Hybrid quantum-classical performance depends on how quantum processors share classical compute, controllers, memory, and communication links. Circuit simulators and provider measurements expose kernel and job behavior, but leave topology-level questions about controller bottlenecks, quantum capacity, and mixed-workload contention unanswered. We present HybridQC, a discrete-event simulator for configurable hybrid compute units (HCUs). Users specify resource graphs containing classical compute, memory, controllers, quantum annealing (QA) and digital quantum computing (DQC) devices, and links. Jobs become dependent stages for preparation, quantum execution, transfers, reconstruction, and postprocessing. Finite capacities and selectable scheduling policies determine where stages wait and overlap. Service profiles use measurements from D-Wave Advantage 1 and Advantage 2 and IBM Kingston, Marrakesh, and Fez, separating physical quantum-processor occupancy from cloud wall time. Mean absolute percentage errors are 3.92%-8.04% for D-Wave access time and 5.26%-19.01% for IBM quantum seconds. Balanced 10x HCU scaling improves makespan by 2.19x-3.42x, while policy choice changes makespan by 1.80x for a mixed workload with 20 jobs per workload family. Scaling depends on which inputs grow: 100x data growth yields median runtime near 306 s, while 100x joint growth in circuits, shots, and depth reaches 4.806 x 10^7 s on the fixed HCU. HybridQC enables designers to study topology, scheduling, and workload growth before tightly integrated quantum-classical machines exist physically.
Hybrid quantum-classical performance depends on how quantum processors share classical compute, controllers, memory, and communication links. Circuit simulators and provider measurements expose kernel and job behavior, but leave topology-level questions about controller bottlenecks, quantum capacity, and mixed-workload contention unanswered. We present HybridQC, a discrete-event simulator for configurable hybrid compute units (HCUs). Users specify resource graphs containing classical compute, memory, controllers, quantum annealing (QA) and digital quantum computing (DQC) devices, and links. Jobs become dependent stages for preparation, quantum execution, transfers, reconstruction, and postprocessing. Finite capacities and selectable scheduling policies determine where stages wait and overlap. Service profiles use measurements from D-Wave Advantage 1 and Advantage 2 and IBM Kingston, Marrakesh, and Fez, separating physical quantum-processor occupancy from cloud wall time. Mean absolute percentage errors are 3.92%-8.04% for D-Wave access time and 5.26%-19.01% for IBM quantum seconds. Balanced 10x HCU scaling improves makespan by 2.19x-3.42x, while policy choice changes makespan by 1.80x for a mixed workload with 20 jobs per workload family. Scaling depends on which inputs grow: 100x data growth yields median runtime near 306 s, while 100x joint growth in circuits, shots, and depth reaches 4.806 x 10^7 s on the fixed HCU. HybridQC enables designers to study topology, scheduling, and workload growth before tightly integrated quantum-classical machines exist physically.
Quantum programming is today largely discussed at the level of circuits and application programminginterfaces: a developer constructs a circuit, submits it to a simulator or a cloud-hosted device, and readsback measurement results. As quantum computing moves toward shared, heterogeneous, andincreasingly hybrid quantum-classical environments, a complementary systems-level question becomesimportant — how should the lifecycle of a quantum computation be managed once it leaves the hands ofthe programmer, particularly when many such computations compete for limited execution resources?This paper presents QuantumOS, a research-oriented software platform that treats a quantum circuit notmerely as an object to be executed, but as a managed workload: a quantum job that is created, queued,scheduled according to a selectable policy, assigned to a computational resource by a resource manager,optionally transformed by a circuit-processing stage, executed on a local Quantum Virtual Machine(QVM), and finally recorded and surfaced through a monitoring dashboard. QuantumOS is explicitly aresearch prototype and does not control physical quantum hardware; its current execution backend is aclassical, local circuit simulator. We describe the system's layered architecture, its job-lifecycle andscheduling abstractions, and its execution workflow, and we report an experimental evaluation of theQVM's performance and correctness characteristics. Measured results show that QVM execution timeremains low for small circuits and rises sharply beyond approximately eight to nine simulated qubits,consistent with the expected cost of classical state-vector simulation, and that execution time growsroughly in proportion to the number of measurement shots requested. A correctness evaluation of fourcanonical circuits — a single-qubit Hadamard gate, a Pauli-X gate, a two-qubit Bell state, and a three-qubitGHZ state, each sampled at 10,000 shots — shows observed outcome probabilities within approximatelyhalf a percentage point of their theoretical values, consistent with ordinary statistical sampling variationrather than simulation error. We discuss how the broader scheduling and resource-managementarchitecture supports the paper's central systems claim even where full quantitative benchmarking ofevery subsystem remains for future work, and we outline the educational value of a locally runnableplatform that makes both quantum-circuit behavior and workload-management concepts directlyobservable. We conclude by identifying the prototype's current limitations and the concrete next stepsrequired to mature QuantumOS into a more completely benchmarked research platform.
