In distributed quantum computing (DQC), executing monolithic quantum circuits across multiple interconnected quantum processing units (QPUs) requires dedicated communication qubits to generate and distribute entanglement. Because the number of physical qubits within a QPU is finite, a trade-off emerges where allocating more communication qubits increases the capacity of quantum channels for concurrent non-local operations, but reduces the number of computational qubits available for local gate operations. Distributed quantum compilation routinely ignores this channel capacity, while hardware architects lack a method to determine it prior to quantum circuit partitioning. Moreover, scheduling entanglement on demand introduces severe latency, whereas pre-fetching exposes stored pairs to decoherence. We propose an economic order quantity model from perishable inventory theory to optimize the trade-off between entanglement distribution latency and the time cost of decoherence. The resulting estimate is driven by algorithmic demand and physical constraints, offering a dual application for the hardware-software co-design of high-performance DQC: for hardware architects, it gives the optimal allocation of dedicated communication qubits in static heterogeneous architectures; for compiler developers, it gives the optimal number to reserve dynamically in homogeneous architectures.
Comments
4 pages, 1 figure, 1 table; accepted at the Workshop on DQC-SI: Distributed Quantum Computing Systems and Infrastructure, IEEE QCE 2026
In distributed quantum computing (DQC), executing monolithic quantum circuits across multiple interconnected quantum processing units (QPUs) requires dedicated communication qubits to generate and distribute entanglement. Because the number of physical qubits within a QPU is finite, a trade-off emerges where allocating more communication qubits increases the capacity of quantum channels for concurrent non-local operations, but reduces the number of computational qubits available for local gate operations. Distributed quantum compilation routinely ignores this channel capacity, while hardware architects lack a method to determine it prior to quantum circuit partitioning. Moreover, scheduling entanglement on demand introduces severe latency, whereas pre-fetching exposes stored pairs to decoherence. We propose an economic order quantity model from perishable inventory theory to optimize the trade-off between entanglement distribution latency and the time cost of decoherence. The resulting estimate is driven by algorithmic demand and physical constraints, offering a dual application for the hardware-software co-design of high-performance DQC: for hardware architects, it gives the optimal allocation of dedicated communication qubits in static heterogeneous architectures; for compiler developers, it gives the optimal number to reserve dynamically in homogeneous architectures.
Quantum computing promises computational capabilities beyond those of classical systems by exploiting superposition, entanglement, and quantum interference. However, the scalability of current noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices is limited by physical and engineering constraints, restricting the number of available qubits. Distributed quantum computing (DQC) mitigates this limitation by interconnecting multiple quantum processing units (QPUs) via quantum networks capable of distributing high-fidelity entanglement. Realizing such networks requires overcoming probabilistic entanglement generation, finite memory coherence, photon loss, and architectural constraints. This dissertation conducts an in-depth and comprehensive study of resource allocation in quantum networks, aiming to support high-throughput and high-fidelity entanglement distribution over lossy infrastructures. Our work spans the quantum networking stack, from physical-layer entanglement distribution protocols to network planning, quantum storage architectures, and distributed quantum computing. We begin by introducing two asynchronous entanglement distribution protocols-Sequential and Parallel-designed for early-stage quantum networks without global synchronization. Unlike many prior models, our protocols account for classical communication delays and quantum memory decoherence, reflecting practical constraints. Through simulations on real-world topologies such as SURFnet, we show that simple mechanisms such as cutoff-based memory management and sequential asynchronous entanglement distribution protocols can deliver competitive performance while significantly simplifying coordination, narrowing the gap between theoretical proposals and deployable protocols. Next, we formulate quantum network planning as a utility maximization problem that jointly considers entanglement distribution rate and fidelity, treating repeater and memory placement as optimization variables. We propose scalable heuristics and mixed-integer formulations, evaluating them under realistic conditions such as finite coherence time of quantum memories, limited number of memories per repeaters and end nodes, and real network topologies such as ESNet. Our findings offer practical design guidance and highlight how optimal placements depend on underlying physical constraints. To support dynamic workloads and respond to traffic bursts, we propose the Quantum Storage Network (QSN) architecture, where storage nodes buffer EPR pairs in advance of demand as an overlay network. This temporal decoupling improves responsiveness and throughput. Simulations across multiple topologies show that QSNs reduce entanglement distribution service latency by up to 40% and provide improved robustness compared to non-overlay designs, underscoring the value of storage-aware planning in future quantum networks. Finally, we focus on DQC, where large-scale quantum circuits are executed across networked QPUs. We propose a window-based circuit partitioning algorithm that minimizes nonlocal gate execution while balancing load across QPUs. Building on this partitioning, we design an adaptive, dependency-aware entanglement generation scheduler that opportunistically initiates remote entanglement as soon as dependent gates are ready, while accounting for realistic constraints such as coherence limits, probabilistic link generation, and Bell-state measurement (BSM) contention. Applied to benchmark circuits such as QAOA and QFT, this joint approach reduces execution delay by up to 35%. We further perform a two-qubit gate fidelity-sensitivity analysis under to show when the distributed quantum computing can be beneficial. Results show that the number of QPUs significantly impacts sensitivity to non-local gate fidelity: with fewer QPUs, distributed execution can outperform monolithic execution under looser fidelity constraints, whereas with more QPUs, achieving the same advantage requires substantially higher non-local gate fidelities relative to local gate fidelities. These findings identify the parameter regimes in which distributed quantum computing is beneficial, mapping break-even regions (as a function of number of QPUs) and quantifying how much cross-QPU (non-local) gate fidelity must improve—or, equivalently, how much per-QPU local gate fidelity must improve under modularization—for distributed execution to outperform a monolithic baseline. Together, these contributions form a cohesive framework for resource allocation in quantum networks in order to build scalable, delay-tolerant quantum networks and distributed computing systems. By grounding architectural design in realistic physical assumptions, this work advances the state of the art from theoretical modeling to practical, deployable quantum infrastructure.
