Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2607.16116

Quantum-classical crossover in fault-tolerant quantum dynamics simulation

Jinzhao Sun, Bozhen Zhou, Jue Xu, Yuan Yao, Zhenyu Du, Zixu Zhang, Yuntian Gu, Junxiang Huang, Shuo Zhou, Ziruo Wang, Alexander Yosifov, Wenzheng Dong, Yiming Huang, Daniel Serrano, Xinzhao Wang, Tianfeng Feng, Shreyas Sadugol, Wenjun Yu, Zhou You, Dayue Qin, Xiao-Ming Zhang, Yantao Wu, Aditya Iyer, You Zhou, Tongyang Li, Ying Li, Xiongfeng Ma, Qi Zhao, Pei Zeng, Pan Zhang, Xiao Yuan

quant-phcond-mat.str-elhep-thmath-phSubmitted Jul 17, 2026• Announced Jul 20, 2026• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

While quantum computers promise to solve classically intractable problems, identifying the point at which fault-tolerant quantum computation outperforms the best classical algorithms for practical applications remains an outstanding challenge. Here we establish a concrete quantum-classical crossover for quantum many-body dynamics under realistic hardware conditions. We introduce a scalable fault-tolerant framework that combines coherent observable estimation with a space-time-efficient implementation of non-Clifford rotations, suppressing the residual logical errors that limit existing partially fault-tolerant approaches. A benchmark against state-of-the-art tensor-network and variational Monte Carlo algorithms reveals a concrete crossover for mixed-field Ising dynamics at modest system sizes. For a physical error rate of $p=10^{-3}$, fault-tolerant simulation requires approximately 2 hours and $3.7 \times 10^5$ physical qubits for a 100-site 1D system, whereas tensor network approaches would require about 100 years. For 2D models, where rapid entanglement growth limits the classical evolution time, we project quantum runtimes within minutes. A physical error rate of $p=10^{-4}$ leads to at least an order of magnitude reduction in qubit count ($3.1 \times 10^4$ physical qubits) and runtime (minutes for 1D and seconds for 2D). The reduction in quantum runtime arises from our improved rotation-state injection and co-design of quantum error correction and observable-estimation protocols, which jointly suppress logical-error accumulation and reduce sampling overhead. Our results establish a scalable route towards practical quantum advantage and identify quantitative engineering targets for future fault-tolerant architectures.

Comments
45 pages, 25 figures, 7 tables

Related papers

Practical Quantum Advantage on Partially Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computer

Riki Toshio, Yutaro Akahoshi, Jun Fujisaki +3 more

Achieving quantum speedups in practical tasks remains challenging for current noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices. These devices always encounter significant obstacles such as inevitable physical errors and the limited scalability of current near-term algorithms. Meanwhile, assuming a typical architecture for fault-tolerant quantum computing (FTQC), realistic applications inevitably require a vast number of qubits, typically exceeding 10 6 , which seems far beyond near-term realization. In this work, to bridge the gap between the NISQ and FTQC eras, we propose an alternative approach to achieve practical quantum advantages on early-FTQC devices. Our framework is based on partially fault-tolerant logical operations to minimize spatial overhead and avoids the costly distillation techniques typically required for executing non-Clifford gates. To this end, we develop a space-time efficient state preparation protocol to generate an ancillary non-Clifford state consumed for implementing an analog rotation gate with an arbitrary small angle θ and a remarkably low worst-case error rate below O ( | θ | p ph ) , where p ph is the physical error rate. Furthermore, we propose several error suppression schemes tailored to our preparation protocol, which are essential to minimize the overhead for mitigating errors. Based on this framework, we present several promising applications that leverage the potential of our framework, including the Trotter simulation and quantum phase estimation (QPE). Notably, we demonstrate that our framework allows us to perform the QPE for an ( 8 × 8 ) -site Hubbard model with fewer than 6.8 × 10 4 qubits and an execution time of 10.6 days (or 14 min with full parallelization) under p ph = 10 − 4 , which is significantly faster than recent classical estimation with tensor network techniques (density matrix renormalization group and projected entangled pair states).

