Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2608.01121

Geometry-Informed Polynomial Time Quantum Approximation Schemes for Constrained Optimisation

Chinonso Onah, Kristel Michielsen

quant-phcs.CCcs.DMmath-phphysics.app-phSubmitted Aug 2, 2026• Announced Aug 4, 2026• 0 citations
v1 · Aug 2, 2026v2 · Aug 5, 2026v3 · Aug 6, 2026
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

When does a noisy quantum sampler yield an end-to-end polynomial-time optimization algorithm with performance guarantees? Building on finite-depth and finite-shot guarantees for Constraint-Enhanced QAOA, we show that inverse-polynomial ideal probability on the optimal set, together with independent sampling, polynomial-time feasibility repair, and scoring, produces an exact-hit fully polynomial randomized approximation scheme, which we call an FPRASq. This guarantee survives device noise within an instance-dependent window. For effective circuit depth linear in the product of layer count and problem size, preserving an inverse-depth fraction of the ideal optimal mass increases the required shot complexity by one power of the problem size. Beyond this window, deterministic repair guarantees feasibility and provides an instance-dependent approximation guarantee whenever the induced objective inflation is controlled. The resulting NP-HQ algorithm fits the Chen-Cotler-Huang-Li oracle model. On any NP-hard kernel-admissible promise family, reproducing its inverse-polynomial optimal overlap with a polynomial-time classical sampler would imply that NP is contained in BPP, even with identical repair and perfect access to the constraint structure. Thus, the separation lies in generating the sampling distribution. We further introduce Heavy-Hitter QAOA, which preserves these conditional guarantees while reducing the retained candidate set and classical post-processing cost by one power of the problem size. Hardware experiments on IBM Eagle r3 processors cover instances with up to one hundred logical variables and match or improve every tested QOptlib reference tour.

Related papers

Global Optimization for Parametrized Quantum Circuits

Iosif Sakos, Antonios Varvitsiotis, Georgios Korpas +1 more

In the absence of error correction, noisy intermediate-scale quantum devices are operated by training parametrized quantum circuits (PQCs) so as to minimize a suitable loss function. Finding the optimal parameters of those circuits is a hard optimization problem, where global guarantees are known only for highly structured cases of limited practical relevance, and first-order methods can fail to find even local minima due to the presence of barren plateaus. In this work, we study the training of practical classes of PQCs, namely polynomial-depth circuits with a constant number of trainable parameters. This captures widely used PQC families, including fixed-depth QAOA, hardware-efficient ansätze, and Fixed Parameter Count QAOA. Our main technical result is a fully polynomial randomized approximation scheme (FPRAS), which, for every $ε>0$, returns an $ε$-approximate solution to the problem's global optimum with high probability, and has runtime and query complexity polynomial in $1/ε$ and the number of qubits. Unlike the standard hybrid quantum-classical training loop in variational algorithms, where the quantum device is queried repeatedly throughout the training, our approach separates the computation into two distinct stages: (1) an initial quantum data-acquisition phase, followed by (2) a classical global-optimization phase based on the trigonometric moment/sum-of-squares hierarchies. Under a standard flat-extension condition, which can be checked numerically, the method also supports the extraction of optimal circuit parameters. The existence of an FPRAS implies that the promise problem associated with the optimization of poly-depth constant-parameter PQC is in BQP. This imposes a limitation on the expressive power of the class, namely, it cannot encode combinatorial optimization problems whose objective values are separated by an inverse-polynomial gap.

quant-pharXiv:2603.21757•Mar 24, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Approximation Complexity of Classical Optimization Problems

