Quantum Multi-Armed Bandits and Linear Bandits: Lower Bounds and Algorithms

Abstract

We study quantum multi-armed bandits (QMAB) and quantum linear bandits (QLB), where the learner queries each arm or action through a quantum reward oracle or its inverse. Prior work gives algorithms over horizon $T$ with regret $O(K\log T)$ for QMAB with $K$ arms and $O(d^2\operatorname{polylog} T)$ for $d$-dimensional QLB. This leaves open the optimal dependence on $K$ and $T$ and whether the dependence on $d$ can be further improved. In this work, we prove the first tight minimax regret bound of $Θ(K\log(1+T/K))$ for QMAB and the first lower bound of $Ω(d\log(1+T/d))$ for finite-action QLB, ruling out regret independent of $T$. Our lower bounds rely on a high-confidence single-arm quantum testing lower bound for distinguishing a fixed reward mean from an interval of alternatives. A bandit-to-testing reduction then lifts it to the QMAB lower bound, while a linear embedding gives the finite-action QLB lower bound. The matching QMAB upper bound is obtained using a tail bound for the Quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) estimator. For finite-action QLB, we propose a phased elimination algorithm that combines a low-bias low-variance quantum mean estimator with a small-support $G$-optimal design through a query allocation matched to the design weights. When the action set has size $\operatorname{poly}(d)$, its regret is nearly linear in $d$ and matches our lower bound up to polylogarithmic factors.