Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal of Modern Physics

The Bell Inequality, Inviolable by Data Used Consistently with Its Derivation, Is Satisfied by Quantum Correlations Whose Probabilities Satisfy the Wigner Inequality

Louis Sica

Published Jan 1, 2023• 1 citation
Publisher

Abstract

It is not generally known that the inequality that Bell derived using three random variables must be identically satisfied by any three corresponding data sets of ±1’s that are writable on paper. This surprising fact is not immediately obvious from Bell’s inequality derivation based on causal random variables, but follows immediately if the same mathematical operations are applied to finite data sets. For laboratory data, the inequality is identically satisfied as a fact of pure algebra, and its satisfaction is independent of whether the processes generating the data are local, non-local, deterministic, random, or nonsensical. It follows that if predicted correlations violate the inequality, they represent no three cross-correlated data sets that can exist, or can be generated from valid probability models. Reported data that violate the inequality consist of probabilistically independent data-pairs and are thus inconsistent with inequality derivation. In the case of random variables as Bell assumed, the correlations in the inequality may be expressed in terms of the probabilities that give rise to them. A new inequality is then produced: The Wigner inequality, that must be satisfied by quantum mechanical probabilities in the case of Bell experiments. If that were not the case, predicted quantum probabilities and correlations would be inconsistent with basic algebra.

DOI
10.4236/jmp.2023.146046

Related papers

The Bell inequality, inviolable by data used consistently with its derivation, leads to quantum correlations that satisfy it, and probabilities that satisfy the Wigner inequality

Louis Sica

It is not generally known, that the inequality that Bell derived using three random variables must be identically satisfied by any three corresponding data sets of plus and minus 1s that are writable on paper.This surprising fact is not immediately obvious from Bell's inequality derivation based on causal random variables, but follows immediately if the same mathematical operations are applied to finite data sets.For laboratory data, the inequality is identically satisfied as a fact of pure algebra, and its satisfaction is independent of whether the processes generating the data are local, nonlocal, deterministic, random, or nonsensical.It follows that if predicted correlations violate the inequality, they represent no three cross correlated data sets that experimentally exist or can be generated from valid probability models. Reported data that violate the inequality consist of probabilistically independent data pairs and are thus inconsistent with inequality derivation.In the case of random variables as Bell assumed, the correlations in the inequality may be expressed in terms of the probabilities that give rise to them.A new inequality results, the Wigner inequality that must be satisfied by quantum mechanical probabilities in the case of Bell experiments.If that were not the case, predicted quantum probabilities and correlations would be inconsistent with basic algebra.

arXiv:2102.13227•Feb 25, 2021•0 citations

An Alternative View: Satisfaction of the Four-Variable Bell Inequality Using Quantum Correlations

Louis Sica

The algebraic derivation of the numerical limits of Bell inequalities in either three or four random variables is independent of the assumption of randomness. The limits of the inequalities follow as mathematical consequences of their created algebraic structures independently of application to random or deterministic variables. The inequalities should be called identity-inequalities. A final correlation re-uses data from the previous correlations and thus leads to the inequality limits. It generally has a different functional form from the previous correlations, whether derived as a counterfactual mathematical result, or in a way enabling comparison with experiment. These algebraic facts and their consequences are central to understanding the inequalities’ use, but have not been widely recognized. Logically consistent application of the inequalities to Bell experiments is challenging, given that the number of mathematically assumed random variables is greater than the number of physical variables produced per experimental realization. Given Bell’s rejection of the use of sequential, alternative paths, three experimental runs are here considered to enable acquisition of data to be rearranged for computation of statistical cross-correlations. Predicted quantum mechanical correlations then satisfy the inequality. Since mathematically inconsistent use is sufficient to cause inequality violation, the conclusion that violation implies the nonexistence of underlying variables in the entanglement process does not follow.

arXiv:2306.13097•Journal of Modern Physics•Jan 1, 2023•0 citations

Unseen facts due to the statistical derivation of the Bell inequality and their logical consequences

Louis Sica

The Bell inequality is derived under the assumption of three physical data sets, random or deterministic. The data sets represent a laboratory realization of the three probability based variables used by Bell. For physical data as can be written on paper, the derivation of the inequality results only from principles of algebra and is independent of assumptions of locality, hidden variables and even randomness. Cross correlations of thee data sets carried out as Bell correlated three random variables results in the same inequality that is identically satisfied even by deterministic data. However, to obtain three data sets on two particles destroyed by measurement, two experimental runs are required, followed by data matching to reduce four data sets to three. If quantum mechanical probabilities are used to describe the data frequencies, the Bell inequality is satisfied. The situation is analogous to performing two sets of coin flips to compare the effect of two different coin loadings on the probabilities for heads and tails.

arXiv:2108.08283•Aug 16, 2021•0 citations

Conditional Independence Leads to Satisfaction of the Bell Inequality without Assuming Non-Locality or Non-Reality

