Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2608.23698

Compositionality in quantum reference frame perspectives

Bruna Sahdo, Esteban Castro-Ruiz

quant-phgr-qcSubmitted Aug 24, 2026• Announced Aug 26, 2026• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Understanding a composite system through its constituents is a fundamental practice in physics. In the context of quantum reference frames (QRFs), however, combining the usual quantum-theoretic notion of composition with QRF perspectives gives rise to subtle issues, such as the 'paradox of the third particle'. Here we study in depth how to compose subsystems in QRF perspectives, building on a recent formalism for QRFs [E$.$Castro-Ruiz and O$.$Oreshkov, 2025]. We first show how the frames of external observers can be internalised and treated within the framework. This establishes a consistent hierarchy of QRF perspectives, which we use to define the adding and removing of subsystems. We then explain how, owing to the so-called 'extra-particle' degrees of freedom, the formalism gives a consistent treatment of subsystems, avoiding any paradoxes by construction. Consistency then implies that composing subsystems in a QRF perspective differs from, and generalises, the standard quantum-theoretic case. In particular, not every state can be appended in tensor-product form relative to a QRF, and we characterise the set of compatible states. Finally, we introduce 'classicalisation', a procedure that recovers a classical-like perspective from a general QRF. This procedure circumvents the aforementioned state restrictions but carries a different operational meaning, which we study through a concrete example.

Comments
33 pages, 8 figures

Related papers

Quantum reference frames beyond subsystems: a reconstruction and generalization of the perspective-neutral framework

Stefan L. Ludescher, Manuel Mekonnen, Thomas D. Galley +1 more

We generalize the notion of quantum reference frames (QRFs) to cases where the frame does not necessarily correspond to a tensor factor subsystem, but to a covariant quantum instrument. This unlocks a variety of physical applications: "frames of labeling" for indistinguishable particles, suggesting explanations for the symmetrization postulate and the absence of parastatistics, and yielding a transparent description of the entanglement of bosons and fermions; and relational clocks reproducing the Schrödinger equation exactly even when all subsystems are interacting or when there are frequency superselection sectors. Our work generalizes the perspective-neutral approach to QRFs pioneered by Höhn and co-authors, which we reconstruct from a simple operational scenario. We give a resource-theoretic grounding of this framework, and show how the notion of completely covariant operations explains the relevance of the charge-zero sector and the pure-state transformation behavior across perspectives. This also suggests operational clarifications of some aspects of constraint quantization, e.g. of the meaning of constraint equations such as $C|ψ\rangle=0$. Some of our results, such as our generalization of relationalization maps to instruments, apply more broadly to other QRF frameworks too, and they contribute to bridging the gap between operational quantum information theory and the internal QRF research program.

quant-pharXiv:2607.24976•Jul 29, 2026•0 citations

Frame-Dependent Traces and the Third-Particle Paradox

Alessandro Palumbo, Luca Apadula

The Paradox of the Third Particle arises when comparing subsystem descriptions across Quantum Reference Frame (QRF) perspectives. We isolate two distinct origins of the Paradox: the QRF covariance of the partial trace and the failure of the physical Hilbert space to inherit the kinematical tensor-product structure. We give an explicit counterexample to the Relational Trace (RT) resolution: an uncorrelated product state for which the RT statistical condition trivialises. We then introduce a new statistical consistency condition comparing subsystem discarding between external and internal QRFs, together with an associated frame-dependent map, the Perspective Relational Trace (PRT). We argue that our condition captures the operational content of the Paradox: rather than imposing consistency on the whole state space, we characterise exactly the states on which it holds in the Perspective-Neutral (PN) and Quantum-Information (QI) approaches. This separates three levels of description: a PN subsystem of a PN whole, where consistency fails on a characterised set that includes product states; a QI subsystem of a QI whole, where it holds for all states; and a QI subsystem obtained from a PN whole by kinematical partial trace, where the full weakly invariant algebra is recovered, yet consistency holds only on a proper subset. These results show that the PN approach can consistently describe only a closed, isolated system, while the QI approach can accommodate arbitrary subsystems. Tracing out a subsystem from a globally PN state yields a charge-superselected algebra, reproducing in a minimal QRF model the boundary-charge structure of edge modes. We understand the Paradox not as a genuine contradiction, but as the consequence of comparing inequivalent physical layers without tracking which information is externally and which internally accessible.

