Quantum computing research increasingly depends on complex software stacks, yet the reproducibility of published results does not receive the priority and longevity mandated by recommendations of large international scientific bodies and best practices in software-centric systems research. In this paper, we present a combined manual and automated large-scale analysis of the reproducibility landscape in quantum computing research, quantify shortcomings, and derive actionable steps forward.
We manually evaluate a curated sample of 127 papers using a five-question framework that covers code availability, environment specification, documentation, hardware description, and executability. To place these findings in a broader context, we conduct an automated large-scale screening of nearly 5000 quantum computing papers for the same reproducibility indicators. Our manual analysis reveals that only 24.4% of the sampled papers provide code artefacts, and among those, 64.5% fail to execute successfully in a clean environment. This assessment is corroborated by a large-scale automated analysis that yields a consistent code availability rate of 26.8%. Further, it shows that approximately one-third of the papers with accessible code lack machine-readable environment specifications.
The results in this paper indicate that reproducibility is not yet consistently achieved in quantum computing research. In response, we outline a set of practical recommendations that address the observed failure modes and illustrate how reproducibility can be improved in practice.
Quantum computing research increasingly depends on complex software stacks, yet the reproducibility of published results does not receive the priority and longevity mandated by recommendations of large international scientific bodies and best practices in software-centric systems research. In this paper, we present a combined manual and automated large-scale analysis of the reproducibility landscape in quantum computing research, quantify shortcomings, and derive actionable steps forward.
We manually evaluate a curated sample of 127 papers using a five-question framework that covers code availability, environment specification, documentation, hardware description, and executability. To place these findings in a broader context, we conduct an automated large-scale screening of nearly 5000 quantum computing papers for the same reproducibility indicators. Our manual analysis reveals that only 24.4% of the sampled papers provide code artefacts, and among those, 64.5% fail to execute successfully in a clean environment. This assessment is corroborated by a large-scale automated analysis that yields a consistent code availability rate of 26.8%. Further, it shows that approximately one-third of the papers with accessible code lack machine-readable environment specifications.
The results in this paper indicate that reproducibility is not yet consistently achieved in quantum computing research. In response, we outline a set of practical recommendations that address the observed failure modes and illustrate how reproducibility can be improved in practice.
The reproducibility of software defect datasets is essential for obtaining reliable and comparable research results. Zhu et al. have shown that defect datasets such as Defects4J suffer from reproduction failures (i.e., reported bugs become non-reproducible) as time passes since their creation. However, it remains unclear whether these findings generalize to quantum software defect datasets. We therefore conduct a replication study of the prior work using Bugs4Q, a widely used dataset of real-world bugs in quantum programs. Our analysis includes 77,700 quantum program executions of 37 Bugs4Q artifacts across 21 core-library versions. The experimental results showed that the reproducibility of Bugs4Q dropped from 62.2% on Qiskit v0.20.1 to 16.2% on v2.3.1, the latest version as of April 1, 2026. A manual inspection of the root causes further indicated that 93.6% of the failures were dependency-related. While these findings are consistent with those of the prior work, we also observed differences. In particular, most reproduction failures in Bugs4Q cannot be resolved merely by adjusting dependency versions; instead, they require source-code modifications such as migrating import paths and API invocations. Based on this observation, we curated Bugs4Q-Robust, a patched version of Bugs4Q to restore reproducibility. Bugs4Q-Robust increases reproducibility from 16.2% to 78.4% on Qiskit v2.3.1. Our findings highlight the importance of continuous dataset maintenance in the rapidly evolving quantum software ecosystem.
Quantum computing is rapidly advancing, but quantum software development faces significant challenges, including a steep learning curve, high hardware error rates, and a lack of mature engineering practices. This study conducts a large-scale mining analysis of over 21,000 GitHub repositories, containing 1.2 million commits from more than 10,000 developers, to examine the evolution and maintenance of quantum software. We analyze repository growth, programming language and framework adoption, and contributor trends, revealing a 200 % increase in repositories and a 150 % rise in contributors since 2017. Additionally, we investigate software development and maintenance practices, showing that perfective commits dominate (51.76 %), while the low occurrence of corrective commits (18.54%) indicates potential gaps in bug resolution. Furthermore, 34% of reported issues are quantum-specific, highlighting the need for specialized debugging tools beyond conventional software engineering approaches. This study provides empirical insights into the software engineering challenges of quantum computing, offering recommendations to improve development workflows, tooling, and documentation. We are also open-sourcing our dataset to support further analysis by the community and to guide future research and tool development for quantum computing. The dataset is available at: https://github.com/kriss-u/QRepoAnalysis-Paper.
