $ρ$ of \emph{positive} distributions ($p_i\ge1/2+Δ$) to within additive error $ε$. We prove an upper bound of $\tilde{O}\!\big(\frac{\sqrtρ}{Δε}+\frac{1}{Δ\sqrtε}\big)$ queries, achieving a quadratic speedup over the classical sample complexity. % of $Θ(ρ/Δ^2ε^2)$. Our algorithm first uses the Quantum Singular Value Transformation (QSVT) to coherently amplify the bias gap without collapsing the superposition over distributions, and then applies two-stage adaptive amplitude estimation. We complement this upper bound with a near-matching lower bound of $Ω(\sqrtρ/(Δε))$ via a new composition theorem for the quantum adversary method in the Boolean-over-average-case direction. For the special case of a constant gap $Δ=Θ(1)$, which corresponds to the bounded-error oracle where each query returns the correct label with constant probability, our bounds specialize to $\tilde{O}\big(\frac{\sqrtρ}ε+\frac{1}{\sqrtε}\big)$ and $Ω(\frac{\sqrtρ}ε)$, thereby characterizing the query complexity of quantum counting with bounded-error oracles.

Related papers

Small-Bias Quantum Approximate Counting via the Multiplicative Adversary Method

Albert Lin, Han-Hsuan Lin

We study the two-weight decision version of quantum approximate counting: given oracle access to $x\in\{0,1\}^N$, distinguish $|x|=M$ from $|x|=M+Δ$ with success probability $1/2+ζ$. Using the multiplicative adversary method, we prove $Ω\left(\max\left\{ζ\sqrt{(N-M)(M+Δ)}/Δ,\sqrt{ζN/Δ}\right\}\right)$. The same parameter dependence follows from the polynomial-method characterization of the two-layer symmetric function by Podder, Yao, and Ye. Our contribution is a multiplicative-adversary derivation that tracks the progress produced by individual oracle queries. For the first term, after complementing the input if necessary, we assume $M+Δ\le N-M$. We use the Hamming-layer subspaces from the eigenspace method of Ambainis, Spalek, and de Wolf and compose their adjacent-layer unitary maps to relate the two nonadjacent promise layers. After fixing the queried coordinate, the analysis block-diagonalizes into four-dimensional subspaces. An exact calculation of the one-query progress ratio gives the first lower bound. The same estimate also implies $\left\|(I-\widehatΠ_{\mathrm{bad}})\lvertΨ^T\rangle\right\|^2=O\left(T^2Δ^2/((N-M)(M+Δ))\right)$ for the coherent input superposition used in the adversary argument. For the second term, we prove directly using a three-eigenvalue multiplicative adversary that unique OR on $n$ bits with success probability $1/2+ζ$ requires $Ω(\sqrt{ζn})$ queries, and then reduce unique OR to the two-weight counting problem.

quant-pharXiv:2609.09804•Sep 10, 2026•0 citations

Optimal query complexity for fractional quantum evolution

Anthony Yuezhang Liu, Adam Wesołowski, Jayne Thompson +2 more

Given oracle access to an unknown unitary $U=e^{iH}$ , the fractional query problem asks how many queries are required to implement a noninteger power $U^t=e^{itH}$, $0<t<1$, when the spectrum is separated from the branch cut by a gap $δ$. Quantum singular value transformation gives an upper bound of $O\!\left(\frac{1}δ\log\frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right)$ queries for approximation error $\varepsilon$. We prove a matching lower bound for arbitrary query algorithms. Our argument reduces any $N$-query circuit to the approximation of $e^{itθ}$ by a trigonometric polynomial with degree bounded by $O(N)$, together with Remez inequality. This allows us to establish the lower bound of $Ω_τ\!\left(\frac{1}δ\log\frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right)$. Consequently, the optimal query complexity for fractional query problem is $Θ_τ\!\left(\frac{1}δ\log\frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right)$, showing that the known QSVT construction is asymptotically optimal. We also give an alternative lower bound proof based on constructing a linear functional that annihilates the approximant space, yielding a $Ω_τ\!\left(\log\frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right)$ bound uniform to $δ$.

