Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

PSA Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association

The Only Real Probabilities in Quantum Mechanics

Nancy Delaney Cartwright

Published Jan 1, 1978• 5 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Position probabilities play a privileged role in the interpretation of quantum mechanics. The quantum wave function (usually designated “Ψ(r)’) cannot itself represent a physical quantity, because it is complex valued. Its square — |Ψ(r)|2 — however, is real; and it is |Ψ(r)|2 which is the fundamental interpreted quantity of the theory. Schrödinger, who originated wave mechanics, interpreted |Ψ(r)|2 as the density of a charged particle; but this suggestion was inadequate. A principal reason is that, for most physical systems, |Ψ(r)|2 spreads out in time, whereas particles themselves do not. Schrödinger's interpretation was replaced by Born who introduced probabilities into quantum mechanics. Born urged that |Ψ(r)|2 represents not the density of the system in space, but rather a probability density. This is almost universally how quantum mechanics is taught today: |Ψ(r)|2 gives the probability that a system in state Ψ(r) is located at r.

DOI
10.1086/psaprocbienmeetp.1978.1.192625

Related papers

Born’s Interpretation of the Wavefunction

Jim Baggott

Schrödinger hoped that his wave mechanics would help to re-establish some sense of ‘visualizability’ of the physics going on inside the atom. In searching for a suitable interpretation of the wavefunction, he focused on the density of electrical charge, which he associated with the wavefunction ψ‎ multiplied by its complex conjugate. Hidden in his words is the interpretation that would eventually come to dominate our understanding of the wavefunction. Max Born had no hesitation in concluding that the only way to reconcile wave mechanics with the particle description is to interpret the modulus-square of the wavefunction as a probability density. It was Wolfgang Pauli who proposed to interpret this not only as a transition probability or as the probability for the system to be in a specific state, as Born had done, but as the probability of ‘finding’ the electron at a specific position in its orbit inside an atom.

Oxford University Press eBooks•Jan 10, 2020•1 citation

Statistical representation of quantum states

A. Montina

In the standard interpretation of quantum mechanics, the state is described by an abstract wave function in the representation space. Conversely, in a realistic interpretation, the quantum state is replaced by a probability distribution of physical quantities. Bohm mechanics is a consistent example of realistic theory, where the wave function and the particle positions are classically defined quantities. Recently, we proved that the probability distribution in a realistic theory cannot be a quadratic function of the quantum state, in contrast to the apparently obvious suggestion given by the Born rule for transition probabilities. Here, we provide a simplified version of this proof.

Journal of Physics Conference Series•May 1, 2007•3 citations

The State of a System

Uri Peskin

According to the postulates of quantum mechanics, the state of a system is associated with a wave function that contains any measurable information on the system at any time. In this chapter we become familiar with wave functions and how they represent the position of particles within the system. Within the realm of quantum mechanics, the position of particles is not deterministic. It is defined by a probability distribution. The wave function is a position-dependent complex-valued amplitude, whose absolute value squared is identified with the probability density for locating the particle in the position space. This identification of the wave function with a probability amplitude imposes some limitation. Particularly, for a closed system in which the particles are bound, the wave function must be proper (square integrable) and normalizable. These properties are discussed and demonstrated for different coordinate systems.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•May 11, 2023•0 citations

- Schrödinger Equation and Wave Function

S. Rajasekar, R. Velusamy

Till 1925 the idea of what the quantum theory would be was unknown. During 1925 three different but equivalent versions of quantum theory were proposed – Schrödinger-proposed wave mechanics; Heisenberg-developed matrix mechanics and Dirac-introduced operator theory. Considering the de Broglie’s matter waves Erwin Schrödinger, an Austrian physicist, argued that if a particle like an electron behaves as a wave then the equation of wave motion could be successfully applied to it. He postulated a function varying in both space and time in a wave-like manner (hence called wave function and denoted it as ψ). This function is generally complex and assumed to contain information about a system. Schrödinger set up a linear and time-dependent wave-like equation, called Schrödinger wave equation, to describe the wave aspect of a particle taking account of de Broglie’s relation for wavelength. Physically, |ψ(X, t)|2, where ψ(X, t) is the solution of the Schrödinger equation, is interpreted as position probability density. That is, |ψ(X, t)|2 is the probability density of observing a particle at position X at time t. ψ does not give exact outcomes of observations but helps us to know all possible events and their probabilities . Further, the probability interpretation allows us to find the average or expected result of a set of measurements on a quantum system.