arXiv:2408.14848•Physical Review X•May 16, 2025•21 citations

Quantum resource estimation for large scale quantum algorithms

Vlad Gheorghiu, Michele Mosca

Quantum algorithms are often represented in terms of quantum circuits operating on ideal (logical) qubits. However, the practical implementation of these algorithms poses significant challenges. Many quantum algorithms require a substantial number of logical qubits, and the inherent susceptibility to errors of quantum computers require quantum error correction. The integration of error correction introduces overhead in terms of both space (physical qubits required) and runtime (how long the algorithm needs to be run for). This paper addresses the complexity of comparing classical and quantum algorithms, primarily stemming from the additional quantum error correction overhead. We propose a comprehensive framework that facilitates a direct and meaningful comparison between classical and quantum algorithms. By acknowledging and addressing the challenges introduced by quantum error correction, our framework aims to provide a clearer understanding of the comparative performance of classical and quantum computing approaches. This work contributes to understanding the practical viability and potential advantages of quantum algorithms in real-world applications. We apply our framework to quantum cryptanalysis, since it is well known that quantum algorithms can break factoring and discrete logarithm based cryptography and weaken symmetric cryptography and hash functions. In order to estimate the real-world impact of these attacks, apart from tracking the development of fault-tolerant quantum computers it is important to have an estimate of the resources needed to implement these quantum attacks. This analysis provides state-of-the art snap-shot estimates of the realistic costs of implementing quantum attacks on these important cryptographic algorithms, assuming quantum fault-tolerance is achieved using surface code methods, and spanning a range of potential error rates. These estimates serve as a guide for gauging the realistic impact of these algorithms and for benchmarking the impact of future advances in quantum algorithms, circuit synthesis and optimization, fault-tolerance methods and physical error rates.

Future Generation Computer Systems•Aug 12, 2024•17 citations

Error Mitigation of Fault-Tolerant Quantum Circuits with Soft Information

Zeyuan Zhou, Shaun Pexton, Aleksander Kubica +1 more

Quantum error mitigation (QEM) is typically viewed as a suite of practical techniques for today's noisy intermediate-scale quantum devices, with limited relevance once fault-tolerant quantum computers become available. In this work, we challenge this conventional wisdom by showing that QEM can continue to provide substantial benefits in the era of quantum error correction (QEC), and in an even more efficient manner than it does on current devices. We introduce a framework for logical-level QEM that leverages soft information naturally produced by QEC decoders, requiring no additional data, hardware modifications, or runtime overhead beyond what QEC protocols already provide. Within this framework, we develop and analyze three logical-level QEM techniques: post-selection and runtime abort policies, probabilistic error cancellation, and zero-noise extrapolation. Our techniques reduce logical error rates by more than 100x while discarding fewer than 0.1% of shots; they also provide in situ characterization of logical channels for QEM protocols. As a proof of principle, we benchmark our approach using a surface-code architecture and two state-of-the-art decoders based on tensor-network contraction and minimum-weight perfect matching. We evaluate logical-level QEM on random Clifford circuits and molecular simulation algorithms and find that, compared to previous approaches relying on QEC only or QEC combined with QEM, we can achieve up to 87.4% spacetime overhead savings. Our results demonstrate that logical-level QEM with QEC decoder soft information can reliably improve logical performance, underscoring the efficiency and usefulness of QEM techniques for fault-tolerant quantum computers.

quant-pharXiv:2512.09863•Dec 11, 2025•0 citations

Partially Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computing Architecture with Error-Corrected Clifford Gates and Space-Time Efficient Analog Rotations

Yutaro Akahoshi, Kazunori Maruyama, Hirotaka Oshima +2 more

Quantum computers are expected to drastically accelerate certain computing tasks versus classical computers. Noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices, which have tens to hundreds of noisy physical qubits, are gradually becoming available, but it is still challenging to achieve useful quantum advantages in meaningful tasks. On the other hand, full fault-tolerant quantum computing (FTQC) based on quantum error correction code remains far beyond realization due to its extremely large requirement of high-precision physical qubits. In this study, we propose a quantum computing architecture to close the gap between NISQ and FTQC architectures. Our architecture is based on erroneous arbitrary rotation gates and error-corrected Clifford gates implemented by lattice surgery. We omit the typical distillation protocol to achieve direct analog rotations and small qubit requirements, and minimize the remnant errors of the rotations by a carefully designed state injection protocol. Our estimation based on numerical simulations shows that for early-FTQC devices that consist of 104 physical qubits with physical error probability p=10−4 , we can perform roughly 1.72×107 Clifford operations and 3.75×104 arbitrary rotations on 64 logical qubits. Such computations cannot be realized by the existing NISQ and FTQC architectures on the same device, as well as classical computers. We hope that our proposal and the corresponding development of quantum algorithms based on it will bring new insights into the realization of practical quantum computers in the future. Published by the American Physical Society 2024