quant-pharXiv:2610.01940•Oct 2, 2026•0 citations

Tight bounds for hybrid quantum-classical query algorithms

Andris Ambainis, András Gilyén, Martins Kokainis

We study hybrid quantum-classical algorithms in the query model. The computation consists of quantum subroutines that make at most $q$ oracle queries; between subroutines, all qubits are measured and discarded. We prove matching upper and lower bounds for several problems in this model: (i) (Unbiased) Phase estimation up to a precision $ε$ requires $Θ(\frac{1}{q ε^2})$ queries; (ii) (Unbiased) Amplitude estimation up to a precision $ε$ requires $Θ(\frac{p(1-p)}{q ε^2})$ queries; (iii) Search among $N$ items requires $Θ(\frac{N}{q})$ queries; (iv) Two level AND-OR tree (AND of $m$ ORs, with $n$ inputs to each OR) requires $Θ(\frac{nm}{q})$ queries. All of these bounds are optimal up to a constant factor, for all $q$ from 1, corresponding to the classical complexity, to $Q(f)$, the unrestricted quantum query complexity of the respective problem. We also derive a hybrid lower bound for distinguishing two distributions specified by a state-preparation unitary; this bound is tight up to a logarithmic factor. Besides specific lower bounds, an important contribution is developing methods for proving lower bounds on hybrid quantum algorithms (which have been very ad-hoc up to now). The first two bounds follow from a common framework: we analyze probability distributions over measurement transcripts and bound a progress measure that captures their distinguishability. The AND-OR bound requires a more delicate argument, combining two progress measures that track the information available to the algorithm classically and in quantum form, respectively.

quant-pharXiv:2610.06803•Oct 6, 2026•0 citations

Improved Upper and Lower Bounds for Quantum Convex-Body Volume Estimation

Ruizhe Zhang

Estimating the volume of a high-dimensional convex body is a fundamental problem in theoretical computer science. Given a quantum membership oracle for a convex body $K\subset\mathbb{R}^d$, we show that estimating $\mathrm{vol}(K)$ to relative error $\varepsilon$ takes $\widetilde O(d^{5/2}+d^{3/2}/\varepsilon)$ queries. This improves the previous quantum upper bound $\widetilde O(d^3+d^{9/4}/\varepsilon)$ of Chakrabarti et al. (ACM TQC 2023) and Cornelissen--Hamoudi (SODA 2023), and achieves a larger quantum speedup over the currently best classical upper bound $\widetilde O(d^{7/2}+d^3/\varepsilon^2)$ of Jia et al. (JACM 2026). Our quantum algorithm combines two new ingredients: an input-dependent effective spectral-gap analysis of quantum walks based on uniform classical warm-start mixing bounds, and a single quantum estimator for products of normalizer ratios in simulated annealing based on classical bridge sampling. We also prove an $Ω(d)$ quantum query lower bound for constant relative error, improving the previous $Ω(\sqrt d)$ lower bound.

quant-pharXiv:2610.04987•Oct 6, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Non-Identical Mean Estimation: Efficient Algorithms and Fundamental Limits

Jiachen Hu, Tongyang Li, Xinzhao Wang +3 more

We systematically investigate quantum algorithms and lower bounds for mean estimation given query access to non-identically distributed samples. On the one hand, we give quantum mean estimators with quadratic quantum speed-up given samples from different bounded or sub-Gaussian random variables. On the other hand, we prove that, in general, it is impossible for any quantum algorithm to achieve quadratic speed-up over the number of classical samples needed to estimate the mean $μ$, where the samples come from different random variables with mean close to $μ$. Technically, our quantum algorithms reduce bounded and sub-Gaussian random variables to the Bernoulli case, and use an uncomputation trick to overcome the challenge that direct amplitude estimation does not work with non-identical query access. Our quantum query lower bounds are established by simulating non-identical oracles by parallel oracles, and also by an adversarial method with non-identical oracles. Both results pave the way for proving quantum query lower bounds with non-identical oracles in general, which may be of independent interest.

arXiv:2405.12838•Leibniz international proceedings in informatics•Jan 1, 2024•0 citations