Scientific knowledge increasingly depends on complex computational processes where both hardware and software layers can influence research outcomes. As computational complexity grows, classical-quantum integration provides a lens for examining how the scientific method adapts, particularly regarding a foundational principle of scientific validation - reproducibility. Building upon previous warnings of an ongoing reproducibility crisis in the computational context, this paper examines challenges across classical (HPC) and quantum computing. Despite its deterministic nature, HPC faces reproducibility threats from hardware dependencies, documentation inadequacies, disincentivizing research culture and infrastructure variation. Quantum computing, at low technological maturity, amplifies some challenges, while creating new ones through probabilistic outputs, hardware-specific noise, and tight software-hardware coupling. Classical-quantum integration reveals a telling pattern, where current reproducibility frameworks prove inadequate, as infrastructure blends with the results. Quantum integration serves as a catalyst exposing methodological limitations across the computational domain. We propose a workflow-centered path forward, pointing to the value of gradual cultural shift toward workflow-centered scientific practice. By developing meta-workflows that document both process abstractions and implementation contexts, we create a more robust foundation for scientific knowledge that acknowledges complexity without sacrificing rigor. The path forward involves embracing this evolution in understanding scientific knowledge rather than resisting it
Quantum Software Engineering (QSE) is essential for ensuring the reliability and maintainability of hybrid quantum-classical systems, yet empirical evidence on how bugs emerge and affect quality in real-world quantum projects remains limited. This study presents the first ecosystem-scale longitudinal analysis of software bugs across 123 open source quantum repositories from 2012 to 2024, spanning eight functional categories, including full-stack libraries, simulators, annealing, algorithms, compilers, assembly, cryptography, and experimental computing. Using a mixed method approach combining repository mining, static code analysis, issue metadata extraction, and a validated rule-based classification framework, we analyze 32,296 verified bug reports. Results show that full-stack libraries and compilers are the most bug-prone categories due to circuit, gate, and transpilation-related issues, while simulators are mainly affected by measurement and noise modeling errors. Classical bugs primarily impact usability and interoperability, whereas quantum-specific bugs disproportionately degrade performance, maintainability, and reliability. Longitudinal analysis indicates ecosystem maturation, with bug densities peaking between 2017 and 2021 and declining thereafter. High-severity bugs cluster in cryptography, experimental computing, and compiler toolchains. Repositories employing automated testing detect more bugs and resolve issues faster. A negative binomial regression further shows that automated testing is associated with an approximate 60 percent reduction in expected bug incidence. Overall, this work provides the first large-scale data-driven characterization of quantum software bugs and offers empirical guidance for improving testing, documentation, and maintainability practices in QSE.
Quantum simulators are a foundational component of the quantum software ecosystem. They are widely used to develop and debug quantum programs, validate compiler transformations, and support empirical claims about correctness and performance. In the absence of large-scale quantum hardware, simulator outputs are often treated as ground truth for algorithm development and system evaluation. However, quantum simulators also introduce unique implementation challenges. They must faithfully emulate quantum behavior while executing on classical hardware, requiring complex representations of quantum state evolution, operator composition, and noise modeling. Yet, we still lack a large-scale and in-depth study of failures in quantum simulators.
To bridge this gap, this work presents a comprehensive empirical study of bugs in widely used open-source quantum simulators. We analyze 394 confirmed bugs from 12 simulators and manually categorize them based on root causes, failure manifestations, affected components, and discovery mechanisms. Our study reveals several key findings. First, bug discovery is largely user-driven, with most crashes, exceptions, and resource-related failures not detected by automated testing and identified after deployment. Second, logical correctness failures are widespread and often silent, producing plausible but incorrect outputs without triggering crashes or explicit error signals. Third, many critical failures originate in classical simulator infrastructure, such as memory management, indexing, configuration, and dependency compatibility, rather than in core quantum execution logic. These findings provide new insights into the reliability challenges of quantum simulators and highlight opportunities to improve testing and validation practices in the quantum software ecosystem.
Quantum computing has progressed from early demonstrations across superconducting, trapped ion, photonic, and spin-based platforms to increasingly integrated systems. However, transitioning from the noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) era to robust, fault tolerant implementations remain a central challenge. This paper presents a systematic review and synthesis of practical quantum computing, encompassing experimental advances, integrated photonics, error correction breakthroughs, software stack evolution, benchmarking practices, algorithmic readiness, and socio-technical dimensions. We critically assess current limitations and highlight emerging directions, including integrated photonic modules with high fidelity interconnects, real time decoders for surface code logical qubits, and hardware aware compiler strategies. Our analysis is grounded in peer-reviewed experimental data and model-based evaluations. Key findings include demonstrated logical error suppression via increased code distance, scalable photonic module prototypes, and refined resource estimates for cryptanalytic and simulation tasks. This paper concludes with a structured research agenda for 2025–2030, proposing four priority thrusts such as hardware QEC co design, reproducible cross platform benchmarking, modular/distributed architectures, and quantum networking with governance frameworks. This evidence based roadmap aims to align researchers and practitioners toward actionable milestones on the path to practical quantum computing.