Quantum benchmarks provide compact measures of performance that are important for evaluating and comparing quantum systems. Circuit-level benchmarks are particularly valuable because they capture the accumulated effects of noise across interacting operations, but existing approaches may require structured gate sets and costly compilation, classical simulation of reference outputs, or subsystem decompositions that do not capture full-register behavior. We introduce Error Per Circuit Layer (EPCL), an overlap-based circuit-level benchmark that estimates an effective layer polarization by applying identical random circuits to two disjoint quantum registers and measuring the overlap between their output states as a function of circuit depth. EPCL avoids classical simulation of ideal output distributions and recovery to a known reference state, and is compatible with arbitrary gate sets, including non-Clifford gates.
We derive the expected overlap decay under an ensemble-averaged depolarizing model and identify the assumptions under which the fitted decay parameter represents an effective layer polarization. Numerical simulations show that EPCL recovers the predicted polarization under weak local stochastic noise and remains well described by a single-exponential decay at stronger stochastic noise levels. The simulations further show that coherent errors associated with fixed entangling layers may require Pauli twirling or randomized compiling to produce the expected decay, while inter-register correlations contribute an additional covariance term to the measured overlap. Finally, experiments on IBM quantum hardware demonstrate clear EPCL decay in 8- and 16-qubit implementations. These results support EPCL as a method for measuring aggregate register performance without requiring classical simulation of ideal circuit outputs or restriction to structured gate sets.
Quantum benchmarks provide compact measures of performance that are important for evaluating and comparing quantum systems. Circuit-level benchmarks are particularly valuable because they capture the accumulated effects of noise across interacting operations, but existing approaches may require structured gate sets and costly compilation, classical simulation of reference outputs, or subsystem decompositions that do not capture full-register behavior. We introduce Error Per Circuit Layer (EPCL), an overlap-based circuit-level benchmark that estimates an effective layer polarization by applying identical random circuits to two disjoint quantum registers and measuring the overlap between their output states as a function of circuit depth. EPCL avoids classical simulation of ideal output distributions and recovery to a known reference state, and is compatible with arbitrary gate sets, including non-Clifford gates.
We derive the expected overlap decay under an ensemble-averaged depolarizing model and identify the assumptions under which the fitted decay parameter represents an effective layer polarization. Numerical simulations show that EPCL recovers the predicted polarization under weak local stochastic noise and remains well described by a single-exponential decay at stronger stochastic noise levels. The simulations further show that coherent errors associated with fixed entangling layers may require Pauli twirling or randomized compiling to produce the expected decay, while inter-register correlations contribute an additional covariance term to the measured overlap. Finally, experiments on IBM quantum hardware demonstrate clear EPCL decay in 8- and 16-qubit implementations. These results support EPCL as a method for measuring aggregate register performance without requiring classical simulation of ideal circuit outputs or restriction to structured gate sets.
Quantum circuit ensembles that have the properties of unitary k-designs represent applications where there is no obvious bias toward any particular Pauli support, as is the case in simulating systems exhibiting ''quantum chaos,'' which range from quantum dynamics near black holes to gapless spin fluid analysis. However, noisy hardware makes quantum circuits prone to a myriad of error sources, of which depolarizing and coherent error can be particularly destructive. To combat depolarizing error, popular techniques typically involve circuit or gate folding, which can be time-intensive procedures due to increased circuit depth and shot overhead. Other tensor-network-based mitigation techniques suffer from intractability in high-entanglement regimes. In this work, we leverage the structure of unitary k-design Pauli support distributions by introducing a technique we name ''circuit balancing,'' along with gate benchmarking data, in order to estimate circuit-wide depolarization. We describe how to invert the diagnosed circuit depolarization even in the presence of coherent error, via Pauli twirling. We provide asymptotics to estimate the number of twirls needed to maintain a desired output fidelity. We test our method numerically in a variety of simulation settings and find that it can significantly reduce average random circuit infidelity. Further, we employ our methods to find significant infidelity reductions when running a random circuit ensemble on a contemporary superconducting quantum computer, IBM Fez. Overall, we show that the method effectively reduces gate-based error for unitary k-designs without incurring any two-qubit gate overhead.
