Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2608.17610

Towards the Impossibility of Imperfectly Complete Key Agreement in the QROM

Fuyuki Kitagawa, Ryo Nishimaki, Agi Villanyi, Takashi Yamakawa

quant-phcs.CRSubmitted Aug 18, 2026• Announced Aug 19, 2026• 0 citations
v1 · Aug 18, 2026v2 · Oct 1, 2026
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We make progress towards the impossibility of imperfectly complete quantum-computation, classical-communication (QCCC) key agreement by constructing the first unconditional attacks on quantum key agreement in the following restricted settings. In the two-message setting, we assume that Alice makes only classical queries to the oracle in the first round and that her message to Bob is classical, but otherwise both parties may perform arbitrary quantum computation, make quantum queries, and send a quantum state in the second round. Our attack and analysis are based on the heavy-query learning techniques from Austrin et al. (CRYPTO 2022) and the reprogramming techniques of Katz and Sela (arXiv 2401.14319). In the round-independent setting, we show that the attack of Barak and Mahmoody (CRYPTO 2009; J. Cryptology 2017) can be extended to multiple rounds when Alice and Bob share classical communication and make only classical queries in all but the final round. In both settings, the attacker is computationally unbounded and makes $poly(λ)$ queries to recover the key whenever each honest query bound is at most $poly(λ)$ and the valid agreement probability is inverse-polynomial. As a consequence, we rule out imperfectly correct quantum public-key encryption for classical messages whose length is bounded by a polynomial in $λ$ in the QROM when key generation has classical oracle access, even if encryption, decryption, and the ciphertext are quantum. In particular, the one-bit case applies to the imperfectly correct PKE obtained from two-round OSP by Bartusek and Khurana (CRYPTO 2025) whenever the classical OSP sender makes only classical random-oracle queries.

Comments
37 pages, 1 table

Related papers

Impossibility of Perfectly Complete Many-Round Key Agreement in the QROM

Longcheng Li, Qian Li, Xingjian Li +1 more

This paper proves that it is impossible to construct perfectly complete quantum key agreement protocols (QKA) from quantumly secure one-way functions (OWFs) in a black-box manner. Specifically, consider any protocol in which Alice and Bob exchange only classical messages, make at most $q_{\mathsf{A}}$ and $q_{\mathsf{B}}$ quantum queries, respectively, to a Boolean-valued random oracle, and agree on a shared key with certainty. This paper shows that there exists an eavesdropper, given the classical messages, that can recover the shared key with certainty using $O((q_{\mathsf{A}}+q_{\mathsf{B}})^5)$ classical oracle queries. The bound is independent of the number of rounds, transcript length, key length, and oracle-domain size. Previous results only applies to two-round key agreement (Li et al. CRYPTO 26) or relies on unproven conjectures (Austrin et al. CRYPTO 22). GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra found this proof in a one-shot conversation and drafted a preliminary version of this paper. The authors are fully responsible for the correctness, writing and discussions of this paper.

quant-pharXiv:2608.03824•Aug 5, 2026•0 citations

On Quantum Chosen-Ciphertext Attacks and Learning with Errors

Gorjan Alagic, Stacey Jeffery, Māris Ozols +1 more

Large-scale quantum computing poses a major threat to classical public-key cryptography. Recently, strong “quantum access” security models have shown that numerous symmetric-key cryptosystems are also vulnerable. In this paper, we consider classical encryption in a model that grants the adversary quantum oracle access to encryption and decryption, but where we restrict the latter to non-adaptive (i.e., pre-challenge) queries only. We formalize this model using appropriate notions of ciphertext indistinguishability and semantic security (which are equivalent by standard arguments) and call it QCCA 1 in analogy to the classical CCA 1 security model. We show that the standard pseudorandom function ( PRF )-based encryption schemes are QCCA 1 -secure when instantiated with quantum-secure primitives. Our security proofs use a strong bound on quantum random-access codes with shared randomness. Revisiting plain IND − CPA -secure Learning with Errors ( LWE ) encryption, we show that leaking only a single quantum decryption query (and no other leakage or queries of any kind) allows the adversary to recover the full secret key with constant success probability. Information-theoretically, full recovery of the key in the classical setting requires at least a linear number of decryption queries. Our results thus challenge the notion that LWE is unconditionally “just as secure” quantumly as it is classically. The algorithm at the core of our attack is a new variant of the well-known Bernstein–Vazirani algorithm. Finally, we emphasize that our results should not be interpreted as a weakness of these cryptosystems in their stated security setting (i.e., post-quantum chosen-plaintext secrecy). Rather, our results mean that, if these cryptosystems are exposed to chosen-ciphertext attacks (e.g., as a result of deployment in an inappropriate real-world setting) then quantum attacks are even more devastating than classical ones.