Stuart Hadfield

Classical approximation complexity asks what solution quality can be guaranteed with polynomial-time computation. The classes APX, PTAS, and FPTAS distinguish a fixed approximation ratio, approximation to any fixed accuracy, and approximation schemes whose running time is also polynomial in inverse accuracy. Their randomized counterparts are R-APX, R-PTAS, and R-FPTAS. We define bounded-error quantum counterparts BQ-APX, BQ-PTAS, and BQ-FPTAS. Membership requires a uniform quantum algorithm that, on every input, returns a feasible classical solution achieving at least the claimed approximation ratio with probability at least 2/3. Scores (objective values) must be efficiently classically computable. Running time includes parameter selection, preparation, measurement, decoding, and repetition. Many quantum optimization methods are used heuristically, and high benchmark scores alone do not establish these guarantees. We further establish a conditional hierarchy for logarithmic, polynomial, and exponential approximation factors. Assuming NP $\nsubseteq$ BQP, the quantum classes form a strict hierarchy. Problems based on prime factorization and discrete logarithms give conditional quantum-classical separations. Certified Maximum Order has an exact quantum algorithm, while any randomized polynomial-time algorithm guaranteeing at least an inverse-polynomial approximation ratio on every input would yield efficient factoring. Discrete-Logarithm Fitting has an exact quantum algorithm and a deterministic one-half approximation, but any fixed improvement over one half would give a randomized polynomial-time algorithm for the safe-prime discrete logarithm problem. Our results show, under explicit complexity assumptions, that quantum computation can improve worst-case approximation guarantees. A quantum-classical gap for common problems such as MaxCut or MaxSAT remains open.

quant-pharXiv:2610.09584•Oct 8, 2026•0 citations

Empirical Quantum Advantage in Constrained Optimization from Encoded Unitary Designs

Chinonso Onah, Roman Firt, Kristel Michielsen

We introduce the Constraint-Enhanced Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (CE-QAOA), a shallow, constraint-aware ansatz that operates inside the one-hot product space [n]^m, where m is the number of blocks and each block is initialized in an n-qubit W_n state. We give an ancilla-free, depth-optimal encoder that prepares W_n using n-1 two-qubit rotations per block, and a two-local block-XY mixer that preserves the one-hot manifold and has a constant spectral gap on the one-excitation sector. At the level of expressivity, we establish per-block controllability, implying approximate universality per block. At the level of distributional behavior, we show that, after natural block and symbol permutation twirls, shallow CE-QAOA realizes an encoded unitary 1-design and supports approximate second-moment (2-design) behavior; combined with a Paley-Zygmund argument, this yields finite-shot anticoncentration guarantees. Algorithmically, we wrap constant-depth sampling with a deterministic feasibility checker to obtain a polynomial-time hybrid quantum-classical solver (PHQC) that returns the best observed feasible solution in O(S n^2) time, where S is a polynomial shot budget. We obtain two advantages. First, when CE-QAOA fixes r >= 1 locations different from the start city, we achieve a Theta(n^r) reduction in shot complexity even against a classical sampler that draws uniformly from the feasible set. Second, against a classical baseline restricted to raw bitstring sampling, we show an exp(Theta(n^2)) minimax separation. In noiseless circuit simulations of traveling salesman problem instances with n in {4,...,10} locations from the QOPTLib benchmark library, we recover the global optimum at depth p = 1 using polynomial shot budgets and coarse parameter grids defined by the problem size.

cs.ETCross-listedarXiv:2511.14296•Nov 19, 2025•0 citations

Iterative Optimization with Partial Convergence Guarantees on Neutral Atom Quantum Computers

Cédrick Perron, Yves Bérubé-Lauzière, Victor Drouin-Touchette

Neutral atom quantum computers (NAQCs) have emerged as a promising platform for solving the maximum weighted independent set (MWIS) problem. However, analog quantum approaches face two key limitations: constraints of the atomic layout on realizable graph geometries and the absence of performance guarantees. We introduce Lp-Quts, a hybrid quantum-classical framework that integrates an NAQC sampler into a classical cutting-plane algorithm. At each iteration, a relaxed linear program (RLP) bounds the MWIS and induces a reduced graph from which independent sets are sampled using an analog quantum sampler. A novel sample-informed separation problem guides odd-cycle cut selection and accelerates convergence. For t-perfect graphs, Lp-Quts inherits polynomial-time convergence guarantees from the classical theory of cutting planes. We evaluate our approach on instances with up to 300 vertices -- a scale that exceeds the capabilities of current NAQC hardware. In this regime, Lp-Quts reaches solutions within 5--10\% of optimality, outperforming direct analog quantum protocols and greedy baselines under equal sampling budgets. As expected, simulated annealing remains the strongest sample-based solver at this scale. These results demonstrate how quantum samplers can be effectively embedded within classical optimization frameworks to deliver near-optimal solutions with reduced quantum resources while preserving formal guarantees.

