Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2610.04560

Quantum Submodular Maximization

Yonggang Jiang, Xiaoming Sun, Penghui Yao, Zekun Ye, Jialin Zhang, Zhijie Zhang

quant-phcs.CCcs.DSSubmitted Oct 3, 2026• Announced Oct 6, 2026• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We study the quantum query complexity of maximizing a non-negative submodular function, considering both the unconstrained setting and, for monotone functions, a cardinality constraint $k$ on an $n$-element ground set. In the exact reversible digital value-oracle model, our unconstrained algorithm achieves an expected $(1/2-\varepsilon)$-approximation using only $O_\varepsilon(\log n)$ queries. In contrast, any classical randomized algorithm that attains a fixed expected ratio above $1/4$ requires $Ω(n/\log n)$ queries (Li, Feldman, Kazemi, and Karbasi, 2022), establishing an exponential separation in query complexity. For cardinality-constrained maximization, we give a bounded-error quantum algorithm that achieves a $(1-1/e-\varepsilon)$-approximation using $\widetilde O_\varepsilon(\min\{\sqrt n,n/k\})$ queries. When $k=o(n)$, our algorithm achieves at least a quadratic speedup up to logarithmic factors over classical randomized algorithms (Mirzasoleiman, Badanidiyuru, Karbasi, Vondrák, and Krause, 2015; Peng and Rubinstein, 2025). Moreover, when $k=cn$ for any fixed rational $c<1-1/e-\varepsilon$, the query complexity reduces to $O_{\varepsilon,c}(\log n)$, yielding an exponential separation from the classical $Ω(n/\log n)$ lower bound (Li, Feldman, Kazemi, and Karbasi, 2022). We further prove quantum lower bounds of $\exp(Ω(\varepsilon^2n))$ queries for achieving a ratio beyond $1/2+\varepsilon$ without constraints, and $\exp(Ω(\varepsilon^2k))$ queries for exceeding $1-1/e+\varepsilon$ when $k/n\le\varepsilon$. These barriers demonstrate that quantum computation offers no exponential speedup at these approximation thresholds.

Comments
62 pages; abstract shortened for arXiv

Related papers

Optimal query complexity for fractional quantum evolution

Anthony Yuezhang Liu, Adam Wesołowski, Jayne Thompson +2 more

Given oracle access to an unknown unitary $U=e^{iH}$ , the fractional query problem asks how many queries are required to implement a noninteger power $U^t=e^{itH}$, $0<t<1$, when the spectrum is separated from the branch cut by a gap $δ$. Quantum singular value transformation gives an upper bound of $O\!\left(\frac{1}δ\log\frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right)$ queries for approximation error $\varepsilon$. We prove a matching lower bound for arbitrary query algorithms. Our argument reduces any $N$-query circuit to the approximation of $e^{itθ}$ by a trigonometric polynomial with degree bounded by $O(N)$, together with Remez inequality. This allows us to establish the lower bound of $Ω_τ\!\left(\frac{1}δ\log\frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right)$. Consequently, the optimal query complexity for fractional query problem is $Θ_τ\!\left(\frac{1}δ\log\frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right)$, showing that the known QSVT construction is asymptotically optimal. We also give an alternative lower bound proof based on constructing a linear functional that annihilates the approximant space, yielding a $Ω_τ\!\left(\log\frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right)$ bound uniform to $δ$.

quant-pharXiv:2610.01940•Oct 2, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Query Complexity for Nonstandard Oracles with Tight Bounds and Tradeoffs Beyond Grover

Yalla Jnan Devi Satya Prasad

Quantum query complexity underpins much of our understanding of quantum speedups, yet nearly all existing lower and upper bounds are derived for simple Boolean oracles. Many practical tasks-noisy database search, stochastic optimization, adaptive learning, and time-varying systems-are best modeled by richer oracle classes. This paper systematically extends quantum query complexity theory to four non-standard oracle models: (1) stochastic oracles that return random outputs drawn from a distribution; (2) multi-solution oracles encoding a solution set of size k; (3) time-dependent oracles whose internal state evolves between queries; and (4) relational oracles encoding structured constraints rather than simple membership. Using generalized adversary methods, polynomial method techniques, and hybrid arguments, we derive tight (up to polylog factors) lower bounds for each model and construct matching algorithms where possible. For instance, we show that searching for any one of k marked items in an unstructured database still admits a Grover-like quadratic speedup, but with optimal complexity Θ(N/k), and that stochastic noise in oracle outputs degrades the advantage gracefully as a function of the noise parameter. For certain time-dependent and relational models, we prove that no better-than-classical speedup is possible, clarifying the limits of quantum advantage in adaptive settings. These results provide a more realistic foundation for quantum algorithms targeting noisy search, stochastic optimization, and constraint satisfaction, and they highlight the precise structural features that enable or preclude query-based quantum speedups.