arXiv:1808.09655•Cryptography•Mar 21, 2020•9 citations

Classical Verification of Quantum Computation Beyond the Polynomial Hierarchy

Atul Mantri

It is not known whether a classical polynomial-time verifier can verify arbitrary polynomial-time quantum computations with an efficient quantum honest prover without computational assumptions. We show that, relative to a classical oracle, such verification is possible for a language beyond the polynomial hierarchy that is decided exactly in quantum polynomial time. The protocol is public-coin, with perfect completeness and soundness error at most 1/4. To our knowledge, no language with such a proof system was previously proved to lie outside AM relative to an oracle. For every unbounded polynomial-time computable function, the oracle can be chosen so that the message count and the oracle query counts of the quantum algorithm, verifier, and honest prover are bounded by this function of the input length. The message count is optimal up to a constant factor, since for a suitable oracle every interactive proof system for the language uses at least a constant fraction of the messages of our protocol on infinitely many lengths, with a constant depending on its verifier. The language is a variant of recursive Fourier sampling in which code tables encode secrets that address data tables. The tables are evaluated recursively, and the oracle stores only the leaves. The quantum algorithm recovers every secret exactly, and the verifier checks the prover's secrets recursively against random code entries. The recursion restricts the input in a correlated way, as the same secret fixes the code bits and chooses the free coordinate, so Håstad's switching lemma does not apply. We prove a switching theorem for these restrictions, which may be of independent interest. For instances of sufficient height, no constant-depth circuit of size $2^{\mathrm{poly}(n)}$ changes its output with probability above $2^{-Ω(n)}$ when the answer of a random instance is flipped by changing a single leaf.

quant-pharXiv:2610.37635•Oct 28, 2026•0 citations

Lower Bounds for Preprocessing Attacks on Quantum Cryptography

Fangqi Dong, Alex Lombardi

We prove near-optimal lower bounds for preprocessing attacks on quantum cryptography in the random oracle model. Specifically, we show that a $T$-query adversary with $S$ qubits of non-uniform advice can recover a random key $k$ from the $n$-qubit binary phase state $|ψ_k\rangle \propto \sum_{x} R(k,x) |x\rangle$ with probability at most $O(\frac{T^2 + \sqrt{ST}}{N})$ for $N=2^n$. In contrast, the best known bound for post-quantum one-way functions is $O(\frac{T^2 + ST}{N})$, with a trivial attack at $S = N$. This demonstrates a new advantage of quantum cryptography over classical cryptography: $n$ qubits of communication suffice for security against preprocessing attacks with space up to $N^2$ rather than $N$. Our methodology is simple: express the optimal preprocessing attack as the operator norm of a random matrix, and bound this value in expectation over the random oracle via the trace-moment method. These trace moments have a natural interpretation using compressed oracles [Zhandry, Crypto 2019], which we then analyze. This can be viewed as a simplification and generalization of the approach of Liu [Eurocrypt 2023] for proving the security of post-quantum cryptography against preprocessing attacks. We also prove the following results: (1) We tighten Liu's analysis of post-quantum PRGs in QROM, achieving a distinguishing advantage bound of $O(\frac{T^2}N + \sqrt{\frac{ST}N})$. (2) For unitary synthesis, we extend the one-query lower bound of Lombardi-Ma-Wright [STOC 2024] to hold against adversaries that can make one arbitrary function query along with polynomially many (adaptive) queries to the random oracle, either before or after the function query. This also interprets the original LMW24 result in terms of compressed oracles. (3) Finally, we prove a tight $O(\frac{\sqrt{S}}N)$ bound for the pseudorandomness of random binary phase states against space $S$ distinguishers.

quant-pharXiv:2610.02101•Oct 2, 2026•0 citations

Towards the Impossibility of Quantum Public Key Encryption with Classical Keys from One-Way Functions