Quantum Submodular Maximization

Yonggang Jiang, Xiaoming Sun, Penghui Yao +3 more

We study the quantum query complexity of maximizing a non-negative submodular function, considering both the unconstrained setting and, for monotone functions, a cardinality constraint $k$ on an $n$-element ground set. In the exact reversible digital value-oracle model, our unconstrained algorithm achieves an expected $(1/2-\varepsilon)$-approximation using only $O_\varepsilon(\log n)$ queries. In contrast, any classical randomized algorithm that attains a fixed expected ratio above $1/4$ requires $Ω(n/\log n)$ queries (Li, Feldman, Kazemi, and Karbasi, 2022), establishing an exponential separation in query complexity. For cardinality-constrained maximization, we give a bounded-error quantum algorithm that achieves a $(1-1/e-\varepsilon)$-approximation using $\widetilde O_\varepsilon(\min\{\sqrt n,n/k\})$ queries. When $k=o(n)$, our algorithm achieves at least a quadratic speedup up to logarithmic factors over classical randomized algorithms (Mirzasoleiman, Badanidiyuru, Karbasi, Vondrák, and Krause, 2015; Peng and Rubinstein, 2025). Moreover, when $k=cn$ for any fixed rational $c<1-1/e-\varepsilon$, the query complexity reduces to $O_{\varepsilon,c}(\log n)$, yielding an exponential separation from the classical $Ω(n/\log n)$ lower bound (Li, Feldman, Kazemi, and Karbasi, 2022). We further prove quantum lower bounds of $\exp(Ω(\varepsilon^2n))$ queries for achieving a ratio beyond $1/2+\varepsilon$ without constraints, and $\exp(Ω(\varepsilon^2k))$ queries for exceeding $1-1/e+\varepsilon$ when $k/n\le\varepsilon$. These barriers demonstrate that quantum computation offers no exponential speedup at these approximation thresholds.

