Teaching quantum mechanics is challenging, not least because the theory often conflicts with our classical worldview. Quantum correlations in particular are notoriously counter-intuitive. Their non-classical behavior is typically revealed through Bell-type inequalities. Among these, Wigner's Inequality constitutes a particularly accessible test, as it relies on minimal set-theoretic assumptions. In this pedagogical paper, we derive Wigner's Inequality, describe a quantum-optical setup to experimentally violate it, and provide access to the raw data, enabling students and instructors to perform their own analyses. Our measured data shows clear violations of Wigner's Inequality, directly illustrating the non-classical nature of quantum correlations. By connecting theory, experiment, and data analysis, this paper equips educators with a resource for engaging students in authentic scientific practice and developing a deeper understanding of quantum systems.
Teaching quantum mechanics is challenging, not least because the theory often conflicts with our classical worldview. Quantum correlations in particular are notoriously counter-intuitive. Their non-classical behavior is typically revealed through Bell-type inequalities. Among these, Wigner's Inequality constitutes a particularly accessible test, as it relies on minimal set-theoretic assumptions. In this pedagogical paper, we derive Wigner's Inequality, describe a quantum-optical setup to experimentally violate it, and provide access to the raw data, enabling students and instructors to perform their own analyses. Our measured data shows clear violations of Wigner's Inequality, directly illustrating the non-classical nature of quantum correlations. By connecting theory, experiment, and data analysis, this paper equips educators with a resource for engaging students in authentic scientific practice and developing a deeper understanding of quantum systems.
In 1964, J. Bell introduced an inequality that stated a mathematical bound for any physical system that holds both locality and realism; if we violate this inequality, it is clear that we have to reconsider the previous statement. In our work, we report an experimental activity with photons suitable for undergraduate students that makes them question these naïve ideas of nature’s behavior. With a pre-aligned setup, our students tested and violated Bell’s inequality in a two-hour laboratory session, using two distant photons entangled in polarization. In addition, complementing an educational approach to this phenomenon, the usually called S function, that quantifies correlations, was mapped using different detection angles in one of the two locations. In particular, a more complete picture of the S function, allow us to identify the initial state of light. We show in this work that it is possible for undergraduate students to question some of our common sense ideas of nature using experiments with photons.
Over the past few decades, experimental tests of Bell-type inequalities have been at the forefront of understanding quantum mechanics and its implications. These strong bounds on specific measurements on a physical system originate from some of the most fundamental concepts of classical physics-in particular that properties of an object are well-defined independent of measurements (realism) and only affected by local interactions (locality). The violation of these bounds unambiguously shows that the measured system does not behave classically, void of any assumption on the validity of quantum theory. It has also found applications in quantum technologies for certifying the suitability of devices for generating quantum randomness, distributing secret keys and for quantum computing. Here we report on the violation of a Bell inequality involving a massive, macroscopic mechanical system. We create light-matter entanglement between the vibrational motion of two silicon optomechanical oscillators, each comprising approx. 10^{10} atoms, and two optical modes. This state allows us to violate a Bell inequality by more than 4 standard deviations, directly confirming the nonclassical behavior of our optomechanical system under the fair sampling assumption.
We present a novel Bell inequality that does not require dichotomic (two-outcome) measurements. It is based on an inequality originally derived by Wigner in 1969, extending it such that no assumptions other than local-realism, fair-sampling, and freedom-of-choice are necessary. It is most useful in situations where there is no direct access to true two-outcome (dichotomic) measurements, like photonic quantum experiments where spatial degrees-of-freedoms are often analyzed with spatial light modulators (SLMs), as well as many other experimental scenarios. The only other class of inequalities (CH-type) that has this feature requires coincidence and single count-rates to be of the same order of magnitude for violation, ours does not. It thereby enables the stringent verification of entanglement and rejection of local-realism, without any assumptions about the underlying Hilbert-space, such as dimensionality – in the most dificult experimental conditions. We also experimentally violate this inequality in a novel setup: entangled states of very high orbital angular momentum. This constitutes a rejection of the hypothesis of local realism (under reasonable assumptions) with the highest quanta to date.
The view that non-classical phenomena are witnessed when noncontextuality inequalities are violated by quantum correlations has become widespread over the last decades, and many authors describe contextuality as a counter-intuitive and non-classical feature of quantum systems. In this paper we show that a classical input/output device generating contextual data (i.e., data violating noncontextuality inequalities) can easily be found if the following conditions are satisfied: (1) We only have access to a specific collection of epistemic measurements, namely measurements which do not necessarily reveal properties possessed by the system to the agent, and (2) not all these measurements can be jointly performed. The conclusion we draw from this example is twofold. Firstly, regarding model-independent contextuality, it suggests that, unlike Bell inequalities (whose violation allegedly implies non-locality), noncontextuality inequalities have no phenomenological significance per se: we cannot treat experiments as black-boxes and draw conclusions about the phenomenological status of their underlying structure based only on contextuality analysis of the data they generate. Secondly, regarding quantum theory, it indicates that one who accepts, as many interpretations suggest, that quantum theory satisfies both these conditions should not take for granted that quantum contextuality is a signature of non-classicality.
It is not generally known that the inequality that Bell derived using three random variables must be identically satisfied by any three corresponding data sets of ±1’s that are writable on paper. This surprising fact is not immediately obvious from Bell’s inequality derivation based on causal random variables, but follows immediately if the same mathematical operations are applied to finite data sets. For laboratory data, the inequality is identically satisfied as a fact of pure algebra, and its satisfaction is independent of whether the processes generating the data are local, non-local, deterministic, random, or nonsensical. It follows that if predicted correlations violate the inequality, they represent no three cross-correlated data sets that can exist, or can be generated from valid probability models. Reported data that violate the inequality consist of probabilistically independent data-pairs and are thus inconsistent with inequality derivation. In the case of random variables as Bell assumed, the correlations in the inequality may be expressed in terms of the probabilities that give rise to them. A new inequality is then produced: The Wigner inequality, that must be satisfied by quantum mechanical probabilities in the case of Bell experiments. If that were not the case, predicted quantum probabilities and correlations would be inconsistent with basic algebra.
It is not generally known, that the inequality that Bell derived using three random variables must be identically satisfied by any three corresponding data sets of plus and minus 1s that are writable on paper.This surprising fact is not immediately obvious from Bell's inequality derivation based on causal random variables, but follows immediately if the same mathematical operations are applied to finite data sets.For laboratory data, the inequality is identically satisfied as a fact of pure algebra, and its satisfaction is independent of whether the processes generating the data are local, nonlocal, deterministic, random, or nonsensical.It follows that if predicted correlations violate the inequality, they represent no three cross correlated data sets that experimentally exist or can be generated from valid probability models. Reported data that violate the inequality consist of probabilistically independent data pairs and are thus inconsistent with inequality derivation.In the case of random variables as Bell assumed, the correlations in the inequality may be expressed in terms of the probabilities that give rise to them.A new inequality results, the Wigner inequality that must be satisfied by quantum mechanical probabilities in the case of Bell experiments.If that were not the case, predicted quantum probabilities and correlations would be inconsistent with basic algebra.