quant-pharXiv:2607.21703•Jul 27, 2026•0 citations

Relative subsystems and quantum reference frame transformations

Esteban Castro-Ruiz, Ognyan Oreshkov

Recently there has been much effort in developing a quantum generalisation of reference frame transformations. Despite important progress, a complete understanding of their principles is still lacking. In particular, we argue that previous proposals could yield reversible transformations between arbitrary quantum reference frames only when applied to the whole universe. In contrast, here we derive quantum reference frame transformations from first principles, using only standard quantum theory. Our framework, naturally based on incoherent rather than coherent group averaging, yields reversible transformations that only depend on the reference frames and system of interest. We find more general transformations than those studied so far, which are valid only in a restricted subspace. Importantly, our framework contains additional degrees of freedom in the form of an "extra particle," which carries information about the quantum features of reference frame states. Our formalism is valid for a broad range of symmetry groups. We study the centrally extended Galilei group specifically, highlighting key differences from previous proposals.

arXiv:2110.13199•Oct 25, 2021•4 citations

Quantum reference frame transformations as symmetries and the paradox of the third particle

Marius Krumm, Philipp A. Höhn, Markus P. Müller

In a quantum world, reference frames are ultimately quantum systems too – but what does it mean to "jump into the perspective of a quantum particle"? In this work, we show that quantum reference frame (QRF) transformations appear naturally as symmetries of simple physical systems. This allows us to rederive and generalize known QRF transformations within an alternative, operationally transparent framework, and to shed new light on their structure and interpretation. We give an explicit description of the observables that are measurable by agents constrained by such quantum symmetries, and apply our results to a puzzle known as the `paradox of the third particle'. We argue that it can be reduced to the question of how to relationally embed fewer into more particles, and give a thorough physical and algebraic analysis of this question. This leads us to a generalization of the partial trace (`relational trace') which arguably resolves the paradox, and it uncovers important structures of constraint quantization within a simple quantum information setting, such as relational observables which are key in this resolution. While we restrict our attention to finite Abelian groups for transparency and mathematical rigor, the intuitive physical appeal of our results makes us expect that they remain valid in more general situations.

arXiv:2011.01951•Quantum•Aug 27, 2021•50 citations

Mutual Information Across Quantum Reference Frame Perspectives

Leonardo Valente, Carla Ferradini, Flaminia Giacomini +1 more

In quantum information theory, standard notions typically presuppose a fixed partition of the world into subsystems, encoded in a tensor product structure of the Hilbert space. Yet, in some scenarios, the subsystem structure is not uniquely fixed. A case in point is the description of subsystems relative to different quantum reference frames (QRFs), where the tensor product structure, although fixed in a specific QRF, changes across different QRFs. Such a relativity of subsystems underlies many interesting features of QRFs, such as the relativity of entanglement, entropy, and coherence. It also raises a broader question: how do we compare the information across different subsystem perspectives, especially when the corresponding subsystem algebras overlap? Here, we propose a notion of quantum mutual information across different QRF perspectives, which captures the correlations between subsystems relative to different frames of reference. To do so, we focus on an algebraic definition of subsystems. Studying in detail the union and overlap between subsystem algebras relative to different QRFs, we find that the usual definition of mutual information in terms of the chain law overcounts the information associated to the overlap. Based on this insight, we propose a modified chain law and show that the resulting notion of mutual information satisfies subadditivity and connects naturally to other measures found in the literature [1]. Our investigations not only provide a way to quantify the relation between different QRF perspectives from an information-theoretic point of view but also sheds light on some important features of quantum information in absence of a fixed tensor product structure.