quant-pharXiv:2603.28933•Apr 1, 2026•0 citations

Quantum-Enhanced Greedy with QAOA (QEGQ): A Hybrid Algorithm for Set Cover with Sub-exponential Expected Runtime

Yalla Jnan Devi Satya Prasad

We present Quantum-Enhanced Greedy with QAOA (QEGQ), a hybrid quantum-classical algorithm for Set Cover that preserves the classical \(H_n\le\ln n+O(1)\) approximation ratio while offering conditional sub-exponential speedups. QEGQ replaces the classical greedy selection with fixed-point amplitude amplification, achieving \(O(\sqrt{m/M_t})\) oracle calls per step under the Heavy-Hitters condition (\(M_t\ge m^{\alpha}\)). We integrate QAOA-based batch refinement, demonstrated to yield up to 12% quality improvements in structured instances, and quantum-accelerated SDP/LP subroutines for fractional cover tightening. We provide detailed quantum circuit constructions (QROM, reversible population count), rigorous runtime and resource analyses including real-device gate counts and wall-clock estimates, and noise-resilience strategies with hybrid fallbacks. Empirical validation on sensor placement, document summarization, and synthetic families confirms robust Heavy-Hitters behavior (α ≥ 0.28) and quantifies performance degradation in adversarial instances. Our results establish practical guidelines for NISQ implementation, identify critical hardware targets for quantum advantage, and open pathways for broader quantum-enhanced approximation algorithms.

•Oct 6, 2025•0 citations

Evidence for effectively constant shot complexity in the quantum approximate optimization algorithm without per-instance optimization

Anonymous, Denis A. Kulikov, B. I. Bantysh +3 more

We study a modified fixed-point version of the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (fpQAOA), where parameters are trained classically on small instances and then transferred to larger problems. Our scheme combines three ingredients: (i) targeting approximate solutions via a prescribed approximation ratio (AR), (ii) scaling the circuit depth linearly with the problem size using a two-parameter sin-cos angle encoding, and (iii) normalizing QUBO Hamiltonians by their Frobenius norm. Noiseless numerical simulations (for system sizes up to 30 qubits) across a variety of random QUBO ensembles show that with these modifications the median number of quantum circuit runs ("shots") required to achieve AR=0.95 counterintuitively decreases towards a nearly constant value as the problem size increases, while the per-shot time remains polynomial. Extrapolation of this finite-size behavior is consistent with an effectively constant sampling complexity. Moreover, removing any single component of the scheme restores rapid growth of the required number of shots, highlighting the synergistic nature of the three modifications. These empirical findings suggest that fpQAOA, equipped with the proposed protocol, may achieve scalable approximate performance with polynomial-depth circuits for the considered problem classes.