Louis Sica

The original Bell inequality was obtained in a statistical derivation assuming three mutually cross-correlated random variables (four in the later version). Given that observations destroy the particles, the physical realization of three variables from an experiment producing two particles per trial requires two separate trial runs. One assumed variable value (for particle 1) occurs at a fixed instrument setting in both trial runs while a second variable (for particle 2) occurs at alternative instrument settings in the two trial runs. Given that measurements on the two particles occurring in each trial are themselves correlated, measurements from independent realizations at mutually exclusive settings on particle 2 are conditionally independent, i.e., conditionally dependent on particle 1, through probability. This situation is realized from variables defined by Bell using entangled particle pairs. Two correlations have the form that Bell computed from entanglement, but a third correlation from conditionally independent measurements has a different form. When the correlations are computed using quantum probabilities, the Bell inequality is satisfied without recourse to assumptions of non-locality, or non-reality.

Advances in Pure Mathematics•Jan 1, 2022•3 citations

A Probability Model for the Bell Experiment

Kees van Hee, Kees van Berkel, J. de Graaf

The Bell inequality constrains the outcomes of measurements on pairs of distant entangled particles. The Bell contradiction states that the Bell inequality is inconsistent with the calculated outcomes of these quantum experiments. This contradiction led many to question the underlying assumptions, viz. so-called realism and locality. The probability model underlying the Bell inequality is generally left implicit. We propose an explicit probability model for the CHSH version of the Bell experiment. This model has only two simultaneously observable detector settings per measurement, and therefore does not assume realism. The quantum expectation now becomes a conditional expectation, given the two detector settings. This probability model is in full agreement with both quantum mechanics and experiments. As a result, the model satisfies the Bell inequality; there are no so-called violations. We extend this model to include a hidden variable. This extended model is not Bell-separable. This non-separability implies that the model is non-deterministic or non-local (or both).

arXiv:2302.05174•Quantum Reports•Feb 14, 2026•0 citations

Wigner and Bell Inequalities relationships and Kolmogorov's Axioms

Felipe Andrade Velozo, José A. C. Nogales

In this work, we show that Bell's inequality violation of arise from the fact that the condition imposed upon the development of inequality is not respected when it is applied in the idealized experiment. Such a condition is that the quantities taken by probability must be non negative, and such a condition is represented by $|\cal{P(w)}|=\cal{P(w)}$. We will also show that, when trying to define the values of the joint probabilities of $ (Z_1, Z_2, Z_3) $, through the values obtained from the $ (Z_j, Z_k) $ pairs, we find that these values are negative, so not Kolmogorov's axiom is respected: $\cal{P(w)}\geq0$ in cases where Bell's inequality is violated, and we also show that only such violation is possible if Wigner's inequality, in a certain arrangement, is violated, and that both violations are related to the violation of one of Kolmogorov's axioms. At the end of the paper, we suggest a new interpretation of the probabilities involved, in order to avoid the situation of negative probabilities and the violation of Bell's inequality and, consequently, Wigner's inequality.