•Dec 19, 2025•0 citations

Quantum Search With Generalized Wildcards

Arjan Cornelissen, Nikhil S. Mande, Subhasree Patro +2 more

In the search with wildcards problem [Ambainis, Montanaro, Quantum Inf.~Comput.'14], one's goal is to learn an unknown bit-string $x \in \{-1,1\}^n$. An algorithm may, at unit cost, test equality of any subset of the hidden string with a string of its choice. Ambainis and Montanaro showed a quantum algorithm of cost $O(\sqrt{n} \log n)$ and a near-matching lower bound of $Ω(\sqrt{n})$. Belovs [Comput.~Comp.'15] subsequently showed a tight $O(\sqrt{n})$ upper bound. We consider a natural generalization of this problem, parametrized by a subset $\cal{Q} \subseteq 2^{[n]}$, where an algorithm may test whether $x_S = b$ for an arbitrary $S \in \cal{Q}$ and $b \in \{-1,1\}^S$ of its choice, at unit cost. We show near-tight bounds when $\cal{Q}$ is any of the following collections: bounded-size sets, contiguous blocks, prefixes, and only the full set. All of these results are derived using a framework that we develop. Using symmetries of the task at hand we show that the quantum query complexity of learning $x$ is characterized, up to a constant factor, by an optimization program, which is succinctly described as follows: `maximize over all odd functions $f : \{-1,1\}^n \to \mathbb{R}$ the ratio of the maximum value of $f$ to the maximum (over $T \in \cal{Q}$) standard deviation of $f$ on a subcube whose free variables are exactly $T$.' To the best of our knowledge, ours is the first work to use the primal version of the negative-weight adversary bound (which is a maximization program typically used to show lower bounds) to show new quantum query upper bounds without explicitly resorting to SDP duality.

quant-pharXiv:2511.04669•Leibniz international proceedings in informatics•Nov 7, 2025•0 citations

Tight bounds for hybrid quantum-classical query algorithms

Andris Ambainis, András Gilyén, Martins Kokainis

We study hybrid quantum-classical algorithms in the query model. The computation consists of quantum subroutines that make at most $q$ oracle queries; between subroutines, all qubits are measured and discarded. We prove matching upper and lower bounds for several problems in this model: (i) (Unbiased) Phase estimation up to a precision $ε$ requires $Θ(\frac{1}{q ε^2})$ queries; (ii) (Unbiased) Amplitude estimation up to a precision $ε$ requires $Θ(\frac{p(1-p)}{q ε^2})$ queries; (iii) Search among $N$ items requires $Θ(\frac{N}{q})$ queries; (iv) Two level AND-OR tree (AND of $m$ ORs, with $n$ inputs to each OR) requires $Θ(\frac{nm}{q})$ queries. All of these bounds are optimal up to a constant factor, for all $q$ from 1, corresponding to the classical complexity, to $Q(f)$, the unrestricted quantum query complexity of the respective problem. We also derive a hybrid lower bound for distinguishing two distributions specified by a state-preparation unitary; this bound is tight up to a logarithmic factor. Besides specific lower bounds, an important contribution is developing methods for proving lower bounds on hybrid quantum algorithms (which have been very ad-hoc up to now). The first two bounds follow from a common framework: we analyze probability distributions over measurement transcripts and bound a progress measure that captures their distinguishability. The AND-OR bound requires a more delicate argument, combining two progress measures that track the information available to the algorithm classically and in quantum form, respectively.