Distributed quantum computing (DQC) is a promising near-term approach for executing circuits that exceed the capacity of a single quantum processing unit (QPU). Prior work has made significant progress on circuit partitioning and reconstruction, but practical DQC requires more than cutting a circuit into smaller pieces. A runtime system must determine whether to execute the circuit intact, cut it for sequential execution on one QPU, or distribute it across multiple QPUs, while accounting for queueing, communication, reconstruction, and hardware constraints. We present a resource-aware scheduler for DQC that compares these execution alternatives at runtime using explicit models of QPU execution, communication, and host-side reconstruction, together with hardware-informed timing derived from simulated IBM QPUs. By treating communication and reconstruction as first-class scheduling costs, the scheduler selects execution plans using a more realistic view of end-to-end overhead than cutting-only approaches. Across our experiments, reconstruction accounts for over 83% of cutting overhead, distributed execution reduces P90 latency by up to 39% relative to uncut single-QPU execution, and scheduling overhead itself remains negligible, never exceeding 0.038% of end-to-end job latency. Together, these results show that DQC must be treated as a runtime scheduling problem over both quantum and classical resources, not just circuit partitioning.
Distributed quantum computing (DQC) seeks to scale beyond the limits of monolithic processors by interconnecting multiple quantum processing units (QPUs) through entanglement-based links. Realizing this vision requires the co-design of hardware and software across the domains of quantum networking, compilation, and scheduling, yet existing tools remain fragmented between monolithic circuit compilers and long-distance quantum network simulators. We present an open-source, topology-informed framework for the compilation and scheduling of distributed quantum programs. Given an input circuit and a description of the target network, the framework partitions and reconstructs the circuit into a distributed program that respects the specified inter- and intra-QPU topology, covers cross-QPU operations through gate and state teleportation, and schedules the result under either deterministic or stochastic entanglement-generation models. By accepting and emitting standard OpenQASM, the framework interoperates with existing monolithic toolchains, and its standardized module interfaces allow partitioning and scheduling strategies to be interchanged and benchmarked. Using this framework, we show that the best-performing compilation strategy varies across the tested circuits and network configurations, and that both network topology and intra-QPU connectivity substantially affect the entanglement cost of execution. These findings underscore the need for a co-design approach to distributed quantum computing, which our framework is designed to support.
Distributed Quantum Computing (DQC) enables the execution of quantum circuits across multiple interconnected quantum processing units (QPUs), but requiring efficient qubit allocation and network topology design to optimize computational performance. Proper qubit allocation minimizes entanglement costs across QPUs, balances computational workload, and ensures efficient execution of quantum computing tasks. Meanwhile, network topology plays a crucial role in reducing entanglement routing complexity and communication overhead for remote quantum gate operations. In this paper, we propose a joint optimization framework for network topology design and qubit allocation in DQC to minimize the communication overhead. We formulate the problem as a tractable integer nonlinear programming model that explicitly incorporates entanglement routing, thereby ensuring a more tractable optimization process. To further improve computational efficiency, we present a partially linearized version of the problem, making it solvable using any classical optimization solver. Extensive simulations on both random and real-world quantum circuits validate the effectiveness of our proposed approach, demonstrating its capability to handle complex quantum circuits while reducing communication costs in DQC.
Distributed Quantum Computing (DQC) addresses the physical scaling limitations of monolithic quantum processors by networking modular Quantum Processing Units (QPUs). Efficient execution of quantum algorithms on DQC architectures requires compiling them across QPUs while minimizing inter-QPU communication bottlenecks, primarily through circuit partitioning. However, current evaluations of state-of-the-art partitioning heuristics focus primarily on the total entanglement cost of the partitions, failing to capture the broader structural and temporal overheads introduced by distributed network constraints. This paper addresses this evaluation gap by applying established monolithic benchmarking metrics to partitioned distributed circuits to quantify the performance impact of network constraints. Using an open-source, automated evaluation pipeline, we systematically assess diverse partitioning algorithms across standardized workloads and quantum network topologies. Our empirical results reveal that partitioning algorithms with comparable entanglement costs can still introduce drastically different physical execution penalties. By exposing these hidden trade-offs, such as severe increases in circuit depth and substantial reductions in gate density, this study demonstrates that comprehensive circuit-level metrics are essential for guiding the future design of DQC compilers.
In recent years, advances in quantum computing have been driven by substantial improvements in both the number and quality of qubits. As the field progresses, there is growing interest in interconnecting quantum systems to enable scalable computation through Distributed Quantum Computing (DQC) architectures. Consider a distributed quantum application executed across multiple Quantum Processing Units (QPUs) within a quantum data center, where remote gates require establishing entanglement between different QPUs. The creation of such end-to-end entanglement can lead to network congestion and resource contention. To address these challenges, we propose a resource management framework that maximizes fidelity-guaranteed throughput while satisfying dependency constraints. We first formulate the problem as a Mixed-Integer Linear Programming (MILP) model to provide a performance benchmark. Building on this, we develop efficient approximate scheduling algorithms that achieve performance comparable to the optimization solver. Although a trade-off exists between execution time and network throughput, simulation results demonstrate that one of the proposed strategies, Weighted Group Least Resource First (WGLRF), closely approximates the solver’s performance across most scenarios. These findings suggest that the lightweight strategy is sufficient for current DQC settings, offering a practical solution for managing remote-gate resource contention in distributed quantum circuits and improving overall system performance.