quant-pharXiv:2610.04560•Oct 6, 2026•0 citations
Quantum counting is a fundamental quantum algorithm that estimates the fraction of marked elements using a membership oracle, achieving a quadratic speedup over classical sampling. The membership oracle, however, assumes exact labeling of each element, but this assumption fails when the labels are inherently probabilistic. We study quantum counting with \emph{Bernoulli oracles}, where given mmm Bernoulli distributions with unknown biases p1,…,pmp_1,\dots,p_mp1​,…,pm​ and a gap parameter ΔΔΔ, the goal is to estimate the fraction ρρρ of \emph{positive} distributions (pi≥1/2+Δp_i\ge1/2+Δpi​≥1/2+Δ) to within additive error εεε. We prove an upper bound of O~ ⁣(ρΔε+1Δε)\tilde{O}\!\big(\frac{\sqrtρ}{Δε}+\frac{1}{Δ\sqrtε}\big)O~(Δερ​​+Δε​1​) queries, achieving a quadratic speedup over the classical sample complexity. % of Θ(ρ/Δ2ε2)Θ(ρ/Δ^2ε^2)Θ(ρ/Δ2ε2).
Our algorithm first uses the Quantum Singular Value Transformation (QSVT) to coherently amplify the bias gap without collapsing the superposition over distributions, and then applies two-stage adaptive amplitude estimation. We complement this upper bound with a near-matching lower bound of Ω(ρ/(Δε))Ω(\sqrtρ/(Δε))Ω(ρ​/(Δε)) via a new composition theorem for the quantum adversary method in the Boolean-over-average-case direction. For the special case of a constant gap Δ=Θ(1)Δ=Θ(1)Δ=Θ(1), which corresponds to the bounded-error oracle where each query returns the correct label with constant probability, our bounds specialize to O~(ρε+1ε)\tilde{O}\big(\frac{\sqrtρ}ε+\frac{1}{\sqrtε}\big)O~(ερ​​+ε​1​) and Ω(ρε)Ω(\frac{\sqrtρ}ε)Ω(ερ​​), thereby characterizing the query complexity of quantum counting with bounded-error oracles.
We study the two-weight decision version of quantum approximate counting: given oracle access to x∈{0,1}Nx\in\{0,1\}^Nx∈{0,1}N, distinguish ∣x∣=M|x|=M∣x∣=M from ∣x∣=M+Δ|x|=M+Δ∣x∣=M+Δ with success probability 1/2+ζ1/2+ζ1/2+ζ. Using the multiplicative adversary method, we prove Ω(max⁡{ζ(N−M)(M+Δ)/Δ,ζN/Δ})Ω\left(\max\left\{ζ\sqrt{(N-M)(M+Δ)}/Δ,\sqrt{ζN/Δ}\right\}\right)Ω(max{ζ(N−M)(M+Δ)​/Δ,ζN/Δ​}). The same parameter dependence follows from the polynomial-method characterization of the two-layer symmetric function by Podder, Yao, and Ye. Our contribution is a multiplicative-adversary derivation that tracks the progress produced by individual oracle queries. For the first term, after complementing the input if necessary, we assume M+Δ≤N−MM+Δ\le N-MM+Δ≤N−M. We use the Hamming-layer subspaces from the eigenspace method of Ambainis, Spalek, and de Wolf and compose their adjacent-layer unitary maps to relate the two nonadjacent promise layers. After fixing the queried coordinate, the analysis block-diagonalizes into four-dimensional subspaces. An exact calculation of the one-query progress ratio gives the first lower bound. The same estimate also implies ∥(I−Π^bad)∣ΨT⟩∥2=O(T2Δ2/((N−M)(M+Δ)))\left\|(I-\widehatΠ_{\mathrm{bad}})\lvertΨ^T\rangle\right\|^2=O\left(T^2Δ^2/((N-M)(M+Δ))\right)​(I−Πbad​)∣ΨT⟩​2=O(T2Δ2/((N−M)(M+Δ))) for the coherent input superposition used in the adversary argument. For the second term, we prove directly using a three-eigenvalue multiplicative adversary that unique OR on nnn bits with success probability 1/2+ζ1/2+ζ1/2+ζ requires Ω(ζn)Ω(\sqrt{ζn})Ω(ζn​) queries, and then reduce unique OR to the two-weight counting problem.
Given oracle access to an unknown unitary U=eiHU=e^{iH}U=eiH , the fractional query problem asks how many queries are required to implement a noninteger power Ut=eitHU^t=e^{itH}Ut=eitH, 0<t<10<t<10<t<1, when the spectrum is separated from the branch cut by a gap δδδ. Quantum singular value transformation gives an upper bound of O ⁣(1δlog⁡1ε)O\!\left(\frac{1}δ\log\frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right)O(δ1​logε1​) queries for approximation error ε\varepsilonε. We prove a matching lower bound for arbitrary query algorithms. Our argument reduces any NNN-query circuit to the approximation of eitθe^{itθ}eitθ by a trigonometric polynomial with degree bounded by O(N)O(N)O(N), together with Remez inequality. This allows us to establish the lower bound of Ωτ ⁣(1δlog⁡1ε)Ω_τ\!\left(\frac{1}δ\log\frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right)Ωτ​(δ1​logε1​). Consequently, the optimal query complexity for fractional query problem is Θτ ⁣(1δlog⁡1ε)Θ_τ\!\left(\frac{1}δ\log\frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right)Θτ​(δ1​logε1​), showing that the known QSVT construction is asymptotically optimal. We also give an alternative lower bound proof based on constructing a linear functional that annihilates the approximant space, yielding a Ωτ ⁣(log⁡1ε)Ω_τ\!\left(\log\frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right)Ωτ​(logε1​) bound uniform to δδδ.