arXiv:2303.13181•PRX Quantum•Mar 5, 2024•41 citations

Error-structure-tailored early fault-tolerant quantum computing

Pei Zeng, Guo Zheng, Qian Xu +1 more

Fault tolerance is widely regarded as indispensable for achieving scalable and reliable quantum computing. However, the spacetime overhead required for fault-tolerant quantum computating remains prohibitively large. A critical challenge arises in many quantum algorithms with Clifford + $\varphi$ compiling, where logical rotation gates $R_{Z_L}(\varphi)$ serve as essential components. The Eastin-Knill theorem prevents their transversal implementation in quantum error correction codes and necessitating resource-intensive workarounds through T-gate compilation combined with magic state distillation and injection. In this work, we consider error-structure-tailored fault tolerance, where fault-tolerance conditions are analyzed by combining perturbative analysis of realistic dissipative noise processes with the structural properties of stabilizer codes. Based on this framework, we design 1-fault-tolerant continuous-angle rotation gates in stabilizer codes, implemented via dispersive-coupling Hamiltonians. Our approach could circumvent the need for T-gate compilation and distillation, offering a hardware-efficient solution that maintains simplicity, minimizes physical footprint, and requires only nearest-neighbor interactions. Integrating with recent small-angle-state preparation techniques, we can suppress the gate error to $91|\varphi| p^2$ for small rotation angle (where p denotes the physical error rate). For current achievable hardware parameters ($p=10^{-3}$), this enables reliable execution of over $10^7$ small-angle rotations when $|\varphi|\approx 10^{-3}$, meeting the requirements of many near-term quantum applications. Compared to the 15-to-1 magic state distillation and magic state cultivation approaches, our method reduces spacetime resource costs by factors of 1337.5 and 43.6, respectively, for a Heisenberg Hamiltonian simulation task under realistic hardware assumptions.

quant-pharXiv:2511.19983•Nov 26, 2025•0 citations

Realistic Cross-Stack Architectural Design for Scalable Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computation

Jason D. Chadwick

The transition from noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) processors to large-scale fault-tolerant machines requires more than incremental improvements in physical qubit fidelity. While advances in quantum error correction (QEC) theory continue to lower the theoretical overhead of quantum computing, much of this research remains abstracted from the physical realities of qubit implementations. This disconnect often results in hardware-agnostic designs that are inefficient or impractical to build. In this dissertation, I identify three primary gaps between theoretical QEC research and practical hardware: (1) the high levels of noise and temporal instability in experimental devices that impede scalable QEC; (2) the prohibitively large qubit and time costs of useful algorithms, driven largely by the limitations of the standard surface code; and (3) the failure of current resource estimates to account for hardware-level constraints, such as limited connectivity and the complexity of implementing non-local operations. To bridge these gaps, I propose a holistic, cross-stack approach where the error correction protocols and the physical hardware are designed in concert. By developing realistic device models and hardware-aware solutions at the lowest levels of the software stack, we can accelerate the path toward functional fault-tolerance. I present my work across three research thrusts: first, leveraging codesign to mitigate hardware-specific noise and reduce physical error rates; second, developing software tools for fault-tolerant quantum computers to reduce the space-time overhead of the QEC layer; and third, proposing two novel hardware-aware QEC architectures that provide practical, high-performance routes to scalable quantum computation.