arXiv:2509.19035•Physical Review A•Aug 3, 2026•1 citation
When does a noisy quantum sampler yield an end-to-end polynomial-time optimization algorithm with performance guarantees? Building on finite-depth and finite-shot guarantees for Constraint-Enhanced QAOA, we show that inverse-polynomial ideal probability on the optimal set, together with independent sampling, polynomial-time feasibility repair, and scoring, produces an exact-hit fully polynomial randomized approximation scheme, which we call an FPRASq.
This guarantee survives device noise within an instance-dependent window. For effective circuit depth linear in the product of layer count and problem size, preserving an inverse-depth fraction of the ideal optimal mass increases the required shot complexity by one power of the problem size. Beyond this window, deterministic repair guarantees feasibility and provides an instance-dependent approximation guarantee whenever the induced objective inflation is controlled.
The resulting NP-HQ algorithm fits the Chen-Cotler-Huang-Li oracle model. On any NP-hard kernel-admissible promise family, reproducing its inverse-polynomial optimal overlap with a polynomial-time classical sampler would imply that NP is contained in BPP, even with identical repair and perfect access to the constraint structure. Thus, the separation lies in generating the sampling distribution.
We further introduce Heavy-Hitter QAOA, which preserves these conditional guarantees while reducing the retained candidate set and classical post-processing cost by one power of the problem size. Hardware experiments on IBM Eagle r3 processors cover instances with up to one hundred logical variables and match or improve every tested QOptlib reference tour.
In the absence of error correction, noisy intermediate-scale quantum devices are operated by training parametrized quantum circuits (PQCs) so as to minimize a suitable loss function. Finding the optimal parameters of those circuits is a hard optimization problem, where global guarantees are known only for highly structured cases of limited practical relevance, and first-order methods can fail to find even local minima due to the presence of barren plateaus. In this work, we study the training of practical classes of PQCs, namely polynomial-depth circuits with a constant number of trainable parameters. This captures widely used PQC families, including fixed-depth QAOA, hardware-efficient ansätze, and Fixed Parameter Count QAOA. Our main technical result is a fully polynomial randomized approximation scheme (FPRAS), which, for every ε>0ε>0ε>0, returns an εεε-approximate solution to the problem's global optimum with high probability, and has runtime and query complexity polynomial in 1/ε1/ε1/ε and the number of qubits. Unlike the standard hybrid quantum-classical training loop in variational algorithms, where the quantum device is queried repeatedly throughout the training, our approach separates the computation into two distinct stages: (1) an initial quantum data-acquisition phase, followed by (2) a classical global-optimization phase based on the trigonometric moment/sum-of-squares hierarchies. Under a standard flat-extension condition, which can be checked numerically, the method also supports the extraction of optimal circuit parameters. The existence of an FPRAS implies that the promise problem associated with the optimization of poly-depth constant-parameter PQC is in BQP. This imposes a limitation on the expressive power of the class, namely, it cannot encode combinatorial optimization problems whose objective values are separated by an inverse-polynomial gap.
Classical approximation complexity asks what solution quality can be guaranteed with polynomial-time computation. The classes APX, PTAS, and FPTAS distinguish a fixed approximation ratio, approximation to any fixed accuracy, and approximation schemes whose running time is also polynomial in inverse accuracy. Their randomized counterparts are R-APX, R-PTAS, and R-FPTAS. We define bounded-error quantum counterparts BQ-APX, BQ-PTAS, and BQ-FPTAS. Membership requires a uniform quantum algorithm that, on every input, returns a feasible classical solution achieving at least the claimed approximation ratio with probability at least 2/3. Scores (objective values) must be efficiently classically computable. Running time includes parameter selection, preparation, measurement, decoding, and repetition. Many quantum optimization methods are used heuristically, and high benchmark scores alone do not establish these guarantees. We further establish a conditional hierarchy for logarithmic, polynomial, and exponential approximation factors. Assuming NP ⊈\nsubseteq⊈ BQP, the quantum classes form a strict hierarchy. Problems based on prime factorization and discrete logarithms give conditional quantum-classical separations. Certified Maximum Order has an exact quantum algorithm, while any randomized polynomial-time algorithm guaranteeing at least an inverse-polynomial approximation ratio on every input would yield efficient factoring. Discrete-Logarithm Fitting has an exact quantum algorithm and a deterministic one-half approximation, but any fixed improvement over one half would give a randomized polynomial-time algorithm for the safe-prime discrete logarithm problem. Our results show, under explicit complexity assumptions, that quantum computation can improve worst-case approximation guarantees. A quantum-classical gap for common problems such as MaxCut or MaxSAT remains open.