arXiv:2006.08066•Jun 15, 2020•0 citations
It is not generally known that the inequality that Bell derived using three random variables must be identically satisfied by any three corresponding data sets of ±1’s that are writable on paper. This surprising fact is not immediately obvious from Bell’s inequality derivation based on causal random variables, but follows immediately if the same mathematical operations are applied to finite data sets. For laboratory data, the inequality is identically satisfied as a fact of pure algebra, and its satisfaction is independent of whether the processes generating the data are local, non-local, deterministic, random, or nonsensical. It follows that if predicted correlations violate the inequality, they represent no three cross-correlated data sets that can exist, or can be generated from valid probability models. Reported data that violate the inequality consist of probabilistically independent data-pairs and are thus inconsistent with inequality derivation. In the case of random variables as Bell assumed, the correlations in the inequality may be expressed in terms of the probabilities that give rise to them. A new inequality is then produced: The Wigner inequality, that must be satisfied by quantum mechanical probabilities in the case of Bell experiments. If that were not the case, predicted quantum probabilities and correlations would be inconsistent with basic algebra.
It is not generally known, that the inequality that Bell derived using three random variables must be identically satisfied by any three corresponding data sets of plus and minus 1s that are writable on paper.This surprising fact is not immediately obvious from Bell's inequality derivation based on causal random variables, but follows immediately if the same mathematical operations are applied to finite data sets.For laboratory data, the inequality is identically satisfied as a fact of pure algebra, and its satisfaction is independent of whether the processes generating the data are local, nonlocal, deterministic, random, or nonsensical.It follows that if predicted correlations violate the inequality, they represent no three cross correlated data sets that experimentally exist or can be generated from valid probability models. Reported data that violate the inequality consist of probabilistically independent data pairs and are thus inconsistent with inequality derivation.In the case of random variables as Bell assumed, the correlations in the inequality may be expressed in terms of the probabilities that give rise to them.A new inequality results, the Wigner inequality that must be satisfied by quantum mechanical probabilities in the case of Bell experiments.If that were not the case, predicted quantum probabilities and correlations would be inconsistent with basic algebra.
The algebraic derivation of the numerical limits of Bell inequalities in either three or four random variables is independent of the assumption of randomness. The limits of the inequalities follow as mathematical consequences of their created algebraic structures independently of application to random or deterministic variables. The inequalities should be called identity-inequalities. A final correlation re-uses data from the previous correlations and thus leads to the inequality limits. It generally has a different functional form from the previous correlations, whether derived as a counterfactual mathematical result, or in a way enabling comparison with experiment. These algebraic facts and their consequences are central to understanding the inequalities’ use, but have not been widely recognized. Logically consistent application of the inequalities to Bell experiments is challenging, given that the number of mathematically assumed random variables is greater than the number of physical variables produced per experimental realization. Given Bell’s rejection of the use of sequential, alternative paths, three experimental runs are here considered to enable acquisition of data to be rearranged for computation of statistical cross-correlations. Predicted quantum mechanical correlations then satisfy the inequality. Since mathematically inconsistent use is sufficient to cause inequality violation, the conclusion that violation implies the nonexistence of underlying variables in the entanglement process does not follow.
The Bell inequality is derived under the assumption of three physical data sets, random or deterministic. The data sets represent a laboratory realization of the three probability based variables used by Bell. For physical data as can be written on paper, the derivation of the inequality results only from principles of algebra and is independent of assumptions of locality, hidden variables and even randomness. Cross correlations of thee data sets carried out as Bell correlated three random variables results in the same inequality that is identically satisfied even by deterministic data. However, to obtain three data sets on two particles destroyed by measurement, two experimental runs are required, followed by data matching to reduce four data sets to three. If quantum mechanical probabilities are used to describe the data frequencies, the Bell inequality is satisfied. The situation is analogous to performing two sets of coin flips to compare the effect of two different coin loadings on the probabilities for heads and tails.
The original Bell inequality was obtained in a statistical derivation assuming three mutually cross-correlated random variables (four in the later version). Given that observations destroy the particles, the physical realization of three variables from an experiment producing two particles per trial requires two separate trial runs. One assumed variable value (for particle 1) occurs at a fixed instrument setting in both trial runs while a second variable (for particle 2) occurs at alternative instrument settings in the two trial runs. Given that measurements on the two particles occurring in each trial are themselves correlated, measurements from independent realizations at mutually exclusive settings on particle 2 are conditionally independent, i.e., conditionally dependent on particle 1, through probability. This situation is realized from variables defined by Bell using entangled particle pairs. Two correlations have the form that Bell computed from entanglement, but a third correlation from conditionally independent measurements has a different form. When the correlations are computed using quantum probabilities, the Bell inequality is satisfied without recourse to assumptions of non-locality, or non-reality.
The Bell inequality constrains the outcomes of measurements on pairs of distant entangled particles. The Bell contradiction states that the Bell inequality is inconsistent with the calculated outcomes of these quantum experiments. This contradiction led many to question the underlying assumptions, viz. so-called realism and locality. The probability model underlying the Bell inequality is generally left implicit. We propose an explicit probability model for the CHSH version of the Bell experiment. This model has only two simultaneously observable detector settings per measurement, and therefore does not assume realism. The quantum expectation now becomes a conditional expectation, given the two detector settings. This probability model is in full agreement with both quantum mechanics and experiments. As a result, the model satisfies the Bell inequality; there are no so-called violations. We extend this model to include a hidden variable. This extended model is not Bell-separable. This non-separability implies that the model is non-deterministic or non-local (or both).
In this work, we show that Bell's inequality violation of arise from the fact that the condition imposed upon the development of inequality is not respected when it is applied in the idealized experiment. Such a condition is that the quantities taken by probability must be non negative, and such a condition is represented by ∣P(w)∣=P(w)|\cal{P(w)}|=\cal{P(w)}∣P(w)∣=P(w). We will also show that, when trying to define the values of the joint probabilities of $ (Z_1, Z_2, Z_3) $, through the values obtained from the $ (Z_j, Z_k) $ pairs, we find that these values are negative, so not Kolmogorov's axiom is respected: P(w)≥0\cal{P(w)}\geq0P(w)≥0 in cases where Bell's inequality is violated, and we also show that only such violation is possible if Wigner's inequality, in a certain arrangement, is violated, and that both violations are related to the violation of one of Kolmogorov's axioms. At the end of the paper, we suggest a new interpretation of the probabilities involved, in order to avoid the situation of negative probabilities and the violation of Bell's inequality and, consequently, Wigner's inequality.