quant-pharXiv:2610.31729•Oct 23, 2026•0 citations

Relative subsystems and quantum reference frame transformations

Esteban Castro-Ruiz, Ognyan Oreshkov

Recently there has been much effort in developing a quantum generalisation of reference frame transformations. Despite important progress, a complete understanding of their principles is still lacking. Here we derive quantum reference frame transformations for a broad range of symmetry groups from first principles, using only standard quantum theory. Our framework, naturally based on incoherent rather than coherent group averaging, yields reversible transformations that only depend on the reference frames and system of interest. We find more general transformations than those studied so far, which are valid only in a restricted subspace. Our framework contains additional degrees of freedom in the form of an "extra particle", which carries information about the quantum features of reference frame states. We study the centrally extended Galilei group specifically, highlighting key differences from previous proposals.

Communications Physics•Apr 30, 2025•18 citations
Understanding a composite system through its constituents is a fundamental practice in physics. In the context of quantum reference frames (QRFs), however, combining the usual quantum-theoretic notion of composition with QRF perspectives gives rise to subtle issues, such as the 'paradox of the third particle'. Here we study in depth how to compose subsystems in QRF perspectives, building on a recent formalism for QRFs [E...Castro-Ruiz and O...Oreshkov, 2025]. We first show how the frames of external observers can be internalised and treated within the framework. This establishes a consistent hierarchy of QRF perspectives, which we use to define the adding and removing of subsystems. We then explain how, owing to the so-called 'extra-particle' degrees of freedom, the formalism gives a consistent treatment of subsystems, avoiding any paradoxes by construction. Consistency then implies that composing subsystems in a QRF perspective differs from, and generalises, the standard quantum-theoretic case. In particular, not every state can be appended in tensor-product form relative to a QRF, and we characterise the set of compatible states. Finally, we introduce 'classicalisation', a procedure that recovers a classical-like perspective from a general QRF. This procedure circumvents the aforementioned state restrictions but carries a different operational meaning, which we study through a concrete example.
We generalize the notion of quantum reference frames (QRFs) to cases where the frame does not necessarily correspond to a tensor factor subsystem, but to a covariant quantum instrument. This unlocks a variety of physical applications: "frames of labeling" for indistinguishable particles, suggesting explanations for the symmetrization postulate and the absence of parastatistics, and yielding a transparent description of the entanglement of bosons and fermions; and relational clocks reproducing the Schrödinger equation exactly even when all subsystems are interacting or when there are frequency superselection sectors. Our work generalizes the perspective-neutral approach to QRFs pioneered by Höhn and co-authors, which we reconstruct from a simple operational scenario. We give a resource-theoretic grounding of this framework, and show how the notion of completely covariant operations explains the relevance of the charge-zero sector and the pure-state transformation behavior across perspectives. This also suggests operational clarifications of some aspects of constraint quantization, e.g. of the meaning of constraint equations such as C∣ψ⟩=0C|ψ\rangle=0C∣ψ⟩=0. Some of our results, such as our generalization of relationalization maps to instruments, apply more broadly to other QRF frameworks too, and they contribute to bridging the gap between operational quantum information theory and the internal QRF research program.
The Paradox of the Third Particle arises when comparing subsystem descriptions across Quantum Reference Frame (QRF) perspectives. We isolate two distinct origins of the Paradox: the QRF covariance of the partial trace and the failure of the physical Hilbert space to inherit the kinematical tensor-product structure. We give an explicit counterexample to the Relational Trace (RT) resolution: an uncorrelated product state for which the RT statistical condition trivialises. We then introduce a new statistical consistency condition comparing subsystem discarding between external and internal QRFs, together with an associated frame-dependent map, the Perspective Relational Trace (PRT). We argue that our condition captures the operational content of the Paradox: rather than imposing consistency on the whole state space, we characterise exactly the states on which it holds in the Perspective-Neutral (PN) and Quantum-Information (QI) approaches. This separates three levels of description: a PN subsystem of a PN whole, where consistency fails on a characterised set that includes product states; a QI subsystem of a QI whole, where it holds for all states; and a QI subsystem obtained from a PN whole by kinematical partial trace, where the full weakly invariant algebra is recovered, yet consistency holds only on a proper subset. These results show that the PN approach can consistently describe only a closed, isolated system, while the QI approach can accommodate arbitrary subsystems. Tracing out a subsystem from a globally PN state yields a charge-superselected algebra, reproducing in a minimal QRF model the boundary-charge structure of edge modes. We understand the Paradox not as a genuine contradiction, but as the consequence of comparing inequivalent physical layers without tracking which information is externally and which internally accessible.