We introduce the Constraint-Enhanced Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (CE-QAOA), a shallow, constraint-aware ansatz that operates inside the one-hot product space [n]^m, where m is the number of blocks and each block is initialized in an n-qubit W_n state. We give an ancilla-free, depth-optimal encoder that prepares W_n using n-1 two-qubit rotations per block, and a two-local block-XY mixer that preserves the one-hot manifold and has a constant spectral gap on the one-excitation sector. At the level of expressivity, we establish per-block controllability, implying approximate universality per block. At the level of distributional behavior, we show that, after natural block and symbol permutation twirls, shallow CE-QAOA realizes an encoded unitary 1-design and supports approximate second-moment (2-design) behavior; combined with a Paley-Zygmund argument, this yields finite-shot anticoncentration guarantees. Algorithmically, we wrap constant-depth sampling with a deterministic feasibility checker to obtain a polynomial-time hybrid quantum-classical solver (PHQC) that returns the best observed feasible solution in O(S n^2) time, where S is a polynomial shot budget. We obtain two advantages. First, when CE-QAOA fixes r >= 1 locations different from the start city, we achieve a Theta(n^r) reduction in shot complexity even against a classical sampler that draws uniformly from the feasible set. Second, against a classical baseline restricted to raw bitstring sampling, we show an exp(Theta(n^2)) minimax separation. In noiseless circuit simulations of traveling salesman problem instances with n in {4,...,10} locations from the QOPTLib benchmark library, we recover the global optimum at depth p = 1 using polynomial shot budgets and coarse parameter grids defined by the problem size.
Neutral atom quantum computers (NAQCs) have emerged as a promising platform for solving the maximum weighted independent set (MWIS) problem. However, analog quantum approaches face two key limitations: constraints of the atomic layout on realizable graph geometries and the absence of performance guarantees. We introduce Lp-Quts, a hybrid quantum-classical framework that integrates an NAQC sampler into a classical cutting-plane algorithm. At each iteration, a relaxed linear program (RLP) bounds the MWIS and induces a reduced graph from which independent sets are sampled using an analog quantum sampler. A novel sample-informed separation problem guides odd-cycle cut selection and accelerates convergence. For t-perfect graphs, Lp-Quts inherits polynomial-time convergence guarantees from the classical theory of cutting planes. We evaluate our approach on instances with up to 300 vertices -- a scale that exceeds the capabilities of current NAQC hardware. In this regime, Lp-Quts reaches solutions within 5--10\% of optimality, outperforming direct analog quantum protocols and greedy baselines under equal sampling budgets. As expected, simulated annealing remains the strongest sample-based solver at this scale. These results demonstrate how quantum samplers can be effectively embedded within classical optimization frameworks to deliver near-optimal solutions with reduced quantum resources while preserving formal guarantees.
We present Quantum-Enhanced Greedy with QAOA (QEGQ), a hybrid quantum-classical algorithm for Set Cover that preserves the classical Hn≤ln⁡n+O(1)H_n\le\ln n+O(1)Hn​≤lnn+O(1) approximation ratio while offering conditional sub-exponential speedups. QEGQ replaces the classical greedy selection with fixed-point amplitude amplification, achieving O(m/Mt)O(\sqrt{m/M_t})O(m/Mt​​) oracle calls per step under the Heavy-Hitters condition (Mt≥mαM_t\ge m^{\alpha}Mt​≥mα). We integrate QAOA-based batch refinement, demonstrated to yield up to 12% quality improvements in structured instances, and quantum-accelerated SDP/LP subroutines for fractional cover tightening. We provide detailed quantum circuit constructions (QROM, reversible population count), rigorous runtime and resource analyses including real-device gate counts and wall-clock estimates, and noise-resilience strategies with hybrid fallbacks. Empirical validation on sensor placement, document summarization, and synthetic families confirms robust Heavy-Hitters behavior (α ≥ 0.28) and quantifies performance degradation in adversarial instances. Our results establish practical guidelines for NISQ implementation, identify critical hardware targets for quantum advantage, and open pathways for broader quantum-enhanced approximation algorithms.
We study a modified fixed-point version of the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (fpQAOA), where parameters are trained classically on small instances and then transferred to larger problems. Our scheme combines three ingredients: (i) targeting approximate solutions via a prescribed approximation ratio (AR), (ii) scaling the circuit depth linearly with the problem size using a two-parameter sin-cos angle encoding, and (iii) normalizing QUBO Hamiltonians by their Frobenius norm. Noiseless numerical simulations (for system sizes up to 30 qubits) across a variety of random QUBO ensembles show that with these modifications the median number of quantum circuit runs ("shots") required to achieve AR=0.95 counterintuitively decreases towards a nearly constant value as the problem size increases, while the per-shot time remains polynomial. Extrapolation of this finite-size behavior is consistent with an effectively constant sampling complexity. Moreover, removing any single component of the scheme restores rapid growth of the required number of shots, highlighting the synergistic nature of the three modifications. These empirical findings suggest that fpQAOA, equipped with the proposed protocol, may achieve scalable approximate performance with polynomial-depth circuits for the considered problem classes.