quant-pharXiv:2610.06803•Oct 6, 2026•0 citations

Near-Optimal Quantum Algorithm for Minimizing the Maximal Loss

Hao Wang, Zhang, Chenyi, Tongyang Li

The problem of minimizing the maximum of $N$ convex, Lipschitz functions plays significant roles in optimization and machine learning. It has a series of results, with the most recent one requiring $O(Nε^{-2/3} + ε^{-8/3})$ queries to a first-order oracle to compute an $ε$-suboptimal point. On the other hand, quantum algorithms for optimization are rapidly advancing with speedups shown on many important optimization problems. In this paper, we conduct a systematic study for quantum algorithms and lower bounds for minimizing the maximum of $N$ convex, Lipschitz functions. On one hand, we develop quantum algorithms with an improved complexity bound of $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{N}ε^{-5/3} + ε^{-8/3})$. On the other hand, we prove that quantum algorithms must take $\tildeΩ(\sqrt{N}ε^{-2/3})$ queries to a first order quantum oracle, showing that our dependence on $N$ is optimal up to poly-logarithmic factors.

arXiv:2402.12745•Feb 20, 2024•0 citations

Pseudo-deterministic Quantum Algorithms

Hugo Aaronson, Tom Gur, Jiawei Li

We initiate a systematic study of pseudo-deterministic quantum algorithms. These are quantum algorithms that, for any input, output a canonical solution with high probability. Focusing on the query complexity model, our main contributions include the following complexity separations, which require new lower bound techniques specifically tailored to pseudo-determinism: - We exhibit a problem, Avoid One Encrypted String (AOES), whose classical randomized query complexity is $O(1)$ but is maximally hard for pseudo-deterministic quantum algorithms ($Ω(N)$ query complexity). - We exhibit a problem, Quantum-Locked Estimation (QL-Estimation), for which pseudo-deterministic quantum algorithms admit an exponential speed-up over classical pseudo-deterministic algorithms ($O(\log(N))$ vs. $Θ(\sqrt{N})$), while the randomized query complexity is $O(1)$. Complementing these separations, we show that for any total problem $R$, pseudo-deterministic quantum algorithms admit at most a quintic advantage over deterministic algorithms, i.e., $D(R) = \tilde O(psQ(R)^5)$. On the algorithmic side, we identify a class of quantum search problems that can be made pseudo-deterministic with small overhead, including Grover search, element distinctness, triangle finding, $k$-sum, and graph collision.