•Jun 1, 2026•0 citations
While quantum computers promise to solve classically intractable problems, identifying the point at which fault-tolerant quantum computation outperforms the best classical algorithms for practical applications remains an outstanding challenge. Here we establish a concrete quantum-classical crossover for quantum many-body dynamics under realistic hardware conditions. We introduce a scalable fault-tolerant framework that combines coherent observable estimation with a space-time-efficient implementation of non-Clifford rotations, suppressing the residual logical errors that limit existing partially fault-tolerant approaches. A benchmark against state-of-the-art tensor-network and variational Monte Carlo algorithms reveals a concrete crossover for mixed-field Ising dynamics at modest system sizes. For a physical error rate of p=10−3p=10^{-3}p=10−3, fault-tolerant simulation requires approximately 2 hours and 3.7×1053.7 \times 10^53.7×105 physical qubits for a 100-site 1D system, whereas tensor network approaches would require about 100 years. For 2D models, where rapid entanglement growth limits the classical evolution time, we project quantum runtimes within minutes. A physical error rate of p=10−4p=10^{-4}p=10−4 leads to at least an order of magnitude reduction in qubit count (3.1×1043.1 \times 10^43.1×104 physical qubits) and runtime (minutes for 1D and seconds for 2D). The reduction in quantum runtime arises from our improved rotation-state injection and co-design of quantum error correction and observable-estimation protocols, which jointly suppress logical-error accumulation and reduce sampling overhead. Our results establish a scalable route towards practical quantum advantage and identify quantitative engineering targets for future fault-tolerant architectures.
Achieving quantum speedups in practical tasks remains challenging for current noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices. These devices always encounter significant obstacles such as inevitable physical errors and the limited scalability of current near-term algorithms. Meanwhile, assuming a typical architecture for fault-tolerant quantum computing (FTQC), realistic applications inevitably require a vast number of qubits, typically exceeding 10 6 , which seems far beyond near-term realization. In this work, to bridge the gap between the NISQ and FTQC eras, we propose an alternative approach to achieve practical quantum advantages on early-FTQC devices. Our framework is based on partially fault-tolerant logical operations to minimize spatial overhead and avoids the costly distillation techniques typically required for executing non-Clifford gates. To this end, we develop a space-time efficient state preparation protocol to generate an ancillary non-Clifford state consumed for implementing an analog rotation gate with an arbitrary small angle θ and a remarkably low worst-case error rate below O ( | θ | p ph ) , where p ph is the physical error rate. Furthermore, we propose several error suppression schemes tailored to our preparation protocol, which are essential to minimize the overhead for mitigating errors. Based on this framework, we present several promising applications that leverage the potential of our framework, including the Trotter simulation and quantum phase estimation (QPE). Notably, we demonstrate that our framework allows us to perform the QPE for an ( 8 × 8 ) -site Hubbard model with fewer than 6.8 × 10 4 qubits and an execution time of 10.6 days (or 14 min with full parallelization) under p ph = 10 − 4 , which is significantly faster than recent classical estimation with tensor network techniques (density matrix renormalization group and projected entangled pair states).
Quantum algorithms are often represented in terms of quantum circuits operating on ideal (logical) qubits. However, the practical implementation of these algorithms poses significant challenges. Many quantum algorithms require a substantial number of logical qubits, and the inherent susceptibility to errors of quantum computers require quantum error correction. The integration of error correction introduces overhead in terms of both space (physical qubits required) and runtime (how long the algorithm needs to be run for). This paper addresses the complexity of comparing classical and quantum algorithms, primarily stemming from the additional quantum error correction overhead. We propose a comprehensive framework that facilitates a direct and meaningful comparison between classical and quantum algorithms. By acknowledging and addressing the challenges introduced by quantum error correction, our framework aims to provide a clearer understanding of the comparative performance of classical and quantum computing approaches. This work contributes to understanding the practical viability and potential advantages of quantum algorithms in real-world applications. We apply our framework to quantum cryptanalysis, since it is well known that quantum algorithms can break factoring and discrete logarithm based cryptography and weaken symmetric cryptography and hash functions. In order to estimate the real-world impact of these attacks, apart from tracking the development of fault-tolerant quantum computers it is important to have an estimate of the resources needed to implement these quantum attacks. This analysis provides state-of-the art snap-shot estimates of the realistic costs of implementing quantum attacks on these important cryptographic algorithms, assuming quantum fault-tolerance is achieved using surface code methods, and spanning a range of potential error rates. These estimates serve as a guide for gauging the realistic impact of these algorithms and for benchmarking the impact of future advances in quantum algorithms, circuit synthesis and optimization, fault-tolerance methods and physical error rates.