CRC Press eBooks•Dec 11, 2014•0 citations

Born’s Probability Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics (1926)

S. Brandt

Abstract Schrödinger’s wave mechanics was using the mathematics familiar to all physicists and was therefore preferred by most over matrix mechanics. Moreover, it contained a function Ψ, the Schrödinger function or wave function, which was expected to be connected in some way to the position of a particle in space. For some time this connection was unclear. Bloch quotes a verse (original and translation) by Hückel , recited in the summer of 1926 in Zurich, which describes the situation in a humorous way [1]:

•Apr 22, 1992•1 citation

The Wave Function and Quantum Reality

Shan Gao, Andrei Yu. Khrennikov, Gregg S. Jaeger +2 more

We investigate the meaning of the wave function by analyzing the mass and charge density distributions of a quantum system. According to protective measurement, a charged quantum system has effective mass and charge density distributing in space, proportional to the square of the absolute value of its wave function. In a realistic interpretation, the wave function of a quantum system can be taken as a description of either a physical field or the ergodic motion of a particle. The essential difference between a field and the ergodic motion of a particle lies in the property of simultaneity; a field exists throughout space simultaneously, whereas the ergodic motion of a particle exists throughout space in a time‐divided way. If the wave function is a physical field, then the mass and charge density will be distributed in space simultaneously for a charged quantum system, and thus there will exist gravitational and electrostatic self‐interactions of its wave function. This not only violates the superposition principle of quantum mechanics but also contradicts experimental observations. Thus the wave function cannot be a description of a physical field but be a description of the ergodic motion of a particle. For the later there is only a localized particle with mass and charge at every instant, and thus there will not exist any self‐interaction for the wave function. It is further argued that the classical ergodic models, which assume continuous motion of particles, cannot be consistent with quantum mechanics. Based on the negative result, we suggest that the wave function is a description of the quantum motion of particles, which is random and discontinuous in nature. On this interpretation, the square of the absolute value of the wave function not only gives the probability of the particle being found in certain locations, but also gives the probability of the particle being there. The suggested new interpretation of the wave function provides a natural realistic alternative to the orthodox interpretation, and it also implies that the de Broglie‐Bohm theory and many‐worlds interpretation are wrong and the dynamical collapse theories are in the right direction by admitting wavefunction collapse.

