Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2608.23191

Quantum observables as Fréchet sensitivity kernels

Rafael Abreu

quant-phmath-phphysics.geo-phSubmitted Aug 24, 2026• Announced Aug 25, 2026• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We present a variational--adjoint interpretation of quantum mechanics in which the interaction between forward and adjoint wavefunctions defines a general sensitivity kernel of the system. This Fréchet interaction density quantifies how perturbations in the wavefunction (or system parameters) influence a chosen observable. The familiar Born probability density appears as a special case when the adjoint wavefunction is chosen as the complex conjugate of the forward wavefunction, for which the interaction density becomes real and non-negative. Within this framework, probability is a particular positive-definite form of sensitivity described by the Fréchet interaction density. In general, the variational--adjoint interpretation also produces Fréchet sensitivity kernels associated with other quantum observables, including momentum, energy, and spin. This suggests that the Born probability density belongs to a broader class of Fréchet sensitivity kernels associated with quantum observables. The proposed interpretation also provides a connection with time-symmetric interpretations of quantum mechanics and possible future applications in quantum control and quantum metrology.

Related papers

An Observer-Centric, Deterministic Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics

Sebastian Schepis

We propose an interpretation of quantum mechanics in which the wavefunction represents unresolved potential relative to an observer, measurement is deterministic resonance stabilisation, and Born-rule probability quantifies the observer’s incomplete access to the full entropic and phase-geometric state of the observer–system interaction. An observer is defined operationally as any bounded system capable of converting external entropy into internal coherence. On this view,superposition is not a set of co-existing realities but an unresolved field of possible coherence resolutions; collapse is not a stochastic discontinuity but a deterministic phase-lock between observer and system; and the classical world is the high-coherence limit in which environmental observation is dense enough to continuously stabilise macroscopic facts.The interpretation preserves the full predictive machinery of quantum mechanics while providing a unified account of the measurement problem, the Born rule, decoherence, entanglement, delayed choice, Wigner’s friend, and the quantum-to-classical transition. We formalise the framework through a resonance-selection rule, an observer equation of collapse, and a prime-modal state-space structure, and identify five classes of empirically accessible predictions.

•May 23, 2026•0 citations

Born’s Interpretation of the Wavefunction

Jim Baggott

Schrödinger hoped that his wave mechanics would help to re-establish some sense of ‘visualizability’ of the physics going on inside the atom. In searching for a suitable interpretation of the wavefunction, he focused on the density of electrical charge, which he associated with the wavefunction ψ‎ multiplied by its complex conjugate. Hidden in his words is the interpretation that would eventually come to dominate our understanding of the wavefunction. Max Born had no hesitation in concluding that the only way to reconcile wave mechanics with the particle description is to interpret the modulus-square of the wavefunction as a probability density. It was Wolfgang Pauli who proposed to interpret this not only as a transition probability or as the probability for the system to be in a specific state, as Born had done, but as the probability of ‘finding’ the electron at a specific position in its orbit inside an atom.

Oxford University Press eBooks•Jan 10, 2020•1 citation

Quantum Mechanics as a Reversible Diffusion Theory

Charalampos Antonakos

This paper proposes an interpretation of quantum mechanics, relying on the time-symmetric stochastic dynamics of quantum particles and on non-classical probability theory. Our main purpose is to demonstrate that the wave function and its complex conjugate can be interpreted as complex probability distributions in two complex diffusion equations related to non-real forward and backward in time stochastic motions respectively. We say non-real because Schroedinger forward and backward diffusions describe both reversible (real trajectories) and irreversible trajectories (non-real trajectories). The reversible trajectories are the only real trajectories and are given by the intersection of those forward and backward processes. It turns out that if we translate this intersection using set-theoretic language, we are led to a reversible diffusion described by Born rule probabilities. This proposal is useful also for explaining more about the role of complex numbers in quantum mechanics that produces this so-called "wave-like" nature of quantum reality. Our perspective also challenges the notion of physical superposition and aims at a derivation of superposition principle not based on the linearity of Schroedinger's equation but relying on pure probability theory. Moreover, it is suggested that, embracing the idea of stochastic processes in quantum theory, explains the reasons for the appearance of classical behavior in large objects, in contrast to the quantum behavior of small ones. In other words, we claim that a combination of a probabilistic and no-ontic view (neither epistemic though) of the wave function with a stochastic hidden-variables approach, may provide some insight into the quantum physical reality and potentially establish the groundwork for a novel interpretation of quantum mechanics.

arXiv:2502.10523•Feb 14, 2025•0 citations

A New Form for the Statistical Postulate of Quantum Mechanics

Norbert Wiener, Armand Siegel

A new type of representation of the wave function of quantum mechanics, and a new form of the statistical interpretation of the wave function, are presented. The variable in the new representation is a mapping of points of differential space, closely related to Hilbert space, but having an associated measure for suitably defined sets of points in it. In the new statistical interpretation, an eigenvalue of every observable defined in the system is associated with each point in differential space. This can be done in such a way that, for each observable, the measure (=probability) of the set of all differential-space points belonging to a given set of eigenvalues is equal to the quantum-mechanical probability, calculated in the usual way (Born statistical postulate), that an experiment will yield an eigenvalue in this set. Thus we obtain an interpretation of quantum mechanics in terms of probability densities or probabilities instead of probability amplitudes.