Samuel Bouaziz--Ermann, Alex B. Grilo, Damien Vergnaud +1 more

There has been a recent interest in proposing quantum protocols whose security relies on weaker computational assumptions than their classical counterparts. Importantly to our work, it has been recently shown that public-key encryption (PKE) from one-way functions (OWF) is possible if we consider quantum public keys. Notice that we do not expect classical PKE from OWF given the impossibility results of Impagliazzo and Rudich (STOC'89). However, the distribution of quantum public keys is a challenging task. Therefore, the main question that motivates our work is if quantum PKE from OWF is possible if we have classical public keys. Such protocols are impossible if ciphertexts are also classical, given the impossibility result of Austrin et al. (CRYPTO'22) of quantum enhanced key-agreement (KA) with classical communication. In this paper, we focus on black-box separation for PKE with classical public key and quantum ciphertext from OWF under the polynomial compatibility conjecture, first introduced in Austrin et al.. More precisely, we show the separation when the decryption algorithm of the PKE does not query the OWF. We prove our result by extending the techniques of Austrin et al. and we show an attack for KA in an extended classical communication model where the last message in the protocol can be a quantum state.

arXiv:2311.03512•Nov 6, 2023•1 citation

On Quantum Chosen-Ciphertext Attacks and Learning with Errors

Gorjan Alagic, Stacey Jeffery, Māris Ozols +1 more

Quantum computing is a significant threat to classical public-key cryptography. In strong "quantum access" security models, numerous symmetric-key cryptosystems are also vulnerable. We consider classical encryption in a model which grants the adversary quantum oracle access to encryption and decryption, but where the latter is restricted to non-adaptive (i.e., pre-challenge) queries only. We define this model formally using appropriate notions of ciphertext indistinguishability and semantic security (which are equivalent by standard arguments) and call it QCCA1 in analogy to the classical CCA1 security model. Using a bound on quantum random-access codes, we show that the standard PRF-based encryption schemes are QCCA1-secure when instantiated with quantum-secure primitives. We then revisit standard IND-CPA-secure Learning with Errors (LWE) encryption and show that leaking just one quantum decryption query (and no other queries or leakage of any kind) allows the adversary to recover the full secret key with constant success probability. In the classical setting, by contrast, recovering the key requires a linear number of decryption queries. The algorithm at the core of our attack is a (large-modulus version of) the well-known Bernstein-Vazirani algorithm. We emphasize that our results should not be interpreted as a weakness of these cryptosystems in their stated security setting (i.e., post-quantum chosen-plaintext secrecy). Rather, our results mean that, if these cryptosystems are exposed to chosen-ciphertext attacks (e.g., as a result of deployment in an inappropriate real-world setting) then quantum attacks are even more devastating than classical ones.