AIP conference proceedings•Jan 1, 2011•2 citations
Position probabilities play a privileged role in the interpretation of quantum mechanics. The quantum wave function (usually designated “Ψ(r)’) cannot itself represent a physical quantity, because it is complex valued. Its square — |Ψ(r)|2 — however, is real; and it is |Ψ(r)|2 which is the fundamental interpreted quantity of the theory. Schrödinger, who originated wave mechanics, interpreted |Ψ(r)|2 as the density of a charged particle; but this suggestion was inadequate. A principal reason is that, for most physical systems, |Ψ(r)|2 spreads out in time, whereas particles themselves do not. Schrödinger's interpretation was replaced by Born who introduced probabilities into quantum mechanics. Born urged that |Ψ(r)|2 represents not the density of the system in space, but rather a probability density. This is almost universally how quantum mechanics is taught today: |Ψ(r)|2 gives the probability that a system in state Ψ(r) is located at r.
Schrödinger hoped that his wave mechanics would help to re-establish some sense of ‘visualizability’ of the physics going on inside the atom. In searching for a suitable interpretation of the wavefunction, he focused on the density of electrical charge, which he associated with the wavefunction ψ‎ multiplied by its complex conjugate. Hidden in his words is the interpretation that would eventually come to dominate our understanding of the wavefunction. Max Born had no hesitation in concluding that the only way to reconcile wave mechanics with the particle description is to interpret the modulus-square of the wavefunction as a probability density. It was Wolfgang Pauli who proposed to interpret this not only as a transition probability or as the probability for the system to be in a specific state, as Born had done, but as the probability of ‘finding’ the electron at a specific position in its orbit inside an atom.
In the standard interpretation of quantum mechanics, the state is described by an abstract wave function in the representation space. Conversely, in a realistic interpretation, the quantum state is replaced by a probability distribution of physical quantities. Bohm mechanics is a consistent example of realistic theory, where the wave function and the particle positions are classically defined quantities. Recently, we proved that the probability distribution in a realistic theory cannot be a quadratic function of the quantum state, in contrast to the apparently obvious suggestion given by the Born rule for transition probabilities. Here, we provide a simplified version of this proof.
According to the postulates of quantum mechanics, the state of a system is associated with a wave function that contains any measurable information on the system at any time. In this chapter we become familiar with wave functions and how they represent the position of particles within the system. Within the realm of quantum mechanics, the position of particles is not deterministic. It is defined by a probability distribution. The wave function is a position-dependent complex-valued amplitude, whose absolute value squared is identified with the probability density for locating the particle in the position space. This identification of the wave function with a probability amplitude imposes some limitation. Particularly, for a closed system in which the particles are bound, the wave function must be proper (square integrable) and normalizable. These properties are discussed and demonstrated for different coordinate systems.
Till 1925 the idea of what the quantum theory would be was unknown. During 1925 three different but equivalent versions of quantum theory were proposed – Schrödinger-proposed wave mechanics; Heisenberg-developed matrix mechanics and Dirac-introduced operator theory. Considering the de Broglie’s matter waves Erwin Schrödinger, an Austrian physicist, argued that if a particle like an electron behaves as a wave then the equation of wave motion could be successfully applied to it. He postulated a function varying in both space and time in a wave-like manner (hence called wave function and denoted it as ψ). This function is generally complex and assumed to contain information about a system. Schrödinger set up a linear and time-dependent wave-like equation, called Schrödinger wave equation, to describe the wave aspect of a particle taking account of de Broglie’s relation for wavelength. Physically, |ψ(X, t)|2, where ψ(X, t) is the solution of the Schrödinger equation, is interpreted as position probability density. That is, |ψ(X, t)|2 is the probability density of observing a particle at position X at time t. ψ does not give exact outcomes of observations but helps us to know all possible events and their probabilities . Further, the probability interpretation allows us to find the average or expected result of a set of measurements on a quantum system.
Abstract Schrödinger’s wave mechanics was using the mathematics familiar to all physicists and was therefore preferred by most over matrix mechanics. Moreover, it contained a function Ψ, the Schrödinger function or wave function, which was expected to be connected in some way to the position of a particle in space. For some time this connection was unclear. Bloch quotes a verse (original and translation) by Hückel , recited in the summer of 1926 in Zurich, which describes the situation in a humorous way [1]:
We investigate the meaning of the wave function by analyzing the mass and charge density distributions of a quantum system. According to protective measurement, a charged quantum system has effective mass and charge density distributing in space, proportional to the square of the absolute value of its wave function. In a realistic interpretation, the wave function of a quantum system can be taken as a description of either a physical field or the ergodic motion of a particle. The essential difference between a field and the ergodic motion of a particle lies in the property of simultaneity; a field exists throughout space simultaneously, whereas the ergodic motion of a particle exists throughout space in a time‐divided way. If the wave function is a physical field, then the mass and charge density will be distributed in space simultaneously for a charged quantum system, and thus there will exist gravitational and electrostatic self‐interactions of its wave function. This not only violates the superposition principle of quantum mechanics but also contradicts experimental observations. Thus the wave function cannot be a description of a physical field but be a description of the ergodic motion of a particle. For the later there is only a localized particle with mass and charge at every instant, and thus there will not exist any self‐interaction for the wave function. It is further argued that the classical ergodic models, which assume continuous motion of particles, cannot be consistent with quantum mechanics. Based on the negative result, we suggest that the wave function is a description of the quantum motion of particles, which is random and discontinuous in nature. On this interpretation, the square of the absolute value of the wave function not only gives the probability of the particle being found in certain locations, but also gives the probability of the particle being there. The suggested new interpretation of the wave function provides a natural realistic alternative to the orthodox interpretation, and it also implies that the de Broglie‐Bohm theory and many‐worlds interpretation are wrong and the dynamical collapse theories are in the right direction by admitting wavefunction collapse.