Recently there has been much effort in developing a quantum generalisation of reference frame transformations. Despite important progress, a complete understanding of their principles is still lacking. In particular, we argue that previous proposals could yield reversible transformations between arbitrary quantum reference frames only when applied to the whole universe. In contrast, here we derive quantum reference frame transformations from first principles, using only standard quantum theory. Our framework, naturally based on incoherent rather than coherent group averaging, yields reversible transformations that only depend on the reference frames and system of interest. We find more general transformations than those studied so far, which are valid only in a restricted subspace. Importantly, our framework contains additional degrees of freedom in the form of an "extra particle," which carries information about the quantum features of reference frame states. Our formalism is valid for a broad range of symmetry groups. We study the centrally extended Galilei group specifically, highlighting key differences from previous proposals.
In a quantum world, reference frames are ultimately quantum systems too – but what does it mean to "jump into the perspective of a quantum particle"? In this work, we show that quantum reference frame (QRF) transformations appear naturally as symmetries of simple physical systems. This allows us to rederive and generalize known QRF transformations within an alternative, operationally transparent framework, and to shed new light on their structure and interpretation. We give an explicit description of the observables that are measurable by agents constrained by such quantum symmetries, and apply our results to a puzzle known as the `paradox of the third particle'. We argue that it can be reduced to the question of how to relationally embed fewer into more particles, and give a thorough physical and algebraic analysis of this question. This leads us to a generalization of the partial trace (`relational trace') which arguably resolves the paradox, and it uncovers important structures of constraint quantization within a simple quantum information setting, such as relational observables which are key in this resolution. While we restrict our attention to finite Abelian groups for transparency and mathematical rigor, the intuitive physical appeal of our results makes us expect that they remain valid in more general situations.
In quantum information theory, standard notions typically presuppose a fixed partition of the world into subsystems, encoded in a tensor product structure of the Hilbert space. Yet, in some scenarios, the subsystem structure is not uniquely fixed. A case in point is the description of subsystems relative to different quantum reference frames (QRFs), where the tensor product structure, although fixed in a specific QRF, changes across different QRFs. Such a relativity of subsystems underlies many interesting features of QRFs, such as the relativity of entanglement, entropy, and coherence. It also raises a broader question: how do we compare the information across different subsystem perspectives, especially when the corresponding subsystem algebras overlap? Here, we propose a notion of quantum mutual information across different QRF perspectives, which captures the correlations between subsystems relative to different frames of reference. To do so, we focus on an algebraic definition of subsystems. Studying in detail the union and overlap between subsystem algebras relative to different QRFs, we find that the usual definition of mutual information in terms of the chain law overcounts the information associated to the overlap. Based on this insight, we propose a modified chain law and show that the resulting notion of mutual information satisfies subadditivity and connects naturally to other measures found in the literature [1]. Our investigations not only provide a way to quantify the relation between different QRF perspectives from an information-theoretic point of view but also sheds light on some important features of quantum information in absence of a fixed tensor product structure.
Recently there has been much effort in developing a quantum generalisation of reference frame transformations. Despite important progress, a complete understanding of their principles is still lacking. Here we derive quantum reference frame transformations for a broad range of symmetry groups from first principles, using only standard quantum theory. Our framework, naturally based on incoherent rather than coherent group averaging, yields reversible transformations that only depend on the reference frames and system of interest. We find more general transformations than those studied so far, which are valid only in a restricted subspace. Our framework contains additional degrees of freedom in the form of an "extra particle", which carries information about the quantum features of reference frame states. We study the centrally extended Galilei group specifically, highlighting key differences from previous proposals.