We present a total function with a polylogarithmic two-message quantum protocol, whereas every randomised protocol, even with arbitrarily many rounds, requires polynomial communication.
We refine Gavinsky's framework (arXiv:2608.18784) for exponential separations between quantum and randomized communication complexity of total functions and obtain larger separations: polylogarithmic quantum communication versus Ω~(n) randomized communication with two quantum messages, and versus Ω(n1−ε) for every fixed 0<ε<1 with more quantum messages.
A major open problem in quantum communication complexity is whether quantum protocols can be exponentially more efficient than classical protocols for computing total Boolean functions; the prevailing conjecture is that they cannot be so. In a seminal work, Razborov (2002) resolved this question for AND-functions of the form F(x,y)=f(x1∧y1,…,xn∧yn), when the outer function f is symmetric, by proving that their bounded-error quantum and classical communication complexities are polynomially related. Since then, extending this result to all AND-functions has remained open and has been posed by several authors.
In this work, we settle this problem in a strong way. We show that for every Boolean function f, the bounded-error quantum and classical deterministic communication complexities of the function f∘AND2 are polynomially related, up to polylogarithmic factors in n. We prove this by showing that both are characterized--up to polynomial loss--by the logarithm of the De Morgan sparsity of f.
Our results build on the recent work of Chattopadhyay, Dahiya, and Lovett (2025) on structural characterizations of non-sparse Boolean functions, which we extend to resolve the conjecture for general AND-functions.
We study a new type of separations between quantum and classical communication complexity, separations that are obtained using quantum protocols where all parties are efficient , in the sense that they can be implemented by small quantum circuits, with oracle access to their inputs. Our main result qualitatively matches the strongest known separation between quantum and classical communication complexity Gavinsky (2016) and is obtained using a quantum protocol where all parties are efficient. More precisely, we give an explicit partial Boolean function f over inputs of length N , such that: f can be computed by a simultaneous-message quantum protocol with communication complexity polylog( N ) (where at the beginning of the protocol Alice and Bob also have polylog( N ) entangled EPR pairs). Any classical randomized protocol for f , with any number of rounds, has communication complexity at least Ω~(N1/4) . All parties in the quantum protocol of Item (1) (Alice, Bob and the referee) can be implemented by quantum circuits of size polylog( N ) (where Alice and Bob have oracle access to their inputs). Items (1), (2) qualitatively match the strongest known separation between quantum and classical communication complexity, proved by Gavinsky (2016). Item (3) is new. (Our result is incomparable to the one of Gavinsky. While he obtained a quantitatively better lower bound of Ω(N1/2) in the classical case, the referee in his quantum protocol is inefficient). Exponential separations of quantum and classical communication complexity have been studied in numerous previous works, but to the best of our knowledge the efficiency of the parties in the quantum protocol has not been addressed, and in most previous separations the quantum parties seem to be inefficient. The only separations that we know of that have efficient quantum parties are the recent separations that are based on lifting Göös et al. (2017), Chattopadhyay et al. (2019a). However, these separations seem to require quantum protocols with at least two rounds of communication, so they imply a separation of two-way quantum and classical communication complexity, but they do not give the stronger separations of simultaneous-message quantum communication complexity vs. two-way classical communication complexity (or even one-way quantum communication complexity vs. two-way classical communication complexity). Our proof technique is completely new, in the context of communication complexity, and is based on techniques from Raz & Tal (2019). Our function f is based on a lift of the forrelation problem, using xor as a gadget.
A major open problem in quantum communication complexity is whether quantum protocols can be exponentially more efficient than classical protocols for computing total Boolean functions; the prevailing conjecture is that they cannot be so. In a seminal work, Razborov (2002) resolved this question for And-functions of the form F(x,y) = f(x₁ ∧ y₁, …, x_n ∧ y_n), when the outer function f is symmetric, by proving that their bounded-error quantum and classical communication complexities are polynomially related. Since then, extending this result to all And-functions has remained open and has been posed by several authors. In this work, we settle this problem in a strong way. We show that for every Boolean function f, the bounded-error quantum and classical deterministic communication complexities of the function f∘And₂ are polynomially related, up to polylogarithmic factors in n. We prove this by showing that both are characterized - up to polynomial loss - by the logarithm of the De Morgan sparsity of f. Our results build on the recent work of Chattopadhyay, Dahiya, and Lovett [Arkadev Chattopadhyay et al., 2026] on structural characterizations of non-sparse Boolean functions, which we extend to resolve the conjecture for general And-functions.
We make progress towards the impossibility of quantum-computation, classical-communication (QCCC) key agreement by giving the first unconditional polynomial-query attacks that tolerate imperfect completeness in the following settings. First, we give a quantum attack on protocols with arbitrarily many rounds in which both parties' oracle queries and communication are classical before the final round, while local computation may be quantum throughout, and the final round may involve quantum oracle queries and one quantum message. Second, we give a classical attack on constant-round QCCC protocols in which Alice has classical oracle access and Bob may make quantum queries throughout. In both settings, the attacker is computationally unbounded and makes poly(λ) queries to recover the key with nonnegligible probability whenever each party's total honest query bound is at most poly(λ) and the valid agreement probability is inverse-polynomial.
As consequences, we rule out query-bounded IND-CPA security for quantum public-key encryption with classical public and secret keys and classical messages of polynomially bounded length in the QROM in either of two settings: (i) key generation has classical oracle access, while encryption, decryption, and the ciphertext may be quantum; or (ii) encryption has classical oracle access and ciphertexts are classical, while key generation and decryption may have quantum oracle access. Both results assume negligible correctness error and polynomial honest query complexity. Combining the constant-round attack with the constructions of Bartusek and Khurana (CRYPTO 2025), we also rule out constant-round oblivious state preparation with polynomial honest query complexity and negligible correctness error in the QROM against computationally unbounded quantum receivers making polynomially many oracle queries.