We study hybrid quantum-classical algorithms in the query model. The computation consists of quantum subroutines that make at most qqq oracle queries; between subroutines, all qubits are measured and discarded. We prove matching upper and lower bounds for several problems in this model: (i) (Unbiased) Phase estimation up to a precision εεε requires Θ(1qε2)Θ(\frac{1}{q ε^2})Θ(qε21​) queries; (ii) (Unbiased) Amplitude estimation up to a precision εεε requires Θ(p(1−p)qε2)Θ(\frac{p(1-p)}{q ε^2})Θ(qε2p(1−p)​) queries; (iii) Search among NNN items requires Θ(Nq)Θ(\frac{N}{q})Θ(qN​) queries; (iv) Two level AND-OR tree (AND of mmm ORs, with nnn inputs to each OR) requires Θ(nmq)Θ(\frac{nm}{q})Θ(qnm​) queries. All of these bounds are optimal up to a constant factor, for all qqq from 1, corresponding to the classical complexity, to Q(f)Q(f)Q(f), the unrestricted quantum query complexity of the respective problem. We also derive a hybrid lower bound for distinguishing two distributions specified by a state-preparation unitary; this bound is tight up to a logarithmic factor. Besides specific lower bounds, an important contribution is developing methods for proving lower bounds on hybrid quantum algorithms (which have been very ad-hoc up to now). The first two bounds follow from a common framework: we analyze probability distributions over measurement transcripts and bound a progress measure that captures their distinguishability. The AND-OR bound requires a more delicate argument, combining two progress measures that track the information available to the algorithm classically and in quantum form, respectively.
Estimating the volume of a high-dimensional convex body is a fundamental problem in theoretical computer science. Given a quantum membership oracle for a convex body K⊂RdK\subset\mathbb{R}^dK⊂Rd, we show that estimating vol(K)\mathrm{vol}(K)vol(K) to relative error ε\varepsilonε takes O~(d5/2+d3/2/ε)\widetilde O(d^{5/2}+d^{3/2}/\varepsilon)O(d5/2+d3/2/ε) queries. This improves the previous quantum upper bound O~(d3+d9/4/ε)\widetilde O(d^3+d^{9/4}/\varepsilon)O(d3+d9/4/ε) of Chakrabarti et al. (ACM TQC 2023) and Cornelissen--Hamoudi (SODA 2023), and achieves a larger quantum speedup over the currently best classical upper bound O~(d7/2+d3/ε2)\widetilde O(d^{7/2}+d^3/\varepsilon^2)O(d7/2+d3/ε2) of Jia et al. (JACM 2026). Our quantum algorithm combines two new ingredients: an input-dependent effective spectral-gap analysis of quantum walks based on uniform classical warm-start mixing bounds, and a single quantum estimator for products of normalizer ratios in simulated annealing based on classical bridge sampling. We also prove an Ω(d)Ω(d)Ω(d) quantum query lower bound for constant relative error, improving the previous Ω(d)Ω(\sqrt d)Ω(d​) lower bound.
We systematically investigate quantum algorithms and lower bounds for mean estimation given query access to non-identically distributed samples. On the one hand, we give quantum mean estimators with quadratic quantum speed-up given samples from different bounded or sub-Gaussian random variables. On the other hand, we prove that, in general, it is impossible for any quantum algorithm to achieve quadratic speed-up over the number of classical samples needed to estimate the mean μμμ, where the samples come from different random variables with mean close to μμμ. Technically, our quantum algorithms reduce bounded and sub-Gaussian random variables to the Bernoulli case, and use an uncomputation trick to overcome the challenge that direct amplitude estimation does not work with non-identical query access. Our quantum query lower bounds are established by simulating non-identical oracles by parallel oracles, and also by an adversarial method with non-identical oracles. Both results pave the way for proving quantum query lower bounds with non-identical oracles in general, which may be of independent interest.
We study the quantum query complexity of maximizing a non-negative submodular function, considering both the unconstrained setting and, for monotone functions, a cardinality constraint kkk on an nnn-element ground set. In the exact reversible digital value-oracle model, our unconstrained algorithm achieves an expected (1/2−ε)(1/2-\varepsilon)(1/2−ε)-approximation using only Oε(log⁡n)O_\varepsilon(\log n)Oε​(logn) queries. In contrast, any classical randomized algorithm that attains a fixed expected ratio above 1/41/41/4 requires Ω(n/log⁡n)Ω(n/\log n)Ω(n/logn) queries (Li, Feldman, Kazemi, and Karbasi, 2022), establishing an exponential separation in query complexity. For cardinality-constrained maximization, we give a bounded-error quantum algorithm that achieves a (1−1/e−ε)(1-1/e-\varepsilon)(1−1/e−ε)-approximation using O~ε(min⁡{n,n/k})\widetilde O_\varepsilon(\min\{\sqrt n,n/k\})Oε​(min{n​,n/k}) queries. When k=o(n)k=o(n)k=o(n), our algorithm achieves at least a quadratic speedup up to logarithmic factors over classical randomized algorithms (Mirzasoleiman, Badanidiyuru, Karbasi, Vondrák, and Krause, 2015; Peng and Rubinstein, 2025). Moreover, when k=cnk=cnk=cn for any fixed rational c<1−1/e−εc<1-1/e-\varepsilonc<1−1/e−ε, the query complexity reduces to Oε,c(log⁡n)O_{\varepsilon,c}(\log n)Oε,c​(logn), yielding an exponential separation from the classical Ω(n/log⁡n)Ω(n/\log n)Ω(n/logn) lower bound (Li, Feldman, Kazemi, and Karbasi, 2022). We further prove quantum lower bounds of exp⁡(Ω(ε2n))\exp(Ω(\varepsilon^2n))exp(Ω(ε2n)) queries for achieving a ratio beyond 1/2+ε1/2+\varepsilon1/2+ε without constraints, and exp⁡(Ω(ε2k))\exp(Ω(\varepsilon^2k))exp(Ω(ε2k)) queries for exceeding 1−1/e+ε1-1/e+\varepsilon1−1/e+ε when k/n≤εk/n\le\varepsilonk/n≤ε. These barriers demonstrate that quantum computation offers no exponential speedup at these approximation thresholds.