Physical Review•Sep 15, 1953•105 citations

The Only Real Probabilities in Quantum Mechanics

Nancy Delaney Cartwright

Position probabilities play a privileged role in the interpretation of quantum mechanics. The quantum wave function (usually designated “Ψ(r)’) cannot itself represent a physical quantity, because it is complex valued. Its square — |Ψ(r)|2 — however, is real; and it is |Ψ(r)|2 which is the fundamental interpreted quantity of the theory. Schrödinger, who originated wave mechanics, interpreted |Ψ(r)|2 as the density of a charged particle; but this suggestion was inadequate. A principal reason is that, for most physical systems, |Ψ(r)|2 spreads out in time, whereas particles themselves do not. Schrödinger's interpretation was replaced by Born who introduced probabilities into quantum mechanics. Born urged that |Ψ(r)|2 represents not the density of the system in space, but rather a probability density. This is almost universally how quantum mechanics is taught today: |Ψ(r)|2 gives the probability that a system in state Ψ(r) is located at r.

PSA Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association•Jan 1, 1978•5 citations

Time-of-arrival probabilities and quantum measurements

Charis Anastopoulos, Ntina Savvidou

In this paper we study the construction of probability densities for time of arrival in quantum mechanics. Our treatment is based upon the facts that (i) time appears in quantum theory as an external parameter to the system, and (ii) propositions about the time of arrival appear naturally when one considers histories. The definition of time-of-arrival probabilities is straightforward in stochastic processes. The difficulties that arise in quantum theory are due to the fact that the time parameter of the Schrödinger’s equation does not naturally define a probability density at the continuum limit, but also because the procedure one follows is sensitive on the interpretation of the reduction procedure. We consider the issue in Copenhagen quantum mechanics and in history-based schemes like consistent histories. The benefit of the latter is that it allows a proper passage to the continuous limit—there are, however, problems related to the quantum Zeno effect and decoherence. We finally employ the histories-based description to construct Positive-Operator-Valued-Measures (POVMs) for the time-of-arrival, which are valid for a general Hamiltonian. These POVMs typically depend on the resolution of the measurement device; for a free particle, however, this dependence cancels in the physically relevant regime and the POVM coincides with that of Kijowski.