Hybrid High-performance Computing (HPC)-quantum workloads based on circuit cutting decompose large quantum circuits into independent fragments, but existing frameworks tightly couple cutting logic to execution orchestration, preventing HPC centers from applying mature resource management policies to Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) workloads. We present DQR (Dynamic Queue Router), a runtime framework that bridges this gap by treating circuit fragments as first-class schedulable units. The framework introduces a backend-agnostic fragment descriptor to expose structural properties without requiring execution layers to parse quantum code, a wave-based coordinator that achieves pipeline concurrency via non-blocking polling, and a production-ready implementation on the CESGA Qmio supercomputer integrating both QPUs local on-premises (Qmio) and remote cloud (IBM Torino) backends. Experiments on a 32-qubit Hardware-Efficient Ansatz (HEA) circuit demonstrate not only makespan improvements over a monolithic CPU baseline but also transparent per-fragment failover recovery-specifically rerouting tasks from the local QPU to classical simulators upon encountering hardware-level incompatibilities-without pipeline restart. For deeper circuits, the coordination residual accounts for only 5% of the total execution time, highlighting the framework's scalability. These results show that DQR enables HPC centers to integrate NISQ workloads into existing production infrastructure while preserving the flexibility to adopt improved cutting algorithms or heterogeneous backend technologies.
High-performance computing (HPC) has evolved over decades through multiple architectural transitions, from vector supercomputers to massively parallel CPU clusters and GPU-accelerated systems, continuously expanding the frontier of scientific discovery. With the emergence of quantum processing units (QPUs) as practical computational accelerators, a new opportunity arises to further extend this trajectory by integrating quantum and classical computing paradigms. Building on the emerging vision of Quantum Integrated High-Performance Computing (QHPC), this paper contributes a full-stack layered architecture that integrates QPUs as first-class accelerators within, not merely alongside, the classical HPC software and hardware stack, with tight, on-premise quantum-classical coupling as its defining characteristic. The architecture comprises of unified resource management, quantum-aware scheduling, hybrid workflow orchestration, middleware and programming abstraction, interconnect technologies, and a tiered execution model enabling seamless workload partitioning across classical and quantum backends. A central aspect of this architecture is a strong user requests abstraction layer that exposes heterogeneous resources through a unified job submission interface, similar in spirit to existing schedulers such as Slurm, allowing users to describe workloads in a consistent template independent of underlying compute type or location. Drawing insights from prior accelerator integration eras, we outline how QHPC can support emerging workloads in quantum chemistry, materials discovery, combinatorial optimization, and climate modeling. We conclude by highlighting open challenges in building scalable, reliable, and programmable quantum-classical infrastructures that seamlessly connect global users to heterogeneous compute resources for future quantum-classical HPC ecosystems.
High-performance computing (HPC) has evolved over decades through multiple architectural transitions, from vector supercomputers to massively parallel CPU clusters and GPU-accelerated systems, continuously expanding the frontier of scientific discovery. With the emergence of quantum processing units (QPUs) as practical computational accelerators, a new opportunity arises to further extend this trajectory by integrating quantum and classical computing paradigms. Building on the emerging vision of Quantum Integrated High-Performance Computing (QHPC), this paper contributes a full-stack layered architecture that integrates QPUs as first-class accelerators within, not merely alongside, the classical HPC software and hardware stack, with tight, on-premise quantum–classical coupling as its defining characteristic. The architecture comprises of unified resource management, quantum-aware scheduling, hybrid workflow orchestration, middleware and programming abstraction, interconnect technologies, and a tiered execution model enabling seamless workload partitioning across classical and quantum backends. A central aspect of this architecture is a strong user requests abstraction layer that exposes heterogeneous resources through a unified job submission interface, similar in spirit to existing schedulers such as Slurm, allowing users to describe workloads in a consistent template independent of underlying compute type or location. Drawing insights from prior accelerator integration eras, we outline how QHPC can support emerging workloads in quantum chemistry, materials discovery, combinatorial optimization, and climate modeling. We conclude by highlighting open challenges in building scalable, reliable, and programmable quantum–classical infrastructures that seamlessly connect global users to heterogeneous compute resources for future quantum–classical HPC ecosystems.
As quantum computing (QC) technologies mature, their integration into established high-performance computing (HPC) infrastructures is becoming a central objective for next-generation computing systems. However, unlocking the potential of hybrid platforms for computationally demanding workloads remains challenging. The mismatch between quantum and classical programming models, the limited maturity of quantum software stacks, and the scarcity of quantum processing units (QPUs) above all, necessitate scheduling strategies that go beyond standard HPC mechanisms to manage such heterogeneous and constrained resources.
To address this issue, we investigate three distinct methodologies for HPC-QC resource scheduling: time-based multiplexing, dynamic resource management, and workflow decomposition. Experimental validation on production HPC clusters and real quantum hardware demonstrates the effectiveness of these approaches under different workload scenarios. Malleability and workflow strategies significantly optimize classical resource utilization, reducing consumption by up to 45.7% and 64% respectively, proving to be best fitted for hybrid jobs where quantum and classical workloads are evenly balanced. Conversely, time-multiplexing enhances QPU utilization and reduces execution time at the cluster level, making it the optimal strategy for the opposite context, which is characterized by high classical-quantum workload imbalances. These findings underscore the practical viability of tailored scheduling strategies for hybrid HPC-QC environments and highlight their complementarity in building efficient, scalable software stacks for next-generation quantum-accelerated facilities.
Quantum computing resources are increasingly being incorporated into high-performance computing (HPC) environments as co-processors for hybrid workloads. To support this paradigm, quantum devices must be treated as schedulable first-class resources within existing HPC infrastructure. This enables consistent workload management, unified resource visibility, and support for hybrid quantum-classical job execution models. This paper presents a reference architecture and implementation for the integration of quantum computing resources, both on-premises and cloud-hosted into HPC centers via standard workload managers. We introduce a Slurm plugin designed to abstract and control quantum backends, enabling seamless resource scheduling, minimizing queue duplication, and supporting job co-scheduling with classical compute nodes. The architecture supports heterogeneous quantum resources and can be extended to any workload (and container) management systems.