Leibniz international proceedings in informatics•Jan 1, 2019•0 citations
We make progress towards the impossibility of imperfectly complete quantum-computation, classical-communication (QCCC) key agreement by constructing the first unconditional attacks on quantum key agreement in the following restricted settings. In the two-message setting, we assume that Alice makes only classical queries to the oracle in the first round and that her message to Bob is classical, but otherwise both parties may perform arbitrary quantum computation, make quantum queries, and send a quantum state in the second round. Our attack and analysis are based on the heavy-query learning techniques from Austrin et al. (CRYPTO 2022) and the reprogramming techniques of Katz and Sela (arXiv 2401.14319). In the round-independent setting, we show that the attack of Barak and Mahmoody (CRYPTO 2009; J. Cryptology 2017) can be extended to multiple rounds when Alice and Bob share classical communication and make only classical queries in all but the final round. In both settings, the attacker is computationally unbounded and makes poly(λ)poly(λ)poly(λ) queries to recover the key whenever each honest query bound is at most poly(λ)poly(λ)poly(λ) and the valid agreement probability is inverse-polynomial. As a consequence, we rule out imperfectly correct quantum public-key encryption for classical messages whose length is bounded by a polynomial in λλλ in the QROM when key generation has classical oracle access, even if encryption, decryption, and the ciphertext are quantum. In particular, the one-bit case applies to the imperfectly correct PKE obtained from two-round OSP by Bartusek and Khurana (CRYPTO 2025) whenever the classical OSP sender makes only classical random-oracle queries.
This paper proves that it is impossible to construct perfectly complete quantum key agreement protocols (QKA) from quantumly secure one-way functions (OWFs) in a black-box manner. Specifically, consider any protocol in which Alice and Bob exchange only classical messages, make at most qAq_{\mathsf{A}}qA​ and qBq_{\mathsf{B}}qB​ quantum queries, respectively, to a Boolean-valued random oracle, and agree on a shared key with certainty. This paper shows that there exists an eavesdropper, given the classical messages, that can recover the shared key with certainty using O((qA+qB)5)O((q_{\mathsf{A}}+q_{\mathsf{B}})^5)O((qA​+qB​)5) classical oracle queries. The bound is independent of the number of rounds, transcript length, key length, and oracle-domain size. Previous results only applies to two-round key agreement (Li et al. CRYPTO 26) or relies on unproven conjectures (Austrin et al. CRYPTO 22). GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra found this proof in a one-shot conversation and drafted a preliminary version of this paper. The authors are fully responsible for the correctness, writing and discussions of this paper.
Large-scale quantum computing poses a major threat to classical public-key cryptography. Recently, strong “quantum access” security models have shown that numerous symmetric-key cryptosystems are also vulnerable. In this paper, we consider classical encryption in a model that grants the adversary quantum oracle access to encryption and decryption, but where we restrict the latter to non-adaptive (i.e., pre-challenge) queries only. We formalize this model using appropriate notions of ciphertext indistinguishability and semantic security (which are equivalent by standard arguments) and call it QCCA 1 in analogy to the classical CCA 1 security model. We show that the standard pseudorandom function ( PRF )-based encryption schemes are QCCA 1 -secure when instantiated with quantum-secure primitives. Our security proofs use a strong bound on quantum random-access codes with shared randomness. Revisiting plain IND − CPA -secure Learning with Errors ( LWE ) encryption, we show that leaking only a single quantum decryption query (and no other leakage or queries of any kind) allows the adversary to recover the full secret key with constant success probability. Information-theoretically, full recovery of the key in the classical setting requires at least a linear number of decryption queries. Our results thus challenge the notion that LWE is unconditionally “just as secure” quantumly as it is classically. The algorithm at the core of our attack is a new variant of the well-known Bernstein–Vazirani algorithm. Finally, we emphasize that our results should not be interpreted as a weakness of these cryptosystems in their stated security setting (i.e., post-quantum chosen-plaintext secrecy). Rather, our results mean that, if these cryptosystems are exposed to chosen-ciphertext attacks (e.g., as a result of deployment in an inappropriate real-world setting) then quantum attacks are even more devastating than classical ones.
It is not known whether a classical polynomial-time verifier can verify arbitrary polynomial-time quantum computations with an efficient quantum honest prover without computational assumptions. We show that, relative to a classical oracle, such verification is possible for a language beyond the polynomial hierarchy that is decided exactly in quantum polynomial time. The protocol is public-coin, with perfect completeness and soundness error at most 1/4. To our knowledge, no language with such a proof system was previously proved to lie outside AM relative to an oracle. For every unbounded polynomial-time computable function, the oracle can be chosen so that the message count and the oracle query counts of the quantum algorithm, verifier, and honest prover are bounded by this function of the input length. The message count is optimal up to a constant factor, since for a suitable oracle every interactive proof system for the language uses at least a constant fraction of the messages of our protocol on infinitely many lengths, with a constant depending on its verifier. The language is a variant of recursive Fourier sampling in which code tables encode secrets that address data tables. The tables are evaluated recursively, and the oracle stores only the leaves. The quantum algorithm recovers every secret exactly, and the verifier checks the prover's secrets recursively against random code entries. The recursion restricts the input in a correlated way, as the same secret fixes the code bits and chooses the free coordinate, so Håstad's switching lemma does not apply. We prove a switching theorem for these restrictions, which may be of independent interest. For instances of sufficient height, no constant-depth circuit of size 2poly(n)2^{\mathrm{poly}(n)}2poly(n) changes its output with probability above 2−Ω(n)2^{-Ω(n)}2−Ω(n) when the answer of a random instance is flipped by changing a single leaf.