quant-pharXiv:2602.17647•Feb 20, 2026•1 citation
We study the quantum query complexity of maximizing a non-negative submodular function, considering both the unconstrained setting and, for monotone functions, a cardinality constraint kkk on an nnn-element ground set. In the exact reversible digital value-oracle model, our unconstrained algorithm achieves an expected (1/2−ε)(1/2-\varepsilon)(1/2−ε)-approximation using only Oε(log⁡n)O_\varepsilon(\log n)Oε​(logn) queries. In contrast, any classical randomized algorithm that attains a fixed expected ratio above 1/41/41/4 requires Ω(n/log⁡n)Ω(n/\log n)Ω(n/logn) queries (Li, Feldman, Kazemi, and Karbasi, 2022), establishing an exponential separation in query complexity. For cardinality-constrained maximization, we give a bounded-error quantum algorithm that achieves a (1−1/e−ε)(1-1/e-\varepsilon)(1−1/e−ε)-approximation using O~ε(min⁡{n,n/k})\widetilde O_\varepsilon(\min\{\sqrt n,n/k\})Oε​(min{n​,n/k}) queries. When k=o(n)k=o(n)k=o(n), our algorithm achieves at least a quadratic speedup up to logarithmic factors over classical randomized algorithms (Mirzasoleiman, Badanidiyuru, Karbasi, Vondrák, and Krause, 2015; Peng and Rubinstein, 2025). Moreover, when k=cnk=cnk=cn for any fixed rational c<1−1/e−εc<1-1/e-\varepsilonc<1−1/e−ε, the query complexity reduces to Oε,c(log⁡n)O_{\varepsilon,c}(\log n)Oε,c​(logn), yielding an exponential separation from the classical Ω(n/log⁡n)Ω(n/\log n)Ω(n/logn) lower bound (Li, Feldman, Kazemi, and Karbasi, 2022). We further prove quantum lower bounds of exp⁡(Ω(ε2n))\exp(Ω(\varepsilon^2n))exp(Ω(ε2n)) queries for achieving a ratio beyond 1/2+ε1/2+\varepsilon1/2+ε without constraints, and exp⁡(Ω(ε2k))\exp(Ω(\varepsilon^2k))exp(Ω(ε2k)) queries for exceeding 1−1/e+ε1-1/e+\varepsilon1−1/e+ε when k/n≤εk/n\le\varepsilonk/n≤ε. These barriers demonstrate that quantum computation offers no exponential speedup at these approximation thresholds.
Given oracle access to an unknown unitary U=eiHU=e^{iH}U=eiH , the fractional query problem asks how many queries are required to implement a noninteger power Ut=eitHU^t=e^{itH}Ut=eitH, 0<t<10<t<10<t<1, when the spectrum is separated from the branch cut by a gap δδδ. Quantum singular value transformation gives an upper bound of O ⁣(1δlog⁡1ε)O\!\left(\frac{1}δ\log\frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right)O(δ1​logε1​) queries for approximation error ε\varepsilonε. We prove a matching lower bound for arbitrary query algorithms. Our argument reduces any NNN-query circuit to the approximation of eitθe^{itθ}eitθ by a trigonometric polynomial with degree bounded by O(N)O(N)O(N), together with Remez inequality. This allows us to establish the lower bound of Ωτ ⁣(1δlog⁡1ε)Ω_τ\!\left(\frac{1}δ\log\frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right)Ωτ​(δ1​logε1​). Consequently, the optimal query complexity for fractional query problem is Θτ ⁣(1δlog⁡1ε)Θ_τ\!\left(\frac{1}δ\log\frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right)Θτ​(δ1​logε1​), showing that the known QSVT construction is asymptotically optimal. We also give an alternative lower bound proof based on constructing a linear functional that annihilates the approximant space, yielding a Ωτ ⁣(log⁡1ε)Ω_τ\!\left(\log\frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right)Ωτ​(logε1​) bound uniform to δδδ.
Quantum query complexity underpins much of our understanding of quantum speedups, yet nearly all existing lower and upper bounds are derived for simple Boolean oracles. Many practical tasks-noisy database search, stochastic optimization, adaptive learning, and time-varying systems-are best modeled by richer oracle classes. This paper systematically extends quantum query complexity theory to four non-standard oracle models: (1) stochastic oracles that return random outputs drawn from a distribution; (2) multi-solution oracles encoding a solution set of size k; (3) time-dependent oracles whose internal state evolves between queries; and (4) relational oracles encoding structured constraints rather than simple membership. Using generalized adversary methods, polynomial method techniques, and hybrid arguments, we derive tight (up to polylog factors) lower bounds for each model and construct matching algorithms where possible. For instance, we show that searching for any one of k marked items in an unstructured database still admits a Grover-like quadratic speedup, but with optimal complexity Θ(N/k), and that stochastic noise in oracle outputs degrades the advantage gracefully as a function of the noise parameter. For certain time-dependent and relational models, we prove that no better-than-classical speedup is possible, clarifying the limits of quantum advantage in adaptive settings. These results provide a more realistic foundation for quantum algorithms targeting noisy search, stochastic optimization, and constraint satisfaction, and they highlight the precise structural features that enable or preclude query-based quantum speedups.