arXiv:quant-ph/0509020•Journal of Mathematical Physics•Dec 1, 2006•60 citations
We present a variational--adjoint interpretation of quantum mechanics in which the interaction between forward and adjoint wavefunctions defines a general sensitivity kernel of the system. This Fréchet interaction density quantifies how perturbations in the wavefunction (or system parameters) influence a chosen observable. The familiar Born probability density appears as a special case when the adjoint wavefunction is chosen as the complex conjugate of the forward wavefunction, for which the interaction density becomes real and non-negative. Within this framework, probability is a particular positive-definite form of sensitivity described by the Fréchet interaction density.
In general, the variational--adjoint interpretation also produces Fréchet sensitivity kernels associated with other quantum observables, including momentum, energy, and spin. This suggests that the Born probability density belongs to a broader class of Fréchet sensitivity kernels associated with quantum observables. The proposed interpretation also provides a connection with time-symmetric interpretations of quantum mechanics and possible future applications in quantum control and quantum metrology.
We propose an interpretation of quantum mechanics in which the wavefunction represents unresolved potential relative to an observer, measurement is deterministic resonance stabilisation, and Born-rule probability quantifies the observer’s incomplete access to the full entropic and phase-geometric state of the observer–system interaction. An observer is defined operationally as any bounded system capable of converting external entropy into internal coherence. On this view,superposition is not a set of co-existing realities but an unresolved field of possible coherence resolutions; collapse is not a stochastic discontinuity but a deterministic phase-lock between observer and system; and the classical world is the high-coherence limit in which environmental observation is dense enough to continuously stabilise macroscopic facts.The interpretation preserves the full predictive machinery of quantum mechanics while providing a unified account of the measurement problem, the Born rule, decoherence, entanglement, delayed choice, Wigner’s friend, and the quantum-to-classical transition. We formalise the framework through a resonance-selection rule, an observer equation of collapse, and a prime-modal state-space structure, and identify five classes of empirically accessible predictions.
Schrödinger hoped that his wave mechanics would help to re-establish some sense of ‘visualizability’ of the physics going on inside the atom. In searching for a suitable interpretation of the wavefunction, he focused on the density of electrical charge, which he associated with the wavefunction ψ‎ multiplied by its complex conjugate. Hidden in his words is the interpretation that would eventually come to dominate our understanding of the wavefunction. Max Born had no hesitation in concluding that the only way to reconcile wave mechanics with the particle description is to interpret the modulus-square of the wavefunction as a probability density. It was Wolfgang Pauli who proposed to interpret this not only as a transition probability or as the probability for the system to be in a specific state, as Born had done, but as the probability of ‘finding’ the electron at a specific position in its orbit inside an atom.
This paper proposes an interpretation of quantum mechanics, relying on the time-symmetric stochastic dynamics of quantum particles and on non-classical probability theory. Our main purpose is to demonstrate that the wave function and its complex conjugate can be interpreted as complex probability distributions in two complex diffusion equations related to non-real forward and backward in time stochastic motions respectively. We say non-real because Schroedinger forward and backward diffusions describe both reversible (real trajectories) and irreversible trajectories (non-real trajectories). The reversible trajectories are the only real trajectories and are given by the intersection of those forward and backward processes. It turns out that if we translate this intersection using set-theoretic language, we are led to a reversible diffusion described by Born rule probabilities. This proposal is useful also for explaining more about the role of complex numbers in quantum mechanics that produces this so-called "wave-like" nature of quantum reality. Our perspective also challenges the notion of physical superposition and aims at a derivation of superposition principle not based on the linearity of Schroedinger's equation but relying on pure probability theory. Moreover, it is suggested that, embracing the idea of stochastic processes in quantum theory, explains the reasons for the appearance of classical behavior in large objects, in contrast to the quantum behavior of small ones. In other words, we claim that a combination of a probabilistic and no-ontic view (neither epistemic though) of the wave function with a stochastic hidden-variables approach, may provide some insight into the quantum physical reality and potentially establish the groundwork for a novel interpretation of quantum mechanics.
A new type of representation of the wave function of quantum mechanics, and a new form of the statistical interpretation of the wave function, are presented. The variable in the new representation is a mapping of points of differential space, closely related to Hilbert space, but having an associated measure for suitably defined sets of points in it. In the new statistical interpretation, an eigenvalue of every observable defined in the system is associated with each point in differential space. This can be done in such a way that, for each observable, the measure (=probability) of the set of all differential-space points belonging to a given set of eigenvalues is equal to the quantum-mechanical probability, calculated in the usual way (Born statistical postulate), that an experiment will yield an eigenvalue in this set. Thus we obtain an interpretation of quantum mechanics in terms of probability densities or probabilities instead of probability amplitudes.
Position probabilities play a privileged role in the interpretation of quantum mechanics. The quantum wave function (usually designated “Ψ(r)’) cannot itself represent a physical quantity, because it is complex valued. Its square — |Ψ(r)|2 — however, is real; and it is |Ψ(r)|2 which is the fundamental interpreted quantity of the theory. Schrödinger, who originated wave mechanics, interpreted |Ψ(r)|2 as the density of a charged particle; but this suggestion was inadequate. A principal reason is that, for most physical systems, |Ψ(r)|2 spreads out in time, whereas particles themselves do not. Schrödinger's interpretation was replaced by Born who introduced probabilities into quantum mechanics. Born urged that |Ψ(r)|2 represents not the density of the system in space, but rather a probability density. This is almost universally how quantum mechanics is taught today: |Ψ(r)|2 gives the probability that a system in state Ψ(r) is located at r.
In this paper we study the construction of probability densities for time of arrival in quantum mechanics. Our treatment is based upon the facts that (i) time appears in quantum theory as an external parameter to the system, and (ii) propositions about the time of arrival appear naturally when one considers histories. The definition of time-of-arrival probabilities is straightforward in stochastic processes. The difficulties that arise in quantum theory are due to the fact that the time parameter of the Schrödinger’s equation does not naturally define a probability density at the continuum limit, but also because the procedure one follows is sensitive on the interpretation of the reduction procedure. We consider the issue in Copenhagen quantum mechanics and in history-based schemes like consistent histories. The benefit of the latter is that it allows a proper passage to the continuous limit—there are, however, problems related to the quantum Zeno effect and decoherence. We finally employ the histories-based description to construct Positive-Operator-Valued-Measures (POVMs) for the time-of-arrival, which are valid for a general Hamiltonian. These POVMs typically depend on the resolution of the measurement device; for a free particle, however, this dependence cancels in the physically relevant regime and the POVM coincides with that of Kijowski.