Quantum error mitigation (QEM) is typically viewed as a suite of practical techniques for today's noisy intermediate-scale quantum devices, with limited relevance once fault-tolerant quantum computers become available. In this work, we challenge this conventional wisdom by showing that QEM can continue to provide substantial benefits in the era of quantum error correction (QEC), and in an even more efficient manner than it does on current devices. We introduce a framework for logical-level QEM that leverages soft information naturally produced by QEC decoders, requiring no additional data, hardware modifications, or runtime overhead beyond what QEC protocols already provide. Within this framework, we develop and analyze three logical-level QEM techniques: post-selection and runtime abort policies, probabilistic error cancellation, and zero-noise extrapolation. Our techniques reduce logical error rates by more than 100x while discarding fewer than 0.1% of shots; they also provide in situ characterization of logical channels for QEM protocols. As a proof of principle, we benchmark our approach using a surface-code architecture and two state-of-the-art decoders based on tensor-network contraction and minimum-weight perfect matching. We evaluate logical-level QEM on random Clifford circuits and molecular simulation algorithms and find that, compared to previous approaches relying on QEC only or QEC combined with QEM, we can achieve up to 87.4% spacetime overhead savings. Our results demonstrate that logical-level QEM with QEC decoder soft information can reliably improve logical performance, underscoring the efficiency and usefulness of QEM techniques for fault-tolerant quantum computers.
Quantum computers are expected to drastically accelerate certain computing tasks versus classical computers. Noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices, which have tens to hundreds of noisy physical qubits, are gradually becoming available, but it is still challenging to achieve useful quantum advantages in meaningful tasks. On the other hand, full fault-tolerant quantum computing (FTQC) based on quantum error correction code remains far beyond realization due to its extremely large requirement of high-precision physical qubits. In this study, we propose a quantum computing architecture to close the gap between NISQ and FTQC architectures. Our architecture is based on erroneous arbitrary rotation gates and error-corrected Clifford gates implemented by lattice surgery. We omit the typical distillation protocol to achieve direct analog rotations and small qubit requirements, and minimize the remnant errors of the rotations by a carefully designed state injection protocol. Our estimation based on numerical simulations shows that for early-FTQC devices that consist of 104 physical qubits with physical error probability p=10−4 , we can perform roughly 1.72×107 Clifford operations and 3.75×104 arbitrary rotations on 64 logical qubits. Such computations cannot be realized by the existing NISQ and FTQC architectures on the same device, as well as classical computers. We hope that our proposal and the corresponding development of quantum algorithms based on it will bring new insights into the realization of practical quantum computers in the future. Published by the American Physical Society 2024
Fault tolerance is widely regarded as indispensable for achieving scalable and reliable quantum computing. However, the spacetime overhead required for fault-tolerant quantum computating remains prohibitively large. A critical challenge arises in many quantum algorithms with Clifford + φ\varphiφ compiling, where logical rotation gates RZL(φ)R_{Z_L}(\varphi)RZL​​(φ) serve as essential components. The Eastin-Knill theorem prevents their transversal implementation in quantum error correction codes and necessitating resource-intensive workarounds through T-gate compilation combined with magic state distillation and injection. In this work, we consider error-structure-tailored fault tolerance, where fault-tolerance conditions are analyzed by combining perturbative analysis of realistic dissipative noise processes with the structural properties of stabilizer codes. Based on this framework, we design 1-fault-tolerant continuous-angle rotation gates in stabilizer codes, implemented via dispersive-coupling Hamiltonians. Our approach could circumvent the need for T-gate compilation and distillation, offering a hardware-efficient solution that maintains simplicity, minimizes physical footprint, and requires only nearest-neighbor interactions. Integrating with recent small-angle-state preparation techniques, we can suppress the gate error to 91∣φ∣p291|\varphi| p^291∣φ∣p2 for small rotation angle (where p denotes the physical error rate). For current achievable hardware parameters (p=10−3p=10^{-3}p=10−3), this enables reliable execution of over 10710^7107 small-angle rotations when ∣φ∣≈10−3|\varphi|\approx 10^{-3}∣φ∣≈10−3, meeting the requirements of many near-term quantum applications. Compared to the 15-to-1 magic state distillation and magic state cultivation approaches, our method reduces spacetime resource costs by factors of 1337.5 and 43.6, respectively, for a Heisenberg Hamiltonian simulation task under realistic hardware assumptions.
The transition from noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) processors to large-scale fault-tolerant machines requires more than incremental improvements in physical qubit fidelity. While advances in quantum error correction (QEC) theory continue to lower the theoretical overhead of quantum computing, much of this research remains abstracted from the physical realities of qubit implementations. This disconnect often results in hardware-agnostic designs that are inefficient or impractical to build. In this dissertation, I identify three primary gaps between theoretical QEC research and practical hardware: (1) the high levels of noise and temporal instability in experimental devices that impede scalable QEC; (2) the prohibitively large qubit and time costs of useful algorithms, driven largely by the limitations of the standard surface code; and (3) the failure of current resource estimates to account for hardware-level constraints, such as limited connectivity and the complexity of implementing non-local operations. To bridge these gaps, I propose a holistic, cross-stack approach where the error correction protocols and the physical hardware are designed in concert. By developing realistic device models and hardware-aware solutions at the lowest levels of the software stack, we can accelerate the path toward functional fault-tolerance. I present my work across three research thrusts: first, leveraging codesign to mitigate hardware-specific noise and reduce physical error rates; second, developing software tools for fault-tolerant quantum computers to reduce the space-time overhead of the QEC layer; and third, proposing two novel hardware-aware QEC architectures that provide practical, high-performance routes to scalable quantum computation.