In the search with wildcards problem [Ambainis, Montanaro, Quantum Inf.~Comput.'14], one's goal is to learn an unknown bit-string x∈{−1,1}nx \in \{-1,1\}^nx∈{−1,1}n. An algorithm may, at unit cost, test equality of any subset of the hidden string with a string of its choice. Ambainis and Montanaro showed a quantum algorithm of cost O(nlog⁡n)O(\sqrt{n} \log n)O(n​logn) and a near-matching lower bound of Ω(n)Ω(\sqrt{n})Ω(n​). Belovs [Comput.~Comp.'15] subsequently showed a tight O(n)O(\sqrt{n})O(n​) upper bound. We consider a natural generalization of this problem, parametrized by a subset Q⊆2[n]\cal{Q} \subseteq 2^{[n]}Q⊆2[n], where an algorithm may test whether xS=bx_S = bxS​=b for an arbitrary S∈QS \in \cal{Q}S∈Q and b∈{−1,1}Sb \in \{-1,1\}^Sb∈{−1,1}S of its choice, at unit cost. We show near-tight bounds when Q\cal{Q}Q is any of the following collections: bounded-size sets, contiguous blocks, prefixes, and only the full set. All of these results are derived using a framework that we develop. Using symmetries of the task at hand we show that the quantum query complexity of learning xxx is characterized, up to a constant factor, by an optimization program, which is succinctly described as follows: `maximize over all odd functions f:{−1,1}n→Rf : \{-1,1\}^n \to \mathbb{R}f:{−1,1}n→R the ratio of the maximum value of fff to the maximum (over T∈QT \in \cal{Q}T∈Q) standard deviation of fff on a subcube whose free variables are exactly TTT.' To the best of our knowledge, ours is the first work to use the primal version of the negative-weight adversary bound (which is a maximization program typically used to show lower bounds) to show new quantum query upper bounds without explicitly resorting to SDP duality.
We study hybrid quantum-classical algorithms in the query model. The computation consists of quantum subroutines that make at most qqq oracle queries; between subroutines, all qubits are measured and discarded. We prove matching upper and lower bounds for several problems in this model: (i) (Unbiased) Phase estimation up to a precision εεε requires Θ(1qε2)Θ(\frac{1}{q ε^2})Θ(qε21​) queries; (ii) (Unbiased) Amplitude estimation up to a precision εεε requires Θ(p(1−p)qε2)Θ(\frac{p(1-p)}{q ε^2})Θ(qε2p(1−p)​) queries; (iii) Search among NNN items requires Θ(Nq)Θ(\frac{N}{q})Θ(qN​) queries; (iv) Two level AND-OR tree (AND of mmm ORs, with nnn inputs to each OR) requires Θ(nmq)Θ(\frac{nm}{q})Θ(qnm​) queries. All of these bounds are optimal up to a constant factor, for all qqq from 1, corresponding to the classical complexity, to Q(f)Q(f)Q(f), the unrestricted quantum query complexity of the respective problem. We also derive a hybrid lower bound for distinguishing two distributions specified by a state-preparation unitary; this bound is tight up to a logarithmic factor. Besides specific lower bounds, an important contribution is developing methods for proving lower bounds on hybrid quantum algorithms (which have been very ad-hoc up to now). The first two bounds follow from a common framework: we analyze probability distributions over measurement transcripts and bound a progress measure that captures their distinguishability. The AND-OR bound requires a more delicate argument, combining two progress measures that track the information available to the algorithm classically and in quantum form, respectively.
The problem of minimizing the maximum of NNN convex, Lipschitz functions plays significant roles in optimization and machine learning. It has a series of results, with the most recent one requiring O(Nε−2/3+ε−8/3)O(Nε^{-2/3} + ε^{-8/3})O(Nε−2/3+ε−8/3) queries to a first-order oracle to compute an εεε-suboptimal point. On the other hand, quantum algorithms for optimization are rapidly advancing with speedups shown on many important optimization problems. In this paper, we conduct a systematic study for quantum algorithms and lower bounds for minimizing the maximum of NNN convex, Lipschitz functions. On one hand, we develop quantum algorithms with an improved complexity bound of O~(Nε−5/3+ε−8/3)\tilde{O}(\sqrt{N}ε^{-5/3} + ε^{-8/3})O~(N​ε−5/3+ε−8/3). On the other hand, we prove that quantum algorithms must take Ω~(Nε−2/3)\tildeΩ(\sqrt{N}ε^{-2/3})Ω~(N​ε−2/3) queries to a first order quantum oracle, showing that our dependence on NNN is optimal up to poly-logarithmic factors.
We initiate a systematic study of pseudo-deterministic quantum algorithms. These are quantum algorithms that, for any input, output a canonical solution with high probability. Focusing on the query complexity model, our main contributions include the following complexity separations, which require new lower bound techniques specifically tailored to pseudo-determinism: - We exhibit a problem, Avoid One Encrypted String (AOES), whose classical randomized query complexity is O(1)O(1)O(1) but is maximally hard for pseudo-deterministic quantum algorithms (Ω(N)Ω(N)Ω(N) query complexity). - We exhibit a problem, Quantum-Locked Estimation (QL-Estimation), for which pseudo-deterministic quantum algorithms admit an exponential speed-up over classical pseudo-deterministic algorithms (O(log⁡(N))O(\log(N))O(log(N)) vs. Θ(N)Θ(\sqrt{N})Θ(N​)), while the randomized query complexity is O(1)O(1)O(1). Complementing these separations, we show that for any total problem RRR, pseudo-deterministic quantum algorithms admit at most a quintic advantage over deterministic algorithms, i.e., D(R)=O~(psQ(R)5)D(R) = \tilde O(psQ(R)^5)D(R)=O~(psQ(R)5). On the algorithmic side, we identify a class of quantum search problems that can be made pseudo-deterministic with small overhead, including Grover search, element distinctness, triangle finding, kkk-sum, and graph collision.