Abstract We study the distribution over measurement outcomes of noisy random quantum circuits in the regime of low fidelity, which corresponds to the setting where the computation experiences at least one gate-level error with probability close to one. We model noise by adding a pair of weak, unital, single-qubit noise channels after each two-qubit gate, and we show that for typical random circuit instances, correlations between the noisy output distribution pnoisy p noisy and the corresponding noiseless output distribution pideal p ideal shrink exponentially with the expected number of gate-level errors. Specifically, the linear cross-entropy benchmark F that measures this correlation behaves as F=exp(−2sϵ±O(sϵ2)) F = exp ( - 2 s ϵ ± O ( s ϵ 2 ) ) , where ϵ ϵ is the probability of error per circuit location and s is the number of two-qubit gates. Furthermore, if the noise is incoherent—for example, depolarizing or dephasing noise—the total variation distance between the noisy output distribution pnoisy p noisy and the uniform distribution punif p unif decays at precisely the same rate. Consequently, the noisy output distribution can be approximated as pnoisy≈Fpideal+(1−F)punif p noisy ≈ F p ideal + ( 1 - F ) p unif . In other words, although at least one local error occurs with probability 1−F 1 - F , the errors are scrambled by the random quantum circuit and can be treated as global white noise, contributing completely uniform output. Importantly, we upper bound the average total variation error in this approximation by O(Fϵs) O ( F ϵ s ) . Thus, the “white-noise approximation” is meaningful when ϵs≪1 ϵ s ≪ 1 , a quadratically weaker condition than the ϵs≪1 ϵ s ≪ 1
Quantum noise is a central challenge in quantum computing across many applications. Extensive work has examined how qubits couple to their environment, leading to decoherence and irreversible relaxation. This work studies a continuous coherent noise model for quantum circuits and compares it with a discrete Pauli model. The focus is on small, coherent gate errors that accumulate across circuit depth. These errors are modeled as random rotations on the Bloch sphere using a von Mises-Fisher distribution. In the small-angle limit, the model reduces to an isotropic Gaussian distribution. We test the model on quantum error-correction circuits based on the [[5,1,3]] and [[7,1,3]] codes. A variant of Grover's search circuit with different qubit counts is also examined. To enable fair comparison, we introduce a model-independent matching scheme. Pauli and continuous noise channels are aligned using the binary entropy at readout. This isolates the effect of noise structure at fixed uncertainty. An approximate analytical method for the propagation of coherent errors is also developed. The method tracks error distributions both on Clifford and non-Clifford circuits without full Monte Carlo sampling. It reduces simulation cost while preserving accuracy for circuit-level error estimates. The approximation is validated against brute-force simulations, identifying its regime of validity with Clifford and non-Clifford circuits under error correction. Our results show that continuous coherent noise and Pauli noise lead to comparable logical-error trends in the stabilizer-code circuits studied here. This behavior is consistent with syndrome extraction projecting a general single-qubit error onto Pauli-error subspaces before recovery. They also show where simplified propagation models work well and where their accuracy is reduced.
As quantum processors grow, new performance benchmarks are required to capture the full quality of the devices at scale. While quantum volume is an excellent benchmark, it focuses on the highest quality subset of the device and so is unable to indicate the average performance over a large number of connected qubits. Furthermore, it is a discrete pass/fail and so is not reflective of continuous improvements in hardware nor does it provide quantitative direction to large-scale algorithms. For example, there may be value in error mitigated Hamiltonian simulation at scale with devices unable to pass strict quantum volume tests. Here we discuss a scalable benchmark which measures the fidelity of a connecting set of two-qubit gates over N qubits by measuring gate errors using simultaneous direct randomized benchmarking in disjoint layers. Our layer fidelity can be easily related to algorithmic run time, via γ defined in Ref.\cite{berg2022probabilistic} that can be used to estimate the number of circuits required for error mitigation. The protocol is efficient and obtains all the pair rates in the layered structure. Compared to regular (isolated) RB this approach is sensitive to crosstalk. As an example we measure a N=80(100) qubit layer fidelity on a 127 qubit fixed-coupling "Eagle" processor (ibm\_sherbrooke) of 0.26(0.19) and on the 133 qubit tunable-coupling "Heron" processor (ibm\_montecarlo) of 0.61(0.26). This can easily be expressed as a layer size independent quantity, error per layered gate (EPLG), which is here 1.7×10−2(1.7×10−2) for ibm\_sherbrooke and 6.2×10−3(1.2×10−2) for ibm\_montecarlo.
Randomized benchmarking (RB) returns a single decay parameter or gate error rate, but when the noise is gate-dependent that parameter is notoriously difficult to interpret. We study RB and related random-circuit benchmarks under small gate-local Markovian noise by factorizing each noisy gate into its ideal action followed by the exponential of a small error generator and then perturbing the RB L matrix, which models the RB decay. For any low-error gate set that satisfies the requirements of RB (it is a sequence-asymptotic unitary 2-design), we show that Pauli-stochastic error rates contribute linearly to the RB decay parameter, while Hamiltonian error rates contribute through a gauge-invariant quadratic form. Pauli-correlation and active generators are absent from the linear term and enter only at higher order. For the single-qubit native gate set {Xπ/2,Yπ/2} we derive this quadratic form explicitly in terms of three first-order gauge-invariant (FOGI) coordinates: the two intrinsic over-rotations and one relational axis-tilt error. The resulting formula explains the dependence of DRB on the sampling distribution and the compilation dependence of CRB. These results turn RB decay rates into interpretable functions of experimentally meaningful elementary error rates.
We study the distribution over measurement outcomes of noisy random quantum circuits in the low-fidelity regime. We show that, for local noise that is sufficiently weak and unital, correlations (measured by the linear cross-entropy benchmark) between the output distribution pnoisy of a generic noisy circuit instance and the output distribution pideal of the corresponding noiseless instance shrink exponentially with the expected number of gate-level errors, as F=exp(−2sε±O(sε2)), where ε is the probability of error per circuit location and s is the number of two-qubit gates. Furthermore, if the noise is incoherent, the output distribution approaches the uniform distribution punif at precisely the same rate and can be approximated as pnoisy≈Fpideal+(1−F)punif, that is, local errors are scrambled by the random quantum circuit and contribute only white noise (uniform output). Importantly, we upper bound the total variation error (averaged over random circuit instance) in this approximation as O(Fεs), so the "white-noise approximation" is meaningful when εs≪1, a quadratically weaker condition than the εs≪1 requirement to maintain high fidelity. The bound applies when the circuit size satisfies s≥Ω(nlog(n)) and the inverse error rate satisfies ε−1≥Ω~(n). The white-noise approximation is useful for salvaging the signal from a noisy quantum computation; it was an underlying assumption in complexity-theoretic arguments that low-fidelity random quantum circuits cannot be efficiently sampled classically. Our method is based on a map from second-moment quantities in random quantum circuits to expectation values of certain stochastic processes for which we compute upper and lower bounds.