We prove near-optimal lower bounds for preprocessing attacks on quantum cryptography in the random oracle model. Specifically, we show that a TTT-query adversary with SSS qubits of non-uniform advice can recover a random key kkk from the nnn-qubit binary phase state ∣ψk⟩∝∑xR(k,x)∣x⟩|ψ_k\rangle \propto \sum_{x} R(k,x) |x\rangle∣ψk​⟩∝∑x​R(k,x)∣x⟩ with probability at most O(T2+STN)O(\frac{T^2 + \sqrt{ST}}{N})O(NT2+ST​​) for N=2nN=2^nN=2n. In contrast, the best known bound for post-quantum one-way functions is O(T2+STN)O(\frac{T^2 + ST}{N})O(NT2+ST​), with a trivial attack at S=NS = NS=N. This demonstrates a new advantage of quantum cryptography over classical cryptography: nnn qubits of communication suffice for security against preprocessing attacks with space up to N2N^2N2 rather than NNN. Our methodology is simple: express the optimal preprocessing attack as the operator norm of a random matrix, and bound this value in expectation over the random oracle via the trace-moment method. These trace moments have a natural interpretation using compressed oracles [Zhandry, Crypto 2019], which we then analyze. This can be viewed as a simplification and generalization of the approach of Liu [Eurocrypt 2023] for proving the security of post-quantum cryptography against preprocessing attacks. We also prove the following results: (1) We tighten Liu's analysis of post-quantum PRGs in QROM, achieving a distinguishing advantage bound of O(T2N+STN)O(\frac{T^2}N + \sqrt{\frac{ST}N})O(NT2​+NST​​). (2) For unitary synthesis, we extend the one-query lower bound of Lombardi-Ma-Wright [STOC 2024] to hold against adversaries that can make one arbitrary function query along with polynomially many (adaptive) queries to the random oracle, either before or after the function query. This also interprets the original LMW24 result in terms of compressed oracles. (3) Finally, we prove a tight O(SN)O(\frac{\sqrt{S}}N)O(NS​​) bound for the pseudorandomness of random binary phase states against space SSS distinguishers.
There has been a recent interest in proposing quantum protocols whose security relies on weaker computational assumptions than their classical counterparts. Importantly to our work, it has been recently shown that public-key encryption (PKE) from one-way functions (OWF) is possible if we consider quantum public keys. Notice that we do not expect classical PKE from OWF given the impossibility results of Impagliazzo and Rudich (STOC'89). However, the distribution of quantum public keys is a challenging task. Therefore, the main question that motivates our work is if quantum PKE from OWF is possible if we have classical public keys. Such protocols are impossible if ciphertexts are also classical, given the impossibility result of Austrin et al. (CRYPTO'22) of quantum enhanced key-agreement (KA) with classical communication. In this paper, we focus on black-box separation for PKE with classical public key and quantum ciphertext from OWF under the polynomial compatibility conjecture, first introduced in Austrin et al.. More precisely, we show the separation when the decryption algorithm of the PKE does not query the OWF. We prove our result by extending the techniques of Austrin et al. and we show an attack for KA in an extended classical communication model where the last message in the protocol can be a quantum state.
Quantum computing is a significant threat to classical public-key cryptography. In strong "quantum access" security models, numerous symmetric-key cryptosystems are also vulnerable. We consider classical encryption in a model which grants the adversary quantum oracle access to encryption and decryption, but where the latter is restricted to non-adaptive (i.e., pre-challenge) queries only. We define this model formally using appropriate notions of ciphertext indistinguishability and semantic security (which are equivalent by standard arguments) and call it QCCA1 in analogy to the classical CCA1 security model. Using a bound on quantum random-access codes, we show that the standard PRF-based encryption schemes are QCCA1-secure when instantiated with quantum-secure primitives. We then revisit standard IND-CPA-secure Learning with Errors (LWE) encryption and show that leaking just one quantum decryption query (and no other queries or leakage of any kind) allows the adversary to recover the full secret key with constant success probability. In the classical setting, by contrast, recovering the key requires a linear number of decryption queries. The algorithm at the core of our attack is a (large-modulus version of) the well-known Bernstein-Vazirani algorithm. We emphasize that our results should not be interpreted as a weakness of these cryptosystems in their stated security setting (i.e., post-quantum chosen-plaintext secrecy). Rather, our results mean that, if these cryptosystems are exposed to chosen-ciphertext attacks (e.g., as a result of deployment in an inappropriate real-world setting) then quantum attacks are even more devastating than classical ones.